EUAN McCOLM: Ignore the urge to stick two fingers up to Trump, deploy some 'necessary hypocrisy' and welcome him to Scotland, Mr Swinney - it's your duty
Days after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer met Mr Trump at the Whitehouse, Mr Swinney said the invitation should be revoked. The US President was not, said the SNP leader, a 'steadfast ally'.
The nationalists' leader at Westminster, Stephen Flynn MP, was even more direct, saying it was time for Mr Starmer to 'get back up of his knees' and withdraw the offer of bells-and-whistles visit.
Both Mr Swinney and Mr Flynn lashed out after a meeting between Mr Trump and Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky during which the US president harangued his counterpart.
There is no question in my mind that Mr Trump and his Vice President JD Vance behaved disgracefully during that Oval Office summit. Their attempts to humiliate Mr Zelensky made them look the small men they are.
And so the instinct to stick two fingers up to the American President is, I think, perfectly understandable.
But what good would withdrawal of that invitation have done? How would that have advanced the cause of the Ukrainian people or benefitted the UK? (Those calling for the cancellation of a state visit might, had their demands been met, have enjoyed a dopamine-rush of self-righteousness, I suppose.)
It now emerges that, in advance of the state visit in September, Mr Trump will be in the UK later this month. The President will meet both Sir Keir and Mr Swinney during a trip to his Aberdeenshire golf resort.
While the First Minister greets Mr Trump, other Scottish MSPs will be protesting his presence in the country.
During the launch, last week, of his bid to become one the Scottish Green Party's two co-leaders, Ross Greer said he doubted that Mr Swinney would agree to meet either Russian President Vladimir Putin or Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu.
'What,' asked Mr Greer, 'is the distinction between them other than economic power and how do we think history will judge those who tried to treat him like just another world leader?'
Leaving aside the far-left's obsession with the judgement of history, why shouldn't Mr Trump be treated, while in the UK, like any other world leader?
It is - or certainly should be - possible for a politician to deprecate the actions of the petty and vindictive president while maintaining a clear-eyed view of the bigger picture. And that bigger picture is one in which - although the present occupant of the White House may not be to one's taste - the USA remains a key democratic ally to the UK.
Some years ago, I attended an event in Edinburgh at which former US President Barack Obama delivered a speech in which he spoke of the complexity of political relationships and decision making. Sometimes, he said, leadership involved a degree of 'necessary hypocrisy'.
To the rigid ideologue, such a concept is difficult to grasp. Armed with the certainty that he - and only those who agree with him - are in the right, he attacks those who do not share his worldview.
From the moral high-ground, the view is not at all clear. Rather, it is clouded by the prejudices or, if one is feeling charitable, convictions of the person standing there.
When John Swinney and Stephen Flynn spoke out against a state visit for President Trump, they gave voice to the instincts of many. The disgusting treatment of President Zelensky during his White House visit remains a stain on the USA's reputation.
But politicians are not elected to give voice to our personal - or, indeed their own - prejudices but to advance the interests of the country.
And, I do not see how it would benefit the UK - including Scotland - for either Sir Keir Starmer or Mr Swinney to pick an unnecessary fight with Mr Trump.
The SNP has form when it comes to the childishly inept handling of international relations.
Last August, Mr Swinney was invited to meet Israel's deputy ambassador to the UK, Daniela Grudsky. Unable to attend, the First Minister sent external affairs secretary Angus Robertson in his stead.
Mr Robertson - as he should have - greeted Ms Grudsky warmly and happily posed for photographs with her.
Then came the backlash from within the SNP.
There were calls from nationalists for Mr Robertson to be suspended from the party.
SNP backbencher Christine Grahame, said her constituents were shocked the meeting had happened, and described Robertson as 'a liability' while minister Ivan McKee told the BBC that his colleagues should reflect on what he had said during the meeting.
As the backlash grew, Mr Robertson humiliated himself.
With the benefit of hindsight, he said, the meeting - which included discussions about rising antisemitism, renewable energy cooperation, and culture - should have gone played out differently.
