What to know about Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend
Now, three years after she was sentenced, a top U.S. Department of Justice official plans to personally interview Maxwell to find out if she has information about anyone who has committed crimes against Epstein's victims.
It isn't clear what Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche might learn from the meeting. Maxwell has long claimed she is innocent and had no knowledge that Epstein, or anyone else, was sexually abusing teenagers.
Epstein killed himself while awaiting trial in 2019, but his case has generated endless attention and conspiracy theories because of his and Maxwell's links to famous people, including royals, presidents and billionaires.
President Donald Trump has suggested in the past there was a cover-up. Now his administration is dealing with the fallout after the Justice Department initially announced two weeks ago that it would not release any more evidence about the Epstein investigation. The department has since changed course, at Trump's urging.
Who is Ghislaine Maxwell?
She grew up as the daughter of the late British billionaire Robert Maxwell, a former member of Parliament whose publishing empire included the Daily Mirror, one of Britain's biggest tabloid newspapers, and the book publisher Macmillan.
As a college student, she became close friends with Britain's Prince Andrew, who would later invite her to royal residences, including Windsor Castle.
But the Maxwell family was shattered by scandal. After Robert Maxwell fell from his yacht and died in 1991, investigators accused him of embezzling huge sums of money from his companies' pension funds.
Soon after her father's death, Ghislaine Maxwell was photographed at a memorial sitting next to Epstein, an American money manager.
Maxwell dated Epstein but later also became his employee, taking on a variety of tasks, including hiring staff for his six homes.
How did Ghislaine Maxwell help Epstein?
Part of Maxwell's household duties included hiring a steady stream of young people to give massages to Epstein.
'As far as I'm concerned, everyone who came to his house was an adult professional person,' she said in a deposition nearly a decade ago.
But police and prosecutors said many of those 'masseuses' were underage girls who were paid for sexual acts.
Epstein was arrested in 2006 in Palm Beach, Florida, after multiple girls, including students from a local high school, spoke to police. But he ultimately pleaded guilty in 2008 to a single charge of procuring a person under 18 for prostitution and served 13 months in jail.
Maxwell wasn't charged until 2021. At her trial, four women testified that Maxwell groomed them as teenagers to participate in sexual acts with Epstein and sometimes participated in the abuse.
Maxwell's lawyers argued that the women's recollections had been manipulated by lawyers pursuing civil lawsuits, pointing to inconsistencies in their testimony.
A jury convicted Maxwell of sex trafficking, conspiracy and transportation of a minor for illegal sexual activity.
Why do investigators want to talk to Maxwell now?
The Justice Department's request to talk with Maxwell comes at a time when it is dealing with backlash from some of President Donald Trump's supporters, some of whom believe there has been a government cover-up to protect Epstein's rich and powerful friends from being implicated in his crimes.
The department asked a judge last week to unseal transcripts of the grand jury sessions that led to indictments against Epstein and Maxwell.
The Justice Department said in a memo that it had not uncovered evidence to charge anyone else in connection with Epstein's abuse. But Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said on social media that 'if Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.'
He said he anticipated meeting with Maxwell in the coming days.
Will she talk?
It remains to be seen. One of her lawyers, David Oscar Markus, said Tuesday that they were in discussions with the government.
'Ghislaine will always testify truthfully,' he said in the statement.
Maxwell did not testify at her trial but gave two lengthy depositions years ago. She repeatedly said that one of Epstein's accusers, who claimed he had trafficked her to powerful men, including Prince Andrew, was a liar who fabricated her story.
Where is Ghislaine Maxwell now?
Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence and is currently at a low-security federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida.
Her attorneys have appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court after a lower court upheld her convictions last fall.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Statue of Confederate general torn down in 2020 protests to be restored in Washington DC
A statue of a Confederate general that was torn down in 2020 during racial injustice protests will be restored in Washington, D.C., the National Park Service has announced. In June 2020, the Albert Pike statue near D.C. police headquarters was toppled and vandalized by protesters. NBC4 Washington was there when protesters used ropes to pull the statue down. 'Many of these protesters say that the Confederacy represents racism, slavery and here on Juneteenth they are trying to pull down…this statue,' local reporter Shomari Stone said during a broadcast at the time. 'People have spray-painted BLM, for Black Lives Matter, they have written Black Lives Matter on it, and they are continuing to try to pull this down.' Protesters later poured lighter fluid on the statue and set it on fire. On Monday, the National Park Service said it will restore and reinstall the statue. 'The restoration aligns with federal responsibilities under historic preservation law as well as recent executive orders to beautify the nation's capital and re-instate pre-existing statues,' the service wrote in a press release. The release cited two executive orders signed by Trump in March, including 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.' In this executive order, Trump ordered the Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to determine whether, since January 2020, public statues and other monuments 'have been removed or changed to perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history, inappropriately minimize the value of certain historical events or figures, or include any other improper partisan ideology,' and to take action to reinstate these statues as appropriate. Pike's statue was dedicated in 1901 and has sat in storage since its removal in 2020. It is currently being restored. 'Site preparation to repair the statue's damaged masonry plinth will begin shortly, with crews repairing broken stone, mortar joints, and mounting elements,' the National Park Service said. The service hopes to reinstall the statue by October 2025. Pike's statue was vandalized nearly a month after George Floyd, a 46-year-old Black man, died in Minneapolis after a white police officer, Derek Chauvin, knelt on his neck. Floyd's death sparked nationwide protests, some of which turned violent, against racial injustice, particularly police violence against Black Americans. Journalist Geoff Bennett reported in June 2020 Trump, who was nearing the end of his first term, had moved to reinstall Pike's statue. 'Two sources tell NBC News that Pres. Trump personally called Interior Sec. Bernhardt and asked the Park Service to put back up the statue of Gen. Albert Pike – Washington, D.C.'s only outdoor Confederate statue, which protesters tore down and set on fire the night of Juneteenth,' Bennett wrote on X.
