logo
Flawed system leaves millions paying too much for energy bills, says GABRIEL MCKEOWN

Flawed system leaves millions paying too much for energy bills, says GABRIEL MCKEOWN

Daily Mail​25-05-2025

Gabriel McKeown is head of macroeconomics at Sad Rabbit.
Inflationary pressures have eased considerably from the peaks reached in late 2022.
Yet households across the country continue to grapple with the lingering effects of a prolonged cost-of-living crisis.
Prices for essential goods and services remain significantly higher than historical norms.
Despite reassurances of an economic recovery on the horizon, many consumers are yet to experience meaningful relief.
One of the most notable contributors to these persistent high costs has been the energy sector.
Even with a sizeable drop in wholesale natural gas prices, bills are remaining stubbornly high for consumers.
Even with a cut to the price cap on the horizon, this represents a delayed response to wholesale prices that fell many months ago.
Consumers have been stuck paying elevated rates, and are long overdue a reduction in the cap.
This situation has intensified calls for policy intervention and market reform.
The paradox of energy pricing
The energy market has had a tumultuous few years. Wholesale gas prices plummeted in the spring of 2020, as Covid-19 lockdowns strangled economic activity.
They then surged by late 2021 due to supply bottlenecks following the global re-opening.
This was further compounded by the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which saw UK and European wholesale gas prices spike to record levels. They briefly rose by ten times from the pandemic lows.
Households were largely sheltered from this immediate energy cost jump, thanks to the retail price cap administered by Ofgem, combined with massive government subsidies when that proved insufficient.
The price cap had already risen 54 per cent in April 2022 but was set to soar a further 80 per cent in October 2022. This resulted in emergency intervention in the form of the Energy Price Guarantee (EPG).
Yet the market is far from static. Despite British families seeing energy costs leap to record highs in 2022, by early 2023, a combination of mild weather, ample gas storage in Europe and reductions in demand brought wholesale prices down sharply.
Unfortunately for consumers, the regulated price cap was slow to follow. It wasn't until mid-2023 that the cap fell below the government's EPG level, providing some relief.
By Autumn 2023, the cap stood at around £1,568 for a typical household. This still far exceeded the pre-Covid average of below £1,000.
Furthermore, as of early 2025, the average bill under the cap remains 52 per cent higher than in the winter of 2021 and 2022. This illustrates how far energy costs have diverged from the baseline.
The supplier-consumer divide
With Europe enjoying relatively mild weather and benefiting from increased non-Russian supplies, wholesale gas prices were on a clear downward trend at the beginning of this year.
Yet households were told to expect higher bills once again.
Gas prices had dropped to levels not seen since mid-2021. But to justify this latest rise, Ofgem pointed to a brief wholesale price spike that occurred during the cap's assessment window in February.
However, by the time the cap increase was announced, those market prices had already fallen back to previous levels.
Yet this earlier spike had now been baked into consumer rates for months to come.
Consequently, Ofgem declared that the energy price cap would rise by 6.4 per cent from April.
This has resulted in households paying an additional £111 annually, and marked the third consecutive quarterly increase in the cap.
This highlights a crucial flaw in the UK pricing system. The price cap is not a real-time reflection of market prices but is instead based on future wholesale prices averaged over the prior period.
The aim is for this to smooth volatility in prices. But in this case, suppliers had bought much of the energy for spring 2025 during late 2024 and early 2025 when prices were higher.
In effect, household prices right now reflect the wholesale market of several months ago. This leads to a gap between the latest energy prices and the bills facing consumers.
The energy regulator confirmed that energy bills will fall by £129 in July.
Energy supplier profits
The energy supplier sector has undergone a significant transformation during this period.
It has shifted from a group of loss-making firms on the brink of collapse in 2021 to an arguably healthier state overall, thanks to consolidation and improved profitability.
The UK has ended up with an energy system where the risk of high wholesale prices was largely shifted to taxpayers.
This was achieved through significant government subsidies and ongoing elevated bills.
However, the rewards of higher prices were reaped primarily by the producers and some well-hedged suppliers.
This comes at a time when many households are still grappling with energy costs significantly elevated from pre-crisis levels, resulting in widespread energy debt.
More than three million households have now fallen behind on payments, exacerbating the living standard collapse experienced over the past few years.
The promise of market reform
Combatting these issues was a core policy point during much of the election campaigning last year.
Yet Labour, which came to power partly on promises to address the energy crisis, faces growing criticism as high bills persist.
The government has started to implement policies aimed at reforming the energy sector, such as establishing GB Energy, a publicly owned entity designed to increase the UK's clean energy capacity.
But these measures offer limited immediate relief to households.
To truly address the foundational issues facing the sector, it will require far broader policies.
There needs to be a reassessment of how consumers fit into the energy sector's business model.
Energy suppliers naturally defend their hedging practices as essential for market stability.
Purchasing energy through forward contracts is necessary to manage risk in rapidly fluctuating markets.
They can claim that this protects both themselves and consumers from unpredictable price swings.
However, the past few years have shown that while suppliers are insulated from short-term market volatility, consumers feel the direct and prolonged impact of past wholesale price spikes.
Even when consumers seek relief from escalating prices via fixed-rate energy deals, which are increasingly available at prices below the current capped rates, these options do not address the structural problems embedded within the UK's energy pricing model.
An uncertain future
As long as wholesale and retail prices remain disconnected, structural inequities will persist.
Addressing these systemic flaws will require immediate reform of pricing mechanisms. It will also need sustained long-term investments in British energy independence.
A particularly important area of potential reform is a reevaluation of geographical differences in standing charges.
These have drawn criticism for exacerbating regional household inequality.
There is also mounting support for introducing targeted social tariffs. These would provide direct financial relief to vulnerable groups that are most impacted by energy market volatility.
Aligning Britain more closely with several European peers. Along with offering a viable short-term solution, while longer-term structural adjustments are implemented.
Without such actions, British consumers will continue facing elevated bills despite falling wholesale energy prices. This will leave them to bear the brunt of system-wide inefficiencies that have yet to be meaningfully addressed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump doubles US steel and aluminium tariffs to 50%
Donald Trump doubles US steel and aluminium tariffs to 50%

