
My grandfather ‘the destroyer': Inside the ruthless world of NJ's frozen veggie kings
When John Seabrook first discussed writing a book about his grandfather, C.F. Seabrook, and the family's agricultural empire with his mother, her response shocked him, as he reveals in 'The Spinach King: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty' (WW Norton). 'Don't write about your family,' she said. 'Just don't.'
Seabrook was perplexed. 'Maybe she knew what I was going to find out,' he writes.
In 'The Spinach King,' he unearths the story of how his grandfather created one of the world's largest farming operations, as well as the ugly means that got him there.
9 C.F. Seabrook with factory workers in the 1950s. The Seabrook family's pioneering expansion of the frozen vegetable market is chronicled in a new book.
Seabrook Educational and Cultural Center
'Charles Franklin Seabrook, my grandfather, was the principal dreamer, main promoter, master builder, and autocratic ruler of this industrial farming empire – and ultimately its destroyer,' he writes.
At its peak in the mid-1950s, Seabrook Farms owned or controlled 50,000 acres in southwestern New Jersey, employed 8,000 people, and grew and packed about a third of the nation's frozen vegetables.
Dubbed the 'Henry Ford of Agriculture,' C.F. Seabrook had taken over his father's farm in 1911, transforming its fortunes with his innovative approach to agriculture. He introduced new irrigation and mechanization and diversified into building roads and railroads.
But it was his pioneering use of quick-freezing vegetables in the 1930s, partnering with Birdseye, that sent Seabrook stratospheric.
'In our family history, he was Thomas Edison and Henry Ford in the same Dagwood sandwich; a great American who had elevated us from dirt farmers to industrialists in a single generation,' writes John Seabrook.
Seabrook Farms was so successful that a 1959 Life magazine story described it as 'the biggest vegetable factory on earth.'
9 C.F. Seabrook seen here with his family.
Courtesy of John Seabrook
9 A tractor at Seabrook Farm, the family's vast agricultural estate in New Jersey.
Heritage Images via Getty Images
In 1969, meanwhile, director Stanley Kubrick featured an astronaut in '2001: A Space Odyssey' sucking a Seabrook Farms Liquipack on their way to the moon.
Thousands of workers worked for Seabrook: Russians, Syrians, Germans, Hungarians, Jamaicans, and Japanese Americans, many personally sponsored by Seabrook under the Displaced Persons Act and all paying rent to him.
Workers were divided into three sections; whites, 'negroes' and Americans, with each living in separate 'villages' and their rent depending on their ethnicity. African-Americans were given the worst accommodation, without water or sanitary facilities, with European immigrants receiving the next level of housing, and Americans the best standard.
9 Seabrook was known for his ruthless anti-labor practices, most notably during a 1934 labor strike by company workers.
Bettmann Archive
It also determined their job.
'In the workplace, Blacks were confined to the field and weren't allowed to work in the plant at all, to say nothing of management, which was entirely white, Protestant, and male,' adds Seabrook.
Behind the public image of the successful businessman was a man feared by everyone.
'Ambition, energy, and ingenuity drove his rise,' writes Seabrook, 'but violence and terror allowed him to maintain control.'
9 The Seabrook family partners with Bird's Eye vegetables as part of the expansion plan that made them frozen food leaders.
REUTERS
The way he tackled a strike in the summer of 1934 was typical.
Seabrook's revenues from quick-freezing were slow to materialize, and by that summer, it became necessary to cut wages and lay off workers.
'That was when the trouble started,' says Seabrook.
9 Bird's Eye products were so ubiquitous that they were even featured in the movie '2001: A Space Odyssey.'
With resentment stoked by the workers' miserable living standards, C.F. Seabrook amassed a vigilante strike force to subdue protests and even enlisted the local chapter of the Ku Klux Klan to crush the 'Communist agitators' holding up operations.
The results were violent and terrifying; the KKK burned crosses outside black workers' homes.
Belford Seabrook, one of C.F. Seabrook's three sons, reportedly threw a small bomb into a house with a mother and her children inside. Workers had their homes surrounded with chicken wire to prevent their escape, and tear gas was employed to quell protestors.
9 C.F. Seabrook was compared to other American industrial moguls such as Henry Ford and Thomas Edison (above).
Bettmann Archive
Appeals were made to New Jersey Gov. Harry Moore to declare martial law and send in the National Guard.
While a deal was eventually struck, most black strikers were fired, and others were evicted from Seabrook properties. C.F. Seabrook would, years later, recruit Japanese Americans from World War II incarceration camps, a 'model minority who would never challenge the old man's authority,' writes Seabrook.
Remarkably, John Seabrook had never heard about the strike before he started researching for his book.
Even his father, John M. Seabrook, who took over the business from his father, had never mentioned it.
9 'The Spinach King: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty' is written by John Seabrook.
9 'All that's left of the world that my bootstrapping grandfather built is a small museum at one end of the basement of the Upper Deerfield Township Municipal Building,' said author John Seabrook.
