Queenstown council wants Environment Court to make decision on discharge into Shotover River
The Shotover River where Queenstown Lakes District Council discharged 12,000 cubic metres of treated wastewater in March.
Photo:
RNZ / Tess Brunton
The Queenstown Lakes District Council wants its retrospective application to discharge treated effluent to Shotover River to go directly to the Environment Court.
In late March, the council enacted emergency powers under the Resource Management Act to
pump at least 12,000 cubic metres of treated wastewater into the river
each day from the Shotover Wastewater Treatment Plant after its disposal field failed.
The
council submitted a retrospective resource consent
to the Otago Regional Council in May and asked for it to be publicly notified.
The Queenstown Lakes District Council has now applied to the regional council to directly refer its resource consent to the Environment Court.
District council property and infrastructure general manager Tony Avery said it believed that this would provide the most efficient and robust approach given the nature of the consent.
"Shotover River is a significant natural resource and comes with considerable cultural and community values.
"As such, we believe it is beneficial for the evaluation of and decision on council's application to be made in an experienced and well-resourced court," Avery said.
If approved, it would mean the regional council would no longer be the decision-maker in the first instance - the Environment Court would.
Earlier this year, the regional council took the district council to Environment Court over
repeated resource consent breaches at the plant
.
It resulted in the [. http://rnz.co.nz/news/national/563664/queenstown-lakes-district-council-must-fix-issues-with-shotover-wastewater-plant-court district council being ordered to pay at least $235,000] in costs and fix the issues at the plant
The Queenstown Lakes District Council said that meant the Environment Court was already well acquainted with the matter and "would help to provide an efficient and comprehensive decision from a neutral arbiter".
Public notification, submission timeframes and assessing the application would still fall under the regional council's jurisdiction, and it would still need to provide that assessment and a report before the matter was heard by the court.
The district council said the Environment Court would be able to properly test evidence to assist decision makers.
"Referring the matter to the Environment Court would result in a faster decision, ensure access to the necessary resourcing in a cost-effective way, and provide a simple process that the public can engage with and take part in if they wish to," the district council said.
"Rights of appeal would remain intact."
If the regional council declined the request, it would stay as the decision maker and a council hearing would be held.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Taxes will have to increase to cope with ageing population, government spending
The IRD has warned government spending needs to change or taxes will need to increase in the future. Photo: RNZ Inland Revenue is warning that unless what the government spends its money on changes, taxes will need to increase in the coming years to cope with an ageing population. It is currently seeking submissions on its latest long-term insights briefing. It notes that in the coming years, if the current settings are maintained, government spending as a proportion of the economy will rise. "A core driver of these fiscal pressures is that New Zealand's population is ageing." By 2060, a quarter of the population will be older than 65. "This means that the amount the government needs to spend on superannuation and health care will increase if the government maintains current policy settings. "In its last Long-term Fiscal Statement, the Treasury predicted that government expenditure will exceed government revenue by 13.3 percent of GDP by 2061 if the government takes no response to rising fiscal pressures," IRD said. That would mean either that existing taxes would need to be levied at a higher rate - such as higher levels of income tax or GST - or there would need to be new taxes implemented. It said New Zealand taxed a more limited set of capital gains than most other OECD countries. It could be possible to broaden that scope. "The absence of a general approach to taxing capital gains can provide an incentive for individuals to reduce their tax liability by undertaking activities that are not taxed rather than those that are taxed. "This can reduce government's ability to raise more revenue in a way that is progressive." It pointed to an estimate for a Tax Working Group report in 2019 that, if a capital gains tax took effect from the 2022 tax year, it would raise about $3 billion in the 2026 tax year. Revenue would increase over time. IRD said this was in line with revenue raised in other countries from capital gains taxes. "Revenue from capital gains could therefore make a meaningful contribution to addressing long-term fiscal challenges. "However [as noted above] the last Treasury LTFS projected an operating deficit of 13.3 percent of GDP by 2061 under current settings. "Therefore, even with more comprehensive taxation of capital gains other tax or expenditure measures would be needed in the longer term. "Therefore, Inland Revenue considers that it is