Devon church 'deeply sad' after eagle lectern sculpture stolen
A hand-carved wooden eagle has been stolen from a church in Devon. Rev Andrew Thomas, of St Paul's in Yelverton, said the sculpture was sawn off a lectern on Monday evening. Mr Thomas said there had were clear signs of sawing on the carpet and described the theft as "deeply sad". Devon and Cornwall Police said the "local team are making inquiries".
He said: "I was deeply sad that someone thought this act of violence and entitlement was something that was ok to do."We work very hard here at St Paul's Yelverton to make the churches as inclusive and welcoming and open as we possibly can."So, the fact someone thought this was a great thing for them to do, to come in and do this, was deeply, deeply sad and really quite upsetting."It's a unique piece, it's clearly been carved by hand sometime in the past. "We don't know how old it is, we think it is an antique."It is, in that respect, irreplaceable, so, yes... there is a little bit of anger and a little bit of annoyance."
Sgt Tom Ottley, of Devon and Cornwall Police, said: "The local team are making enquiries in relation to this report and are appealing for anyone with information to get in touch."If you were in the area and witnessed any suspicious behaviour, please make sure you tell us. "If you live in the area and may have dashcam, CCTV or doorbell footage which may help, you can send that in too."Rev Thomas added: "If anyone sees anybody walking down the street with a great big eagle under their arm, please do give me a call; or better than that, call the police because we would like it back."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Baroness Casey's findings on grooming gangs set to be announced
Update: Date: 08:10 BST Title: Shadow home secretary says authorities 'covered up' grooming gangs Content: Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp says it is "critical" to get to the truth about police forces and local authorities' involvement in grooming gangs. "They deliberately covered up these appalling crimes, the rape of young girls, predominantly those from vulnerable backgrounds," he tells BBC Breakfast. He adds that authorities covered up these crimes because they were "more interested in race relations, than they were in protecting young girls". Philip says Prime Minister Keir Starmer only announced the national inquiry into grooming gangs because the government had been "forced" to due to the Casey report being published. Starmer told reporters at the weekend: "I've never said we should not look again at any issue." He added that Baroness Casey had originally thought a new inquiry was not necessary, but she had changed her mind having looked into it in recent months. Update: Date: 07:55 BST Title: How did Elon Musk get involved? Content: At the start of this year, the issue of grooming gangs was amplified by tech billionaire Elon Musk, who has millions of social media followers. Musk made a number of attacks on X including accusing Sir Keir Starmer of being "complicit in the rape of Britain" during his time as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) between 2008 and 2013. Speaking in January, Starmer said his record was there for all to see. While he was DPP he introduced a special prosecutor for child abuse and sexual exploitation. Starmer also attacked those who were "spreading lies and misinformation". The row was reignited after it was reported that the government had rejected Oldham Council's request for a government-led inquiry into historical child sexual exploitation in the town, in favour of a locally-led investigation. Update: Date: 07:46 BST Title: Previous Inquiry chair highlighted abuse 'epidemic' Content: In October 2022, child protection expert Prof Alexis Jay finished a seven-year inquiry into the countless ways children had been sexually abused in England and Wales. The independent inquiry carried out 15 investigations, including into grooming gangs and abuse in schools and church settings. She warned there was an "epidemic that left thousands of victims in its poisonous wake". She also made 20 recommendations to reduce child suffering. These included setting up a national child protection authority, implementing tighter controls on who can work with vulnerable children and making not reporting abuse a criminal offence. Professor Jay was also behind a 2014 report which found 1,400 underage girls, some as young as 11, had been abused between 1997 and 2013 in Rotherham. Update: Date: 07:43 BST Title: PM says it's 'right' to hold national inquiry Content: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said on Saturday there would be a full national statutory inquiry into grooming gangs in England and Wales. The move was announced ahead of the publication of Baroness Louise Casey's report into the data and evidence on the nature and scale of group-based child sexual abuse. "She's come to the view there should be a national inquiry on the basis of what she's seen," Sir Keir told reporters over the weekend. "I've read every single word of her report, and I'm going to accept her recommendation," he added. Earlier this year, the government dismissed calls for a national inquiry on the basis the issue had already been examined during a lengthy inquiry led by Professor Alexis Jay in 2022. Update: Date: 07:36 BST Title: Baroness Casey's findings on grooming gangs set to be announced Content: Baroness Louise Casey's findings on grooming gangs are set to be published, after the prime minister announced a new national inquiry. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is expected to give a statement to the Commons over the report this afternoon. Meanwhile, the National Crime Agency said it would carry out a nationwide operation to target and jail predators who have sexually exploited children as part of a grooming gang, the Home Office says. Sir Keir Starmer announced on Saturday there would be a full national statutory inquiry into grooming gangs covering England and Wales. Stay with us for live updates ahead of the report being published.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
British women are being jailed under archaic abortion laws. MPs can act to end that this week