'This was arguably the single most significant event in Seabrook Farms history,' he writes. 'How could I have remained clueless of an event that convulsed the family, the company, the county, and the state?'
Just as Seabrook Farms prospered during World War I, so it did again in World War II, as quick-freezing came into its own.
But by April 1959, with his health failing, C.F. Seabrook had sold the business.
By the end of the 1970s, Seabrook Farms was no longer. The plant was demolished, and the land was given to the township in lieu of taxes.
'All that's left of the world that my bootstrapping grandfather built is a small museum at one end of the basement of the Upper Deerfield Township Municipal Building,' adds Seabrook.
'Here the memory of C.F. Seabrook, his multicultural workforce, and his vegetable factory is preserved, swaddled in gauzy nostalgia.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Warren Buffett is giving away $6 billion in Berkshire shares
Warren Buffett has just dropped his latest charitable donation — $6 billion worth of Berkshire Hathaway shares. The Berkshire chairman said he would donate around 12.4 million Class B shares to five charities. Buffett has pledged to give away the majority of his fortune to philanthropic causes. Warren Buffett has announced his latest charitable donation — a whopping $6 billion worth of Berkshire Hathaway shares. The 94-year-old Berkshire chairman announced Friday that he would donate about 12.4 million Class B shares to five foundations. Most of the shares — about 9.4 million ($4.6 billion worth) — are headed for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust, which was founded by the Microsoft cofounder and his ex-wife. The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, named after Buffett's first wife, is set to receive about 943,000 of the shares, while roughly 660,000 are destined for each of the Sherwood Foundation, the Howard G. Buffett Foundation, and the NoVo Foundation, according to a statement. Buffett, whose net worth as of Friday was $152 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, pledged in 2006 to give away the vast majority of his fortune to philanthropic causes, and he has since made large annual donations to these foundations. In Friday's statement, he outlined some of the math behind his 2006 pledge: "When originally made, I owned 474,998 Berkshire A shares worth about $43 billion and those shares represented more than 98% of my net worth. I have converted A shares into B shares before making contributions." "During the following 19 years, I have neither bought nor sold any A or B shares nor do I intend to do so," he continued. "The five foundations have received Berkshire B shares that had a value when received of about $60 billion, substantially more than my entire net worth in 2006. I have no debts and my remaining A shares are worth about $145 billion, well over 99% of my net worth." Reflecting on his success, Buffett added that "nothing extraordinary" had happened at Berkshire, instead pointing to "a very long runway, simple and generally sound decisions, the American tailwind and compounding effects."

Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Scott Galloway reveals real Social Security problem
Republican lawmakers are preparing to advance President Trump's sweeping Big Beautiful Bill in the coming days, with the Senate expected to hold its first procedural vote as early as June 28. According to the latest report from the Congressional Budget Office, which considers variables such as interest rates, inflation, and projected economic performance, the estimated cost is $2.8 trillion. New York University professor and popular podcaster Scott Galloway says Democrats have criticized the bill but have failed to offer alternatives, which he believes is a missed opportunity. That being the case, Galloway has a few thoughts of his own on problems with the bill and some suggested solutions, including how to handle increasingly pressing problems with Social Security. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Despite earning $16 million annually, Galloway believes he shouldn't receive Social Security benefits in retirement. He argues that means-testing - evaluating financial need - should be used to determine eligibility. He points out that although he makes millions, he still pays only about $9,000 a year into Social Security, the same amount as someone earning $160,000 due to the payroll tax cap. Related: Jean Chatzky sends strong message on buying vs. leasing a car In Galloway's view, many Social Security recipients end up collecting two to three times what they contributed over their lifetimes. He suggests that high earners such as himself, while technically eligible, don't necessarily need or deserve Social Security benefits simply because they paid into the system. Galloway explains further views on Social Security and what the Big Beautiful Bill might have included given different leadership in Congress. Galloway lays out some key facts that he believes should be driving the conversation about what should be done to fix Social Security. "Since 1957 the share of Americans who are 65 and older has nearly doubled from 9% to 17%," Galloway wrote in his "No Mercy / No Malice" newsletter on June 27. "At $1.5 trillion dollars, Social Security is the largest expenditure in the federal budget. U.S. seniors are the wealthiest cohort in history and the recipients of the largest redistribution in history, he added." More on personal finance: Dave Ramsey offers urgent thoughts about MedicareJean Chatzky shares major statement on Social SecurityTony Robbins has blunt words on IRAs,401(k)s Galloway points out that Social Security, which currently provides benefits to around 69 million Americans, is facing a looming funding shortfall expected to hit within the next eight years. He attributes this financial strain to a combination of factors: The growing number of Americans entering retirement (a positive sign of longevity and economic success)Longer life expectancies that mean people collect benefits for more years (also positive from a human perspective)A troubling dip in workforce participation, which results in fewer workers paying into the system to support current retirees "If/when Social Security becomes insolvent, America's grandparents will likely put their retirement on their grandkids' credit cards," Galloway wrote. "The fix is straightforward, but politically fraught: Means-test benefits and raise the retirement