also important to consider how to increase the flexibility of the tax system to changing revenue needs." It said capital gains taxes could also have relatively high compliance costs. Inland Revenue said GST was a substantial source of tax revenue. But if it were to be increased, there would be concerns about the effect on lower-income households. While wealthier households pay more GST overall, poorer households spend more of their money on GST. IRD said GST could be applied at a lower rate on some goods and services that were bought by lower-income households, or there could be assistance via the welfare system to help those households. "Several international and New Zealand-focused studies have shown that using cash transfers is a more cost-effective way to target assistance to lower-income groups compared to applying lower rates to certain goods and services. "Several countries have implemented permanent GST-offset schemes for this reason." The report used modelling of GST at 18 percent. It also considered how other taxes such as payroll tax, wealth tax, inheritance tax, land and property tax could be used to add further tax bases to the New Zealand system. But it said there were difficult trade-offs with each of these. "Payroll taxes provide a means of shifting the balance of taxation away from capital income and onto labour income, but they are likely to have some disadvantages relative to GST and income tax. "Wealth taxes are likely to impose higher distortionary costs than a broad-based income tax, and they face similar challenges to those that would make an idealised income tax that includes accrued capital gains impractical. "Inheritance taxes are likely to have similar distortionary costs to income taxes when people are intentional donors, but they will have much lower distortionary costs when people are unintentional donors. "Land taxes are widely seen as one of the least distortive taxes, and they impose fewer distortionary costs than property taxes or stamp duties. "However, they would have a significant impact on certain groups. As with any tax, providing preferential tax treatment to certain groups or in certain situations would tend to increase efficiency costs and reduce horizontal equity on some margins." IRD said this underscored the importance of income tax and GST being designed in a way that was as efficient and fair as possible while having the flexibility to adjust to changing revenue needs. "New Zealand faces difficult choices in designing a durable tax system in the face of long-term fiscal challenges. "In Inland Revenue's view, a priority for future work should be on how to make New Zealand's main bases of income tax and consumption tax more flexible to changing revenue needs over time." It said, with different personal and company tax rates there was an incentive for people to "shelter" their income in companies. "This incentive is likely to increase the wider gap between top personal tax rates and the company rate, however, in the context of rising fiscal pressures, a system that requires alignment of the company rate and top personal rate is unlikely to be a durable tax system." Economist Shamubeel Eaqub said IRD had a clear message that either tax rates would need to increase, or the tax base - or both. "There are some difficult choices to be had in the future, if spending choices don't change then our revenue choices have to. "And we can either tax more using the same instruments that we have on the same bases that we have or we can increase the bases, and there are no easy answers. "There are always trade-offs, there will be winners and losers. And we're going to have to make a considered decision of what we're going to do - no tax is easy. "No one likes paying tax. I think it's about finding the least disruptive system given the public services that we want." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Queenstown council wants Environment Court to make decision on discharge into Shotover River
The Shotover River where Queenstown Lakes District Council discharged 12,000 cubic metres of treated wastewater in March. Photo: RNZ / Tess Brunton The Queenstown Lakes District Council wants its retrospective application to discharge treated effluent to Shotover River to go directly to the Environment Court. In late March, the council enacted emergency powers under the Resource Management Act to pump at least 12,000 cubic metres of treated wastewater into the river each day from the Shotover Wastewater Treatment Plant after its disposal field failed. The council submitted a retrospective resource consent to the Otago Regional Council in May and asked for it to be publicly notified. The Queenstown Lakes District Council has now applied to the regional council to directly refer its resource consent to the Environment Court. District council property and infrastructure general manager Tony Avery said it believed that this would provide the most efficient and robust approach given the nature of the consent. "Shotover River is a significant natural resource and comes with considerable cultural and community values. "As such, we believe it is beneficial for the evaluation of and decision on council's application to be made in an experienced and well-resourced court," Avery said. If approved, it would mean the regional council would no longer be the decision-maker in the first instance - the Environment Court