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Urgent warning issued to people selling their identities online
There is a 'worrying trend' of people selling their own identities, a fraud prevention service has said. The selling of identities, often in the hope of financial reward, leaves people liable for loans or credit taken out in their name by criminals. Fraud prevention service Cifas, whose members include banking, retail, insurance, and telecoms bodies, said that more than 118,000 cases where identity fraud was suspected were recorded between January and June 2025. It said the ongoing threat is being exacerbated by AI (artificial intelligence)-enabled synthetic identities and fabricated profiles that can bypass security checks. It highlighted concerns that people are sometimes selling their own identities, typically on the promise of attractive financial opportunities. But by giving criminals access to legitimate credentials, Cifas is warning that people risk having debts built up by others in their name. Releasing its latest Fraudscape report, Cifas said that criminals are using advanced AI to create fake identities, forge documents, and bypass verification systems with 'alarming accuracy'. It said identity fraud risks have spread across various sectors, including false applications and identity theft in motor insurance; mobile account takeovers; and gambling-related identity fraud including criminals misusing the identities of people who have died. There has also been an increase in cases involving employees committing fraud against employers, Cifas said, with organisations reporting that more employees were concealing their background information to secure roles. Secret 'polygamous working' – where people hold multiple jobs or roles without their employer's knowledge or consent – as well as using fraudulent reference houses to cover employment gaps – are also a persistent threat to employers, Cifas said. Its Fraudscape report showed that, in total, more than 217,000 fraud risk cases were recorded to the National Fraud Database (NFD) by Cifas members from January to June 2025. Mike Haley, CEO of Cifas, said: 'Fraud is a national emergency – and AI has supercharged the threat, making it more sophisticated and harder to detect. No sector, business, or individual is immune. 'Tackling this fast-changing danger requires urgent, co-ordinated action through cross-sector collaboration and the sharing of data and intelligence. Only by working together can we stay ahead of the criminals and keep organisations and people safe from harm.'
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Washington Post veteran says he left after 18 years over Bezos ‘unapologetically patriotic' content mandate
A veteran Washington Post columnist who quit the newspaper last month has spoken out against owner Jeff Bezos 's Trump-friendly transformation of the opinion pages. Jonathan Capehart, who joined the Post in 2007 and served on its editorial board until 2023, said on MSNBC on Friday that he had chosen to leave because the new demand for "unapologetically patriotic" articles left "[no] room for a voice like mine". He was among several high-profile journalists and editors who accepted a buyout offered by the Post 's new CEO William Lewis to any employees who "do not feel aligned" with Bezos's new order. The news comes after the Amazon founder and chairman decreed this February that the Post 's opinion pages would now pivot to supporting "personal liberties and free markets", while excluding any contrary views. Asked on air why he had chosen to leave, Capehart said that Bezos — who had a prominent seat at Donald Trump's inauguration and is currently the world's fourth richest person, according to Forbes — had the "right" to make those changes but that they left no space for his perspective. "It became clear, as time went along, and especially when he chose a new leader for the section, that there was just not going to be any room for a voice like mine, especially when we were told that we would have to be unapologetically patriotic in talking about the positive things happening in the country," Capehart said. "How can you talk about the positive things happening in the country when the rest of the house is engulfed in flames and the foundation is flooding?' he asked. "I wanted to go someplace where my voice would be heard." By "new leader", Capehart was referring to the paper's new opinion editor Adam O'Neal, who vowed in June to publish "unapologetically patriotic" articles "rooted in fundamental optimism about the future of this country". Capehart had previously quit the Post 's editorial board in 2023 after an editorial that he felt minimized systemic racism was published over his objections. At the time, he was the board's only Black member. When Bezos bought the 147-year-old newspaper in 2013, he promised that its "values... [did] not need changing" and that it would not be beholden "to the private interests of its owners". "I won't be leading The Washington Post day-to-day," he added. That all changed starting in October 2024, 11 days before election day, when Bezos reportedly intervened personally in order to block the editorial board's planned endorsement of Kamala Harris, breaking with decades of tradition. Since then there has been an exodus of longtime workers, with many complaining that they were subject to increased editorial meddling or even directly blocked from criticizing Bezos. "I believe we face a very real threat of autocracy in the candidacy of Donald Trump. I find it untenable and unconscionable that we have lost our voice at this perilous moment," wrote former editorial board member and Pulitzer Prize winner David Hoffman when he resigned last October.
