logo
John Mearsheimer, the not-so-realistic ‘realist,' embarrasses himself again on Russia

John Mearsheimer, the not-so-realistic ‘realist,' embarrasses himself again on Russia

The Hill15-05-2025

The editors of Switzerland's leading newspaper, the Neue Zürcher Zeitung, knew they had a terrific headline when political scientist John Mearsheimer said, 'I would have done the same as Putin. I would have attacked Ukraine even earlier.'
As the paper no doubt realized, the controversy-loving University of Chicago professor had made an outrageous statement even by his own standards. It's one thing to accuse the West of provoking Russia's illegitimate president to invade Ukraine in defense of Russia's strategic interests. It's a whole different ball game actually to endorse Putin's invasion by associating oneself with it so clearly and openly.
In effect, Mearsheimer has justified and legitimized Putin's war and genocide, thereby making himself complicit in the Russian dictator's crimes. This is where Mearsheimer's brand of so-called geopolitical 'realism' ultimately leads: not just indifference to morality, but the wholesale rejection of morality and its replacement with immorality.
It is important to note that this statement is Mearsheimer's personal endorsement not only of Putin's war but also of his genocide of Ukrainians. Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine began a systematic effort to kill Ukrainian civilians and destroy their language, culture, history and identity. That is genocide, by any definition.
Mearsheimer believes Putin bears no animus toward Ukrainians — that he is acting in a purely rational manner focused only on Russia's strategic interests. That's nonsense. As scores of books, articles and journalistic accounts have made clear — including shockingly forthright statements by Putin, former Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev and many other members of Russia's elite — Putin and his set detest Ukrainians for having the gall to believe they aren't Russians. Russia's powers that be are determined to exterminate the Ukrainian nation, state and culture.
'It's quite clear that Putin is a first-class strategist and behaves rationally,' Mearsheimer has said in German (my translation). 'This doesn't mean that one has to agree with his behavior or must consider it good. Since April 2008, when NATO declared Ukraine would become a member, Putin has made one thing very clear: that he and his Russian elites regarded NATO membership for Ukraine as an existential threat for Russia. Since then he has acted according to this conviction. That includes the decision in February 2022 to invade Ukraine. From the viewpoint of Russia's interests he therefore behaved smartly.'
But two points require a closer look: first, that Putin promoted Russia's interests by invading, and second, that Ukraine was on the path to becoming a NATO member.
It is at least unclear how one can characterize as a brilliant strategic move a three-year war that has cost Russia close to a million dead and wounded and thousands of tanks and personnel carriers destroyed; revealed its armed forces as incompetent and third-rate; induced Sweden and Finland to join NATO; ruined Russia's economy; and transformed Russia into a rogue state dependent on North Korea and China. If this is smart behavior by a rational Putin, then heaven help us if he ever rejects Mearsheimer's advice and begins to act irrationally.
Equally absurd is the notion, now a tenet within MAGA world, that Ukraine was marching toward NATO membership before the invasion. The exact opposite was the case. NATO and its member states had expressly rejected membership for Ukraine. Indeed, the West suffered from a recurring bout of 'Ukraine fatigue.'
The fact that NATO and its members still oppose Ukrainian membership exposes the hollowness of Mearsheimer's claims. After all, if membership and the attendant threat to Russia were truly strategic priorities for NATO, why extend membership only to Sweden and Finland, and not to Ukraine?
Things look even more fantastic when one considers the condition of the armed forces of NATO countries. It's no secret that it was and still is abysmal. Putin and his spies must have known that NATO posed no threat to Russia. A truly rational Putin would have known that NATO was a paper tiger and that Ukraine's chances of joining were worse than nil.
Naturally, it's possible that Putin was trapped in his own ideological predispositions and couldn't think straight. But that's just another way of saying that he wasn't rational or that his notion of rationality consisted of Russia's self-destruction.
What else is there to say as one observes a leading scholar commit intellectual and moral suicide? Perhaps that Mearsheimer owes Ukrainians — and Russians — an apology for associating himself with Putin's irrationality, war and genocide.
As for the rest of us, his silence would be enough.
Alexander J. Motyl is a professor of political science at Rutgers University-Newark. A specialist on Ukraine, Russia and the USSR, and on nationalism, revolutions, empires and theory, he is the author of 10 books of nonfiction, as well as 'Imperial Ends: The Decay, Collapse, and Revival of Empires' and 'Why Empires Reemerge: Imperial Collapse and Imperial Revival in Comparative Perspective.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gabbard Warns Global Nuclear Annihilation Is Closer Than Ever
Gabbard Warns Global Nuclear Annihilation Is Closer Than Ever

Bloomberg

time14 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Gabbard Warns Global Nuclear Annihilation Is Closer Than Ever

Tulsi Gabbard, the US director of national intelligence, released a video Tuesday warning that the world is closer to nuclear war than ever and accusing unnamed political elites of trying to foment conflict between world powers. Gabbard didn't cite any countries by name but her remarks echoed longtime claims by Russian officials and, more recently, by far-right commentators in the US who have warned that a Ukrainian drone attack on Russia's strategic bomber fleet earlier this month made nuclear war more likely.