BBC News

time19 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Donald Trump doubles US steel and aluminium tariffs to 50%

US President Donald Trump has signed an order doubling tariffs on steel and aluminium imports from 25% to 50%.The move hikes import taxes on the metals - key inputs in everything from cars to canned food - for the second time in three has said the measures, which come into effect on Thursday, are intended to secure the future of the American steel industry. However, critics say the protections could wreak havoc on steel producers outside the US, spark retaliation from trade partners, and come at a punishing cost for American users of the metals. Hours before he hiked the duties, many firms directly affected could scarcely believe the plan was moving forward, hoping it would turn out to be temporary or some kind of negotiating as Trump moved forward with the deal, the UK was granted a carve-out from the measures, leaving duties on its steel and aluminium at 25%, a move Trump said reflected its ongoing trade discussions with the US. "Always the question with Mr Trump is, is this a tactic or is this a long-term plan?" said Rick Heuther, chief executive of Independent Can Co, a Maryland-based business, which brings in steel from Europe and turns it into decorative cookie tins, popcorn boxes, and other said he had put investments on hold and feared the abrupt changes, and price increases would lead his customers to turn to alternatives such as plastic or paper boxes. "There's a lot of chaos," he said. The US is the biggest importer of steel in the world, after the European Union, getting most of the metal from Canada, Brazil, Mexico and South Korea, according to the US his first term, Trump imposed tariffs of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminium, citing a law that gives him authority to protect industries considered vital to national security. But many imports ultimately escaped the duties after the US struck trade deals with allies and granted exemptions to certain imports at the request of ended those carve-outs in March, saying he was unhappy with the way the protections had been weakened. At Friday's rally at the US Steel factory, he said wanted to make tariffs so high that US businesses would have no alternative but to buy from American suppliers."Nobody's going to get around that," he said of the 50% rate. "That means that nobody's going to be able to steal your industry. It's at 25% - they can get over that fence. At 50%, they can no longer get over the fence." Reaction in the UK and Europe As of May, imports and the rate of raw steel production in the US had changed little since last year before Trump raised tariffs, according to the American Iron and Steel Institute. But steel imports fell 17% in April, compared to March. And businesses selling the metals into the US said they expected Trump's latest announcement to lead to an even more dramatic drop. Trump's moves in March had already prompted Canada and the European Union to prepare to hit back with tariffs of their own American products. On Tuesday, Olof Gill, spokesperson for economic security and trade for the European Commission told the BBC the two sides were engaged in intense talks to try to make progress toward an agreement. "We're negotiating hard to try and make good deals," he said."We really hope that the Americans will roll back on this latest tariff threat, as they have done on others, but that remains to be seen." In the UK, Trump's announcement put new pressure on the government to pin down the trade deal in the works with the US, which had been expected to provide some protection from the March metals tariffs. Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds met with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Wednesday. His office said it was "pleased" that the trade talks had protected UK steel from the latest duties. "We will continue to work with the US to implement our agreement, which will see the 25% US tariffs on steel removed," he said. Gareth Stace, director general of UK Steel, which represents steelmakers, told the BBC that his members had already seen orders cancelled and delayed as a result of the 25% tariffs put in place in March. He warned that a 50% tariff would be "catastrophic" for UK exports to the US, about 7% of overall exports."The introduction of 50% tariffs immediately puts the shutters up," he said. "Most of our orders, if not all of them, will now be cancelled." Economists said the US economy is also facing damage, as prices rise as a result of the new measures. A 2020 analysis estimated that Trump's first term tariffs created roughly 1,000 jobs in the steel industry, but cost the economy 75,000 jobs in other sectors, such as manufacturing and York, vice president of federal tax policy at the Tax Foundation, said that she expected to see even more extreme job losses this time. "Some of the strongest evidence is against tariffs on intermediate inputs like steel and aluminium, finding they are much more harmful because they increase the cost of production in the United States," she said. "It's just very foolish to double down on this type of tariff in particular." Chad Bartusek is director of supply chain management at Drill Rod & Tool Steels, a small, family-owned manufacturing business in Illinois, which brings in about 800,000 pounds of Austrian-made steel each year, at specifications he says are not produced in the US. Mr Bartusek said he was currently waiting on three containers worth of steel rod, which would have entered the US without duties at the start of the of last week, he had expected to pay tariff costs about $72,000. Instead, he is looking at a tariff bill of almost $145,000. "I woke up Saturday morning, looked at the news and my jaw dropped," he said of Trump's announcement. Mr Bartusek said business had been steady until a few weeks ago. But his firm raised prices earlier this year by 8% to 14% to help cover the new cost of the tariffs. Now customers have been ordering more cautiously and he has had to cut back hours for workers. "It's one punch after the other," he said. "Hopefully, this settles down quickly."

Chelsea in shock transfer talks with AC Milan keeper Mike Maignan whose stats shows up Robert Sanchez
Chelsea in shock transfer talks with AC Milan keeper Mike Maignan whose stats shows up Robert Sanchez

The Sun

time20 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Chelsea in shock transfer talks with AC Milan keeper Mike Maignan whose stats shows up Robert Sanchez

CHELSEA are in talks with AC Milan to sign goalkeeper Mike Maignan. The France star, 29, has only a year left on his contract in Italy, with both parties yet to agree on fresh terms. 1 And the Blues have been alerted by Maignan's failure to pen an extension at the San Siro, where AC Milan failed to qualify for Europe. Chelsea boss Enzo Maresca believes the £34million-rated stopper is an ideal option for his possession-based attack. The Stamford Bridge outfit already have five keepers on their books — Robert Sanchez, Filip Jorgensen, Djordje Petrovic, Mike Penders and Kepa Arrizabalaga. But Maignan's potential arrival would see him challenge for the No 1 jersey in another shake-up to the goalkeeping department. Chelsea fans have been calling for a new No 1, with both Sanchez and Jorgensen failing to prove they should be the main man between the sticks. French Guiana-born Maignan helped Lille to the French title in 2021. He won Serie A with Milan a year later. Maignan has amassed a total of 163 appearances for the Italian club and made four errors leading to goals last season, comparing to Sanchez's five. But AC Milan could cash in now amid fears he could leave the club on a free transfer in 2026. Maignan has played 30 times for France and was named in the Euro 2024 team of the tournament. Jadon Sancho shares his Chelsea highlights reel as he says goodbye to fans ahead of Man Utd return Maresca's Chelsea are set to make Liam Delap their first summer signing. The Blues will pay his £30million release clause at relegated Ipswich, who he joined last summer from Manchester City. Chelsea will also welcome youngsters Estevao Willian, Kendry Paez and Dario Essugo to the club. One player leaving the club is Jadon Sancho. Chelsea paid Manchester United £5m NOT to sign him on a permanent basis. And the winger, 25, posted on Instagram: 'Grateful for the experience. Big love to everyone at Chelsea who made me feel at home — teammates, staff and the fans. 'Wishing the club all the best moving forward. Truly grateful. Thank you Blues.'