would. Earlier this year, the regional council took the district council to Environment Court over repeated resource consent breaches at the plant . It resulted in the [. district council being ordered to pay at least $235,000] in costs and fix the issues at the plant The Queenstown Lakes District Council said that meant the Environment Court was already well acquainted with the matter and "would help to provide an efficient and comprehensive decision from a neutral arbiter". Public notification, submission timeframes and assessing the application would still fall under the regional council's jurisdiction, and it would still need to provide that assessment and a report before the matter was heard by the court. The district council said the Environment Court would be able to properly test evidence to assist decision makers. "Referring the matter to the Environment Court would result in a faster decision, ensure access to the necessary resourcing in a cost-effective way, and provide a simple process that the public can engage with and take part in if they wish to," the district council said. "Rights of appeal would remain intact." If the regional council declined the request, it would stay as the decision maker and a council hearing would be held. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Watercare to contact Auckland customers after 13,000 faulty meters spark billing chaos
Watercare has revealed that a third of its 40,000 EDMI smart meters are faulty, saying it discovered the issue in October 2024. Photo: Supplied / Watercare The country's largest water supplier says it will start proactively contacting customers about tens of thousands of faulty meters, following a flood of customer complaints. Frustrated Watercare customers have contacted Checkpoint about water bills in the hundreds of dollars, which were received after meters stopped transmitting data about water use. As a result, customers received bills saying they had used zero water for the month and faced paying only the fixed charges. Lizzie from Auckland's North Shore said she investigated her billing after three "zero use" bills and found that their smart meter was no longer transmitting data. "We received a bill that amounted to about $410 for a month's usage. I emailed them and said this is not reasonable. At that point, I revoked the direct debit authority. I made it very clear I was not refusing to pay their bills, but their bills needed to be based in fact and not just plucked out of the air." This week, Watercare revealed that a third of its 40,000 EDMI smart meters are faulty, saying it discovered the issue last October and started returning affected customers to manual reading, leading to ''catch-up'' bills that are higher than previous months. West Auckland customer Kyle said he was on to his second smart meter after the first one stopped sending a signal a few months ago. But he told Checkpoint his water bills are now coming in much higher than he would expect. "Our water bill on average was about $100 or $120 a month, and then it jumped to about $200, and I'm like, 'Yeah, no, that doesn't seem quite right.'" Kyle said Watercare made no effort to contact him about the issue, and it was he who raised it with the company. He said they came back to him and told him his meter had temporarily stopped communicating. Watercare said the EDMI meters were one of two smart meter models that have been rolled out since 2022. "We are really disappointed that this fault has occurred and are working very closely with the supplier to ensure Aucklanders are not out of pocket because of it. All meters are under warranty, and we're still in negotiations with the supplier. For this reason, we can't confirm right now whether we will replace all 40,000 EDMI meters. We are not replacing them until we have confirmed a solution, " said Chief Financial Officer Angela Neeson. Utilities Disputes Commissioner, Neil Mallon, told Checkpoint that he would expect a company with issues with meters to ''be really proactive with communication'' and provide them with information about what to do, such as sending the company data so it can be recorded. "It should be on every bill, really, to let customers know if you've got an estimate or an actual bill, you've got the power to do something about that. To let your provider know." Mellon said water companies were voluntary participants in the scheme, but he would like to see them become mandatory, like energy companies. "I think water and energy are both essential services to Kiwis, and they should be treated consistently. In an ideal world, that's our view. If they were, all Kiwi consumers would be able to come to us if they had a problem with their water provider." Under the current voluntary membership, it's up to Watercare to initiate an investigation into a consumer complaint. Mellon believed that about 5 percent of complaints dealt with by Utilities Disputes relate to water. Watercare has now updated its website with information for customers and said it will proactively contact customers with working EDMI meters from next week, "so that they're aware of the issue, and know to get in touch with us straight away if they get a water bill that incorrectly said they've used no water. This will help to reduce the impact of catch-up bills." Customer last names have been omitted due to privacy concerns. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
