Scottish troops set for relocation with high-readiness posting in Cyprus
A Scottish Army battalion is gearing up to relocate to Cyprus for two years, where it will take on a new role as a high-readiness standby formation.
The soldiers of 4th Battalion, The Royal Regiment of Scotland (4 SCOTS) have been based at Bourlon Barracks at the Catterick Garrison in North Yorkshire for the last 10 years.
During that time they have been able to 'put down roots' – building families and friendships, and continuing 'proud' Scottish traditions including the Highland games.
The new posting will see them relocate to the British Sovereign Base Area in Dhekelia, Cyprus, with the first flights scheduled for Saturday.
Once there the battalion will stand ready to respond at short notice to emerging situations across the Middle East and North Africa.
At the same time they will be tasked with supporting peacekeeping efforts and protecting key military infrastructure on the island.
Captain Craig Taylor, who has been with the battalion throughout its time at Bourlon Barracks, said the move will be a 'big change' for the troops.
'We've had 10 solid years of stability here in Catterick. It's been a place where soldiers could put down roots, raise families, and grow professionally,' he said.
'Moving to Cyprus will be a big change for us, not just in terms of the climate.
'This is an exciting opportunity that soldiers have been training hard for. It's not a short-term tour or exercise – it's a full overseas posting which gives us the chance to experience new cultures and ways of life.
'Professionally, it sharpens our edge. We'll be held at high readiness to deploy anywhere in the region, and beyond which is of real strategic importance to the UK.'
It is not the first overseas posting for the battalion, which has been involved in operations in the likes of Iraq, Afghanistan and Kosovo since its formation in 2006.
Closer to home, 4 SCOTS also provided security support for the 2022 Commonwealth Games in Birmingham, provided emergency aid during the 2018 Saddleworth Moor wildfires, and took part in the national Covid-19 response.
Despite being more than 2,000 miles from Scotland, the battalion intends to take its traditions with it, with events including regimental competitions and Burns Night celebrations remaining 'firm fixtures' in the calendar.
Capt Taylor added: 'We're proud of everything we've achieved here.
'But now it's time to pack up, push forward, and embed our Scottish identity into a new location.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
32 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Entries flooding in for Montgomery Canal Triathlon 2025
Entries for this year's Montgomery Canal Triathlon are already coming in from across Britain. The cross-border event, which is usually held in May, will take place on September 6 this year in a bid to see if this is a more suitable time of the year for the event. It was last held in September in 2021 as Covid restrictions eased. And that's not all that's changing this year. Regulars will see some changes to the event as the Friends of the Montgomery Canal simplify the administration for the organising volunteers, while continuing restoration of the canal in Shropshire means the finish will be at a different location this year too. The popular, family-friendly event welcomes people from across the country each year to travel 27-mile of the canal from Newtown to Maesbury Marsh on bike, canoe and on foot. Entrants, who can take part in one, two or all three sections, will set off from Newtown on bicycles and change to canoes near Whitehouse Bridge, Welshpool (thanks to the generous permission of Powis Estates) to paddle five miles through the centre of Welshpool. Canoes will be left at Pool Quay ready for the final 10 miles on foot, and on the way entrants will be able to see where contractors are at work to create a new canalside nature reserve and to build a new highway bridge across the canal. After crossing the border at Llanymynech the entrants will see the progress now being made by volunteers reinstating the canal channel. As the canal and towpath can only take a limited number of entrants early booking is advised. There is an 'early bird' reduction in entry fees until July 13. A spokesman for the Friends of the Montgomery Canal said: 'The triathlon is the year's biggest event on the Montgomery Canal with families and friends joining every year, many from a long way away. "Already this year we have entries from Cornwall, west Wales, London and the east Midlands. 'The triathlon highlights everything that has already been achieved as today over half the canal has been reopened. On the way, participants will see where road crossings block the canal and where contractors are working to remove one of the blockages and to add another nature reserve to protect the canal's valued flora and fauna. "As they approach the finish they will see the great progress of volunteer work parties restoring a section of the canal towards the new Schoolhouse Bridge. 'We are running the triathlon to support those volunteer work parties and each year the Friends of the Montgomery Canal is able to make a contribution from the proceeds of the event to the 'Restore the Montgomery Canal!' appeal. 'As usual, entrants who complete any section will receive a commemorative medallion of local slate, printed in gold for anyone who completes all three sections, silver for those who complete two, and bronze if only one section is completed.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