'No one,' said Mr Robertson, 'intended that this meeting be presented as legitimatising the actions of the Israeli government in Gaza. The Scottish government has been consistent in our unequivocal condemnation of the atrocities we have witnessed in Gaza.'
The external affairs secretary went on to say that it 'would have been better' to ensure the meeting had been strictly limited to the need for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza.
'I apologise,' he said, 'for the fact this did not happen.'
Mr Robertson is a rarity among senior SNP politicians in that he has some grasp of the complexity of international relations. He is, by nature, a pragmatist; he went to that meeting with Ms Grudsky, enthusiastically, because he understood it was the right thing to do.
Mr Robertson's apology was an embarrassment to him and Scotland.
It should hardly need stating that taking meetings with foreign presidents or ambassadors does not mean support for the positions they hold. Rather, it displays the necessary willingness to engage with the world as it is rather than as one might hope it to be.
When Donald Trump visits the UK later this month, John Swinney should smile, shake his hand, and make the case for US investment in our country. That is his duty.
It is not in the best of interests of either the UK - including Scotland - or Ukraine for posturing politicians at Holyrood to make the presidential visit about their personal feelings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
36 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Columbia adopts controversial definition of antisemitism amid federal grants freeze
Columbia University has agreed to adopt a controversial definition of antisemitism as it pursues an agreement with the Trump aimed at restoring $400m in federal government grants frozen over its alleged failure to protect Jewish students. In a letter to students and staff, the university's acting president, Claire Shipman, said it would incorporate the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism into its anti-discrimination policies as part of a broad overhaul. It is the latest in a string of concessions Columbia has made following criticisms – mainly from pro-Israel groups and Republican members of Congress – that university authorities had tolerated the expression of antisemitic attitudes in pro-Palestinian campus protests following the outbreak of war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza in 2023. 'Columbia is committed to taking all possible steps to combat antisemitism and the University remains dedicated to ensuring that complaints of discrimination and harassment of all types, including complaints based on Jewish and Israeli identity, are treated in the same manner,' wrote Shipman. 'Formally adding the consideration of the IHRA definition into our existing anti-discrimination policies strengthens our approach to combating antisemitism.' The definition, which describes antisemitism as 'a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews', has been adopted by the US state department and several European government and EU groups. However, critics have say it is designed to shield Israel by punishing legitimate criticism of the country. They also complain that it conflates antisemitism with anti-Zionism. Among the examples of criticisms accompanying the definition are 'claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor', 'applying double standards by requiring of [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nations' and 'accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel … than to the interests of their own nations'. Donald Trump gave the IHRA definition a significant boost during his presidency by issuing an executive order in 2018 requiring all federal government agencies to take account of it when handling civil rights complaints. In adopting it now, Columbia is following Harvard, which agreed to embrace the definition last January as part of a court settlement reached with Jewish students, who had accused the university of failing to protect them under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The act prohibits discrimination on the grounds of race, religion or ethnic origin in programs or institutions receiving federal funding. While Harvard remains in dispute with the White House after refusing to bow to its demands in return for the unfreezing of federal funding, Columbia has been accused of surrendering vital academic freedoms in an initial agreement with the administration reached last March that will see it reform its protest and security policies, while restricting the autonomy of its Middle Eastern studies department. Shipman has insisted that the university is 'following the law' and denied that it is guilty of 'capitulation'. Sign up to Headlines US Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion Columbia's previous president, Minouche Shafik, resigned last August following sustained criticism, including in Congress, over her failure to end months of campus protests, despite calling in New York police to dismantle an encampment. In her letter, Shipman said last March's agreement was 'only a starting point for change'. 'The fact that we've faced pressure from the government does not make the problems on our campuses any less real; a significant part of our community has been deeply affected in negative ways,' she wrote. 'Committing to reform on our own is a more powerful path. It will better enable us to recognize our shortcomings and create lasting change.' However, the New York Times recently reported that the university was nearing an agreement to pay Jewish complainants more than $200m in compensation for civil rights violations that would be part of the deal to have its funding restored. The deal is likely to require further reforms in return for restored funding but stops short of requiring a judge-approved consent decree, which had been in an initial draft and would have given the Trump administration significant control over the university.
