Frustration hangs over WNBA All-Star weekend as players slam latest labor talks
The WNBPA admonished the league after their latest meeting on Thursday, saying the WNBA had failed to "address the priorities we've voiced from the day we opted out."
Players in October voted to opt out of the current collective bargaining agreement, once seen as a landmark deal for women's sports but now viewed by many players as woefully inadequate amid a surge of popularity in the WNBA.
Swarmed by reporters on Friday as part of a pre-All-Star Game media availability, WNBPA President Nneka Ogwumike said she felt the meeting was a missed opportunity.
"Yes, we're celebrating amazing growth, but I think it's not lost on us that we're living the growth as we're negotiating our worth," she said. "The fans know what we're worth. Now we need the league to know what we are worth."
Reached for comment on Friday, the WNBA pointed to a statement Commissioner Cathy Engelbert provided to the Associated Press on Thursday, calling the meeting "very constructive dialogue."
Engelbert is expected to meet with members of the media on Saturday for a press conference.
Ogwumike said there had been no direct conversation about a work stoppage but that union leadership cautioned players over the possible outcomes of a failed negotiation.
"What we want to do is negotiate a good deal," she told reporters.
"But we also wouldn't be doing our job if we didn't let players know, 'Hey the league is in a different place. We're in a different place. Just be prepared for anything that can happen'."
More than 40 players attended the negotiations on Thursday, including star rookie Paige Bueckers from the Dallas Wings, who said it was her first time at the negotiating table.
"It's been powerful and I think we're going to continue to fight for that because the proposal that they gave back to us was kind of disrespectful," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Holiday Inn owner IHG's US room revenue falls in second quarter
Aug 7 (Reuters) - Holiday Inn owner InterContinental Hotels Group reported a fall in U.S. revenue per available room (RevPAR) in the second quarter on Thursday, as economic uncertainties dent consumer spending in its largest market. U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on trade partners and rising geopolitical tensions have rattled the travel and hospitality industry as waning consumer confidence threaten to reverse post-pandemic recovery. "While some shorter-term macro-economic uncertainties remain, many are subsiding," IHG CEO Elie Maalouf said in a statement, adding that the company remains on track to meet annual profit and earnings expectations. The hotel operator said U.S. RevPAR fell 0.9% for the three months ended June 30, compared to 3.5% growth in the first quarter. Global RevPAR growth for the first half of the year came at 1.8%, compared to 3% a year prior.
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
US energy exporters face likely letdown in any US-India trade deal
LITTLETON, Colorado, Aug 7 (Reuters) - The fresh 25% tariffs slapped on Indian goods by U.S. President Donald Trump this week are being viewed by many as a negotiating tactic designed to force India to buy more U.S. energy products and other goods going forward. But even though India's fast-growing economy is the fifth largest globally, India's energy importers may have far less room to maneuver than they might appear. Tight corporate operating margins, cost-sensitive consumer markets, binding long-term import contracts and slowing economic growth all limit India's ability to spend big on U.S. oil, LNG, coal and refined products over the near term. At the same time, India's location at the base of Asia means it is far closer to other major energy product exporters than it is to the United States, which would trigger sharply higher shipping costs if it were to switch to U.S.-origin products. No doubt some Indian corporations will be cajoled into pledging major U.S. purchases and investments during upcoming trade negotiations, which may boost sentiment in Washington, D.C. But U.S. exporters of oil, gas, coal and fuels that are hoping for massive, viable and binding purchase commitments by Indian buyers are likely to be left disappointed. It's not just its import needs that India has to worry about. The United States is by far India's largest export market, and has accounted for nearly 20% of all Indian exports in recent years, according to International Monetary Fund (IMF) data. In 2024, the value of India's exports to the United States was just over $80 billion, while its imports from the U.S. totalled just under $45 billion. As the U.S. is more than twice as large as India's next largest export market - the United Arab Emirates - it will be nearly impossible for the country to replace lost U.S. consumers with other buyers. That means that trade negotiators will remain committed to healing trade ties with Washington as quickly as possible, and will be looking at every possible means of reducing the trade imbalance. The rapid rise in India's purchases of Russian crude oil since mid-2022 has been a sore point for the U.S. and Europe, and has been a focal point during the recent trade talks. Average monthly crude oil flows from Russia to India jumped from around 3.2 million barrels a month between 2018 and 2021 to 50 million barrels a month since mid-2022, data from Kpler shows. That more than 15-fold surge in Russian oil purchases by India provided Moscow with critical import earnings while it grappled with the fallout from its war in Ukraine, and seriously undermined international efforts to cut funding to Moscow. However, while India's refusal to join Western-led sanctions drew ire from the international community, its willingness to step up imports of Russian oil ensured that its refiners and fuel consumers were shielded from any rise in global oil prices. Indeed, the opposite has occurred as Indian importers were able to extract steep discounts from Russian oil sellers who were desperate to secure sales wherever they could. Those cheap imported Russian barrels in turn allowed major Indian refiners such as Reliance ( opens new tab to expand supplies and fuel the country's economic growth since 2020. Indian authorities have stated that providing energy security for its 1.4 billion population has been the main driver of its oil import programme, and that the new tariffs are unfair given that the country is only acting in its own self-interest. What's more, any aggressive pivot away from cheap Russian oil to pricier U.S. crude would drastically change the economic outlook for Indian oil refiners and