The creative ambiguity from Keir Starmer is now rapidly breaking down
Nobody, I think, would be at risk of mistaking Sir Keir Starmer for this kind of easy character. He doesn't even have superficial charm. But his political career demonstrates a keen awareness of the importance of telling the audience in front of you what you think it wants to hear, even if that message is wildly at odds with what you might have said a couple of days, weeks, months or years earlier. For fans, I suppose you might describe this as evidence of Starmer's strategic flexibility. To critics, it looks like mendacity. They probably amount to the same thing. These days, savvy modern political analysis tends to assume people-pleasing ambiguity is what cunning political operators should do, particularly before elections. When everyone hates you a few months later, you can wisely look back and observe 'you campaign in poetry and govern in prose'. By then, everyone will have forgotten how prosaic your campaign really was. READ MORE: Scottish manufacturing firm announces 90 jobs face redundancy Roll out a platform of policies before an election, and you are guaranteed to get yourself mired in the details, some of which are likely to be less than fully worked through. Is this scheme fully costed? Are the costings credible? Have you fully thought through the eligibility requirements? If you commit to a particular platform, it's inevitable that your policies will both generate and alienate elements of your support. Almost all policy choices create winners and losers, and the losers may not be inclined to vote for you. Imagine Labour had included winter fuel cuts or Pip clawbacks and cuts in their manifesto. The reaction, I imagine, would have been interesting. And thus the conventional political wisdom says – don't give your enemies a large target. Be vague. Don't commit. As far as possible, don't specify. Deal in vibes instead. Speak of visions and moods and abstract goals. Talk about change by all means, but don't overcommit. Maintain a tight political silhouette. Stay ambiguous. By avoiding standing for anything in particular, there is much more scope for the voters – and indeed, parts of the media – to invent for themselves the details you have failed to fill in. If you have goodwill in your favour, or at least enough antipathy to your opponents to work with, your bland features and featureless policy platform will become a cluster of hopes and expectations. Present the voters with a blank canvas, and the electorate can project their aspirations and hopes on to you, without experiencing anything so discouraging as being alienated by your actual policy ideas or repelled by the principles you actually stand for. (Image: Jonathan Brady/PA Wire) The political cynicism of the press and general public adds a whole other layer to this because if people assume you're speaking out of both sides of your mouth, they might persuade themselves that they – unlike the credulous saps taken in by your fencing and hedging – know what your real intentions are, and happily suppose these real intentions align with their own political preferences. The easiest people to lie to are always those who want to be deceived, after all. And one of the most remarkable – and remarkably prevalent – thoughts about the incoming Starmer administration was the widespread belief, especially among its supporters, that it was basically lying to get elected, on everything from the economy to welfare to immigration. On immigration, I've lost count of the number of folk of more liberal persuasions on the issue who persuaded themselves, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that this embattled Labour administration would herald a shift in official attitudes towards refugee policy and immigration. This is just one area where the creative ambiguity which lifted Labour to power is now breaking down. When you elect to appoint someone from your party's hard right as your Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, who already has a track record of crying for 'crackdowns', you know what you're getting, even if it takes 12 months for everyone else to cotton on. Liz Kendall, you might not remember, stood for her party's leadership in 2015. Steered by Morgan McSweeney – now Starmer's eminence gris in Number 10, after the defenestration of Sue Gray, killed off in classic British establishment style with the pointy end of a peerage – the Kendall campaign secured a mighty 4.5% of the vote, trundling in in fourth place, despite widespread and apparently sympathetic boosting of her candidacy in the right-wing media, claiming that the Leicester MP would be the only Labour leadership candidate to 'strike fear' into Tory hearts, presumably because she'd be advocating a policy platform most of them would recognise. (Image: Dominic Lipinski/PA Wire) Disabled people have well-founded fears about what Kendall has in mind for them. I imagine the average Tory sleeps soundly in contemplation of this pint-sized terror. This last week suggests her Labour colleagues have been tossing and turning more anxiously of late. So, it seems, has Sir Keir. In an interview published in The Observer on Friday, Tom Baldwin outlined what he characterised as the 'private trials of Keir Starmer', using the tormented metaphor that like Downing Street's front door, Starmer can only be 'unlocked from within'. Baldwin advances the dubious thesis that Starmer has always been most effective when he is making and recognising his mistakes. 