More than a million people hit with 'disgraceful' hosepipe ban despite three days of heavy rain and thunderstorms
Homes served by the firm in parts of Oxfordshire, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Berkshire were hit by the ban following one of the driest springs on record.
It comes despite three days of heavy rain and thunderstorms, which have not been enough to replenish reservoir and groundwater levels to the required levels.
Postcodes beginning with OX, GL, SN, RG4, RG8 and RG9 now have restrictions - although London, which is also served by Thames Water, has avoided the ban.
The Reading-based company has asked 1.1million customers not to use hosepipes, including for cleaning cars, watering plants, filling pools or cleaning windows.
The ban follows Southern Water activating restrictions for Hampshire and the Isle of Wight yesterday. That followed other bans implemented by South East Water for parts of Kent and Sussex last Friday, and in the Yorkshire Water region since July 11.
But Gary Carter from the GMB trade union criticised the new restrictions amid rising water bills, adding: 'Thames Water lost 200billion litres of water through leaks last year. That's 570million litres wasted every single day – the worst in the country.
He claimed the union's workers at the company have 'had their hands tied behind their backs by crumbling infrastructure and non-existent investment', adding; 'For Thames Water to now impose a hosepipe ban while bills rocket is disgraceful.'
Racegoers smile despite torrential rain at Royal Windsor Racecourse in Berkshire yesterday
Heavily-indebted Thames Water has been battling to secure funding to shore up its creaking finances and stave off temporary nationalisation by the Government.
Liz Stephens, professor of climate risks and resilience at the University of Reading, said of the restrictions: 'This hosepipe ban is coming into place a whole month earlier in the year than the most recent hosepipe ban in 2022.
'As a result the impact on individuals may be more profound, especially if we experience further heatwaves during the rest of the summer.
'The UK has been experiencing drier-than-average conditions since January, and while this low rainfall might not be as severe as in 1976, the increased population puts more demand on water resources.'
Announcing the ban on July 14, Thames Water's strategic water resources director Nevil Muncaster said: 'This has been a challenging spring and summer with big spikes in customer demand during hot dry days and very little rainfall to replenish local supplies in the Thames Valley.
'Given the continued warm, dry weather we do not anticipate that the situation will improve any time soon so we have to take action now.
'Every drop of water we use comes from the environment and we have to balance protecting this while taking out the water needed to top-up reservoir levels.
'That is why we have had to make to the difficult decision to implement a hosepipe ban to make sure there's enough water for customers' essential needs and to protect rivers.'
Thames Water is the latest company to activate a ban after the UK experienced its warmest spring on record and the driest in more than 50 years. It was the warmest June on record in England.
The firm said it had seen daily demand for water in Swindon and Oxfordshire reach levels last seen during the 2022 drought.
A statement said: 'Water abstracted from the River Thames for this area is stored at Farmoor reservoir in Oxfordshire. If as is expected, the warm, dry weather continues the company anticipates that reservoir levels at Farmoor will continue to drop.
'Further, river levels are below average for the time of year, which limits how much water can be sourced from the River Thames to top up the reservoir.
'In the Cotswolds, aquifers which feed the River Thames are fast draining and the prolonged low rainfall also limits how quickly they can be refilled, further restricting how much water the company can source for reservoir storage.'
The Environment Agency placed the areas covered by Thames Water into the 'prolonged dry weather category' and the water company says its drought plan was designed to mitigate the risk of further impact on water supplies and ensure taps can keep running.
Businesses which use water as a core part of their purpose, such as garden centres and car washes, are exempt.
The ban comes as conditions remain unsettled today following three consecutive days of heavy rain, thunderstorms and flooding.
The Environment Agency has 18 flood alerts in place for England today, while the Scottish Environment Protection Agency has 16 alerts and three warnings .
Today will bring rain in western Scotland, where a yellow warning was in place this morning. A mixture of sunny spells and scattered showers will be seen elsewhere.
Met Office meteorologist Tom Morgan said: 'Tuesday is not looking as unsettled. The showers won't be quite as widespread or indeed as heavy as they have been.
'Nonetheless, there will be some showers or longer spells of rain for Scotland in particular, the west, (and) northwestern parts of England as well.
'But many parts of England and Wales (will be) actually getting away with a fairly reasonable day with some dry periods.
'And if the sunshine does break through that cloud at times, well, we might see temperatures reach 24C or 25C.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Honours system gets new role to make awards more inclusive
Business leader Moni Mannings has been appointed to a new role to make the honours system more inclusive and reach a wider range of communities.A new "diversity and outreach committee" has been created by the Cabinet Office, which will have Ms Mannings as its independent chair for a five-year from the BBC earlier this year showed that only 6% of higher awards went to people in the north of England and only 4% to people from working-class backgrounds."The honours system is one of our nation's most visible mechanisms, not only for celebrating individual contribution but also of promoting our society's values," said Ms Mannings. "Recognising excellence from all walks of life isn't just a symbolic act - it is how we tell our national story."I would be privileged to play a role in ensuring that the honours system reflects and celebrates the full richness of our society."Ms Mannings is an independent director for the Co-operative Group and the Land Securities Group, and was a founder of the Empowering People of Colour business network. She has talked about the challenges as a senior leader in her own business career: "There were very few women, there were certainly no women of colour. "But even more than that, so few people from working class backgrounds, which actually felt like an even bigger barrier."The new committee will encourage a wider range of nominations from regions of the country and parts of society which might currently be under-represented. It will give advice to the other honours committees and the analysis of the New Year honours list found that more than 60% of beneficiaries of "higher" awards, such as Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) and knighthoods and damehoods, lived in London and south-east England, which accounts for 27% of the UK population. There had been accusations of unfairness about specific gaps, such as the lack of any knighthoods for rugby league, unlike rugby union and other sports where former stars had been was resolved in this year's King's birthday honours in June, when Billy Boston became rugby league's first knight in 130 years of the sport, after a campaign that had accused the honours system of snobbery against a northern, working class sport."It is a historic wrong that a sport, which is the backbone of so many communities, has waited so long to receive this honour," Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said at the time of Boston's new role for Ms Mannings will support Sir Keir's strategy of making the honours system more representative of the "length and breadth of the UK" and to be "awarded based on merit, regardless of background". Sign up here to get the latest royal stories and analysis every week with our Royal Watch newsletter. Those outside the UK can sign up here.
