
Corona Del Mar farmers market gets new vendor despite complaints from community
Heritage Wellness Collective won a revocable license to run the market for the next five years following a 6-1 vote by the city council at their meeting Tuesday, with Councilman Erik Weigand as the only member in opposition. The nonprofit will take over after the license with the current manager, Rick Heil, expires on June 30.
The city began soliciting bids for a new operator in August, according to a staff report. Newport Beach officials made their decision based on candidates' experience running farmer's markets as well as their ability to create community events and attract quality merchants while retaining existing vendors. Heritage Wellness Collective was chosen out of 8 bidders.
The nonprofit runs seven weekly or bi-monthly farmer's markets in Orange, Los Angeles, San Bernardino and Riverside counties. Their executive director, Bing Turner, has a background in public health, and told the Daily Pilot during an interview Wednesday he hopes to preserve the Corona Del Mar gathering's focus on high quality produce while drawing in more families, local businesses and institutions to visit and take part in it.
'Will the market look different than what it currently looks like now? Absolutely yes,' Turner said. 'Will the vendors change at the market? That's going to happen. Are we going to move people out of their market or out of their spaces? No, unless they decide they don't want to work with us. But we're there to really enhance and make the space reflective of the community... this isn't going to be any rock concert.'
Numerous residents who attended Tuesday's meeting said they feared the merchants supplying their favorite carrots, strawberries, pomegranates, flowers, cuts of meat and more may go away if the market changes management. Current operator Heil claimed that only one of its current vendors had been contacted by Heritage.
Several public speakers cited the adage 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it.' They said they preferred that the the market remain solely for the exchange of artisan produce. Many worried that adding food vendors, music and public events would make it a larger event that would result in more noise and traffic.
Opponents of the change in vendors claim more than 1,000 people had signed a petition to prevent the move.
'The people are really angry in the community,' Heil told the Pilot at the most recent Corona Del Mar Farmer's Market on Saturday. 'I've never seen anything like this where the city council go up against the will of the people who like it and don't want to change something that's been there 29 years.'
However, Turner said he has heard from numerous people in the Newport Beach community who want to see the market evolve into a more family-oriented event. He said that includes local chefs and merchants who had been denied after expressing interest in doing business at the market.
Turner also refuted Heil's claim that only one vendor had been contacted by Heritage. The nonprofit's executive director said emails were sent prior to Tuesday's meeting to about 15 or 20 merchants currently doing business at the Corona Del Mar market, and 14 had replied expressing interest in staying under new management. Turner added that he was hesitant to contact them before confirming the new license agreement, but had been advised by city staff to do so.
Concerned Corona Del Mar residents said that email was the first notification they received regarding new management and the city did not reach out to them for input. Many said the preliminary message from Heritage was evidence that the change was a 'done deal' even before council members cast their votes.
'We like the Farmers Market the way it is,' said Corona del Mar resident and petition monitor, Carole Geronsin said Saturday. 'Everyone we talked to there was not one person that doesn't absolutely love it the way it is.'
Turner, as well as members of the council, acknowledged that more could have been done to engage residents before the issue came to council. However, he said Heritage's immediate priority will be building a bridge with the Corona Del Mar Community to ensure the market continues to meet their needs and wants, while growing to include more of their neighbors.
Before voting on the new agreement, Councilman Weigand asked that provisions for the inclusion of live music be removed. Mayor Pro Tem formally backed that amendment, which was seconded by Councilman Noah Blom. Councilmembers also asked city staff to further study potential impacts to traffic.
'I get it they don't want to lose something they have none of us do once we have it... nobody on this dais ever wants to see food trucks,' Blom said. 'I'm here to give new things a try because something it's amazing what happens when we take a chance on something new. And I hear the scoffing from people in the room, mainly from the current operator.'