You might have seen their faces. Every few months nowadays, another woman appears in a British newspaper charged with a suspected illegal abortion. Often the woman looks pale and gaunt. Sometimes she hides behind sunglasses as she bows her head. The photographs of these women walking into court feel akin to a public shaming, where the stocks are replaced by a breaking news banner, but the judgment remains the same. If this sounds like a punishment from a different time, it's because it is. The law that's largely used to prosecute women for a suspected illegal abortion was written in 1861 – that's before women had the right to vote or own property independently. While the Abortion Act in 1967 gave widespread access to abortion, it was never made fully legal on the statute books. Now that may change. After more than a century and a half, this week could see abortion decriminalised in England and Wales – and for the first time, give tens of millions of women a genuine right to choose. When the crime and policing bill returns to the Commons, a Labour backbencher, Tonia Antoniazzi, will table an amendment to remove women from the criminal law. It would finally get rid of the anachronistic stain on otherwise modern abortion rights: women will no longer face prosecution if they end a pregnancy after 24 weeks or without approval from two doctors. There is some uncertainty. For one, a second amendment is being put forward by Stella Creasy that aims to enshrine access to abortion as a human right, and pro-choice charities fear would disrupt services. Although it has less support, it could also be selected for a vote. But parliamentary debate aside, reform is highly likely to be on the way. Antoniazzi's amendment has already received the backing of more than 130 MPs, according to the Times, and senior government figures expect it to pass with a large majority. The urge for decriminalisation has increased as the risk of arrest has. It is estimated that more than 100 women have been prosecuted for a suspected abortion over the last decade. And the number of court cases and convictions has actually increased in the 21st century. Between 1861 and 2022, only three women in Great Britain were convicted of an illegal abortion. Since December 2022 alone, seven women have been charged. One woman has been jailed. There is no clear reason as to why. When I asked the British Pregnancy Advisory Service – the leading abortion provider – about the spike in prosecutions, it pointed to an 'inherent suspicion of women in certain circumstances', combined with an increased awareness of abortion medicine by medical professionals, who then breach their duty of confidentiality, and police. Earlier this year, the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC), which sets the strategic direction for policing across the UK, quietly issued guidance on how to search women's homes for abortion drugs as well as seize their phones to inspect menstrual cycle tracker apps. The cases that have already made it to court – and the papers – have been deeply disturbing. Last month, Nicola Packer was acquitted of unlawfully taking abortion pills at home after the legal time limit during the coronavirus lockdown in 2020. Arrested in hospital by uniformed officers while still recovering from surgery for a stillbirth, it took Packer more than four years to clear her name. During her trial, prosecutors picked over her 'alternative' sex life and the size of her nipples. And yet this is also about the women whose names don't make the headlines. Campaigners say women are routinely put under a police investigation that comes to nothing – the majority of them have in fact naturally given birth prematurely or had stillbirths. There have been cases of women denied contact with their children while police investigated a charge that was later dropped. One teenager who had a late miscarriage was arrested in front of her entire street. The small number of women and girls who have had an abortion past the legal cut-off point are often deeply vulnerable, and include victims of trafficking or domestic violence. As BPAS told me: 'We're aware of cases where the woman has been investigated, or even imprisoned, and nothing has happened to her abusive partner.' Where is the public interest in any of this? Pregnancy loss – particularly late term – is still equated with guilt and failure. To lose a pregnancy and then be called in by the police and questioned under caution, let alone taken to court, is less criminal justice and more a kind of state-sponsored humiliation. It does not feel like a coincidence that the rise in prosecutions has come as abortion rights in the UK – from decriminalisation in Northern Ireland to the permanent adoption of telemedicine after lockdown – have made gains. Progress always comes with pushback. The rapid rise of Reform UK shows how, even in the most liberal of societies, the threat to women and minority rights is never truly over. Nigel Farage has already floated tougher restrictions on abortion as well as tax breaks for married couples. We need only look to the global shift to authoritarianism to see the extreme end-point of this. When police searched the car of the man suspected of killing a Democratic lawmaker in Minnesota, US, on Saturday, they allegedly found a list of people with links to abortion rights. Decriminalising abortion will, in the short term, save a handful of women from the trauma of a courtroom, and a hundred or so more from a police cell. That matters. But it will also do something else of value: it will say no woman should be forced to continue a pregnancy against her will, and that abortion is healthcare, not a criminal offence. As we finally edge close to change, it is surely time to shift the stigma – it is not women who should feel shame but the MPs and prosecutors who let this barbarism go on. Frances Ryan is a Guardian columnist
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
TV tonight: a true-crime series about a shockingly violent murder in Shrewsbury
9pm, BBC TwoAfter DPD driver Aurman Singh was beaten to death while on a delivery in Shrewsbury, the police assessed the shocking level of violence involved and surmised that robbery wasn't the motive. Stretched across the week, this gripping true-crime series follows the West Mercia police as they track the suspects, make arrests, then realise the roots of the crime run much deeper than they thought. Phil Harrison 6.35pm, PBS AmericaRight at the end of the first world war, the 1918 flu pandemic killed more than 50 million people and inflicted further misery on an already anguished world. This documentary uses reconstructions and testimony from the doctors, civilians and politicians of the time to tell the story. Christopher Eccleston narrates. PH 8pm, BBC OneOur traditional British summer wouldn't be the same without soaking up the sights, sounds and wild G-forces of a funfair. But should more be done to ensure rides are properly maintained? Correspondent Rahil Sheikh hears from accident victims keen for tougher safety regulation. Graeme Virtue 8pm, BBC ThreeWith the BBC having announced the contestants for its celebrity version of the hyper-addictive reality show, you may be in the mood to indulge your taste for stagey interpersonal intrigue. This New Zealand version sees 22 players gather in a manor house at the foot of Mount Horrible with NZ$100,000 on the table for the winner. PH 9pm, ITV1 Sean Bean may not have the title role in this Tudor murder mystery adapted from CJ Sansom's novel – that goes to Arthur Hughes as the 'crookback' investigator – but his brooding Thomas Cromwell looms large in every scene nonetheless. Shardlake resumes interrogating the St Donatus monks – but nowhere near fast enough for Anthony Boyle's Jack Barak. Ellen E Jones 9pm, Channel 4The documentary series that hopes it can convince viewers to care about the police continues. In this edition, officers tackle a domestic violence call, try to help the victim of a mugging and attend a fire at a seafront hotel. How much it makes the public empathise with an emergency service blighted by sexism and racism remains to be seen. Alexi Duggins
