Anti-Trump Podcaster Calls Joe Rogan ‘Jerk' Who ‘Spreads Lies'
Ben Meiselas flamed rival podcaster Joe Rogan during a discussion about whether Kamala Harris should have appeared on Rogan's show during the 2024 campaign.
'To me, Rogan's a jerk and he spreads lies,' Meiselas said on a new episode The People's Cabinet podcast, slamming the pro-MAGA podcaster.
Meiselas co-hosts the left-leaning MeidasTouch podcast with his brothers Brett and Jordan. The show dethroned The Joe Rogan Experience in February to become the top podcast in the country—and has hovered near the top of the charts ever since.
'I don't think [Harris] should have went on Rogan or any of those right-wing shows,' Meiselas stated. 'The moment you go on a Rogan or a Charlie Kirk they are already going to be framing things in terms of issues that really aren't the issues that need to be discussed.'
Meiselas, who also co-owns Los Angeles Magazine, pushed back on efforts to create a liberal counterpart to Rogan. 'We shouldn't be chasing 'Who could be the next left version of Joe Rogan,' he said, adding, 'Someone on the left shouldn't be like, 'Well I need to be a jerk and punch down.''
Instead, Meiselas—whose podcast racked up 125 million downloads and views in March, nearly double Rogan's 64 million downloads—called for building a 'healthy, vibrant, pro-democracy, pro-truth ecosystem.'
Rogan has faced criticism for spreading COVID-19 and vaccine misinformation and hosting conspiracy theorists. On a recent episode of his podcast, British conservative columnist Douglas Murray confronted him for hosting Ian Carroll, a YouTuber known for pushing antisemitic conspiracy theories.
'If you throw a lot of s--t out there, there's some point at which [saying] 'I'm just raising questions' is not a valid thing,' Murray said. 'You're not raising questions. You're not asking questions. You're telling people something … I feel you've opened the door to quite a lot of people. You've now got a big platform and have been throwing out counter-historical stuff but a very dangerous kind.'
Rogan invited both Donald Trump and Harris onto his show during the 2024 campaign. Only Trump made an appearance, after Rogan declined an invitation from the Harris team to travel to her for an hour-long interview, rather than sit for a three-hour interview in his Austin, Texas studio. He endorsed Trump on the eve of the election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A Harvard acceptance fulfilled a dream for a student in Ethiopia. Trump's order stands in his way
Winning admission to Harvard University fulfilled a longtime goal for Yonas Nuguse, a student in Ethiopia who endured the Tigray conflict, internet and phone shutdowns, and the COVID-19 pandemic — all of which made it impossible to finish high school on time. Now, it's unclear if he will make it this fall to the Ivy League campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He and other admitted students around the world are anxiously tracking the school's feud with the Trump administration, which is seeking to keep it from enrolling international students. The war in the country's Tigray region forced schools to close in many parts of the province. Nuguse, 21, took a gap year to study and save money to pay for his TOEFL English proficiency test in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia's capital. 'The war affected me a great deal and when I found out the news that I was accepted to Harvard, I was ecstatic. I knew it was a proud moment for my family, teachers, mentors and friends, who were instrumental in my achievement,' he said. Increasingly, the nation's oldest and best-known university has attracted some of the brightest minds from around the world, with international students accounting for one-quarter of its enrollment. As Harvard's fight with the administration plays out, foreign students are now navigating deep uncertainty and weighing other options. On Wednesday, President Donald Trump signed a directive seeking to block U.S. entry for Harvard's international students. It marked the administration's latest effort to squeeze Harvard's foreign enrollment after a federal judge in Boston blocked the withdrawal of its certification to host students from overseas. 'Harvard will continue to protect its international students,' the university said in a statement. The standoff with Harvard comes as the administration has been tightening scrutiny of student visas nationwide. Thousands of students around the country abruptly lost permission to be in the U.S. this spring before the administration reversed itself, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced last week the U.S. would 'aggressively revoke' visas for students from China. 'It is one blow after another,' said Mike Henniger, CEO of Illume Student Advisory Services, who works with colleges in the U.S., Canada and Europe to recruit international students. 'At this point, international student interest in the U.S. has basically dropped to nil.' The future of Harvard's international students has been hanging in the balance since the Department of Homeland Security first moved to block its foreign enrollment on May 22. For many, the twists and turns have been exhausting. Jing, a 23-year-old master's student, is currently completing an internship in China this summer, and unsure if he can reenter the U.S. for the fall semester. 'It is tiring, we all feel numb now. Trump just makes big news headlines once every few days since he got back to the White House,' said Jing, who agreed to speak under his family name out of concern about retaliation from the Trump administration. Jing said he is going to watch and see what happens for now, in case the move against international students is a negotiating tactic that does not stick. The possibility that Trump could block foreign enrollment at other colleges only raises the uncertainty for students planning to pursue their education overseas, said Craig Riggs, who has been working in international education for about 30 years and is the editor of ICEF Monitor. He said he urges families to consult carefully with advisers and not to overreact to the day's headlines. 'The rules under which students would make this huge decision to devote years of their lives and quite a bit of money to studying at Harvard have been shown to change quite quickly,' Riggs said. An aspiring economist, Nuguse was the only student accepted to Harvard this year from Kalamino Special High School, which caters to gifted students from underprivileged backgrounds from across Tigray. After receiving acceptances also to Columbia University and Amherst College, Nuguse chose Harvard, which he had long dreamed of attending. He said he hopes it will work out to attend Harvard. Nuguse was granted a visa to study at Harvard, and he worries it might be too late to reverse his decision and attend another university anyway. He received an email from Harvard last week, telling him to proceed with his registration and highlighting a judge's order in Harvard's favor in the dispute over foreign enrollment. 'I hope the situation is temporary and I can enroll on time to go on and realize my dream far from reality in Ethiopia,' he said. ___ Associated Press writers Jocelyn Gecker and Cheyanne Mumphrey contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Gizmodo