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
US citizen and Army veteran spent three days in jail after being arrested in California immigration raid
A U.S. citizen and Army veteran spent three days in jail after being arrested during an immigration raid at a California marijuana farm last Thursday. George Retes, 25, who works as a security guard for the Glass House Farms in Camarillo, said Wednesday he was sprayed with tear gas and pepper spray before being dragged from his car, pinned down by federal agents and arrested. "They took two officers to kneel on my back and then one on my neck to arrest me, even though my hands were already behind my back and I was covered in OC [oleoresin capsicum] spray,' he told reporters during a video press conference. Retes wasn't released until Sunday afternoon and was never charged, Reuters reported. "I told them everything - that I was a citizen, I worked there, and they didn't care. They still never told me my charges, and they sent me away. They sent me to a place in downtown L.A. without even telling me what I was arrested for,' Retes said. Retes was taken to the Metropolitan Detention Center where he said he was put in a special cell and checked on each day after he became emotionally distraught because he was missing his three-year-old daughter's birthday party Saturday. He said federal agents never allowed him a chance to contact a lawyer or his family during his detention. "It doesn't matter if you're an immigrant, it doesn't matter the color of your one deserves to be treated this way," Retes said, adding, "I hope this never happens to anyone ever again." Retes had joined the Army at 18 and was deployed to Iraq in 2019. 'I joined the service to help better myself,' he said. 'I did it because I love this [expletive] country. We are one nation and no matter what, we should be together. All this separation and stuff between everyone is just the way it shouldn't be.' Retes' sister, Destinee Magaña, previously told KABC, 'He has a bad back, and he's disabled, and it clearly says it in the back of his car that he's a disabled veteran. This is how you're going to treat U.S. citizens?" Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Homeland Security Department, told Reuters, "The U.S. Attorney's Office is reviewing his case, along with dozens of others, for potential federal charges related to the execution of the federal search warrant in Camarillo.' More than 360 people were arrested during immigration raids at Glass House Farms facilities in Camarillo and Carpinteria last Thursday, the Associated Press previously reported, citing federal authorities. Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott said agents found 10 undocumented children at the facility, including eight who were unaccompanied. Under California law, minors as young as 12 can work on farms but only in non-hazardous jobs and outside of school hours. Federal authorities characterized the raids as one of the largest deportation operations since President Donald Trump took office and began his immigration crackdown. There was a standoff in the Camarillo raid between authorities in military gear and people protesting Trump's crackdown. Jaime Alanis, a 57-year-old farmworker, fell from a greenhouse roof during the Camarillo raid and died Saturday from his injuries, his family confirmed to the AP. This is the first known death during Trump's ICE raids. The United Farm Workers union said several workers were critically injured during the raids as well.
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
1.4M of the nation's poorest renters risk losing their homes with Trump's proposed HUD time limit
Havalah Hopkins rarely says no to the chain restaurant catering gigs that send her out to Seattle-area events — from church potlucks to office lunches and graduation parties. The delivery fees and tips she earns on top of $18 an hour mean it's better than minimum-wage shift work, even though it's not consistent. It helps her afford the government-subsidized apartment she and her 14-year-old autistic son have lived in for three years, though it's still tough to make ends meet. 'It's a cycle of feeling defeated and depleted, no matter how much energy and effort and tenacity you have towards surviving,' Hopkins said. Still, the 33-year-old single mother is grateful she has stable housing — experts estimate just 1 in 4 low-income households eligible for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development rental assistance get the benefits. And now Hopkins is at risk of losing her home, as federal officials move to restrict HUD policy. Amid a worsening national affordable housing and homelessness crisis, President Donald Trump's administration is determined to reshape HUD's expansive role providing stable housing for low-income people, which has been at the heart of its mission for generations. The proposed changes include a two-year limit on the federal government's signature rental assistance programs. At a June congressional budget hearing, HUD Secretary Scott Turner argued policies like time limits will fix waste and fraud in public housing and Section 8 voucher programs. 