age (exempting people in physically demanding professions)," he added. According to a CBO analysis, Galloway explained, an increase in full retirement age by two months per birth year until it reaches age 70 for Americans born in 1978 or later would decrease total federal outlays by $122 billion through 2032. Related: Dave Ramsey has blunt words on spending money to keep a dog alive Galloway explains his belief that phasing out benefits for those with more than $150,000 of non-Social Security income would save an estimated $600 billion to $700 billion over the course of a decade. "We now spend $5 on seniors for every $1 on children," Galloway wrote. "Enough already. Seniors who need Social Security should get it, but it shouldn't mean an upgrade from Carnival to Crystal Cruises for NaNa and PopPop." "At current rates, within a decade, we'll spend half our federal budget on programs for seniors," Galloway added. Galloway also explains his views on an issue he believes to be a tax on the youth. He argues that tax policies such as reduced rates on long-term capital gains and mortgage interest deductions disproportionately benefit older and wealthier Americans - essentially moving resources from younger, lower-income individuals to those already financially secure. He highlights the fact that asset ownership - stocks and real estate - is largely concentrated among the wealthy and older population, while younger and poorer Americans are more likely to rent and earn most of their income from wages. In his view, this creates an unfair dynamic where those with the least are indirectly subsidizing the wealth-building of those with the most. Galloway advocates eliminating both the preferential tax treatment for capital gains and the mortgage interest deduction, proposing that investment windfalls be taxed at the same rate as regular income. According to his estimates, doing so could generate an additional $117 billion in annual government revenue. Related: Tony Robbins sends strong message to Americans on 401(k)s The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
2 Monster Stocks to Hold for the Next 10 Years
Taiwan Semiconductor is the dominant manufacturer of AI processors. Amazon is a leading player in cloud computing, and its ad business continues to impress. Both stocks look like wise investments over the long term, but expect some short-term volatility. 10 stocks we like better than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing › There's no shortage of great companies to invest in, but narrowing down your decision to just a couple of top stocks can be difficult. Volatility in the market earlier this year has left some investors wondering which companies have the stability, growth prospects, and lead in their respective markets to be long-term winners. If you're searching for two such companies, I think Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM) and Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) fit the bill perfectly. Both dominate their niches and are tapping into long-term trends that should keep their businesses humming for years to come. Here's why. It's hard to escape the constant drumbeat of artificial intelligence (AI) news, but there's a good reason it's getting so much attention. AI could add nearly $16 trillion to global GDP by 2030, according to PwC data, and it's transforming industries at a rapid pace. Technology companies are racing to integrate AI into their products and services at breakneck speed, fearing that if they don't, they'll be left behind. That's causing tech giants, including Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and others, to invest trillions of dollars into data centers with advanced processors. This is where Taiwan Semiconductor (often referred to as TSMC) comes in. The company is the leader in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, holding nearly 90% of the market, and it's resulting in gangbuster growth. Artificial intelligence sales are expected to double this year, according to management, and consensus estimates from analysts put the company's total sales at $4.2 billion for fiscal 2026, up 16% from the previous year. What's more, TSMC is very profitable, with earnings rising 53% to $2.12 per American depositary receipt (ADR) in the most recent quarter. Some people have worried that demand for high-performance AI processors will cool down, but so far that hasn't happened. Tech companies appear to be locked into an AI race that has them vying for the best infrastructure available, which means spending to build new data centers and upgrade older ones with TSMC-manufactured processors. Amazon might be easy to overlook because other tech players with more direct exposure to AI, like Nvidia, are getting a lot of attention. But Amazon is benefiting from the AI boom as well with its Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS is the largest public cloud company with about 30% of the market, leading Microsoft's 21% and Google's 12%. This is notable because companies are ramping up their need for AI services, and that's pushing demand for AWS higher. Artificial intelligence demand will push total cloud computing revenue to an estimated $2 trillion by 2030, according to Goldman Sachs, and AWS is already benefiting. Its sales rose 17% in the first quarter to $29.3 billion and generated $11.5 billion operating income -- which was twice Amazon's e-commerce figure. Amazon is also benefiting from its fast-growing advertising business, which increased sales by 18% in the quarter to nearly $14 billion. That makes advertising Amazon's fastest-growing revenue segment, and there's likely more on the way. An estimate by eMarketer says the company could take 17% of U.S. digital ad spending by 2027, up from less than 12% in 2022. There's been a lot of uncertainty in the market over the past several months, but that doesn't mean you should avoid buying great stocks. Amazon and Taiwan Semiconductor have established themselves as leaders and are continuing to benefit from their ability to outpace their rivals. While there could be short-term ups and downs with their share prices, investors who buy and hold for the long term will likely be rewarded. Before you buy stock in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Chris Neiger has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Goldman Sachs Group, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 Monster Stocks to Hold for the Next 10 Years was originally published by The Motley Fool