logo
In Armenia, rising ceasefire violations bring fears of war with Azerbaijan

In Armenia, rising ceasefire violations bring fears of war with Azerbaijan

Yahoo2 days ago

By Felix Light
KHNATSAKH, Armenia (Reuters) -Nightfall is an anxious time for residents of Khnatsakh.
Every evening at around 10 p.m., automatic gunfire echoes through the tiny village in Armenia, locals say – the sound of Azerbaijani troops firing into the night sky from their positions across the border, high above.
The bullets regularly hit houses, though no-one has been hurt, so far, the villagers say. Azerbaijan denies its troops have been shooting across the border, and has accused Armenian troops of violating the ceasefire.
"It's very tense because at home we have the children, the little ones, and the elderly," said Karo Andranyan, 66, a retired mechanic.
A hundred metres from his front door, on the hillside, an Azerbaijani military position with a flag fluttering in the breeze is a reminder of the proximity of Armenia's bitter rival. The heavily militarized, 1,000-km border has been closed since the early 1990s.
The countries have fought two major wars in the past 40 years, destabilising the Caucasus - a region that carries major oil and gas pipelines toward Europe, and is strategically important to Russia, Iran and Turkey.
Rising tensions along the border are increasing the risk of new clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan as they approach a critical juncture in a tortuous peace process, two experts told Reuters.
In March, the two sides said they had agreed the outline of a peace treaty that could be signed in 2026, raising hopes of reconciliation. The draft envisions the two sides demarcating their shared border, and requires Armenia to amend its constitution before Azerbaijan ratifies the deal.
But since then, reports of ceasefire violations along the border have surged, following months of relative quiet.
Andranyan said he thought the nighttime gunfire was meant to intimidate the villagers and the small garrison of Armenian troops stationed there. The village - which census data said had a population of 1,000 - was emptying as locals feared a return to conflict, he said.
"What are we supposed to do?"
Though there have been no fatalities on the border since last year, incidents of cross-border gunfire are reported regularly. Most of the accusations since March, which describe cross-border gunfire and occasional damage to property, have been made by Azerbaijan against Armenia.
Both sides have repeatedly denied allegations of ceasefire violations.
The simmering conflict has shifted decisively in Azerbaijan's favour since 2020, as the oil and gas producer recaptured territory lost in the 1990s and progressively re-established control over the breakaway Azerbaijani region of Nagorno-Karabakh where ethnic Armenians had established de facto independence since the collapse of the Soviet Union. In 2023, it retook all of Karabakh, prompting the territory's 100,000 ethnic Armenians to flee en masse to Armenia.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told a congressional hearing last month there was a "real risk" of war between the two. He said that the U.S. wanted Azerbaijan "to agree to a peace agreement that does not cause them to invade a neighboring country, Armenia."
Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, in power since 2003, said in January that Armenia presented a "fascist threat" that needed to be destroyed.
Laurence Broers, an expert on Armenia and Azerbaijan at London's Chatham House think tank, said that though a return to full-scale war was possible, more localised skirmishes were more likely.
He said Azerbaijan, whose population of 10 million is three times Armenia's, has few incentives to agree swiftly to a peace treaty and may instead rely on smaller scale escalations to force its neighbour to make further concessions in the talks.
'Escalation and militarization has been a very successful strategy for Ilham Aliyev,' he said.
Armenian authorities have repeatedly insisted there will be no war. In a speech last month, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said that the two countries would not resume fighting, 'despite all the arguments, all the provocations'.
In response to questions about the border tensions, Azerbaijan's Foreign Ministry referred Reuters to its previous public comments.
In a statement in May, it said that Baku is committed to peace and has no territorial claims on Armenia. It said that Yerevan's actions "call into question Armenia's commitment to peace".
Azerbaijan's Defence Ministry has consistently denied Armenian reports of cross-border gunfire.
TENSIONS IN THE SOUTH
Armenia's southernmost province of Syunik is at the heart of the dispute and is where most ceasefire violations are reported.
Syunik separates the main body of Azerbaijan to the east from the Azerbaijani exclave of Nakhchivan to the west. It also provides a vital trade route for Armenia to Iran, which it borders to the south.
Azerbaijan has since 2020 demanded Armenia provide it with a corridor through Syunik to Nakhchivan. Baku has said that the passage would remain Armenian territory but have minimal controls from the capital Yerevan.
Some Azerbaijani officials have also suggested that southern Armenia is historically Azerbaijani territory, though they have not pressed a formal territorial claim.
In addition to its border with Azerbaijan, Armenia's frontier with Turkey – a close ally of Baku's – is also closed, making its boundary with Iran a lifeline for trade. A corridor through Syunik could risk shutting off its access to the remote, mountainous border.
Armenia and Iran have warm ties, despite Armenia's Christian religion, and increasingly pro-Western orientation. In 2022, Iran was Armenia's fourth-largest source of imports. In May, Tehran's defence minister visited Yerevan, with Iranian media quoting him as expressing Iran's opposition to redrawing borders in the region.
The dilemma is heightened by Armenia's strained ties with traditional ally Russia, which opposes Armenia's bid to draw closer to the West, and which has deepened its links with Azerbaijan.
"Armenia has two open borders, one with Georgia, and the other one with Iran. And this keeps the country going,' said Tigran Grigoryan, director of the Regional Centre for Democracy and Security think tank, in Yerevan.
Grigoryan said that Azerbaijan's demands for the corridor could be the spark for future military escalation. He suggested that the ceasefire violations may be an effort to force Armenia into making concessions on the issue.
"If Armenia loses its border with Iran, that would be a catastrophe,' he said.
The Iranian and Russian foreign ministries did not reply to requests for comment.
Throughout Armenia's isolated south, the importance of the Iranian connection is clear.
Along the single route that links the two countries, Iranian road workers are labouring to expand a narrow, zig-zagging mountainside road clogged with lorries from south of the border, heading north towards Georgia and Russia.
Along the way, some locals sell plastic bottles full of red wine to truckers newly arrived from Iran, where alcohol is banned.
At Armenia's southernmost tip sits the historic town of Meghri, the gateway to Iran.
Only 16 km away from Azerbaijan, the town of 4,000 has seen its daily life overshadowed by tensions with Baku, deputy mayor Bagrat Zakaryan said.
'Given the recent events in Karabakh, and what the president of Azerbaijan has been saying, there is this feeling of fear,' he said.
OPPORTUNITY FOR PEACE
Others are more optimistic about the prospect of peace.
Until 1993, Armen Davtyan was the deputy director of Meghri's railway station, which sat at a crossroads connecting Yerevan to Baku, and Iran to the Soviet Union, until the latter's 1991 dissolution.
But after the 1988-1994 Karabakh war and the closure of the frontier, the tracks connecting Armenia to Azerbaijan were ripped up and Davtyan went to work as a border guard.
A rusted train, emblazoned with a Soviet emblem, lingers outside the station building, now a derelict shell metres from the Iranian border.
Davtyan said he fondly remembered the pre-war days, when Armenians and Azerbaijanis worked together on the railways, and hopes that one day cross-border trains might again pull into Meghri station.
"I do understand that some people are scared that if the railway reopens, the Azerbaijanis will return," he said.
"But if in 2025, people are still scared of us opening transport links, I think that's a little absurd."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We knew everything,' Trump tells Reuters about Israel's strikes on Iran
We knew everything,' Trump tells Reuters about Israel's strikes on Iran