'It's broken and deviated from its original purpose, which is to temporarily help Americans in need,' Turner said. 'HUD assistance is not supposed to be permanent.' But the move to restrict such key subsidies would mark a significant retreat from the scope of HUD's work. Millions of tenants moved in with the promise of subsidized housing for as long as they were poor enough to remain qualified, so time limits would be a seismic shift that could destabilize the most vulnerable households, many unlikely to ever afford today's record-high rents. New research from New York University, obtained exclusively by The Associated Press, found that if families were cut off after two years, 1.4 million households could lose their vouchers and public housing subsidies — largely working families with children. This would lead housing authorities to evict many families, the report said. A broad time limit would cause 'substantial disruption and dislocation,' the it said, noting the policy is largely untested and most of the few housing authorities to voluntarily try it eventually abandoned the pilots. A break from HUD's long-held purpose of helping house the poor could also jeopardize its contracts with private landlords, who say they're already feeling the uncertainty as public housing authorities from Seattle to Atlanta announce they're scaling back in anticipation of federal funding cuts. Critics fear the restriction could derail those working towards self-sufficiency — defeating the goal time-limit supporters hope to achieve. HUD spokesperson Kasey Lovett pushed back on the NYU study. 'There is plenty of data that strongly supports time limits and shows that long-term government assistance without any incentive disincentivizes able-bodied Americans to work,' Lovett said in a statement. She primarily cited statistics suggesting low employment among HUD-subsidized tenants. Hopkins said the policy would likely leave her and her son homeless in an economy that often feels indifferent to working poor people like her. 'A two-year time limit is ridiculous,' she said. 'It's so disrespectful. I think it's dehumanizing — the whole system.' Working families are most at risk Researchers from the Housing Solutions Lab at New York University's Furman Center analyzed HUD's data over a 10-year period and found about 70% of households who could be affected by a two-year limit had already been living on those subsidies for two or more years. That's based on 2024 estimates and doesn't include elderly and disabled people who wouldn't be subject to time limits. Exempted households make up about half of the roughly 4.9 million households getting rental assistance. In the first study to examine the proposed policy's possible impacts, the NYU researchers found time limits would largely punish families who are working but earning far below their area's median income, which would ultimately shift federal rental assistance away from households with kids. 'Housing assistance is especially impactful for children,' said Claudia Aiken, the study co-author and director of new research partnerships for the Housing Solutions Lab. Their health, education, employment and earnings potential can "change in really meaningful ways if they have stable housing,' she said. It would affect people like Hopkins, whose family was on a years-long waitlist in the expensive region where she grew up. In July 2022, she and her son moved into a two-bedroom public housing unit in Woodinville, Washington. She pays $450 a month in rent — 30% of her household income. A market-rate apartment in the area costs at least $2,000 more, according to the King County Housing Authority, which in June announced it would pause issuing some new vouchers. Hopkins knows she could never afford to live in her home state without rental assistance. It was a relief they could stay as long as they needed. She had been struggling to scrape together hundreds of dollars more a month for her previous trailer home. 'There's no words to put on feeling like your housing is secure,' Hopkins said. 'I feel like I was gasping for air and I'm finally able to breathe.' She credits the housing subsidy for her ability to finally leave an abusive marriage, and still dreams of more — perhaps her own catering business or working as a party decorator. 'We all can't be lawyers and doctors — and two years isn't enough to even become that,' Hopkins said. Since learning of Trump's proposal, Hopkins said she's been haunted by thoughts of shoving her possessions into a van with her son, upending the stability she built for him. 'Difficult to do well' The average household in HUD-subsidized housing stays about six years, studies show. HUD funds local public housing projects where nearly 1 million households live and the Section 8 vouchers that about 4 million households use to offset their private rentals. There's been little guidance from HUD on how time-limited housing assistance would be implemented — how it would be enforced, when the clock starts and how the exemptions would be defined. Both Democrats and Republicans have acknowledged the potential for time limits to help curb HUD's notorious waitlists. Hard-liners contend the threat of housing loss will push people to reach self-sufficiency; others see limits, when coupled with support and workforce incentives, as a means to motivate tenants to improve their lives. Yet there are strikingly few successful examples. NYU researchers identified just 17 public housing authorities that have tested time limits. None of the programs were designed for only two years and 11 abandoned the restriction — despite being able to use federal dollars for services to help people achieve self-sufficiency. Several agencies that dropped the limits said tenants still struggled to afford housing after their time was up. 