logo
'It took 10 years for the council to fix my mouldy flat - when it grew on my toothbrush'

'It took 10 years for the council to fix my mouldy flat - when it grew on my toothbrush'

Yahoo21 hours ago
Alysha Sayers has lived in her Dagenham council flat for a decade, alongside her husband, who has been there for nearly 30 years. About ten years ago, black mould began spreading in both bathrooms, but pleas for help were met with silence.
The problem first emerged in 2015, shortly after Barking and Dagenham Council had refurbished the building on Siviter Way. Alysha said: 'At first, we were excited about the renovations, but within months I noticed leaks in the ceiling. A contractor came to take pictures, but then… nothing happened.'
Over the years, the couple say they reported the mould repeatedly, but were met with denials. She said: 'Every time someone came, they'd say there were no previous records - but they could clearly see the leak.'
READ MORE: Woman with 'UK's worst garden' she was 'too embarrassed to look at' given £1,500 transformation
READ MORE: London kidnappers threatened to cut off pregnant woman's fingers in bid for cash and jewellery
It was only last year, after MyLondon reported her story, that the council promised action - including a dedicated officer, mould removal, and compensation. Alysha said: 'For a short time, they seemed outraged and did roof work, tested the radiators, and tried to find the leak.'
But communication soon dried up, with weeks or months passing without updates. Alysha said the fixes were often 'just painting over the mould,' which bled through within weeks.
She added: 'We'd go weeks or months without hearing anything unless we chased them. They'd say they'd fixed it, but we could still hear water running and the walls stayed damp.'
It was only two weeks ago that the council finally carried out full repairs, replacing rotten walls and re-skimmed surfaces. Alysha admitted they had to push hard.
She explained: 'When they came, they were just going to paint over it again. I had to fight for them to actually remove the mould, re-skim the walls, and replace the rotten framework.'
Now, the couple are relieved the problem appears resolved - but not thankful. Alysha said: 'I'm happy it's done, but I'm not grateful. It's taken 10 years for something that should've been simple, and black mould is dangerous to your health.'
The long battle had a heavy impact on her wellbeing. Alysha said: 'It's been stressful and depressing. We've avoided having people over because it was embarrassing, and we held off decorating in case the mould spread.'
Daily life was also affected. She added: 'We'd have to throw out toothbrushes because mould grew on them, and it got into grout, towels, even flannels. It just felt like the council didn't care.'
Despite the repairs, Alysha says they still haven't received the compensation they were promised, and she admits they are 'not hopeful.'
She also hasn't been given advice on preventing mould in the future. Alysha said: 'We keep the windows open all the time, but there's no proper ventilation. We're afraid it will just keep coming back.'
Looking back, Alysha believes the council only acted after she 'went to the papers.' She said: 'At first they were really involved, but then it felt like nothing was happening again.'
Even now, she has little faith that communication will be easy if there's any other issue in the flat. She said: 'If this took 10 years to fix, why would they bother with anything else?'
Alysha concluded: 'I still feel completely let down by the council. They ignored us for years, and even when they fixed it, it was only because we kept fighting.'
Have a story you want to share? Email ines.santos@reachplc.com
Keep up with the latest East London news. Sign up to our MyEastLondon newsletter HERE for daily updates and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Teenage boy filmed killed man as he lay dying in the street
Teenage boy filmed killed man as he lay dying in the street

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Teenage boy filmed killed man as he lay dying in the street

A teenager filmed a man as he lay dying in Littlehampton and shared the video on social media in an 'inexcusable' incident. The 17-year-old recorded a video of local man Paul Lawrence, 51, who had been killed in Gladonian Road in the early hours of 28 January, 2024. He then shared it on social media, according to Sussex Police. The Littlehampton teenager pleaded guilty to sending a message that was grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, and possession of cannabis. At Worthing Youth Court on Thursday 14 August, he was given a 12-month Youth Referral Order, which is aimed to address the offences committed and prevent future offending through a series of conditions, police said. Detective Chief Inspector Alex Campbell said: 'In the video, voices could be heard laughing and joking during what would prove to be the tragic last moment's of Paul's life. The video was then circulated by the defendant to other people on social media. 'This sort of behaviour is inexcusable and has compounded the grief felt by Paul's family at this most distressing of times.' Read more Littlehampton murder enquiry: Family of Paul Lawrence pays tribute Littlehampton man died from head injury, inquest hears Woman left 'immensely traumatised' after being sexually assaulted by man Man found guilty of attempted murder after stabbing Another 17-year-old boy, from Bognor Regis, has been charged with manslaughter. He is scheduled to appear in court again on October 6 for a pre-trial preparation hearing. Neither of the boys can be named for legal reasons. A Sussex Police spokesperson said: "Our thoughts remain with the family and friends of Mr Lawrence. "Anyone with any further information about the incident can report it online or phone 101, quoting Operation Sett. "You can also contact the independent charity Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111 or report online."

