logo
Robert Jenrick turns vigilante in bid to tackle London's fare dodgers

Robert Jenrick turns vigilante in bid to tackle London's fare dodgers

The Guardian6 days ago

Robert Jenrick is perhaps best known to the public as the former government minister who unlawfully intervened in a planning decision that could have saved a Conservative party donor tens of millions of pounds.
To others, he may be the Tory MP that parliament's spending watchdog said was centrally involved in wasting nearly £100m on a botched plan to house asylum seekers.
Now, however, Jenrick has a new claim to fame: as the man who released a video of himself delivering 'vigilante justice' to people he accused of fare dodging in London.
The failed party leadership candidate posted a video online on Thursday morning in which he accused the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, of 'driving a proud city into the ground', adding: 'Lawbreaking is out of control. He's not acting. So, I did.'
Jenrick is seen approaching people near tube barriers and asking them if they think 'it is all right not to pay'.
Addressing the camera during the minute-long clip, Jenrick – who in 2020 accepted that his approval of the billionaire Richard Desmond's project had been unlawful – said it was 'so annoying watching so many people break the law and get away with it'. He added that the state needed to 'reassert itself and go after lawbreakers'.
Transport for London (TfL) said fare-evasion had actually fallen slightly recently – down 0.3% on 2023/24's rate to 3.5%. And officials claimed it was lower than many cities globally – citing as an example the 13% seen in New York City. They said they hoped to further cut fare evasion in the capital to reach 1.5% by 2030.
Nevertheless, it is still a serious problem in London – costing an estimated £130m a year. Siwan Hayward, TfL's director of security, policing and enforcement, said: 'Fare evasion is unacceptable. That is why we are strengthening our capability to deter and detect fare evaders, including expanding our team of professional investigators to target the most prolific fare evaders across the network.'
And the Transport Salaried Staffs' Association said it had 'consistently called for a fully resourced British Transport police and trained revenue protection officers to tackle fare evasion effectively and safely'.
It added: 'The latest incident involving a Conservative MP, who took it upon himself to confront fare dodgers on public transport, highlights the dangers of vigilante justice.'
Jenrick also said in the clip: 'It's the same with bike theft, phone theft, tool theft, shoplifting, drugs in town centres, weird Turkish barber shops. It's all chipping away at society.'
Asked to explain what he meant, Jenrick said: 'Obviously, many Turkish barber shops are good local businesses. However, when small towns have as many as 14 barber shops, many of them Turkish-styled and sitting empty, there are questions to answer.
'The National Crime Agency set out earlier this year that it's investigating the boom in 'Turkish barber shops' over concerns many are being used as fronts for money laundering drug and criminal profits. The authorities should continue to pursue suspicious premises.'
Hours after the video emerged, Jenrick accepted he had not got permission to film on TfL premises, telling LBC radio he did not want to forewarn the organisation of his plan to potentially embarrass it.
While it is understood he did not breach the letter of TfL's rules, a TfL spokesperson said: 'We expect permission to be sought for filming of this nature.'
It is understood the organisation expects elected officials to work with it in such circumstances.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Badenoch launches review into leaving ECHR
Badenoch launches review into leaving ECHR

Telegraph

time25 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Badenoch launches review into leaving ECHR