'These policies are complex and difficult to monitor, enforce, and do well,' NYU's Aiken said. The city of Keene, New Hampshire, tried five-year time limits starting in 2001, but terminated the policy before fully enforcing it to avoid kicking out households that would still be 'rent burdened, or potentially homeless,' said Josh Meehan, executive director of Keene Housing. In California, Shawnté Spears of the Housing Authority of San Mateo County said the agency has kept its five-year time limit in tandem with educational programs she says have 'given folks motivation' to meet their goals. It also gives more people the chance to use vouchers, she said. NYU's Aiken acknowledged HUD's long waitlists make the current system 'a bit of a lottery," adding: "You could say that time limits are a way of increasing people's odds in that lottery.' The landlord's dilemma HUD's Section 8 programs have long depended on hundreds of thousands of for-profit and nonprofit small business owners and property managers to accept tenant vouchers. Now, landlords fear a two-year limit could put their contracts for HUD-subsidized housing in limbo. Amid the uncertainty, Denise Muha, executive director of the National Leased Housing Association, said multiple landlord groups have voiced their concerns about HUD's next budget in a letter to congressional leaders. She said landlords generally agree two years is simply not enough time for most low-income tenants to change their fortunes. 'As a practical matter, you're going to increase your turnover, which is a cost," Muha said. 'Nobody wants to throw out their tenants without cause.' It's always been a significant lift for private landlords to work with HUD subsidies, which involve burdensome paperwork, heavy oversight and maintenance inspections. But the trade-off is a near guarantee of dependable longer-term renters and rental income. If that's compromised, some landlords say they'd pull back from the federal subsidy programs. Brad Suster, who owns 86 Chicago-area units funded by HUD, said accepting subsidies could become risky. 'Would we have the same reliability that we know has traditionally come for countless years from the federal government?' Suster said. 'That's something landlords and owners want to know is there." The diminishing housing stock available to low-income tenants has been a brewing problem for HUD. Between 2010 and 2020, some 50,000 housing providers left the voucher program, the agency has reported. Chaos and trade-offs, critics say It's up for debate whether lawmakers will buy into Trump's vision for HUD. This week the U.S. House appropriations committee is taking up HUD's 2026 budget, which so far makes no mention of time limits. HUD's Lovett noted the Senate's budget plans for the agency have not yet been released, and said the administration remains focused on future implementation of time limits. 'HUD will continue to engage with colleagues on the hill to ensure a seamless transition and enforcement of any new time limit,' Lovett said in a statement. Noëlle Porter, the director of government affairs at the National Housing Law Project, said Trump's fight for time limits is far from over, noting that legislative and rule changes could make them a reality. 'It is clearly a stated goal of the administration to impose work requirements and time limits on rental assistance, even though it would be wildly unpopular,' Porter said. Democratic Rep. James Clyburn of South Carolina says there's no evidence time limits would save HUD money. 'This doesn't help families who already are working multiple jobs to become self-sufficient,' Clyburn said at a June hearing. 'Instead, it creates chaos, financial uncertainty and pushes these families into more severe trade-offs.' Time limits could imperil Aaliyah Barnes' longtime dream of graduating college and becoming a nurse, finding a job and a home she can afford. The 28-year-old single mom in Louisville, Kentucky, this year joined Family Scholar House, which provides counseling and support for people pursuing an education — and, to Barnes' relief, housing. Her apartment is paid for by a Section 8 voucher. In March, Barnes moved in and her 3-year-old son, Aarmoni, finally got his own room, where she set up a learning wall. Previously, she had struggled to afford housing on her wages at a call center — and living with her mom, two sisters and their kids in a cramped house was an environment ridden with arguments. The stable future she's building could disappear, though, if she's forced out in two years when her schooling is expected to take three years. 'I'd be so close, but so far away,' Barnes said. ___ Kramon reported from Atlanta. ___