Blom and other councilmembers also noted that the new license is revocable, and can be terminated if new management does not prove satisfactory.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
4 days ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Administration Said to Discuss Stake in Intel
00:00 Bloomberg's also learned that the Trump administration is in talks with Intel on the US government potentially taking a stake in the company. For more on the scoop, let's get to senior tech editor Nick Turner. Nick, thanks for joining us. A lot's changed this week. At the start of the week, we had President Trump pressuring the Intel CEO Lip-bu Tan to leave. Now we've got the US government potentially buying a stake in Intel. So what's changed? Well, the two men had a meeting, so I think that laid the groundwork for these latest discussions. And it seems like he's safe at the moment. That being Lip-bu Tan and his job at Intel. But it'll be interesting to see how this deal ultimately unfolds if it happens. But it would be just sort of kind of the latest White House attempt to sort of make a private public sector agreement that that would have been pretty unusual before this administration. So what are the details of this? Can you tell us from your reporting what you found out? Because it's also understood that, you know, this could have implications for Intel's Ohio plant. Yeah, I mean, that is kind of the crux of it. We don't have a lot of details in terms of of the money involved. What we know is that this plant in Ohio, it's sort of a collection of plants that ultimately they promised would become the biggest chip making facility in the world. This that was back during the Biden administration. And since then, they've kind of scaled back those plans. They've delayed the opening of the first plant until at least 20 the 2030s. And I know that certainly there's some legislators in Ohio and who want to see this happen faster. And and it seems like a priority for the White House as well. There's interesting political optics here as well, because, you know, we've had this news of a revenue sharing deal potentially with India and AMD over the sale of chips to China. And now this potentially the government taking a stake in a publicly listed company. This is the sort of thing that you might expect the Chinese Communist Party to do, getting involved in state owned businesses. What's what's the rationale here? Is there any precedent for this? You know, I mean, there's some maybe some recent precedent, as you just mentioned, with with this administration. But I think it is kind of charting new territory for the U.S. and and it will have to sort of see how it plays out. I mean, in the case of Intel, Intel does need help. I mean, I'm not sure whether they'll arrive at a figure that will put the company on the right track, per se. But certainly it's been losing money. It's been struggling to regain its technological edge. And the current CEO has really been focused on cost cutting, which makes it all the harder for the company to make good on promises to increase domestic manufacturing, which is obviously a Trump priority.


Forbes
5 days ago
- Forbes
How The B Corp Community Is Adapting To Life In 2025
B Corp accreditation has long been seen as a benchmark for environmental and ethical business practices, but with all the economic and geo-political upheaval in recent years, is there still a place for it in the new world order? The chief executive of B Lab UK, Chris Turner, said that while some businesses may be tempted to roll back on issues like sustainability, B Corps have made clear commitments on issues like climate change. Turner added that there are now over 2,600 B Corps in the U.K., which is the largest and fastest-growing B Corp community in the world, in an interview. He said recently published data from B Lab UK's 2024 brand awareness survey revealed a high recognition across the U.K. The survey also found almost two-thirds (63%) of respondents saying they use the certifications to help them make decisions on which businesses to buy from or work for, up from 58% in 2023 and 56% in 2022. The survey also found nearly three-quarters (74%) of the public agree or strongly agree that consumers can impact environmental sustainability through their purchases. And around two-thirds (65%) felt the same about impacting social change. 'We also have more than 3,000 companies backing our Better Business Act campaign,' he added. 'Momentum in the U.K. is still very strong, which is clearly a positive sign.' Turner said B Corps can act as a 'counter-narrative' because they have a clear purpose and are likelier to stay the course, while others roll back on some initiatives. 'There are also some businesses out there who are still doing the same work, but not talking about it as much, or changing some of the language they use,' he told me. 'I don't necessarily think that's a bad thing,' he added. 'The most important thing is the work gets done and the positive impact gets delivered.' Turner said the B Corp movement has seen rapid growth in the last few years, with many brands telling a compelling story about why they are adopting business models with a purpose. 'At the same time, the story that's been playing out alongside that momentum is the need to raise the bar for purposeful business,' said Turner. 'The urgency of the challenges we face means our whole mission as a movement is about how B Corps can lead the way and show what businesses can, and should, be doing.' 'What's really exciting about where we are now as a movement is how those things are coming together. It willbe vital over the next couple of years, as all B Corps move on to B Lab's new standards and we bring new businesses into the movement, to continue going forward and making the progress needed.' Tribe Impact Capital's co-founder and chief impact officer, Amy Clarke, said that sustainability has always faced a certain degree of resistance and has previously had to pivot and adapt as circumstances change. Clarke added that it feels like sustainability is in another 'adaptation phase' at the moment, but one that she hopes will address the root of the world's challenges. 'This is only going to further help sustainability evolve into what it really should be about, which is the common good,' she told me. 'And what the B Corp standards have done is say 'we have this incredible program of assessment in place that has really helped us communicate to the broader world what businesses which trade in the currency of forces for change look like'.' 'This is fundamentally about who you are. It has turbo-charged our credibility and enabled us to attract new employees and clients, who have seen we have not bowed at the first sign of major trouble and, if anything, we have stood up even taller.' And the global B Corp impact manager at Intrepid Travel, Rochelle Turner, said the B Corp movement helps create a framework for businesses and identify opportunities to make improvements, in an interview. Turner added that it also gives businesses like Intrepid Travel the opportunity to be part of a wider community, highlight how you can be a successful business and positively create purpose and impact. She said a recent staff survey showed that more than four-fifths (80%) of its staff say they like working for a company with a purpose, adding that happy staff mean higher retention rates and happy customers. 'We are a better business because we have followed many of the principles of the B Corp framework, and also through thinking about how we operate in all the different aspects we do to create positive impact in our business,' Turner told me.