'Like someone crossing a minefield, he takes steps backwards, to the left and the right, before moving forward again,' Baldwin writes, claiming this 'may look inelegant or uninspiring, but it's still probably the best way of getting to the other side'. I don't know if Baldwin has any more experience than I do of traversing a killing zone packed with unexploded ordinance, but I'm not sure the lolloping slosh he describes is a particularly sound way of maintaining forward momentum with all your limbs intact – whether you're forging through the Korean Demilitarized Zone or attempting to survive as Prime Minister for more than a calendar year. But alongside the fawning dribble, Baldwin has tempted Starmer into making a series of fairly remarkable admissions in this interview. Baldwin's thesis, essentially, is that when Starmer – a man who claims he has no capacity for introspection, no favourite book, no favourite poem, no landscape of dreams – experiences a clash between the public and private dimensions of his life, emblematised by his front door, a self-pitying truculence surges up and dominates the Prime Minister's political responses. I may have editorialised a bit in this summary – but not by much. Take the first few months of Labour's time in office, dominated by the decision to prioritise cutting Winter Fuel Allowance, Downing Street turf wars over which henchperson should be the henchperson in chief, and uncontrolled briefing about just how many freebies different members of the new government were taking from donors and firms in the form of designer clothes, new specks, sports tickets and corporate hospitality. For this expenses scandal, Starmer blames the dirty-minded people of the press for dragging his wife into it, on the shabby pretext that Mrs S (or 'Lady Victoria Sponger' as some unsympathetic platforms described her) accepted a mere £5000 worth of contributions to her personal wardrobe from Labour donors. The problem, according to Starmer, is that he 'got emotionally involved', losing his usual 'calm' because 'they dragged Vic into it through no fault of her own'. Optics, he tells us, aren't 'substance', and if you think his family shouldn't be cashing in to the tune of thousands of pounds in expensive costumes, then he seems to think you're the one being insubstantial and optical. The adults are well and truly back in charge, as some of you centrist dads used to coo. The Labour leader also seems to blame emotion for his decision in a recent immigration speech to caution us all about the imminent prospect of Britain becoming an 'island of strangers'. Starmer told Baldwin that he delivered this speech in a fog of emotion and minimal preparation after an arson attack at his family home. 'I wouldn't have used those words if I had known they were, or even would be interpreted as an echo of Powell,' Starmer says. 'I had no idea – and my speechwriters didn't know either.' Starmer admits he should have read through the speech properly and 'held it up to the light a bit more' before opening his mouth in public – a remarkable suggestion from someone whose supposedly forensic approach to politics is one of his few and diminishing virtues. As human responses to high-stress situations go, 'accidentally evoking Enoch Powell' is a new one for me.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Inside the SNP's political strategy ahead of 2026 Scottish election
Two SNP MPs said they expected the First Minister to set out his stall more fully at the party's conference beginning on October 11, seven months before Scotland goes to the polls. However, frustration among the party grassroots is mounting at the leadership's cautious stance since Swinney took over just over a year ago. He has avoided some of the major controversies which have dogged the party in recent years, most notably declining to do battle on trans rights as his two immediate predecessors did. And the SNP have become quieter in Westminster of late, with one MP attributing this to the natural summer wind-down. The UK Parliament breaks for summer recess on July 22. They said the summer holiday would provide a chance for greater consideration of the party's future direction. 'We're going into recess is one of the issues," the MP said. "So I would imagine there would be considerations about what we decide to do going forward from there." Keeping quiet THE party's nine representatives acted more as observers in Labour's internal row over benefits cuts, with one MP saying: 'This week has been very interesting to watch.' Another senior figure who spoke to the Sunday National referred to the famous adage: 'Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.' An MP also attributed the SNP's recent period of relative quiet to their greatly reduced stature since the election last year, where they lost 39 seats. 