Rapper Young Scooter Dies on 39th Birthday in Atlanta: Report
Young Scooter died Friday night (March 28) on the rapper's 39th birthday, according to a report in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and details from Atlanta Police.
Atlanta Police Lt. Andrew Smith led a news conference late Friday night to share details about what reportedly led to the death of Young Scooter (real name: Kenneth Edward Bailey). According to Smith, police responded to a call about a dispute with a weapon at a home and then set up a perimeter outside the house after a man shut the door on officers. Two men fled from the rear of the house, Smith said, with one returning to the home and the other jumping two fences as he was fleeing.
More from Billboard
Gone But Not Forgotten: Musicians We Lost in 2025
Demi Lovato Lip Syncs Along Lady Gaga's 'How Bad Do U Want Me' on TikTok
GIVĒON Talks Five-Year Anniversary of 'Take Time,' Latest Hit 'Twenties' & New Album
According to the AJC story, Young Scooter was the man who jumped the fences, and Smith said, 'When officers located him on the other side of the fence, he appeared to have suffered an injury to his leg.'
Atlanta Police say the man was taken to Grady Marcus Trauma Center and died there.
During the news conference, Smith denied widespread reports spreading on social media that Scooter had been fatally shot by Atlanta PD officers. 'Just to be very clear, the injury that was sustained was not via the officers on scene. It was when the male was fleeing.'
Young Scooter's peers mourned the late rapper on social media, with Playboi Carti sharing the news on Instagram Stories with the caption 'SMFH.' Quavo took to X with broken-heart and prayer-hands emojis, writing, 'ion understand,' alongside a video of Scooter performing. The late rapper's Instagram Stories shared dozens of posts wishing him a happy birthday throughout Friday.
While Scooter was born in South Carolina, his family moved to Atlanta when he was just 9 years old, and his music career has been based in the rap mecca ever since. He broke out locally with the song 'Colombia' in 2012 before joining forces with hip-hop heavyweights Future, Juicy J and Young Thug for 'DI$Function' in 2014. He hit the Billboard charts as a featured artist on Young Thug's 'Guwop,' also featuring Quavo & Offset of Migos, in 2016 (peaking at No. 45 on the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart) and on Future & Juice WRLD's 'Jet Lag' in 2018 (his only Billboard Hot 100 appearance, peaking at No. 72).
Billboard has reached out to the Atlanta Police and a rep for Young Scooter for further information.
Find Quavo's X post about Scooter below:
Best of Billboard
Chart Rewind: In 1989, New Kids on the Block Were 'Hangin' Tough' at No. 1
Janet Jackson's Biggest Billboard Hot 100 Hits
H.E.R. & Chris Brown 'Come Through' to No. 1 on Adult R&B Airplay Chart
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Manhattan borough-president candidates duke it out over public safety, bail reform
The city's only borough-president primary race considered competitive by political observers is heating up over the issue of public safety and the state's controversial bail law changes. State Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal and city Councilman Keith Powers are the leading candidates in the Democratic Manhattan showdown. Powers recently slammed Hoylman-Sigal for his support of the bail law changes in Albany and said that the state legislators have been too slow to make changes. 3 City Councilman Keith Powers is running for Manhattan Borough President. Paul Martinka 'When polling shows that 80% of New Yorkers are concerned about public safety and Brad dismisses those concerns out of hand, it shows he's out of touch with New Yorkers in Manhattan,' Powers said. Powers said his own public safety plan would increase the number of cops in Manhattan precincts, helping to keep dangerous people off the streets, and ease the discovery process, or how prosecutors must share information with defense lawyers. 'It's been crystal-clear in the past few years that we have a mental-health crisis and there have been some elected officials who have been out of touch with New Yorkers and they failed to meet the moment,' Powers told The Post. Hoylman-Sigal shot back at Powers' jabs by saying housing, quality-of-life, public-safety and education issues are his top concerns. 'I don't know what my opponent has done in terms of public safety and specifically passing any legislation' Hoylman-Sigal said. 3 State Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal campaigning for Manhattan BP on May 31, 2025. Kyle Stevens/Shutterstock He pointed to legislation he has backed cracking down on serial shoplifting and increasing the number of hate-crime offenses. Hoylman-Sigal also defended his initial support for the state's bail-reform laws, saying they were based on concern over due process. He said supported subsequent changes to the laws, discovery reform and involuntary-commitment mental-health standards. 