Ricky Jones case should not be compared to Lucy Connolly
Ricky Jones case should not be compared to Lucy Connolly

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ricky Jones case should not be compared to Lucy Connolly

A jury's decision to clear a suspended Labour councillor of encouraging violent disorder after he called for far-right activists' throats to be cut cannot be compared to the case of Lucy Connolly, lawyers have claimed. Ricky Jones, 58, faced trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court after he described far-right activists as 'disgusting Nazi fascists' in a speech at an anti-racism rally last year, in the wake of the Southport murders. The now-suspended councillor, surrounded by cheering supporters in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 2024, was filmed stating: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' Jurors deliberated for just over half-an-hour and found him not guilty on Friday. This caused Conservative and Reform politicians to brand the decision 'two-tier justice' – with shadow home secretary Chris Philp comparing the case to that of Mrs Connolly, who was jailed for 31 months after she posted a tweet calling for 'mass deportation' of asylum seekers and to 'set fire to all the f****** hotels' on the day of the Southport attacks. Former home secretary and Tory leadership candidate Sir James Cleverly also called the jury's decision to clear Ricky Jones 'perverse' in an X post, adding: 'Perverse decisions like this are adding to the anger that people feel and amplifying the belief that there isn't a dispassionate criminal justice system.' Lawyers have said the cases should not be conflated as Connolly and Jones faced allegations of a different nature – and Jones faced trial where Connolly, having pleaded guilty, did not. Peter Stringfellow, a solicitor at Brett Wilson, told the PA news agency: 'Both (Jones and Connolly) said pretty unpleasant things. 'However, I'm afraid the conflation of the two after that is a problem. It comes from people who've got some sort of political agenda, in my view. 'They were facing completely different allegations and a massive part of those different allegations is the racial element. 'If you look at the Connolly case … her intention is of a racial nature.' Connolly pleaded guilty last year to a charge of inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X. On July 29 last year, she posted: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it.' 'She directs everybody to the fact that this was a racial comment,' Mr Stringfellow said. 'She pleads guilty to that intention … she accepted that she had intended to stir racial hatred. 'The Jones case is different because one, he's facing a completely different allegation: he's facing encouraging violent disorder. 'And the difference with him is he's saying: 'That's not what I was intended to do'.' Mr Stringfellow added that, in the case of Connolly, racially aggravated discourse on social media did translate into real-life violence across the country – whereas Mr Jones' comments at a rally did not cause a violent disorder. 'What she (Connolly) did, what followed her comments about threatening to burn people in hotels, is that that's precisely what then happened – and people were attempting to burn people in hotels.' Ernest Aduwa, partner at Stokoe Partnership Solicitors, said comparisons between Jones' and Connolly's cases were 'misplaced'. 'We need to be honest about what is going on here. The verdict in the Ricky Jones case was not political, it was legal,' he said. 'A jury listened to the evidence, tested it and decided unanimously he was not guilty. 'That is not bias or 'two-tier justice' – it is the justice system doing what it is supposed to do: separating facts from noise. 'Comparisons with the Lucy Connolly case are misplaced. 'Lucy Connolly pleaded guilty. There was no trial, no cross-examination, no jury. She admitted the specific offence: stirring up racial hatred online. 'Ricky Jones faced a different charge … with a high burden of proof. 'The jury decided the Crown had not met it. 'That does not mean the protest was not passionate or loud – it means there was not enough evidence to prove intent to incite violence. That distinction matters. 'I understand why emotions run high. But flattening two different situations into one misleading narrative does no favours to justice. 'The fact that a black man at a protest can receive a fair trial and be acquitted should be seen not as an injustice, but as proof the system can still get it right.' He added: 'The law is not perfect, but it must rest on evidence – not opinion, pressure, or politics.'

Driver fined hundreds after swearing at special constable and saying he wasn't 'real'
Driver fined hundreds after swearing at special constable and saying he wasn't 'real'

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Driver fined hundreds after swearing at special constable and saying he wasn't 'real'

A driver has been fined hundreds of pounds after swearing at a special constable and telling him he wasn't a "real officer". Junaid Iqbal has also had six penalty points put on his driving licence after the incident, which occurred during a traffic stop in Radford. Police officers spotted a car being driven along Hartley Road at around 11.30am on February 10 and discovered the vehicle's road tax had expired the previous year. A special constable later began searching the car and was leaving the address of the registered keeper when Iqbal was seen turning into Regent Street in New Basford. READ MORE: Conman who tried to buy Notts County under different name to be deported READ MORE: CCTV appeal after man punched to ground and kicked in Nottingham assault After being approached by the constable and told a traffic stop was being conducted, Iqbal swore at the officer before driving off. The 26-year-old had also had a legal notice delivered to his house - but police received no reply. In a later interview, Iqbal claimed he didn't believe the constable was a real police officer. Iqbal, of Regent Street, New Basford, was found guilty in his absence of failing to stop for police and failing to provide a driving licence or identification at Nottingham Magistrates' Court on August 11. He was fined £660 and was ordered to pay £390 in costs and a £264 surcharge. Iqbal also received six penalty points on his driving licence. Special Constable Marlow Dupont of Nottinghamshire Police said: "Iqbal wilfully drove a vehicle on a public road without tax and then defied the instruction of a uniformed police officer to try and avoid the consequences of his actions. "The public would rightly expect that those who commit traffic offences and show blatant disregard for the law are robustly dealt with. "We simply won't tolerate this behaviour and will continue to patrol our roads and neighbourhoods to ensure communities are kept safe and that those who believe the law does not apply to them are brought to justice. "The Special Constabulary play an invaluable role in supporting the work of Nottinghamshire Police across the city and county. "Specials conduct a wide range of policing roles – from response and neighbourhoods to specialist teams – and are often at the heart of communities to help keep residents safe."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store