New funding for after-hours care 'not going to go very far' - GP and urgent care doctor
Photo:
Photo /123RF
General practice doctors are grateful for the government's
new funding for after-hours urgent health care
, but there are major concerns about how it will be staffed.
The GPs say the funding acknowledges urgent care has been under pressure, but the funding is "reasonably light" for what the government is trying to achieve.
The government has committed to greater accessibility to urgent and after-hours healthcare in the regions, with several new 24-hour services planned around the country.
New funding of $164 million has been allocated over the next four years, with 24-hour urgent care clinics "identified" for Counties Manukau, Whangārei, Palmerston North, Tauranga and Dunedin.
The funding boost also covers "new and extended" daytime services for other centres, including Lower Hutt, Invercargill and Timaru.
In a pre-Budget announcement on Sunday, Health Minister Simeon Brown said the funding boost would mean 98 percent of New Zealanders would have access to in-person urgent care within an hour's drive.
"Strengthening urgent and after-hours care is an important part of our government's plan to ensure all New Zealanders have access to timely, quality healthcare," Brown said.
There are currently 48 urgent care clinics across New Zealand, most of which are jointly funded by Health New Zealand and ACC. On top of that are many other after-hours services that provide similar levels of care, but are not considered to be urgent care clinics.
Dr Angus Chambers is the chair of GenPro - an organisation that represents the people who own general practices and urgent care centres. He said it was "definitely positive" to have some investment in the after hour urgent care space.
"It's clearly a critical area for patient care and and it's under quite a lot of stress, so it's definitely good to see some thoughts into trying to support it."
His two main concerns were around the amount of funding and the lack of a trained workforce available to staff the clinics.
"The funding seems reasonably light for what they're trying to achieve."
He said when the allocated funding is divided between the hundreds of services across the country, the "money's not going to go very far".
Chambers also compared it to funding for telehealth services, saying the "complexity of providing an in person after hours service is so much greater".
After-hours involved doctors, nurses, a receptionist and facilities, he said.
"It's just a little bit hard to see how they've come up with a figure."
The other issue he said was going to be "staffing the services" because "the general practice workforce has never been weaker than it is at the moment".
He said some of the money will need to be used to make these roles more attractive and keep people working in New Zealand.
Chambers said there were a lot of GPs working around the country at "far lower than market rates" to keep those services going, "because they're part of a community".
"They see the need for some meaningful work, but we shouldn't have to expect GPs to work with altruism."
Overall, Chambers said the "fix" for decreasing demand on hospitals, emergency departments and the after-hours problem was "high functioning general practice care" so that people can get appointments in a timely manner.
"If we could manage chronic disease so it doesn't deteriorate, that is what will lead to far less demand."
Chambers said involving people who provide these services in decision-making would result in better outcomes.
"I think would get greater efficiency and greater effectiveness by trusting the people who actually deliver this work, rather than bureaucrats who are very well meaning, but have really very little idea how to deliver these kind of health services which are very complex and require a lot of experience to get right."
Dr Luke Bradford is the medical director at the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners. The college looks after the education and standards, advocacy and policy work for the country's general practitioners, and has about 6500 members.
Bradford cautiously welcomed the announcement, saying it acknowledged urgent care had been under pressure and an unsustainable model.
"It's a vital part in the delivery of the healthcare system, so to acknowledge that it needs increased support was really important."
Bradford said the core issues for urgent care come from the financial viability of the model. He wants to make sure the funding supports the model.
Bradford said he understood the actual cost to see a patient was about $170 per person. Chambers added the cost to attend an after-hours clinic can range from $0-$260, which was highest he had heard. It varied based on age, ACC status and whether someone had a Community Services Card.
"Without funding going in, it's user pays," Bradford said, "there's no way the fees being charged were covering that."
Bradford said the other big issue was staff. Clinics are usually staffed - in large part - by GPs working "after hours and on top of their normal work," he said.
Rural "on-call hours" and those in the smaller centres often were not paid so you were getting "tired GPs, GPs being underpaid to do it, and therefore you were struggling to staff them."
He hoped that would level out due to this funding.
As to whether what the government has proposed was possible, Bradford said the "devil's in the detail".
He explained the 24/7 clinics were unlikely to be staffed by doctors overnight because there was not enough doctors.