'Look, I'm a proud Liberal Democrat, and I will always stand by the Constitution and the right to a free and fair trial and a hearing before a judge,' said Hoylman-Sigal, explaining his initial support for the bail reform laws. 3 Powers slammed Hoylman-Sigal for supporting bail reform laws in Albany. Kyle Stevens/Shutterstock Powers has strong union support in the race, backed by heavyweights such as 32BJ SEIU, the Hotel Trades Council and the United Federation of Teachers. Hoylman-Sigal has the endorsements of three former Manhattan borough presidents and a slew of other pols. The Manhattan beep's race also includes political newbie Dr. Calvin Smith. Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso is meanwhile fending off challenger and previous candidate Khari Edwards, while fellow Bronx beep incumbent Vanessa Gibson is being challenged by city Councilman Rafael Salamanca. Queens Borough President Donovan Richards isn't facing a primary challenge, but three other Republican candidates are competing to challenge him in November. On Staten Island, incumbent Vito Fossella doesn't have a primary challenger but will square off against Democratic challenger Michael Colombo in the general. The primary election is June 24.
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Justice Department's early moves on voting and elections signal a shift from its traditional role
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up David Becker, a former department attorney who worked on voting rights cases and now leads the Center for Election Innovation & Research, said the Justice Department's moves represent a departure from focusing on major violations of federal law. Advertisement 'This would be like the police department prioritizing jaywalking over murder investigations,' he said. A Justice Department spokesperson responded with 'no comment' to an emailed request for more information about the actions, including whether similar ones had been taken in any other states. Conservatives for years have called for an overhaul of the Justice Department in both personnel and priorities. President Trump also has criticized how elections are run, falsely blaming his 2020 loss on widespread fraud. Earlier this year, he signed an executive order seeking a sweeping overhaul of election operations — an authority the Constitution grants to the states and Congress. Advertisement After his win last November, Trump installed key allies at the Justice Department, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, who has made similar claims about the 2020 election. Multiple reviews in the presidential battleground states affirmed Democrat Joe Biden's win in 2020, Trump and his allies lost dozens of lawsuits, and even Trump's attorney general at the time said there was no evidence of widespread fraud. Justin Levitt, a former deputy assistant attorney general in the department's civil rights division, said most of the DOJ's actions appeared reasonable and focused on issues that had already been raised by conservative activists in those states. They also are the type that would be expected from a conservative administration, he said, with the exception of the Colorado request. He called that 'well out of bounds.' 'This administration has prioritized grievance, even perceived grievance when there is no basis in fact,' said Levitt, who also served as a senior policy adviser in the Biden administration. 'And it's dismaying, but not surprising, that the civil rights division would do the same.' The department's request to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, a Democrat, asked for all records relating to last year's presidential election. Federal law requires those to be kept for 22 months. In the request, the department stated it had received a complaint alleging that Griswold's office was not in compliance with federal law relating to voter registration. The request also directs Griswold to preserve any records of the 2020 election that might still be in the state's possession. Advertisement Griswold, in an interview, called the request a 'fishing expedition' and said her office responded by providing state voting files. 'I'm not even sure they know what they are looking for,' Griswold said. 'They can request all the data they want, and it's not going to prove anything.' In North Carolina, where Republican lawmakers recently wrested control of the state election board from the Democratic governor, Justice Department lawyers filed a lawsuit accusing state election officials of failing to ensure that all voter records include identifying information, such as a driver's license. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, who oversees the civil rights division, said in a statement announcing the lawsuit that accurate voter rolls are critical to ensuring elections are conducted 'fairly, accurately, and without fraud.' The previous board had acknowledged the issue and updated the state's voter registration form. The new board leadership has vowed to address it. In Wisconsin, which Trump won in 2016 and 2024 but lost in 2020, department lawyers recently sent a letter to the state election commission accusing it of not providing a complaint process for those raising concerns. This comes as Republican state lawmakers are pushing legislation to expand the ability to appeal decisions made by the six-member commission, which is equally divided between Republicans and Democrats. Republican lawmakers have long complained about commission decisions they perceive as benefiting Democrats. The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a law firm that frequently defends Republicans on election issues, supports both efforts, said Lucas Vebber, the firm's deputy counsel. 