Singapore to host US$50m fund by Norway-based firm for start-ups in Asia ocean health
UN data also shows that Asia accounted for 75 per cent of the world's total fisheries and aquaculture production. PHOTO: AFP
NICE, France – Norway-based impact investment firm Katapult Ocean will launch a US$50 million (S$64.1 million) fund in Singapore in early 2026 to invest in start-ups that support ocean health in Asia, The Straits Times has learnt.
The firm, which has made 75 investments in companies globally since 2018 , is considered one of the world's most active ocean impact venture fund managers. It has investments in sustainable seaweed production and offshore wind power infrastructure, among other areas.
Katapult Ocean Asia associate director Maureen Bresil told The Straits Times on June 11 that there are many opportunities in the region. These include decarbonisation, tackling ocean pollution, sustainable aquaculture, and eco-tourism.
Speaking on the sidelines of the UN Ocean Conference in Nice, Ms Bresil said: 'We wanted to be in Asia – closer to funders, closer to issues we need to tackle.'
Existing estimates suggest that five Asian countries – China, Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam and Thailand – accounted for up to 60 per cent of the plastic waste leaking into the ocean. UN data also shows that Asia accounted for 75 per cent of the world's total fisheries and aquaculture production.
Ms Bresil added: 'We also want to be in Singapore, because we know that there's a lot of capital there that can be diverted into ocean impact in Asia.'
News of Katapult's Ocean Asia Fund comes amid growing interest from the private sector in the blue economy. The World Bank defines the blue economy as the sustainable use of ocean resources for economic growth, improved livelihoods, and jobs while preserving the health of the ocean ecosystem.
Ahead of the UN Ocean Conference, which started on June 9, some of the world's top financial institutions gathered in Monaco on June 7 and 8 to spotlight the economic opportunity from investing in the health of the ocean and the perils of inaction. The Blue Economy and Finance Forum hosted about 2,000 delegates from major banks, asset management funds and other financial institutions.
Singapore's Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan, speaking on behalf of Asean during a panel on advancing sustainable ocean-based economies on June 11, said the waters in the region are one of the most vital, congested, busy and strategic maritime spaces in the world.
'Our countries depend on these very waters for trade, livelihood, transportation and the other elements of life. Sustainable ocean-based economies, sustainable maritime transport and coastal community resilience are therefore key priorities for all Asean member states,' said Dr Balakrishnan.
He added that Asean is now formulating a blue economy implementation plan from 2026 to 2030, which aims to harness the potential of this blue economy across a range of key sectors.
'It will take into account the varying levels of development among the Asean member states to promote a regional blue economy development based on principles of value creation, inclusivity and sustainability,' said the minister.
Other developments show that the blue economy is picking up in South-east Asia.
In May, the 1,000 Ocean Startups coalition Asia Pacific was launched in Singapore as the regional chapter of a World Economic Forum initiative that started in 2021.
The coalition aims to help start-ups in the region scale up ideas or business models that are profitable or have the potential to generate profit, while also contributing to ocean health.
Mr Thomas Knudsen, a principal of Singapore-based family office Rumah Group, which is a member of the coalition, said it was significant that Katapult Ocean decided to establish a fund for Asia based in Singapore.
'At this moment, there are no ocean-focused funds that are based in Singapore, so having one of the global leaders in this space is important,' he told ST.
Their investments in South-east Asia-based start-ups could enable these firms to grow in the region, potentially helping them scale up globally too.
Mr Knudsen said Katapult's global portfolio could also introduce potential new solutions for the region – concepts or technologies tested elsewhere that have relevance for South-east Asia.
'I also think Katapult's involvement in the blue economy in South-east Asia gives companies based here more confidence to invest in the region,' he said. 'These firms may not have been comfortable in the past because the blue economy may be a new area for them, but having a partner on the ground will allow them to deploy capital through this fund.'
Another key player in the ocean space in the region is Circulate Capital, a private equity firm founded in 2018 in Singapore. Its key mandate is to prevent plastic pollution from ending up in the oceans in South and South-east Asia.
Speaking to ST on June 11, founder and chief executive of Circulate Capital Rob Kaplan said: 'We are thrilled that Katapult is investing more in the region. I think the blue economy is an under-invested sector, particularly in South-east Asia, and it's where most of the impact is.'
Circulate Capital has a focus on the circular economy – promoting the reuse and recycling of plastic so that it does not end up in the oceans.