Telegram Messenger's Ties to Russia's FSB Revealed in New Report
Telegram Messenger's Ties to Russia's FSB Revealed in New Report

Miami Herald

time37 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Telegram Messenger's Ties to Russia's FSB Revealed in New Report

The Telegram messaging app may have ties to Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB), according to an investigation. Independent Russian investigative outlet IStories said it has uncovered evidence suggesting that the platform's server infrastructure is maintained by companies who have collaborated with Russian intelligence services, raising significant concerns about potential government surveillance. Responding to a request for comment, Telegram's head of Press and Media Relations Remi Vaughn said in a statement to Newsweek: "As a global company, Telegram has contracts with dozens of different service providers around the world. However, none of these service providers have access to Telegram data or sensitive infrastructure. "All Telegram servers belong to Telegram and are maintained by Telegram employees. Unauthorized access is impossible. Throughout its entire history, Telegram never disclosed any private messages to a third party - and its encryption has never been breached." In another auto-message sent after reaching out for comment, Telegram said: "Telegram is committed to protecting user privacy and human rights such as freedom of speech and assembly. It has played a prominent role in pro-democracy movements around the world, including in Iran, Russia, Belarus, Myanmar and Hong Kong. "Pavel Durov is the founder, owner and CEO of Telegram. He left Russia in 2014, after losing control of his previous company for refusing to hand over the data of Ukrainian protesters to security agencies. Pavel Durov lives in Dubai and holds a dual citizenship of the United Arab Emirates and France." Telegram has long held a reputation as a secure messaging app, and it is used globally by journalists, activists, and ordinary users seeking privacy. Its founder, Russian-born Pavel Durov, who was detained by French authorities in August 2024, has cultivated an image that the platform protects digital privacy. The IStories report challenges that image by linking the platform to Russia's FSB, which jails individuals critical of the Kremlin and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Telegram's infrastructure is managed by Global Network Management (GNM), a small firm registered in Antigua and Barbuda, which provides the platform with over 10,000 IP addresses, according to IStories. GNM's owner, Russian national Vladimir Vedeneyev, previously testified in a U.S. court that he has employees based in Russia. IStories also found that Vedeneyev serves as Telegram's chief financial officer. Many of these IP addresses were previously owned by Globalnet, a St. Petersburg-based telecommunications operator. IStories reported that Globalnet has connections to the Kremlin and Russian intelligence services, including the FSB. Electrontelecom, a St. Petersburg-based company, also reportedly provided Telegram with another 5,000 IP addresses, according to IStories, which identified the firm as an FSB contractor. Electrontelecom has provided services for the installation and maintenance of "a complex system for transmitting classified information from fixed facilities operated by the FSB's Directorate for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region, which is used to carry out operational investigative activities," it said. The investigation comes days after Russian human rights NGO First Department warned that the FSB had gained access to Russians' communication with Ukrainian Telegram channels, which provide vital updates and reporting on Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. "We know that by the time the defendants in cases of 'state treason' are detained, the FSB is already in possession of their correspondence. And the fact that neither defendants nor a lawyer are named in the main case allows the FSB to hide how exactly it goes about gaining access to that correspondence," First Department said. First Department head Dmitry Zair-Bek said that material from Telegram had already been used as evidence in "a significant number of cases." "On most cases, they have been accessed due to compromised devices. ... However, there are also cases in which no credible technical explanations consistent with known access methods can be identified," he said, Novaya Gazeta reported. "This could indicate either the use of undisclosed cyber espionage tools or Telegram's cooperation with the Russian authorities, obvious signs of which we see in a number of other areas," Zair-Bek added. Cybersecurity expert Michał Woźniak told IStories that beyond storing decrypted messages, Telegram also attaches a unique device identifier to each message sent on the platform, known as auth_key_id, which can determine where a user is located and reveal their IP addresses. "If someone has access to Telegram traffic and cooperates with Russian intelligence services, this means that the device identifier becomes a really big problem-a tool for global surveillance of messenger users, regardless of where they are and what server they connect to," Woźniak said. Telegram has not commented publicly on the investigation or the allegations. The company is being paid $300 million to roll out Elon Musk's Grok chatbot on the messaging app. "This summer, Telegram users will gain access to the best AI technology on the market. @elonmusk and I have agreed to a 1-year partnership to bring xAI's @grok to our billion+ users and integrate it across all Telegram apps," Durov announced on May 28. Related Articles Russia Expands Military Cooperation with North KoreaIsrael Denies Envoy's Claim of Patriot Defenses Given to UkraineNATO Ally Scraps Purchase of US Black Hawk Helicopters'Trump Is Losing,' Putin's Top Propagandist Says 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Putin ramps up drone-making to unleash attacks on Ukrainian cities
Putin ramps up drone-making to unleash attacks on Ukrainian cities

