Cuban seniors defy ageing by diving in
Cuban former revolutionary Orestes Quintana, 87, a member of the Juventud Acumulada swimming club, exercises before swimming in Havana. (AFP pic)
HAVANA : It's never too late to make a splash, as Orestes Quintana, one of the doyens of the Juventud Acumulada (Forever Young) swimming club in Cuba's capital Havana discovered.
The 87-year-old former revolutionary, who helped Fidel Castro fight his way to victory over a dictatorship in 1959, took up swimming relatively late in life, in his sixties.
Before that, 'I knew how to float, I used to bob about in the water like everyone else but I didn't know the different strokes,' the silver-haired ex-soldier said.
Now, he spends a full two hours a day cleaving through the aquamarine waters of the Caribbean and has a bunch of amateur swimming titles to his name.
'I have almost no challengers. In my age category, very few people know how to swim,' he confided with a smile.
Lazaro Diaz, 75, was also a pensioner when he learned to swim as a panacea for a weak heart and recurring back pain.
'I was starting to feel the effects of ageing,' said Diaz, who undertakes a six-kilometre round trip from home every day to get in his vivifying 400-metre swim.
'In the water I don't feel (any pain),' he added.
Juventud Acumulada operates out of one of a string of leisure centers built for the Cuban elite along the coast west of Havana between the 1930s and 1950s.
The centres were later nationalised by Castro's communist government and transformed into 'workers' social circles' or CSOs.
The glamor of the Otto Parellada CSO – named after a young rebel killed fighting the Fulgencio Batista dictatorship – has long since been eroded by the elements and successive economic crises.
The pale green paint on the club house is peeling.
And the ladder that once led from the pier to the water was swept away by a hurricane, meaning swimmers now have to negotiate a slippery sea wall.
But the bronzed elder statesmen and -women of swimming remain undaunted.
Juventud Acumulada was founded by a local amateur swimming champion, Ramon Cordoves, who honed his technique by reading tips from legendary Romanian-born American Olympian and actor Johnny Weissmuller, of 'Tarzan' fame.
The club is now open to swimmers of all ages but is most closely associated with its old-timers, who fly its colours at competitions across the island.
Its oldest member, Maria Antonia Cendoya, recently took gold in a 50-metre race at the tender age of 88.
At a time when Europeans are going crazy for wild swimming in lakes, lochs and oceans, Quintana summed up the benefits of a dip in the sea: 'The sea rejuvenates you, gives you energy, makes you happy and relieves stress. The sea is wonderful.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
17 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Cuban seniors defy ageing by diving in
Cuban former revolutionary Orestes Quintana, 87, a member of the Juventud Acumulada swimming club, exercises before swimming in Havana. (AFP pic) HAVANA : It's never too late to make a splash, as Orestes Quintana, one of the doyens of the Juventud Acumulada (Forever Young) swimming club in Cuba's capital Havana discovered. The 87-year-old former revolutionary, who helped Fidel Castro fight his way to victory over a dictatorship in 1959, took up swimming relatively late in life, in his sixties. Before that, 'I knew how to float, I used to bob about in the water like everyone else but I didn't know the different strokes,' the silver-haired ex-soldier said. Now, he spends a full two hours a day cleaving through the aquamarine waters of the Caribbean and has a bunch of amateur swimming titles to his name. 'I have almost no challengers. In my age category, very few people know how to swim,' he confided with a smile. Lazaro Diaz, 75, was also a pensioner when he learned to swim as a panacea for a weak heart and recurring back pain. 'I was starting to feel the effects of ageing,' said Diaz, who undertakes a six-kilometre round trip from home every day to get in his vivifying 400-metre swim. 'In the water I don't feel (any pain),' he added. Juventud Acumulada operates out of one of a string of leisure centers built for the Cuban elite along the coast west of Havana between the 1930s and 1950s. The centres were later nationalised by Castro's communist government and transformed into 'workers' social circles' or CSOs. The glamor of the Otto Parellada CSO – named after a young rebel killed fighting the Fulgencio Batista dictatorship – has long since been eroded by the elements and successive economic crises. The pale green paint on the club house is peeling. And the ladder that once led from the pier to the water was swept away by a hurricane, meaning swimmers now have to negotiate a slippery sea wall. But the bronzed elder statesmen and -women of swimming remain undaunted. Juventud Acumulada was founded by a local amateur swimming champion, Ramon Cordoves, who honed his technique by reading tips from legendary Romanian-born American Olympian and actor Johnny Weissmuller, of 'Tarzan' fame. The club is now open to swimmers of all ages but is most closely associated with its old-timers, who fly its colours at competitions across the island. Its oldest member, Maria Antonia Cendoya, recently took gold in a 50-metre race at the tender age of 88. At a time when Europeans are going crazy for wild swimming in lakes, lochs and oceans, Quintana summed up the benefits of a dip in the sea: 'The sea rejuvenates you, gives you energy, makes you happy and relieves stress. The sea is wonderful.'