'We see a lot of great start-ups that are way outside our scope. But there are a lot of other areas, and there's not enough capital flowing to it,' he said.
On the business case for investing in plastic recycling, Mr Kaplan said: 'The idea is that if we can build a market for plastic and profitably collect it, sort it, recycle it, manufacture using it, we can divert it from the environment and into the supply chains of global multi-national packaging and consumer goods companies.'
He noted that many of such firms want access to recycled plastic, but cannot get the quality and quantity they need to meet that demand.
'We saw that there were a lot of quality recycling companies, small and medium enterprises and family businesses, but they have never had any outside capital to help them professionalise and scale up. So that's where our strategy fits in,' he said.
Mr Kaplan added that Circulate Capital has shown that investing in the ocean economy – particularly in efforts that prevent plastics from ending up in the blue – is feasible.
'The path forward for the next five years is...to unlock billions of dollars more,' he added.
Audrey Tan is an assistant news editor overseeing sustainability coverage. She has reported on the environment for more than a decade and hosts the Green Pulse podcast series.
Find out more about climate change and how it could affect you on the ST microsite here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
27 minutes ago
- Business Times
Jetstar Asia's demise shows that Singapore could do more to attract and keep airlines at Changi
JETSTAR Asia's departure shows that Singapore cannot take its competitiveness as an air hub for granted – and suggests that it can do more to attract and retain airlines. On Wednesday (Jun 11), Jetstar Group announced that its Singapore-based low cost carrier (LCC) Jetstar Asia (JSA) will cease operations this Jul 31. Changi's high airport fees were one reason cited, along with increased supplier costs and regional competition. With the loss of JSA, the only remaining Singapore-based carriers are those of the Singapore Airlines Group: Singapore Airlines, Scoot and Singapore Airlines Cargo. As at the first week of June, JSA operates around 180 weekly services at Changi. This is about 5 per cent of total weekly passenger services, and forms about 3 per cent of passenger traffic, said the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS). While Singapore Airlines Group is ramping up flights to cover JSA's exit, Changi may also need to reassess its strategy. JSA's withdrawal brings the spotlight back to the fact that while Singapore is a leading regional air hub, it is also expensive compared to its rivals. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Star struck Started in 2004, JSA is owned by Singapore-based holding company Westbrook Investment (51 per cent) and Australia's Qantas group (49 per cent). Temasek previously held as much as 33.5 per cent, but divested in 2009. JSA is expected to post a loss of S$35 million in underlying earnings before interest and taxes in the financial year ending Jun 30. Jetstar did not specify how airport fees affected its bottom line, but aviation industry observers told The Business Times that these were likely an important reason for the closure. To use airports, airlines pay passenger fees – added to ticket prices – as well as landing, parking and aerobridge (LPA) charges. Such fees go towards the operation, maintenance and expansion of airport infrastructure. Singapore's airport passenger fees are higher than many of its regional rivals, and set to keep rising. CAAS and airport operator Changi Airport Group (CAG) announced fee hikes for both passengers and airlines over the next five years. Currently, a passenger departing Changi pays S$65.20. This will rise to S$79.20 in 2030. This is several times what a passenger pays in nearby rivals: 700 baht (S$27.64) in Bangkok, 25,000 won (S$23.58) in Seoul, and up to 70 ringgit (S$22) in Kuala Lumpur. Regionally, Hong Kong's fees are closest to Singapore's, at HK$355 (S$57.98). Last year, JSA chief executive officer John Simeone told the media that Singapore was becoming a 'very expensive' location to operate from, whether in terms of airport, operating or ground service charges. In response to media queries, CAG said that airport fees are applied equally to all carriers and constitute a small component of airlines' total operating cost. But industry observers noted that higher passenger fees hit LCCs harder than full-service or legacy carriers. As LCCs have lower ticket prices, airport fees represent a large share of the total. LCCs may also incur higher fees due to their point-to-point service model of flying directly between destinations. This means passengers pay airport departure fees rather than the transit fees of S$12 in Changi. Passengers on legacy carriers may pay the lower transit fee, due to these airlines' hub-and-spoke approach of flying into a major hub and having passengers take onward connecting flights. Higher supplier costs may also contribute to making Changi pricier than its rivals. Qantas group CEO Vanessa Hudson said that JSA has seen some 'supplier costs increase by up to 200 per cent'. These include suppliers that provide supporting services