Telegraph
2 minutes ago
- Telegraph
M&S apologises over trans employee in bra department
Marks & Spencer has apologised to a mother for causing her teenage daughter 'distress' after she was asked if she needed help by a trans employee in its bra section. The retailer said it was 'truly sorry' after the mother complained that her 14-year-old daughter had felt uncomfortable when they were approached by a transgender shop assistant in the lingerie area of the store, where they were hoping to have a bra fitting. Although the staff member was polite, the mother said she felt it was 'completely inappropriate' for her daughter to be approached by a 'biological male' in that part of the store. In a complaint to M&S, she told the retailer: 'Imagine her horror, then, when the person to approach us and ask if we needed help was a transgender 'woman', ie, a biological male. 'Visibly upset' 'This is obviously the case: he is at least 6ft 2in tall... My daughter recoiled, so I politely declined the offer and we left immediately. She was visibly upset and said she felt 'freaked out'.' The following day, an M&S customer service assistant replied, apologising for the incident. 'Thank you for reaching out to us and sharing your experience,' the email said. 'We deeply regret the distress your daughter felt during her visit to our store. 'We understand how important this milestone is for her, and we are truly sorry that it did not go as you had hoped.' The retailer said it took her concerns 'very seriously' and would ensure her daughter 'receives assistance from a female colleague during her next visit'. 'We want to make this experience as comfortable and positive as possible for her. Please let us know when you plan to visit again, and we will make the necessary arrangements,' the email said. The Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that trans women can be excluded from women-only spaces because equality law protecting women refers to biological sex. Britain's highest court ruled that transgender women are not legally women, and that 'sex' in equality law refers only to biological sex. The incident in M&S, in March, came a few weeks before the ruling. In her complaint, the mother argued that the retailer's response fell 'significantly short of the response that was required to satisfy me that M&S takes seriously the safety and dignity of women and girls'. The mother, who asked to remain anonymous, said that the retailer had acknowledged 'this colleague is not female' but this was 'not sufficient to offer just my daughter the protection of not being approached by him'. She asked the retailer for confirmation that it would not happen to any other teenagers, and that M&S would implement a policy to ensure that transgender staff would not approach young women. It is understood that the staff member involved works across the clothing section as well as other parts of the shop and is not one of the staff members who carries out bra fittings. 'Entirely inappropriate' Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns for the human rights charity Sex Matters, which campaigns for clarity about biological sex in law and life, said that M&S needed to 'rethink its priorities'. 'This is what happens when a business centres the feelings of men who identify as women, even at the expense of their own customers. It is entirely inappropriate for a man to approach a teenage girl in a lingerie department. Being dressed in women's clothes doesn't change that. It's extraordinary that a man would regard himself as entitled to do such a thing; most men know how unwelcome that would be. 'M&S needs to rethink its priorities and remember that women and girls have rights too, and that this man should not be permitted to hang around in the women's underwear department as a matter of common decency.' An M&S spokesman: 'We want our stores to be inclusive and welcoming places for our colleagues and customers. 'We have written to this customer and explained that our colleagues typically work across all departments in our stores and customers can always ask to speak to the colleague they feel most comfortable with.'
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves under pressure to ‘urgently rule out' tax hikes
The Conservatives are urging Chancellor Rachel Reeves to "urgently rule out" increasing share taxes in the upcoming autumn budget, following the leak of a memo from Angela Rayner suggesting a series of tax hikes. The Tories argue that leaving investors"in limbo" could harm the economy. The party claims that scrapping the £500 dividend allowance would pull an estimated 5.22 million more individuals into paying investment levies. This pressure on ministers comes after a document, reportedly sent by the Deputy Prime Minister to Ms Reeves, was leaked to the press. In the memo, Ms Rayner proposed removing the dividend allowance to generate approximately £325 million annually, as well as axing inheritance tax relief for AIM shares and increasing dividend tax rates, according to The Telegraph. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride commented: 'The Government need to urgently rule out these tax hikes on savers and investors before speculation causes further economic harm. ' Labour don't understand how business works and how to create growth. More taxes on investment, entrepreneurship and saving are the last thing our economy needs right now.' The Government's U-turns over welfare reform and winter fuel payments have left the Chancellor with a multibillion-pound black hole to fill, fuelling speculation that she will seek to raise revenue through tax hikes. The Tories claimed axing the dividend allowance would drag 'an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying dividend tax'. This figure appears to be based on an assumption that at least 8.82 million people in the UK hold shares that pay dividends. Some 3.6 million are already subject to dividend tax, according to data obtained by investment platform AJ Bell through a Freedom of Information request. The Chancellor last year said she would not be 'coming back with more borrowing or more taxes' after her first budget but has since refused to rule out raising specific levies, saying it would be 'irresponsible' to do so. A Labour Party spokesperson said: 'The Conservatives have some brass neck. They've still not apologised for the damage caused by the Liz Truss mini-Budget, nor the £22 billion black hole they left – which hammered firms and families across the country. 'Labour is doing more to support business than the Tories ever could. 'We've already delivered three historic trade deals and four interest rate cuts – to reduce costs and put money back in people's pockets.'