22 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Says Trump Is ‘in the Epstein Files' as Their Relationship Publicly Implodes
Trump called Musk "crazy" and has threatened to take away the billionaire's subsidies. Everyone knew the day would come when the relationship between Elon Musk and Donald Trump actually imploded. And that day is finally here, with Musk going scorched-Earth and now saying Trump is in the 'Epstein Files,' a reference to the late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk wrote on X. Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 The open feud between the two men started when President Trump said he was 'very disappointed' in Musk during a press conference in the White House on Thursday, suggesting the billionaire might be developing 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' after he criticized the so-called Big Beautiful Bill. Trump even poked fun at Musk's black eye, saying, 'Do you want a little makeup?' Now Musk is having a full-blown meltdown on his social media platform X, retweeting memes making fun of Trump, joking that Trump may have been replaced with a body double, and saying it might be time to form a new political party. There's also the accusation that Trump is in 'the Epstein Files,' the long-fabled government files showing the powerful people who were associated with Epstein. Trump was rather openly Epstein's friend for years, but many MAGA supporters refuse to believe there was anything nefarious happening between the two. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote Thursday. 'Such ingratitude.' Musk, who reportedly spent over $250 million in the 2024 election to help elect Trump and other Republicans, was responding in his tweet to a video of Trump saying he was 'very disappointed' in the billionaire. Musk also wrote, 'Remember this @realDonaldTrump?' while quote-tweeting a video from March where Trump essentially did an ad for Tesla at the White House. The president bought a Tesla after the publicity stunt, which was one of many blatantly unethical moves by the two men during Musk's stint as the head of DOGE. In the video, Trump can be heard calling Musk a 'patriot' who has 'never asked me for a thing.' Musk also retweeted a meme from an account called Not Jerome Powell that uses the format of a Trump interview from his first term with Jonathan Swan. The meme shows Trump saying, 'I have a plan to cut spending' before handing Swan a piece of paper that reads 'increase spending.' Musk responded to Trump's claims in the televised Oval Office press conference on Thursday that he only got upset after EV 'mandates' had been killed, though it seems like the two men may have been confused about what the other was talking about. 'This is me in 2021!' Musk tweeted, sharing a video clip where he said Tesla didn't need to rely on tax credits anymore. Trump seemed to be talking about a bill passed by Republicans in the Senate last month that makes it illegal for states like California to phase out vehicles with internal combustion engines. But the so-called Big Beautiful Bill doesn't include anything about mandates, instead killing the tax credits that people can get for buying EVs. However, Musk obviously has benefited from government intervention, which has put billions of dollars in his pocket over the years. Whatever Trump and Musk meant when it comes to the details of legislation around electric vehicles, these guys are clearly lashing out in ways that were long predicted. There have long been rumors that Trump didn't like Musk, but they were clearly able to put their personal differences aside and work together in their quest to destroy the federal government. Trump hit back during Musk's tweet-storm with some posts of his own Thursday, really starting to put some oomph into his newfound hate for the billionaire oligarch. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote. Then Trump delivered a line that every oligarch hates to hear. The president said he might have to take away Musk's billions in subsidies and contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump wrote. Musk heavily relies on government contracts through his companies like SpaceX. Musk responded to the threat with a quote-tweet about someone ending the contracts for SpaceX's work shuttling astronauts to the International Space Station. 'This just gets better and better,' Musk wrote with two crying-laughing emojis. 'Go ahead, make my day…' Social media sites also started to become filled with memes on Thursday, making fun of the rift between the two men, including a Mean Girls reference. Ashley St. Clair, the right-wing author and mother of one of Musk's children, also chimed in on X, writing, 'hey @realDonaldTrump lmk if u need any breakup advice.' Tesla's stock is down 14% on the day at the time of this writing, with a share price of $284. And while Musk always seems to find a way to juice his stock with whatever new shiny object he can concoct, this rift with Trump and disillusionment with MAGA is sure to be a hurdle for the short term. When Musk is dropping references to Trump being in the so-called Epstein files, you know things are going to only get messier from here. Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years … — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025
San Francisco Chronicle
36 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Who's in charge? CDC's leadership 'crisis' apparent amid new COVID-19 vaccine guidance