Trump ally Lindsey Graham calls out Elon Musk 'bull****' after tech titan throws his credibility under the bus
Trump ally Lindsey Graham calls out Elon Musk 'bull****' after tech titan throws his credibility under the bus

Daily Mail​

time21 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump ally Lindsey Graham calls out Elon Musk 'bull****' after tech titan throws his credibility under the bus

Senator Lindsey Graham snapped back at billionaire Tesla CEO and X owner Elon Musk, after the tech titan shared a post alleging he was responsible for nearly a million dollars in spending on hotel rooms in Ukraine. Graham, R-S.C., landed in hot water with former top Trump White House ally Elon Musk Tuesday afternoon in a spectacular clash on social media. Musk reposted a tweet which accused Graham of spending $400,000 on hotel rooms in Ukraine. Social media influencer Nick Sortor made the original post with the allegations, which has amassed over 10 million views since just before 11 a.m. Tuesday morning. 'People love whining in my comment section when I say Congress takes a lot of vacations: 'They're not on vacation. They're working in their districts!' 'BULL****. Lindsey Graham was just PARTYING IN UKRAINE on OUR DIME. When did Lindsey Graham become the Senator from Ukraine??!' Sorotor concluded. Sortor's post also included a video of Senator Graham and Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) shaking hands with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy over the weekend in Kiyv. A screenshot of a spending disbursement of $411,634 made by the U.S. Department of State to an organization in Ukraine, the International - Business Center Tov was also included in Sortor's post. Musk reposted Sortor's post, adding 'Why is the hotel bill so high? The room service must be incredible!' Graham fired back at the allegations Tuesday afternoon with his own X post. 'Fake news. More BS. I'm all-in trying to help President @realDonaldTrump end this war — and making sure Putin doesn't win. This isn't a travel expense report. It's a monthly contract between the State Department for U.S. diplomats in a war zone — nothing to do with my trip' Graham tweeted from his official government account. Fake news. More BS. I'm all-in trying to help President @realDonaldTrump end this war — and making sure Putin doesn't win. This isn't a travel expense report. It's a monthly contract between the State Department for U.S. diplomats in a war zone — nothing to do with my trip. — Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) June 3, 2025 Per data available on USA Spending, the International - Business Center Tov has received $8.59 million marked as hotel spending. The group has received money from the American government in 2023, 2024, and 2025. While the allegations continued to gain steam on social media Tuesday, Musk's own Grok AI classified the X boss's claims as misinformation. 'There's no evidence supporting claims of GOP spending on luxury hotels in Ukraine; such narratives may stem from misinformation. The idea that Congress spends 60% of their time on vacation is exaggerated, as they work about 133 days in session, with other time often spent on district duties,' a Grok reply to a post made by X user Matt Van Swol reads. @matt_vanswol is expressing frustration over the GOP's failure to act on proposed spending cuts by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), linked to Elon Musk and the Trump administration. There's no evidence supporting claims of GOP spending on luxury hotels in Ukraine;… — Grok (@grok) June 3, 2025 Senator Graham has been one of Ukraine's most vocal advocates throughout the course of the nation's war with Russia, taking several trips to the country in recent years. Former White House strategist Steve Bannon accused Graham of working against the wishes of President Trump during his trips on an episode of his War Room podcast, which aired Monday. 'The White House has to condemn this immediately and pull all support and tell Lindsey Graham to come home or we are going to put you under arrest when you come home. You're stirring it up,' Bannon said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store