Kemi Badenoch is to launch a review into whether Britain should leave the European Convention on Human Rights. In a speech on Friday, the Conservative leader will announce plans for a commission, headed by Lord Wolfson, her shadow attorney general, to investigate how a Tory government could prevent lawyers using human rights and other legislation to block government decisions. It will form part of a wider review into how to prevent lawyers 'subverting' government policy. The move will be seen as an attempt to resolve an issue that divides the Tory party, with MPs on the Right arguing in favour of leaving the ECHR and those on the Left seeing any attempt to quit the convention as a red line. It is understood that the commission will not solely focus on the ECHR and Refugee Convention, but will look more widely at how to prevent 'lawfare' in environmental and equalities legislation. A Conservative Party aide familiar with the details of the plans said: 'Kemi has worked hard to bring the shadow cabinet together on this very difficult issue. 'She has always said she will take her time to build a proper, workable plan to tackle the issue of the courts subverting parliamentary democracy. This commission, led by the brilliant lawyer Lord Wolfson, will make sure we're ready to take the tough decisions.' Lord Wolfson, a barrister who is also a former justice minister, has previously advocated that Britain should be prepared to refuse to comply with Strasbourg court injunctions, known as rule 39 orders, one of which was used to block the first deportation flight to Rwanda. The power for ministers to ignore rule 39 orders was enshrined in Rishi Sunak's Illegal Migration Act, which sought to disapply human rights laws in order to enable flights to take off to Rwanda. Labour's election victory last July eventually killed off the plans. Nigel Farage's Reform UK is the only major party that has formally committed to quitting the ECHR, while Labour is proposing to restrict the powers of judges to grant asylum under the convention. The moves follow The Telegraph's disclosure of multiple cases over the past four months in which immigration judges have blocked the deportations of foreign criminals or illegal migrants because they ruled it breached articles in the ECHR protecting family life and against persecution. Last month Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, signalled that the Tories were prepared to quit the ECHR after nine European leaders attacked it for preventing the deportation of foreign criminals. 'Fundamental change' He said countries would have to quit the ECHR unless there was 'radical and fundamental change'. It follows a letter signed by the nine leaders, which said European judges were interpreting the ECHR so widely that the 'wrong people' were being protected. This was placing 'too many limitations' on their governments' abilities to deport 'serious violent' offenders and drug dealers. Mr Philp said: 'The ECHR was never intended to facilitate and enable mass illegal immigration, or prevent the removal of foreign murderers and rapists back to their country of origin. The Telegraph has recently unearthed dozens such cases – which are just the tip of the iceberg. 'The public expects democratically elected leaders to be able to control our borders and decide who stays in this country. But the way the courts apply the ECHR makes that impossible. 'Unless there is fundamental and radical change, then countries wanting to control their borders will have to leave the ECHR.'

Thomas Partey's Arsenal future undecided as club issues update
Thomas Partey's Arsenal future undecided as club issues update

The Independent

time39 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Thomas Partey's Arsenal future undecided as club issues update

Arsenal remains in discussions with Thomas Partey over a new contract but confirmed that Jorginho and Kieran Tierney are expected to leave the club. Jorginho, expected to join Flamengo, had already announced his departure in a farewell video, while Tierney is returning to his former club Celtic. Kieran Tierney expressed his gratitude to Arsenal fans for their support during his time with the club. Loanees Raheem Sterling and Neto will return to their parent clubs, Chelsea and Bournemouth, respectively; Nathan Butler-Oyedeji is also departing. Arsenal is in ongoing discussions with Chloe Kelly, and Lina Hurtig, Amanda Ilestedt, and Teyah Goldie are also leaving the women's squad.

Starmer has brought Labour to the brink of extinction. This makes him even more dangerous
Starmer has brought Labour to the brink of extinction. This makes him even more dangerous

Telegraph

time40 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Starmer has brought Labour to the brink of extinction. This makes him even more dangerous