to aircraft, such catering and baggage handling. In Singapore, these suppliers face rising wage pressures, compliance cost and renewed investment in facilities and sustainability infrastructure, said Awad Khireldin, assistant professor of the aviation management degree programme at the Singapore Institute of Technology. To cope with their own costs, suppliers have been charging airlines more. Generating lift CAG said it has been working with airlines, including JSA, to enhance productivity and cost-efficiency. But wider efforts to draw airlines here may be needed. Singapore has ambitious plans to scale Changi's operations further, with Terminal 5 in the mid-2030s. Changi's passenger air traffic reached an all-time high of 68.4 million for the year ended March 2025, with its maximum capacity being around 90 million now. T5 will expand capacity to around 140 million. Yet, growth may be difficult if LCCs avoid the Republic because of high costs. While Apac is predicted to lead global aviation's growth in the coming years, airlines have thin margins. The International Air Transport Association projects that Asia-Pacific airlines' net profit margin per passenger will be just 1.9 per cent, or US$2.60, in 2025. Airlines may not choose Singapore if the cost base is not controlled, and instead head to where they can preserve profits. Granted, CAAS is taking steps to ease the fee hike, such as a 50 per cent LPA fee rebate to airlines from April to September. But perhaps it could go beyond short-term relief, and instead give long-term incentives to airlines that base themselves or increase the scale of their operations in Singapore. Asked if airlines receive benefits to base themselves here, CAAS director for air transport Sidney Koh replied only that Singapore-based airlines enjoy air traffic rights in Singapore's Air Services Agreements with other countries, which can be used to operate flights to those countries. Here, the aviation sector could apply lessons from the maritime industry. Under existing schemes, maritime and shipping companies receive tax breaks and harbour fee rebates, among other things, if they establish operations and register ships here. Changi could explore similar measures and scale them by the size of airline operations. After all, while passenger fees are needed to fund infrastructure improvements, it is counterproductive if they themselves limit passenger numbers. To be fair, fees were only one factor in JSA's descent. Other crucial factors were a lack of scale and the inability or unwillingness to quickly expand due to aircraft shortages. But as competition grows, airlines will be eager for any edge they can get – such as receiving benefits to operate in one of the most strategic, well-run air hubs in the region.
Business Times
28 minutes ago
- Business Times
Oil jumps more than 7% as Israel strikes Iran, rattling investors
OIL prices jumped more than 7 per cent on Friday, hitting their highest in months after Israel said it struck Iran, dramatically escalating tensions in the Middle East and raising worries about disrupted oil supplies. Brent crude futures rose US$5.29, or 7.63 per cent, to US$74.65 a barrel by 0142 GMT after hitting an intraday high of US$75.32, the highest since April 2. US West Texas Intermediate crude was up US$5.38, or 7.91 per cent, at US$73.42 a barrel after hitting a high of US$74.35, the loftiest since Feb 3. Israel said early on Friday that it struck Iran, and Iranian media said explosions were heard in Tehran as tensions mounted over US efforts to win Iran's agreement to halt production of material for an atomic bomb. 'The Israeli attack on Iran has heightened the risk premium further,' MST Marquee senior energy analyst Saul Kavonic said. 'The conflict would need to escalate to the point of Iranian retaliation on oil infrastructure in the region before oil supply is actually materially impacted,' he said, adding that Iran could hinder up to 20 million barrels per day of oil supply via attacks on infrastructure or limiting passage through the Strait of Hormuz in an extreme scenario. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Israel's strikes on Iran are aimed at hurting its nuclear infrastructure, its ballistic missile factories and many of its military capabilities, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Thursday called Israel's strikes against Iran a 'unilateral action' and said Washington was not involved while also urging Tehran not to target US interests or personnel in the region. 'Iran has announced an emergency and is preparing to retaliate, which raises the risk of not just disruptions but of contagion in other neighbouring oil producing nations too,' said Priyanka Sachdeva, senior market analyst at Phillip Nova. 'Although Trump has shown reluctance to participate, US involvement could further raise concerns.' In other markets, stocks dived in early Asian trade, led by a selloff in US futures, while investors scurried to safe havens such as gold and the Swiss franc. IG market analyst Tony Sycamore said the alarming escalation is a blow to risk sentiment in financial markets. 'While we await further news and a potential response from Iran, we are likely to see a further deterioration in risk sentiment as traders cut risk-seeking positions ahead of the weekend,' he added. REUTERS