Free Malaysia Today
31-05-2025
- Free Malaysia Today
US top court lets Trump revoke legal status for 500,000 migrants
Donald Trump campaigned for the White House on a pledge to deport millions of undocumented migrants. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : The US Supreme Court handed president Donald Trump a major victory today in his immigration crackdown, giving his administration the green light to revoke the legal status of half a million migrants from four Caribbean and Latin American countries. The decision puts 532,000 people who came from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela to the US under a two-year humanitarian 'parole' programme launched by former president Joe Biden at risk of deportation. And it marked the second time the highest US court has sided with Trump in his aggressive push to deliver on his election pledge to deport millions of non-citizens, through a series of policy announcements that have prompted a flurry of lawsuits. But the opinion sparked a scathing dissent from two justices in the liberal minority who said the six conservatives on the bench had 'plainly botched' their ruling and undervalued the 'devastating consequences' to those potentially affected. The revoked programme had allowed entry into the US for two years for up to 30,000 migrants a month from the four countries, all of which have dismal human rights records. But as Trump takes a hard line on immigration, his administration moved to overturn those protections, winning a ruling from the Supreme Court earlier this month that allowed officials to begin deporting some 350,000 Venezuelans. The latest case resulted from homeland security secretary Kristi Noem cancelling an 18-month extension of the temporary protected status of the migrants, citing in particular the 'authoritarian' nature of Nicolas Maduro's government in Venezuela. The department gave them 30 days to leave the country unless they had legal protection under another programme. 'Needless human suffering' 'The court has plainly botched this assessment today,' justices Ketanji Brown Jackon and Sonia Sotomayor wrote in their dissent. The justices said the migrants face being wrenched from family and returning to potential danger in their native countries – or opting to stay and risking imminent removal. 'At a minimum, granting the stay would facilitate needless human suffering before the courts have reached a final judgment regarding the legal arguments at issue, while denying the government's application would not have anything close to that kind of practical impact,' Jackson said. None of the other justices gave reasons for their decision, and the court was not required to make the vote public. The district court that barred the administration from revoking the migrants' status had argued that it was unlawfully applying a fast-track deportation procedure aimed at illegal immigrants to non-citizens protected by government programmes. At the Supreme Court, justice department lawyers said the 'district court has nullified one of the administration's most consequential immigration policy decisions' by issuing the stay. The high court's decision means the Trump administration can go ahead with its policy change, even as the litigation on the merits plays out in lower courts. Trump campaigned for the White House on a pledge to deport millions of undocumented migrants, evoking an 'invasion' of the US by hordes of foreign criminals. Among other measures, he invoked an obscure wartime law to fly more than 200 alleged Venezuelan gang members to a prison in El Salvador. But his programme of mass deportations has been thwarted or restricted by numerous court rulings, including from the Supreme Court and notably on the grounds that those targeted should be able to assert their due process rights. And the administration has been berated over its efforts to restrict immigration from poor countries with human rights concerns like Afghanistan and Haiti, while accepting white South African refugees amid baseless claims that they face 'genocide.' The Trump administration systematically accuses judges who oppose his immigration decisions of plundering his presidential national security powers.
Malay Mail
31-05-2025
- Malay Mail
Trump wins Supreme Court ruling to strip legal protections from 500,000 migrants, exposing them to deportation
WASHINGTON, May 31— The US Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a major victory yesterday in his immigration crackdown, giving his administration the green light to revoke the legal status of half a million migrants from four Caribbean and Latin American countries. The decision puts 532,000 people who came from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela to the United States under a two-year humanitarian 'parole' programme launched by former president Joe Biden at risk of deportation. And it marked the second time the highest US court has sided with Trump in his aggressive push to deliver on his election pledge to deport millions of non-citizens, through a series of policy moves that have prompted a flurry of lawsuits. On Calle Ocho, a historic street in Miami's Little Havana neighbourhood, Johnny Cardona, 63, was saddened by the Supreme Court's decision. 'Since I'm American, it's not going to affect me, but I know it's going to affect many friendships, many families, many people I know,' Cardona told AFP. The ruling sparked a scathing dissent from two justices in the liberal minority who said the six conservatives on the bench had 'plainly botched' the decision and undervalued the 'devastating consequences' to those potentially affected. The revoked programme had allowed entry into the United States for two years for up to 30,000 migrants a month from the four countries, all of which have dismal human rights records. But as Trump takes a hard line on immigration, his administration moved to overturn those protections, winning a ruling from the Supreme Court earlier this month that allowed officials to begin deporting around 350,000 Venezuelans. The latest case resulted from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem cancelling an 18-month extension of the temporary protected status of the migrants, citing in particular the 'authoritarian' nature of Nicolas Maduro's government in Venezuela. The department gave them 30 days to leave the country unless they had legal protection under another programme. 'Needless human suffering' 'The court has plainly botched this assessment today,' Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor wrote in their dissent. The justices said the migrants face being wrenched from family and returning to potential danger in their native countries — or opting to stay and risking imminent removal. 'At a minimum, granting the stay would facilitate needless human suffering before the courts have reached a final judgment regarding the legal arguments at issue, while denying the government's application would not have anything close to that kind of practical impact,' Jackson said. None of the other justices gave reasons for their decision, and the court was not required to make the vote public. 'The ultimate goal of this policy is to leave these people without legal status, to make them subjects of deportation,' said Adelys Ferro, co-founder and executive director of the Venezuelan American Caucus, an advocacy group. The district court that barred the administration from revoking the migrants' status had argued that it was unlawfully applying a fast-track deportation procedure aimed at illegal immigrants to non-citizens protected by government programmes. At the Supreme Court, Justice Department lawyers said the 'district court has nullified one of the administration's most consequential immigration policy decisions' by issuing the stay. The high court's decision means the Trump administration can go ahead with its policy change, even as the litigation on the merits plays out in lower courts. Trump campaigned for the White House on a pledge to deport millions of undocumented migrants, claiming there was an ongoing 'invasion' of the United States by hordes of foreign criminals. But his programme of mass deportations has been thwarted or restricted by numerous court rulings, including from the Supreme Court and notably on the grounds that those targeted should be able to assert their due process rights. The Trump administration systematically accuses judges who oppose his immigration decisions of plundering his presidential national security powers. — AFP