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

We knew everything,' Trump tells Reuters about Israel's strikes on Iran

We knew everything,' Trump tells Reuters about Israel's strikes on Iran WASHINGTON, June 13 (Reuters) - After months of urging Israel not to strike Iran while he worked toward a nuclear deal, President Donald Trump told Reuters in a phone interview on Friday that he and his team had known the attacks were coming - and still saw room for an accord. "We knew everything, and I tried to save Iran humiliation and death. I tried to save them very hard because I would have loved to have seen a deal worked out," Trump said. "They can still work out a deal, however, it's not too late," he added. Trump had repeatedly pushed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to delay an Israeli attack to give diplomacy more time, though the president himself had threatened to bomb the Gulf nation if nuclear talks failed. Trump's shifting stance around the Israeli strikes, which he called "excellent" and "very successful" in a series of media interviews on Friday, offered one of the most striking examples yet of how he conducts high-stakes negotiations through both frank public rhetoric and behind-the-scenes maneuvers. The U.S. president offered support for Israel's decision to launch a series of devastating raids in Iran, showing a willingness to embrace the use of military force to set back Tehran's nuclear program. In contrast, some allies stressed the need for restraint. Asked if the U.S. would support Israel against Iranian counterattacks, Trump said he supported Israel. He said he was not concerned about a regional war breaking out as a result of Israel's strikes but did not elaborate. 'We've been very close to Israel. We're their number one ally by far," Trump told Reuters, adding, "We'll see what happens." Later on Friday, two U.S. officials said the U.S. military had helped shoot down Iranian missiles headed toward Israel. Talks in Doubt Still uncertain is whether Trump's attempt to reach an agreement with Iran to halt uranium enrichment is still viable, with a sixth round of talks still scheduled for Sunday in Oman but now in doubt after the attacks. In negotiations with Iran, Trump sought to persuade the Iranians to give up uranium enrichment and was awaiting a counter-proposal from Iran. Tehran had balked at giving up enrichment, seemingly leaving little room for an agreement. "They seek enrichment. We can't have enrichment," Trump told reporters on Monday. As the week wore on, Trump sounded increasingly resigned to the prospect that Israel would strike and hinted that he knew more than he was willing to talk about publicly. "I don't want to say it's imminent, but it looks like something that could very well happen. Look, it's very simple, not complicated. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Other than that, I want them to be successful," he told reporters on Thursday before the raids began. Speaking to Reuters on Friday, Trump said he had given the Iranians 60 days to come to an agreement and that the time had expired with no deal. "We knew just about everything," he said. "We knew enough that we gave Iran 60 days to make a deal and today is 61, right? So, you know, we knew everything.' Trump said it was unclear if Iran still has a nuclear program following Israeli strikes on the country. "Nobody knows. It was a very devastating hit," Trump said. Israel said it had targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders at the start of what it warned would be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon. Trump said the U.S. still has nuclear talks planned with Iran on Sunday but he was unsure they would take place. U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff was scheduled to meet an Iranian delegation in Oman. "They're not dead," Trump said of the U.S.-Iran talks. "We have a meeting with them on Sunday. Now, I'm not sure if that meeting will take place, but we have a meeting with them on Sunday." The president had convened his top national security advisers at Camp David on Sunday night for what he said were discussions that included Iran, and he spoke to Netanyahu on Monday about Iran. A White House official said Trump spoke with Netanyahu again on Friday. Trump also held talks about the attacks with his National Security Council in the White House Situation Room. No details of the discussions were immediately available. (Reporting by Steve Holland; editing by Colleen Jenkins and Howard Goller)

