
Navigating Uncertainties: Transforming Tensions Into Policy Priorities
15 May 2025,
The global economy in 2025 is navigating a complex and volatile environment. Escalating trade tensions, rising protectionism and shifting supply chains are reshaping the growth landscape, particularly in the APEC region, and urging policymakers to adapt swiftly.
Growth Outlook Weakens amid Uncertainty
APEC economies are seeing a sharper downgrade in growth than the rest of the world. Regional GDP growth is projected to slow significantly to 2.6–2.7 percent in 2025–2026, down from 3.6 percent in 2024. These projections are notably lower than the 3.1–3.3 percent forecasts in the March 2025 APEC Regional Trends Analysis (ARTA), highlighting how rising trade tensions and heightened uncertainty are undermining the recovery.
Monetary policy rates hold steady as economies closely monitor inflation and exchange rate pressures amid global headwinds. Oil prices are falling on oversupply and subdued demand, while food prices remain stable, supported by balanced production and steady consumption.
Although a global recession remains unlikely, persistent economic uncertainty is weighing heavily on trade flows, investments and long-term decision-making. Businesses have put on hold investment decisions, including the launch of new products and strategies, affecting not only trade in goods, but also in services.
Trade Contraction Clouds Regional Prospects
The global trade environment is expected to deteriorate in 2025. Merchandise trade volume growth is now projected to turn negative, from an expected 3.0 percent expansion to a contraction of -0.2 percent.[1] Growth in commercial services exports has also been revised downward, from 5.1 percent to 4.0 percent.
Within APEC, the volume of goods and services exports is expected to grow by just 1.1 percent in 2025 on average, a sharp reduction from 6.1 percent in 2024.
While many APEC economies continue to pursue trade-facilitating policies—aimed at streamlining cross-border flows and supporting domestic sectors—these efforts are increasingly offset by a surge in restrictive and discriminatory measures. According to the Global Trade Alert database, the use of subsidies rose to 14,498 cases in 2024 from 12,733 in 2022, alongside other non-tariff measures.
At the same time, trade remedies such as anti-dumping measures and countervailing duties are becoming more common, reflecting growing concerns among APEC economies about unfair trade conditions.
The shift toward a more nuanced trade policy could yield mixed outcomes. Indeed, the export outlook across APEC economies is increasingly uneven, shaped by shifting global dynamics and robust demand in certain sectors, while widespread trade uncertainties cast a long shadow over broader prospects.
Trade Policy Uncertainty Reaches Historic Highs
Indices measuring economic uncertainty have surged to unprecedented levels; in particular, the index on trade policy uncertainty went up to 900 points in 2025—a tenfold increase compared to the 2015–2024 average of 85 points.
This surge reflects escalating tariffs (and retaliatory measures), rising geopolitical tensions, and policy fragmentation, which have clouded the global trade and investment environment. Small and trade-dependent economies are especially vulnerable, facing limited resilience to external shocks. Meanwhile, the growing prioritization of domestic concerns over international cooperation threatens to heighten volatility in global markets and dampen growth.
Historical data underscores the risks: a substantial rise in tariffs correlates with significant long-term economic losses. An empirical research shows that a 10-percentage-point increase in tariffs can lower GDP by around 1.1 percent after five years, highlighting the damaging impact of protectionism on economic performance over time.[2]
Financial Market Volatility Signals Rising Risks
Financial markets are also exhibiting warning signs. The global volatility index spiked to 52 points in April 2025, more than triple the 2023–2024 average of just 16 points.
This reflects heightened concerns over trade tensions, inflation risks, and broader geopolitical instability. Investor sentiment has become more fragile, driving up demand for safe-haven assets like gold, which has soared to record levels of around USD 3,200 per troy ounce so far in early May 2025, from an average of USD 1,400 per troy ounce during the period 2010-2020. Without clearer policy signals, financial markets are likely to remain hypersensitive to shocks, further complicating investment decisions and amplifying economic risks.