Miami Herald

time37 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Putin ramps up drone-making to unleash attacks on Ukrainian cities

Russia is stepping up drone production to increase massive daily attacks on Ukrainian cities as Moscow pressures Kyiv to concede to peace terms. The Kremlin unleashed deadly destruction in the capital Kyiv and the Black Sea city of Odesa overnight, firing 315 drones and seven missiles, according to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. That followed a barrage of a record 479 drones the previous night, which itself surpassed the high set on June 1. Moscow has escalated drone attacks this year with the scale of the strikes surging from a daily record of 267 UAVs in February. After initially losing ground to Ukraine in the development of drones, Russia has steadily ramped up mass production of Iranian-designed Shahed UAVs and other types of unmanned aircraft, giving the Kremlin a ready weapon to step up pressure on Kyiv to accept its war demands. In April, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered defense producers to accelerate drone output from the 1.5 million units produced last year. 'These weapons are still in short supply,' he said at the time. In January, he called for Russia to 'emerge as one of the global technological leaders' in drone production by 2030, in light of what he said was 'the huge importance of this industry' for the country. Moscow's aim is to use a 'punishment strategy' with inexpensive Shahed drones to force Kyiv into submission, the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies said in a recent report. Although Ukraine manages to jam or shoot down most of them, the weapons 'saturate Ukrainian air defenses and erode civilian morale through persistent nightly attacks,' it said. Ukraine estimates Russia is preparing to produce between 300 to 350 long-range drones a day and wants to raise output to 500 a day, Zelenskyy said on May 27. Russian drone manufacturers succeeded in boosting production of long-range craft to more than 30,000 this year from 15,000 in 2024, while also producing as many as 2 million small tactical drones used against tanks and artillery, Politico reported June 5, citing Oleh Aleksandrov, a spokesperson for the Ukrainian Foreign Intelligence Service. Ukraine's defense intelligence directorate estimates that half of the long-range drones produced each month are decoys, according to Forbes Ukraine. Kyiv has also accused Russia of using electronics largely sourced from China in violation of sanctions. Beijing has previously said it's not providing weapons to either side in the war. 'Drones turned out to be a low-cost alternative to precision weaponry,' said Denis Fedutinov, a Moscow-based expert on UAVs. 'This realization didn't come immediately. However, once it became clear that drones deliver tangible results, it provided the impetus to accelerate the integration of unmanned systems of various classes into military operations.' Growth across all categories of Russia's drone output has been exponential, compared to the figures before 2022, Fedutinov said. 'In some areas, such as loitering munitions and FPV drones, we're talking about increases by several orders of magnitude,' he said, referencing first-person view drones controlled by an operator via video feed. At talks in Istanbul last week, Russia laid out terms for a ceasefire that amounted to capitulation, including Kyiv handing over control of territory it still holds in four occupied regions and agreeing to neutrality and limits on its military capability and foreign weapon supplies. The European Union on Tuesday proposed export bans aimed at depriving Russia of critical technologies and industrial goods, including restricting dual-use items used in producing drones, missiles and other weapons. 'We want to make sure that Russia does not find ways to modernize its weapons with European technologies,' European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in Brussels. The E.U. also proposed banning the Nord Stream pipelines and cutting the Group of Seven oil price cap to $45 as part of the new sanctions package. In addition to the Shahed drones, which Russia started to import from Iran in 2022 before starting its own production, Russia has developed a new drone using Chinese technology that can select targets using AI. Ukrainian military intelligence on June 9 published details of the design of the new Russian V2U strike drone, which it said is used by Moscow's forces in Ukraine's northeast Sumy region. Ukraine has led the way in using drones on the battlefield. It launched UAVs from within Russia to strike a series of strategic air bases on June 1, destroying bombers, in one of the most audacious aerial attacks of the war. It's also deployed drones to devastating effect on the frontlines to prevent major Russian advances and to hit vital infrastructure deep inside Russian territory - including transportation networks and oil refineries. 'Russia has caught up and is maximizing production and use of drones, but they're doing this in a conventional way,' said Ruslan Pukhov, head of the Moscow-based Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies, a defense think tank. 'The Ukrainians are managing not to lag behind in the drone war by responding asymmetrically.' With assistance from Daryna Krasnolutska. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store