"I suspect that it'll be a combination of nurses and paramedics with telehealth support."
But he did believe if conditions improved for clinicians working in urgent care, and if the clinics themselves were financially viable, "then a good service can be set up."
The majority of the funding would have to go toward staffing, because "you have to pay a premium to the staff who are going to be working overnight".
Staff safety was also a priority so people were not alone in buildings through the night, he said.
He was also unsure how extra nurses would be attracted to the roles, given the current pay disparity between primary care nurses and their hospital counterparts.
The New Zealand Nurses Organisation was also worried about staffing. Primary Health Care Nurses College chair Tracey Morgan said: "Our biggest concern is where will the staff come from.
"We welcome the focus on primary and community care but it ignores the main issue.
"The pressure on urgent care can't be fixed without solving the chronic under-staffing issues the sector faces."
She said until the government gave primary and community health care nurses pay parity with their Te Whatu Ora counterparts, "the sector will continue to lose nurses and health care workers to better paid jobs in hospitals and to better paid jobs overseas".
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
Senior doctors' union worried national health plan lacks detail
Health Minister Simeon Brown blamed the delay in releasing the plan on the additional audit requirement, which was "imposed by the previous government". Photo: Calvin Samuel / RNZ The lack of detail in the national health plan for how Health NZ will meet its lofty goals, or pay for them, is especially worrying at a time when the public system is under massive pressure, warns the senior doctors' union. Auditor-General John Ryan has found Health NZ's plan - which was released last week, 18 months' overdue - had failed to show how it would deliver public health services , nor how much they would cost. Association of Salaried Medical Specialists principal policy advisor Virginia Mills said the fact there was no roadmap for delivering services, or even an estimate of "unmet need", was a damning indictment on the agency. "Essentially it means he's [the Auditor-General] been unable to vouch for the plan. And that's quite concerning because we've got a health system that's under extreme pressure at the moment, and we're not confident that this plan is going to fix those issues or deliver on better health for New Zealanders," Mills said. Of further concern was the fact that the Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Bill, currently before Parliament, included a clause scrapping the requirement for the health plan to be scrutinised by the Auditor-General at all, she said. "That would be like if you got a school report to say your child was struggling, and instead of helping your child to do better, you called the teacher and said you didn't want the report anymore," Mills said. "It seems like the Government is saying, 'We didn't like this level of independent scrutiny. Let's get rid of that legislation'." Mills said both those things were at odds with the Government's claim that it wanted greater transparency and accountability. Health NZ blamed the delays in getting out the plan on its "immature" reporting systems, but said they were now bedding in. However, Mills said it was also possible that the focus on cost-cutting (from then Commissioner now board chair Dr Lester Levy's "Reset Plan") had made future planning more difficult. In a written response to RNZ, Health Minister Simeon Brown blamed the delay in releasing the plan on the additional audit requirement for the New Zealand Health Plan, which was "imposed by the previous government". "Removing it aligns Health New Zealand's planning processes with other crown agencies and allows the system to be more focused on delivering timely, quality healthcare care for patients," Brown said. "As part of making the system more efficient and focused on patients, we are also removing bureaucratic processes and aligning Health New Zealand's planning documents with other public sector planning documents." Health NZ would continue to have its annual financial statements and statement of performance audited by the Auditor-General, as required of all Crown entities under the Crown Entities Act. His priority was "to ensure everyone can access timely, quality healthcare whenever they need it, regardless of who they are or where they live", Brown said in a statement. "That's why, for the first time, we are putting health targets into law so every part of the system is focused on delivering faster care, shorter wait times, higher immunisation rates, and real results." Those targets would be included in the Government Policy Statement on Health, to which the New Zealand Health Plan would give effect. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Auckland mental health patient worried about future after Segar House closes