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Greenback fades as Singapore dollar, ringgit, baht shine in Asean foreign exchange shift
[SINGAPORE] US-Asean foreign exchange (FX) markets were lukewarm as announcements of a China-US trade agreement revealed few details following talks in London on Wednesday (Jun 11), with widespread uncertainty now becoming the norm for investors. DBS analysts Eugene Leow and Philip Wee said: 'Implied volatility is now reflecting little to no stresses and is essentially back at pre-Liberation Day levels.' This hardly surprised market analysts, who observed that mere hints of favourable news – in a world where policy reversals have become the norm – are no longer as likely to move markets. Maybank analyst Saktiandi Supaat said: 'Markets now show a tendency to react less to sweeping headlines, and only a concrete agreement or something permanent can drive markets into a more lasting direction.' De-dollarisation Indeed, more permanent trends continue to work against the dollar as Asean currencies appreciate amid USD weakness. The dollar index traded at about 98.4 on Thursday morning, having fallen about 5 per cent since before Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs on Apr 2. Once-attractive USD deposits are beginning to unwind in Asean portfolios, with pairs such as USD and SGD declining about 4.5 per cent from before the tariff announcement, and the USD/Thai baht falling 5.5 per cent. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Since around 2022, Asean corporates and investors have built up sizeable onshore US dollar deposits, said a Bank of America (BOA) report by FX strategists Abhay Gupta and Claudio Piron. 'FX deposits in most of Asean are near the highs, with a total of US$230 billion across the Asean-4 economies,' they said. Drawn to the greenback's relative strength, higher deposit rates and its reserve currency status, Asian exporters and other investors avoided converting their earnings into local currencies to maintain their dollar holdings. But now, this may be changing. A trend of 'de-dollarisation' has taken hold in global markets as the greenback loses its charm among Asean investors and corporates. 'The dollar is starting to be viewed as overvalued since the end of last year,' Gupta told The Business Times. 'Global corporations have been caught long (in the) US dollar as they held on to their export proceeds for far too long,' UOB said. Gupta said that institutional investors are likely to be the quickest to rebalance their deposits, as themes such as a weakening dollar, uncertainty towards Washington's escalating fiscal deficit, and waning confidence in US credibility prompt a rebalancing away from dollar deposits. Malaysia and Thailand, which run persistent current account surpluses, are likely to experience the strongest appreciation pressures as investors convert US holdings back into local currencies. The two countries feature prominent US holdings in pension funds and mutual funds, which are typically more risk-averse and adopt larger hedging ratios to defend their dollar positions, Gupta noted. Such hedging activity would place further buying pressure on local currencies as financial institutions lock in forward exchange rates, he noted. Together with the Singapore dollar, these three low-yielding currencies have led gains due to their exposure to global trade cycles, the BOA economists said. Corporates and retail investors are likely to rebalance as well, but will not do so as immediately as institutional investors, said Gupta. This will provide lagging tailwinds into Asean currencies such as Indonesia's rupiah and the Philippines' peso. He told BT: 'As the deposits mature, people realise that their total return has not been as attractive, so they gradually convert back to local currency deposits.' Unlike the much quicker drawdowns on the dollar by institutional investors, retail and corporate selling pressure could sustain tailwinds for Asean currencies well into 2026, he said. But others are less certain of the Asean wave's sustainability in the short-term, with UOB noting higher levels of implied volatility in the foreign exchange options markets. 'Historically, such periods of heightened foreign exchange volatility have often preceded phases of weakness in Asian currencies,' said UOB. The bank also cited tariff doubts and slower growth prospects for Asia, cautioning that the region's currency upside may be limited in the near term. UOB projected that most Asian pairs with the greenback would reverse their uptrend through Q3, before resuming their climb in 2026. Central bank moves For countries running high rates, such as the Philippines and Indonesia, the dollar's slide is a welcome shift. As both countries' central banks implement inflation targeting monetary policies, wrote Gupta and Piron, stronger currencies would further mitigate inflation by keeping import prices low. Yet, as uncertainty about tariffs and external demand remains, stronger regional currencies could hurt export competitiveness and have to be carefully managed by central banks, Gupta warned. 'Central banks have been easing, but in a measured way, due to uncertainty towards the final size of the tariffs,' he said.