Iran calls US nuclear talks ‘meaningless' after Israel attack
Iran calls US nuclear talks ‘meaningless' after Israel attack

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Iran calls US nuclear talks ‘meaningless' after Israel attack

Iranian officials on Saturday signaled they could walk back their decision to not attend upcoming nuclear talks with the U.S., but said further negotiations were likely 'meaningless' as the nation exchanges fire with Israel. Esmaeil Baghaei, Iran's foreign ministry spokesperson, told reporters it is 'still unclear what decision we will make for Sunday,' according to Reuters. 'The other side [the U.S.] acted in a way that makes dialogue meaningless. You cannot claim to negotiate and at the same time divide work by allowing the Zionist regime (Israel) to target Iran's territory,' Baghaei added, per the news wire. The sixth round of talks between the U.S. and Iran is scheduled to talk place in Oman on Sunday. Following tit-for-tat strikes, including Israel's initial surprise attack on Thursday, Tehran announced it would pull out of the talks. 'Israel's unilateral attack on Iran is illegal, unjustifiable and a grave threat to regional stability,' Oman Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi posted on the social platform X after the attacks. 'I condemn it and urge the global community to come together to reject Israeli aggression and support de-escalation and diplomacy with one voice,' he wrote. Iranian officials cast some blame on the Trump administration for Israel's attack, accusing the U.S. of allowing the strike to happen. Secretary of State Marco Rubio denied involvement in the initial attacks, but the U.S. has stepped up to help Israel intercept missiles from Tehran. President Trump told Reuters Friday that the U.S. 'knew everything' about Israel's 'Operation 'Rising Lion'' — targeting nuclear facilities and ballistic missile sites — before the strikes took place. He also in recent days said he warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that launching an attack would complicate nuclear deal negotiations. 'We knew everything, and I tried to save Iran humiliation and death. I tried to save them very hard because I would have loved to have seen a deal worked out,' Trump told the outlet. 'They can still work out a deal, however, it's not too late,' he added. The U.S. leader has urged Iran to recommit to a deal that would require the nation to dismantle nuclear developments. 'There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end,' Trump wrote early Friday on Truth Social. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire,' he continued. 'No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.' The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has already killed several high-ranking Iranian officials and nine engineers tied to nuclear programs. Iran responded to the initial strikes with a counteroffensive, while promising to enact further plans for retaliation, calling the initial strike a 'declaration of war.' 'With this crime, the Zionist regime has set itself up for a bitter and painful fate, and it will receive it,' Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in remarks released through state media.

Russia and Ukraine exchange prisoners of war, but Moscow received no war dead, Russia says
Russia and Ukraine exchange prisoners of war, but Moscow received no war dead, Russia says

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Russia and Ukraine exchange prisoners of war, but Moscow received no war dead, Russia says

(Reuters) -Russia and Ukraine exchanged prisoners-of-war (POWs) on Saturday, the Russian defence ministry said, and Russia handed over the bodies of 1,200 dead Ukrainian soldiers to Kyiv. The exchanges are part of agreements reached by the warring sides during talks in Istanbul earlier this month. Ukraine earlier on Saturday confirmed it had received the bodies of its soldiers killed in action. However, Russian state media reported, citing sources, that Moscow had not received any of its war dead back from Kyiv, echoing a statement Russia made on Friday, when it said it had returned the bodies of 1,200 slain Ukrainian soldiers and received none of its own. The Russian defence ministry did not say how many POWs were involved in the swap with Ukraine on Saturday, but it posted video showing its soldiers holding Russian flags and cheering before boarding a bus. The Russian soldiers are in Belarus, where they are receiving medical treatment before transfer back to Russia, the defence ministry said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store