Debt and Demographic Add to Long-Term Pressures
Soaring general government gross debt continues to limit fiscal space, from a pre-pandemic average of 89 percent of GDP, increasing to 103 percent of GDP during the pandemic, and expected to reach 110 percent of GDP in 2024-2030. The projected rise in public debt, surpassing the pandemic peak, underscores the need for structural reforms to balance long-term growth with rising fiscal pressures.
Adding to the ongoing challenges are demographic shifts. The APEC population is projected to decline from 3 billion today to 2.2 billion by 2100, with an ageing population and a shrinking youth base that could strain social systems, reduce workforce, and challenge growth objectives. Governments will face greater pressure to raise public expenditure in health, pension and other social support measures as the population ages, while ensuring that fiscal debt remains manageable.
Policy Imperatives for an Adaptive and Resilient Future
In light of these challenging conditions, a shift in policy strategy is urgently required. Policymakers must not only manage short-term risks but also invest in long-term structural resilience to sustain growth in an increasingly uncertain and fragmented world.
Promote trade stability: De-escalate trade tensions and reduce policy uncertainty to restore confidence in trade and investment.
Pursue trade diversification: Expand trade partnerships, target new geographic markets, and broaden the range of export and import products to reduce vulnerability and create new opportunities for growth.
Agile monetary and fiscal policies
Responsive monetary policy action: Adjust monetary policy swiftly to manage inflation while maintaining support for stable economic growth.
Strategic fiscal investments: Focus fiscal policy on strategic sectors, striking a balance between long-term growth and prudent spending.
Resilience-enhancing structural reforms
Strengthen labor markets: Promote skills development, workforce participation, and adaptability to support economic transitions.
Boost competitiveness: Implement reforms and promote innovation to help businesses thrive amid global disruptions.
Harness digital innovation: Invest in digital infrastructure to improve efficiency and productivity.
Revitalize multilateral cooperation
Tackle shared challenges: Strengthen multilateral efforts to tackle shared economic challenges, including fostering continuous policy dialogue toward collective action and global stability.
Coordinate crisis responses: Enhance global cooperation to improve resilience and responsiveness to future economic shocks.
The global economy stands at a critical juncture. Protectionist trade measures are aggravating geopolitical tensions and contributing to heightened volatility—developments that could redefine the future of trade and impact on global stability. This growing uncertainty is also dampening economic growth prospects well into the medium term. Nonetheless, with strategic and forward-looking policies—focusing on agility, resilience, and cooperation—APEC economies can navigate current challenges and emerge stronger and more competitive in a rapidly changing world.
Rhea Crisologo Hernando is analyst, Glacer Niño A. Vasquez is researcher, and Carlos Kuriyama is director at the APEC Policy Support Unit.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AP Top Extended Financial Headlines at 12:44 a.m. EDT
Leaders of some of the world's biggest economic powers arrive in the Canadian Rockies for a Group of Seven summit that's been shadowed by an escalating conflict between Israel and Iran and U.S. President Donald Trump's unresolved trade war Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Your boss is probably using AI more than you
Leaders use AI around twice as much as individual contributors, a new Gallup Poll finds. Gallup data indicates AI adoption has risen, especially in white-collar roles, with tech leading at 50%. 16% of employees surveyed who use AI "strongly agree" that AI tools provided by their company are useful. There's a good chance your boss is using AI more than you. Leaders are adopting AI at nearly double the rate of individual contributors, a new Gallup poll released Monday indicates. The survey found that 33% of leaders, or those who identified as "managers of managers," use AI frequently, meaning a few times a week or more, compared to 16% of individual contributors. Gallup's chief scientist for workplace management and wellbeing, Jim Harter, told Business Insider that leaders are likely feeling added pressure to think about AI and how it can increase efficiency and effectiveness. "There's probably more leaders experimenting with it because they see the urgency and they see it as a competitive threat potentially," Harter said. The data point was one of several findings from Gallup's survey on AI adoption in the workplace, including: The number of US employees who use AI at work at least a few times a year has increased from 21% to 40% in the past two years Frequent AI use increased from 11% to 19% since 2023 Daily use of AI doubled in the past year from 4% to 8% 15% of employees surveyed said it was "very or somewhat likely that automation, robots, or AI" would eliminate their jobs in a five-year period 44% of employees said their company has started to integrate AI, but only 22% say their company shared a plan or strategy 30% of employees