Yahoo
11-08-2025
- Yahoo
Housing advocates propose ballot question to bring rent control back to Mass.
The push to bring back rent control in Massachusetts could be put directly to the voters next year in the form of a ballot question. Housing advocates said Wednesday that they plan to collect signatures this fall to put the measure on the ballot. Language they plan to file with the state Attorney General's office on Wednesday would limit annual rent hikes statewide to the cost of living increase measured by the Consumer Price Index, with a maximum cap of 5%. 'Right now, there's no limit to how much rent can increase every year, so corporate real estate investors are increasingly buying up homes in our communities, hiking rents astronomically, and evicting anyone who can't afford to pay,' said Denise Matthews-Turner, executive director of City Life/Vida Urbana, one of the groups organizing the effort, in a press release. 'Rent stabilization is the missing solution to our state's housing crisis.' Read more: Housing advocates renew fight for rent stabilization in Massachusetts The proposed ballot question includes exemptions for owner-occupied buildings with less than five units and for the first 10 years that a newly constructed building is open. Rent control was banned in Massachusetts in 1994 by a ballot question. Renters, advocates and legislators have repeatedly tried to reinstate it without success. A previous effort to get rent stabilization on the 2024 ballot was abandoned after its proponents failed to get enough signatures to qualify. State Sen. Pat Jehlen, D-2nd Middlesex, Rep. Sam Montaño, D-15th Suffolk, and Rep. David Rogers, D-24th Middlesex, filed bills this session that would give cities and towns the option to implement rent stabilization locally, capping annual increases. Unlike the proposed ballot question, the bills would not institute rent control statewide. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the median gross rent for a two-bedroom apartment in Massachusetts was $1,882 in 2023, up from $1,727 the year before and $1,381 in 2018. Opponents of rent stabilization, including many members of the real state industry, say it would actually lead to higher rent costs because it would disincentivize housing production. 'The outcome will be fewer available units, deteriorated housing conditions and owners walking away from reinvestment in old housing stock that needs care,' said Boston-area landlord Tony Lopes during a State House hearing on Jehlen's bill last week. 'And it penalizes the small property owners who make up 60% or more of the commonwealth's rental market, including the immigrant and minority property owners who are seeking to get ahead.' Supporters, however, disagree, saying rent stabilization is needed alongside more housing development to relieve the burden on renters who need help now. The provision that would exempt new construction for the first 10 years is also meant to minimize any effect on development. 'Massive rent hikes are pushing seniors out of the homes they've lived in for decades, and making it impossible for young families to save money for a down payment on their first house,' said Noemi Ramos, executive director of New England Community Project, on Wednesday. 'As the state works to build more affordable housing over the coming years, we need rent stabilization to protect workers, families, and seniors from out-of-control housing costs today.' Wednesday is the deadline for proposed ballot questions to be submitted to the Attorney General's office. Next, the proponents must collect 74,574 valid signatures by Nov. 19. Once signatures are certified, the measure would be sent to the state Legislature, which may choose to enact it before it is added to the ballot. If the Legislature does not act on the petition by May 6, the petitioners must collect an additional 12,429 signatures by June 17 to finally place it on the ballot for the Nov. 3, 2026 election. More on housing Housing costs are out of control. In Boston, experts offer the 4 fastest ways to fix it 92 apartments planned for old former Probate Court site in Northampton How Tim Scott and Elizabeth Warren agreed on a sweeping housing package Housing advocates renew fight for rent stabilization in Massachusetts Read the original article on MassLive. Solve the daily Crossword