consumers, and likely result in a surge in fuel prices that would cause economic harm. Since 2022, the official prices of the main grade of Russian oil imported by India have averaged around $70 a barrel, which is around $10 cheaper than the price of the main U.S. crude for export over that same period, data from LSEG shows. As Indian importers likely secured their Russian oil supplies at even lower prices, the real discount compared to U.S. prices is likely larger. That in turn means that there is almost no prospect of Indian refiners being able to profitably switch to U.S. crude any time soon, even if pressured to do so. U.S. trade negotiators have touted U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a means of reducing trade gaps, as a single LNG cargo can cost several million dollars. However, Indian energy product importers have arguably even less scope to switch out current suppliers for the U.S. here. The primary limiting factor is that Indian gas importers are already locked into long-term purchase deals with suppliers such as Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, and face stiff penalties for breaking contracts. And even if Indian buyers were prepared to tear up those deals in favor of buying from the U.S. instead, they would face a surge in shipping costs that could make overall cargo costs uneconomical. The journey time for an LNG tanker from the U.S. to India is around 30 days, which is six times longer than the trip from Qatar. U.S. coal exporters will likely face similar difficulties in dislodging Indonesia from India's coal import pipeline. The Indonesia to India shipping time is around 11 days, compared to around 27 days for the trip from the U.S. East coast. Such a yawning gap in journey times and shipping costs means that India's trade negotiators may not be able to rely on its energy consumers to close the trade gap, and will need to look elsewhere to secure a trade deal with the U.S. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
We're looking at the wrong earnings season
LONDON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - It's easy to be impressed with the U.S. corporate earnings season that's unfolding, but you're looking at the wrong one if you're trying to identify the true impact of President Donald Trump's tariffs. The coast may not be clear until October, and even then, only partially. With 80% of S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab firms now having reported second-quarter updates, the blended annual profit growth estimate, which aggregates what's been published with forecasts for the remaining 20% of the index, is running at 12%, according to LSEG data. That's more than twice the low-balled expectations that were baked in a month ago, when they were still being dragged down by the uncertainties related to April's "Liberation Day" tariffs - postponed of course for 90 days until this week. Curiously, that 12% pace is exactly what was forecast for the second quarter back on January 1, which gives an impression the much-feared tariff impact evaporated in a puff of smoke despite April's turbulence. But it's partly because very little actually happened tariff-wise in the second quarter. And frantic preparations, including import front-loading and inventory stockpiling, likely offset a lot of what has kicked in to date. And, of course, the dominant artificial intelligence theme once again drove the performance of a handful of megacaps to flatter the index's average, with eye-watering 44% and 23% annual growth recorded in the communications services and technology sectors respectively - both above January's forecast. And that's with less than half of the companies in these hot sectors having updated so far, with chip behemoth Nvidia's (NVDA.O), opens new tab earnings not due out until August 27. By contrast, the equivalent blended readout for consumer discretionary stocks was half as strong as the total, and consumer staples earnings are flatlining. And both are still below January's outlook. What's more, energy sector earnings are running at a negative 20% annually and utility and materials sector earnings are also in the red over the past year. As BlackRock's investment strategists pointed out this week, the $27 billion of federal tariff revenues recorded for June mean someone must be paying the levies and taking the hit - either businesses or consumers, or a mix of both. And with an effective 18% overall U.S. tariff kicking in on Thursday, as Yale Budget Lab estimates, that tax revenue tally is only going to go up for the third quarter. What was largely an uncertainty to date is now becoming a reality. But assessing the overall picture requires separating out the impact of the AI theme, which is keeping the surface calm even with tariff-related undertows. Automakers have clearly taken a whack from the trade disruption, for example, but the industrials sector that they're part of is still managing to generate 4% annual profit growth because it is also getting a lift from the AI-driven data centre buildout and the defence sector reboot. What's more, the financials sector - which indirectly benefited from the whole tariff farrago due to the outsize market volatility and related financial trading revenues - is another unexpectedly strong performer with growth of 14%. BlackRock describes the picture as a "tug-of-war" between tariffs and AI. "The latter is winning so far, in our view, but getting granular views is key as companies and consumers each eat tariff costs," it concludes, saying it remains overweight U.S. stocks but continues to tread carefully, watching out for trade landmines. When might those tariff hits show up in earnest? Corporate guidance should clear up some of the horizon, but it too is affected by similar cross-currents. HSBC's U.S. equity team points out that earnings revisions are moving higher for the tech and AI cohort as well as for financials and utilities. But these industries are relatively immune to tariffs, while those more susceptible - like consumer and healthcare groups - have seen their outlooks turn negative. And while margins have held up more generally, HSBC doesn't foresee that continuing in the third quarter. "We expect a more substantial hit in 3Q as inventories are drawn down and mitigation efforts take time," it told clients. The trade disruption likely will take its toll on the market and the wider economy to some degree. Whether you can see it clearly on the whole is a different matter. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. -- Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn. Plus, sign up for my weekday newsletter, Morning Bid U.S.