'It's ensuring that Wisconsinites are entitled to have their complaints heard and adjudicated,' he said. 'As something as important as our elections, it's vital to ensure that process is transparent and available to everyone.' Advertisement Representative Lee Snodgrass, a Democrat on the Wisconsin Legislature's elections committee, said state law needs some tightening around how election complaints are handled, but she's dubious about the motives of the Trump administration and conservative activists in the state. They are looking for ways 'to cast doubt on election integrity, so if they don't get the results they want, they can cry foul,' Snodgrass said. In Arizona, DOJ lawyers said the state was not clearly telling voter registration applicants to provide a driver's license if they have one and asked the state to conduct a review to identify any noncitizens. Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, a Democrat, responded by saying Arizona requires those registering to vote in state and local elections to provide proof of citizenship and conducts checks using the state's motor vehicle records. In Oregon, Justice Department lawyers weighed in on an ongoing lawsuit filed by the conservative group Judicial Watch. It alleges the state has failed to comply with federal laws on maintaining voter lists and making these records available for public inspection. John Powers, a former Justice Department attorney who now serves as legal director for the Advancement Project, said he was concerned about the moves coupled with the Justice Department's staff departures and its withdrawal from voting rights cases. Powers said he hoped, with midterm elections next year, that the department would not pursue minor technical issues in a way that could undermine public confidence in elections. 'I would be lying if I said I wasn't concerned about what the future might hold,' he said. Advertisement
San Francisco Chronicle
14 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Sen. Padilla's removal from Noem event indicative of Trump's cynical policies
The slam down, handcuffing and forceful removal of Sen. Alex Padilla from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's press conference on Thursday flows from the violence and unrest caused by President Donald Trump's policies to go after the undocumented immigrants where they work, shop and go to school. Immigrants are not criminals but hard-working people (often in jobs others would not consider) who pay taxes and contribute significantly to our economy. They have been allowed to stay in the United States, often for generations, because they are needed Both political parties have failed to pass legislation that would deal with immigration in an efficient and humane way. The most recent attempt, before the presidential election, would have passed but for the opposition of candidate Trump, who cynically sought to exploit the issue. I fear he is now exploiting the unrest he is causing to use it as a means to declare martial law and gain absolute power. Tom Miller, Oakland Deport the worst I am somewhat appalled by the media describing the disruptions in Los Angeles as mostly peaceful demonstrations protected by free speech, accompanied by pictures of burning cars, looting and attacks on police. If these people want to peacefully join our society, why are some of them waving Mexican and, in a few cases, BLM flags? If they intend to intimidate me, they should return to their own country, self-identified by the flag they are waving. Most of our forebears came here legally and peacefully, including, in my case, some from Mexico. I would be happy with a system that screens potential citizens, and excludes those who want to commit crimes or intimidate those around them. I approve of President Donald Trump's stated goal of deporting the worst first. We need to get rid of those who commit crimes. I would be happy to see new citizens, but not the thugs who intimidate us through their demonstrations. Peter Behr, San Anselmo Newsom is right Regarding 'Trump vs. Newsom an ugly skirmish that benefits both politicians' (Politics, June 10): The story suggests that President Donald Trump's search for dictatorial powers through intimidation, fear and escalating violence, and Gov Gavin Newsom calling this out is simply a tit-for-tat play for the attention of an uninformed public. It is becoming more obvious that Trump is trying to tear down the guardrails of civil society, trash the Constitution and eliminate all opposition. If Gov. Newsom did not express his strong, powerful and articulate opposition to this despicable behavior, he would not be doing his job. The Chronicle must not be afraid to illuminate the fact that Trump is a mortal danger to our democratic way of life. Kanda Alahan, Concord