Segar House. Photo: Google Maps Street View A patient at an Auckland mental health programme that's closing its doors next month says she's feeling anxious about her uncertain future. Rauaroha Segar House , a publicly funded intensive service for people who have long-standing or chronic problems, ceases on 19 September. Heloise Cantin-Gilmore said her past four months on the programme were life-changing and there were no other realistic treatment options available to her. News of the closure, delivered in mid-July, hit hard. "The effect this is having on me is having a great sense of anxiety, fear, grief, loss - mostly around whether I'm going to be alone again, essentially, dealing with my mental health issues," she said. "There's just a great sense of loss happening at Segar House." There are nine patients and eight staff working at the inner-city service, which involves group and individual therapy for people who haven't worked out in other programmes. Health NZ said patient numbers are too low and clinicians would be better utilised elsewhere. There are no other similar programmes in the North Island and Cantin-Gilmore said patients were told they could return to other community mental health services, or look further afield where there were similar programmes. "They said the other option was that we move to Dunedin, which isn't really a true option for any of us," she said. "All of our livelihoods are here. Most of us have jobs. Our families are here. To offer to move to Dunedin as a substitute for a service we're getting here in Auckland is just kind of ridiculous, frankly." She didn't know where she'd go next. "When they [Health NZ] told us that it was closing, they said that they would be in contact with us to arrange a meeting time with us, individually, to come up with some sort of plan about whether we could continue in the community mental health services or whether we'd go a different route," she said. "None of us have heard from them since." Cantin-Gilmore said there was an enormous sense of sadness. "Not only is there grief for me losing access to the programme, there's grief for potential future patients who could have access the programme, but also the clinicians themselves," Cantin-Gilmore said. "They're losing their jobs. They're losing their community." Her father, Gus Gilmore, said the clinical team was supportive, but the uncertainty was taking a toll on his daughter. "It's been terrible. Heloise was really improving since she started the programme four months ago," he said. "We hadn't seen that type of improvement in her general and mental health. Since [the closure was confirmed] she has gone backwards." Health NZ group director of operations for Auckland Dr Michael Shepherd said individual transition plans for patients were getting worked through. "Patients will be able to access individual therapy, multi-disciplinary team reviews, key worker support and group work," Shepherd said. "There will be a different group of professionals involved in their care and differences in the types of group therapy available. The location for their individual and group therapy will change." Health NZ was working with staff in redeployment options. Labour's mental health spokeswoman Ingrid Leary is critical of government ministers for not intervening to stop the closure. She said it was a political decision as officials looked to save money. "This is specialised treatment and from the people I've spoken to, the families and the patients, they cannot access the level of care they desperately need and they're very worried about that." Minister for mental health Matt Doocey said the closure decision was made by Health NZ. He said he spoke to its chief executive Dale Bramley and had assurance each patient would have a transition plan and their needs would continue to be met. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Warning that Bay of Plenty shellfish may be toxic
Cooking the shellfish does not remove the toxin, says the New Zealand Food Safety. File photo. Photo: 123rf Bay of Plenty shellfish may be poisonous and should not be eaten, according to New Zealand Food Safety (NZFS) The public are advised not to collect or consume shellfish on the east coast from Whakatane to Mount Maunganui due to the presence of toxins. NZFS spokesperson Vincent Arbuckle said routine tests on shellfish showed unsafe levels of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxin, which can affect common shellfish like mussels, oysters, tuatua, pipi, toheroa, cockles and scallops, as well as pūpū (cat's eyes), Cook's turban. "Please do not gather and eat shellfish from this area because anyone doing so could get sick," he said. He warned that cooking the shellfish did not remove the toxin. It is believed the toxin came from an algal bloom which was spreading in the region. "This type of algae produces a dangerous toxin and when shellfish filter-feed, these toxins can accumulate in their gut and flesh. Generally, the more algae there are in the water, the more toxic the shellfish get," said Arbuckle. Symptoms of paralytic shellfish poisoning usually appear within three hours of eating, but could occur as quickly as 10 minutes after consuming the toxin. Signs of poisoning may include numbness and a prickly feeling around the mouth, face, hands, and feet, difficulty swallowing or breathing, dizziness and headache, nausea and vomiting, diarrhoea, or in severe cases paralysis, respiratory failure, or death. Pāua, crab, crayfish may still be eaten if the gut has been completely removed prior to cooking, as toxins accumulate in the gut. If the gut is not removed, its contents could contaminate the meat during the cooking process. Finfish are not affected by this public health warning, but we advise gutting the fish and discarding the liver before cooking. NZFS said it had not received any notifications of associated illness. "NZFS is monitoring shellfish in the region and will notify the public of any changes to the situation," said Arbuckle. Anyone who became ill after eating shellfish from the coast should seek medical attention immediately and keep any leftover shellfish in case it can be tested. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