Brace, dear readers, brace, for everything will get worse before it gets better. Sir Keir Starmer's premiership is holed below the waterline, his party on the verge of disintegration. Starmer has lost control of immigration and of the public finances. Nobody knows what he stands for. It is a question of when, not if, he is forced to fire Rachel Reeves. It is unclear whether he will lead Labour into the next election, or even whether it will remain the dominant party of the Left. Bring it on, I hear you say. But a desperate Starmer will be far worse than the incompetent, complacent version we have been subjected to so far. He no longer has anything to lose. He will target Middle England with wanton abandon, embracing Corbyn-lite policies to shore up his far-Left flank. Every stupid idea in the collectivist arsenal – wealth taxes, the revaluation of council tax bands to hammer expensive homes, a cap on pension pots, the removal of pension tax relief, a war on Isas, steeper inheritance tax – is bound to make a comeback to fill his self-inflicted fiscal black hole. The 'rich' will be asked to pay more for water and broadband via 'social tariffs'. Ed Miliband will be emboldened in his rush to net zero, minus the occasional tactical delay. There will be no end to the woke madness, rampant crime and unjust legal decisions. As ludicrous as this might sound to outsiders aghast at Starmer's proto-socialism and disgusted by the human rights lawfare pushed by Lord Hermer, his attorney general, many Labour MPs and intellectuals actually believe that Starmer's error was to tack too far to the Right. They believe he cares too much about a Red Wall that is already lost. Those in urban seats hated his warning that migration was turning Britain into 'an island of strangers' (the Red Wallers disagreed). Most saw Reeves's attempts at trimming a few benefits to placate the bond markets as this Government's foundational error (the Red Wall MPs agree). Others believe he is being too cautious when undoing Brexit. Many MPs want Britain immediately to recognise an independent Palestine – even though no such body would truly accept Israel's right to exist – a grotesque gesture that would confirm once again that pogroms and terrorism works. The Prime Ministers' critics blame Morgan McSweeney, No 10 chief of staff, for the Government's supposedly centrist approach, and are convinced that Starmer listens too much to Tony Blair and his allies (such as Liz Lloyd, director of policy, delivery and innovation at No 10). There is talk that 15 Labour MPs may defect to the Greens if they choose as their new leader Zack Polanski, who wants to turn the party into a Left-wing populist alternative to Reform. It is hard to oust a Labour leader, but Starmer's position is weakening. Labour's problem is the mirror image of the Tories'. Britain is undergoing a brutal realignment. Both parties were coalitions; the Tories had no rival to their Right and Labour none to their Left. Policies were designed to appeal to centrist 'median voters' and a few thousand swing electors in a few seats. Everything has changed, for three reasons. First, the Blair-Brown-Osborne-Starmer managerialist orthodoxy has failed. The economy is toast, the public sector is kaput, social breakdown is rife and the ultra-high immigration model has gone badly wrong. The electorate craves new ideas. Second, voters have become radicalised by culture wars. Previously uncontroversial views – on biological sex, on free speech – are now key markers of identity. Education has become more important than class, income or wealth when it comes to political affiliation, and, tragically, sectarian voting is back, fuelled by demographic change. Third, the political marketplace is working: the public want more choice, and they are getting it. Nigel Farage's Reform is leading the polls, while on the far-Left the Greens and 'pro-Gaza' Independents are surging (with the latter's appeal probably underestimated by researchers). Many no longer detect any difference between Labour and Tories, and no longer care which of the old duopoly is in power. On the Left, voting is becoming performative, an expression of identity and values, not a means to seize power; tactical voting is waning, and fragmentation rising. The Labour coalition is gone, never to return. Its Right flank has fled to Reform. Some social democrats are opting for the Lib Dems, a party that could yet overtake Labour in parliament. For Starmer, the only hope is to tack Left, appealing to Greens and Corbynites, to bash Israel and U-turn on cuts, but it won't work: this electorate has become so extreme that even a speech praising Marx and Engels would flop. Recognising Palestine wouldn't be sufficient; they would demand Russia-style sanctions. Higher benefits would be ridiculed as Austerity 2.0. There are some around Starmer who believe he can muddle through, but they are deluded. Yes, the French are saying they will help with small boats (good luck with that), two polls suggest a smaller Reform lead, and £15 billion will be spent on buses in the North. So what? The big picture is apocalyptic. Reeves will increase taxes at the Budget to fund her U-turns on winter fuel, the two-child benefits cap and personal independence payments, as well as public sector pay rises. She will then need to rise taxes again and again over the next few years to put defence on course for 3.5 per cent of GDP, plus another 1.5 per cent on related spending – even before any further increases in spending on the welfare state in a doomed attempt to buy back votes. This could trigger a full-on fiscal crisis: the tax take is already maxed out and will surely fail to keep up with spending. Labour is polling at 22 per cent, down 11.7 points on a pathetically poor election victory. Gordon Brown, Ed Miliband, Jeremy Corbyn, Neil Kinnock and Michael Foot performed better than Starmer's current ratings. We need to go back to 1918, when Labour, still a fringe group, collected 20.8pc under William Adamson, for the party to be scoring so poorly. This is where Labour is heading, or worse. Starmer could be its final PM, the closing chapter in a 100- year story. Let's hope he doesn't entirely ruin Britain on his way out.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store