WASHINGTON (AP) — There was a notable absence last week when U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in a 58-second video that the government would no longer endorse the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children or pregnant women. The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — the person who typically signs off on federal vaccine recommendations — was nowhere to be seen. The CDC, a $9.2 billion-a-year agency tasked with reviewing life-saving vaccines, monitoring diseases and watching for budding threats to Americans' health, is without a clear leader. 'I've been disappointed that we haven't had an aggressive director since — February, March, April, May — fighting for the resources that CDC needs,' said Dr. Robert Redfield, who served as CDC director under the first Trump administration and supported Kennedy's nomination as the nation's health secretary. $9.2 billion-a-year agency without leader as nomination awaits The leadership vacuum at a foremost federal public health agency has existed for months, after President Donald Trump suddenly withdrew his first pick for CDC director in March. A hearing for his new nominee — the agency's former acting director Susan Monarez — has not been scheduled because she has not submitted all the paperwork necessary to proceed, according to a spokesman for Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., who will oversee the nomination. HHS did not answer written questions about Monarez's nomination, her current role at the CDC or her salary. An employee directory lists Monarez, a longtime government employee, as a staffer for the NIH under the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health. Instead, a lawyer and political appointee with no medical experience is 'carrying out some of the duties' of director at the agency that for seven decades has been led by someone with a medical degree. Matthew Buzzelli, who is also the chief of staff at the CDC, is 'surrounded by highly qualified medical professionals and advisors to help fulfill these duties as appropriate,' Andrew Nixon, an HHS spokesperson said in a statement. Adding to the confusion was an employee-wide email sent last week that thanked 'new acting directors who shave stepped up to the plate." The email, signed by Monarez, listed her as the acting director. It was was sent just days after Kennedy said at a Senate hearing that Monarez had been replaced by Buzzelli. The lack of a confirmed director will be a problem if a public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic or a rapid uptick in measles cases hits, said Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota. 'CDC is a crisis, waiting for a crisis to happen,' said Osterholm. 'At this point, I couldn't tell you for the life of me who was going to pull what trigger in a crisis situation." An acting director rarely seen, and stalled decisions At CDC headquarters in Atlanta, employees say Monarez was rarely heard from between late January – when she was appointed acting director – and late March, when Trump nominated her. She also has not held any of the 'all hands' meetings that were customary under previous CDC chiefs, according to several staffers. One employee, who insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media and fears being fired if identified said Monarez has been almost invisible since her nomination, adding that her absence has been cited by other leaders as an excuse for delaying action. The situation already has led to confusion. In April, a 15-member CDC advisory panel of outside experts met to discuss vaccine policy. The panel makes recommendations to the CDC Director, who routinely signs off on them. But it was unclear during the meeting who would be reviewing the panel's recommendations, which included the expansion of RSV vaccinations for adults and a new combination shot as another option to protect teens against meningitis. HHS officials said the recommendations were going to Buzzelli, but then weeks passed with no decision. A month after the meeting ended, the CDC posted on a web site that Kennedy had signed off on recommendations for travelers against chikungunya, a viral disease transmitted to humans by mosquitos. But there continues to be no word about a decision about the other vaccine recommendations. The problem was accentuated again last week, when Kennedy rolled out recommendations for the COVID-19 vaccine saying they were no longer recommended for healthy children or pregnant women, even though expectant mothers are considered a high-risk group if they contract the virus. Kennedy made the surprise announcement without input from the CDC advisory panel that has historically made recommendations on the nation's vaccine schedule. The CDC days later posted revised guidance that said healthy kids and pregnant women may get the shots. Nixon, the HHS spokesman, said CDC staff were consulted on the recommendations, but would not provide staffer's names or titles. He also did not provide the specific data or research that Kennedy reviewed to reach his conclusion on the new COVID-19 recommendations, just weeks after he said that he did not think 'people should be taking medical advice' from him. 'As Secretary Kennedy said, there is a clear lack of data to support the repeat booster strategy in children,' Nixon said in a statement. Research shows that pregnant women are at higher risk of severe illness, mechanical ventilation and death, when they contract COVID-19 infections. During the height of the pandemic, deaths of women during pregnancy or shortly after childbirth soared to their highest level in 50 years. Vaccinations also have been recommended for pregnant women because it passes immunity to newborns who are too young for vaccines and also vulnerable to infections. Nixon did not address a written question about recommendations for pregnant women. Kennedy's decision to bypass the the advisory panel and announce new COVID-19 recommendations on his own prompted a key CDC official who works with the committee – Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos – to announce her resignation last Friday. 'My career in public health and vaccinology started with a deep-seated desire to help the most vulnerable members of our population, and that is not something I am able to continue doing in this role,' she wrote in an email seen by an Associated Press reporter. Signs are mounting that the CDC has been 'sidelined' from key decision-making under Kennedy's watch, said Dr. Anand Parekh, the chief medical adviser for The Bipartisan Policy Center. 'It's difficult to ascertain how we will reverse the chronic disease epidemic or be prepared for myriad public health emergencies without a strong CDC and visible, empowered director,' Parekh said. 'It's also worth noting that every community in the country is served by a local or state public health department that depends on the scientific expertise of the CDC and the leadership of the CDC director.'