said their company has "general guidelines or formal policies" in place for using AI at work 16% of the employees who use AI "strongly agree" that AI tools provided by their company are helpful for their job While AI adoption has increased overall in the last two years, that increase isn't evenly distributed across industries. The Gallup report said that AI adoption "increased primarily for white-collar roles," with 27% surveyed now saying they use AI frequently on the job, a 12% increase from last year. Among white-collar workers, frequent AI is most common in the tech industry, at 50%, according to the survey, followed by professional services at 34%, and finance at 32%. Meanwhile, frequent AI use among production and front-line workers has dropped from 11% in 2023 to 9% this year, according to Gallup's polling. Concerns that AI will eliminate jobs have also not increased overall in the last two years, but the report indicated that employees in industries like technology, retail, and finance are more likely than others to believe AI will one day take their jobs. The most common challenge with AI adoption, according to those surveyed, is "unclear use case or value proposition," suggesting that companies may not providing clear guidance. The report said that when employees say they "strongly agree" that leadership has shared a clear plan for using AI, they're three times as likely to feel "very prepared to work with AI" and 2.6 times as likely to feel comfortable using it at work. "In some cases, you've got to have the training to be able to use AI as a complement with other text analytic tools that are more precise," Gallup's Harter told BI. Harter said that while organizations are increasingly developing plans around AI usage, "there's still a long way to go," and it may not be a one-and-done approach. "They're going to have to continue to be trained in how to use it because it's going to evolve itself," Harter said. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chinese scientists claim AI is capable of spontaneous human-like understanding
Chinese researchers claim to have found evidence that large language models (LLMs) can comprehend and process natural objects like human beings. This, they suggest, is done spontaneously even without being explicitly trained to do so. According to the researchers from the Chinese Academy of Sciences and South China University of Technology in Guangzhou, some AIs (like ChatGPT or Gemini) can mirror a key part of human cognition, which is sorting information. Their study, published in Nature Machine Intelligence, investigated whether LLM models can develop cognitive processes similar to those of human object representation. Or, in other words, to find out if LLMs can recognize and categorize things based on function, emotion, environment, etc. To discover if this is the case, the researchers gave AIs 'odd-one-out' tasks using either text (for ChatGPT-3.5) or images (for Gemini Pro Vision). To this end, they collected 4.7 million responses across 1,854 natural objects (like dogs, chairs, apples, and cars). They found that of the models created, sixty-six conceptual dimensions were created to organize objects, just the way humans would. These dimensions extended beyond basic categories (such as 'food') to encompass complex attributes, including texture, emotional relevance, and suitability for children. The scientists also found that multimodal models (combining text and image) aligned even more closely with human thinking, as AIs process both visual and semantic features simultaneously. Furthermore, the team discovered that brain scan data (neuroimaging) revealed an overlap between how AI and the human brain respond to objects. The findings are interesting and provide, it appears, evidence that AI systems might be capable of genuinely 'understanding' in a human-like way, rather than just mimicking responses. It also suggests that future AIs could have more intuitive, human-compatible reasoning, which is essential for robotics, education, and human-AI collaboration. However, it is also important to note that LLMs don't understand objects the way humans do emotionally or experientially. AIs work by recognizing patterns in language or images that often correspond closely to human concepts. While that may appear to be 'understanding' on the surface, it's not based on lived experience or grounded sensory-motor interaction. Also, some parts of AI representations may correlate with brain activity, but this doesn't mean they can 'think' like humans or share the same architecture. If anything, they can be thought of as more of a sophisticated facsimile of human pattern recognition rather than a thinking machine. LLMs are more like a mirror made from millions of books and pictures, reflecting those models at the user based on learned patterns. The study's findings suggest that LLMs and humans might be converging on similar functional patterns, such as organizing the world into categories. This challenges the view that AIs can only 'appear' smart by repeating patterns in data. But, if, as the study argues, LLMS are starting to build conceptual models of the world independently, it would mean that we could be edging closer to artificial general intelligence (AGI)—a system that can think and reason across many tasks like a human. You can access the study in the journal Nature Machine Intelligence.