'I think also because we're a small group of nine, you have to pick your fights very carefully,' they said. 'We're not on the committees like we used to be, we don't get to do third-party positions, Westminster Hall like we used to do.' Stephen Flynn, the party's leader in Westminster and one of the SNP's most high-profile figures, quit his role on the Scottish Affairs Committee earlier this month, swapping in the relatively lesser-known Dave Doogan. Flynn cuts a more retiring figure in Parliament since SNP high command clipped his wings over now-aborted plans to hold onto his Westminster seat, were he to gain a place in the Scottish Parliament next year. Need for a vision FRUSTRATIONS over the party's lack of a positive message were expressed in the aftermath of the Hamilton by-election, which delivered a shock win for Scottish Labour, who most had assumed were out of the race, including Swinney himself. (Image: PA) Party activists raised concerns during the Hamilton by-election campaign that focusing solely on criticising Reform UK would not make up for the SNP lacking their own story to tell. They claimed these warnings were ignored. Swinney has been praised across the SNP for 'steadying the ship' – as insiders repeat like a mantra – but himself revealed during an interview with the Holyrood Sources podcast that a supporter wrote him recently asking when he would put the sails up. Swinney said that was a 'fair' assessment, adding: 'We've got to get growing and expanding.' Avoiding controversy STEERING clear of the kind of controversies likely to provide fodder to the right-wing press seems to have informed much of Swinney's thinking, including recent announcements that the Scottish Government would continue funding companies that had links with the Israeli military. The party's firm stance on Gaza was weakened significantly when it emerged last year that External Affairs Secretary Angus Robertson had held a meeting – kept under wraps until days later – with Israel's deputy ambassador to the UK. Robertson's meeting infuriated the party's Middle East spokesperson, Brendan O'Hara, who wrote to his Holyrood colleague to chastise him. (Image: PA) And, more recently, Swinney ducked out of a row about the proscription of Palestine Action, declining to echo Humza Yousaf's condemnation of plans to ban the group under terrorism laws. Swinney said only that the decision was one for the UK Home Secretary. But one MP said that the party should not mimic Labour's strategy for the 2024 General Election, which saw the party attempt to steer clear of the most politically explosive issues, hoping that not rocking the boat would steer them to victory. They said: 'If we took any lessons from Morgan McSweeney, we'd be in deep trouble.' And independence ...? ONE recent attempt to reinvigorate the party's base – after one source told The National the Hamilton defeat meant it was 'time to hit the independence button" – came in the form of Swinney giving a speech in which he claimed that independence was 'within reach'. But the party's plan for independence is to slowly and steadily build support for the prospect rather than any mechanism by which to achieve it. A top party insider told the Sunday National they rejected Alba's plans to treat next year's Holyrood election as a 'de facto' referendum, dismissing it as 'arrogant'. The de facto plan was Nicola Sturgeon's backup if the indyref2 Supreme Court gamble failed, but in the event, it was ditched as SNP policy. Polling offers some comfort to the SNP, with Swinney's party consistently coming in first place. But it has decisively become uncoupled from support for independence, where in the past the two were linked. Surveys are also consistently showing that support for Reform UK is solid north of the Border, with one poll last week showing the first predictions the party could gain Westminster seats in southern Scotland and Ayrshire. One MP told the Sunday National they believed that while Reform UK have the chance to do well across Scotland in next year's election, the party was mostly soaking up Tory and Labour voters over SNP ones. (Image: Ben Birchall/PA) However, it is clear that the entrance of Nigel Farage's party will change the Holyrood scene, with some commentators expecting the myth of Scottish exceptionalism – which often sees anti-immigration sentiment as an English attitude – to be decisively punctured. Insiders say that the process of crafting a fresh SNP message for the 2026 election is already under way, with one MP saying that 'we're already at the point of putting motions into conference' to shape party policy. Another said that Swinney had always intended to deliver his strategy in three parts – bringing stability to the Government, then the party, then bringing forward his vision – and had not envisaged this process being interrupted by a by-election, triggered by the sad and untimely death of Christina McKelvie. The Scottish Government appears in no way hurried to placate impatient activists who believe the SNP should hurry up in setting out their stall. Asked whether the party could be expected to wait until October's conference for Swinney to set out his vision, one aide said: 'That would be natural and expected at the last conference before an election.'
