Over 12k proposed homes stuck in planning system for years will not be built
An Bord Pleanála has rejected plans for almost 7,000 new homes stuck in the planning system for years, Extra.ie has learned.
Applications for a further 5,500-plus new units in developments initially earmarked to be fast-tracked under the Strategic Housing Development (SHD) scheme have also been controversially 'withdrawn'.
And the national planning authority has yet to decide on a further 19 developments with a combined 6,600-plus new homes, despite the fact that they have been clogging the planning system for several years. James Browne. Pic: Gareth Chaney/ Collins Photos
The huge number of rejections and delays sparked a political backlash last night as the Government is under mounting pressure to reverse a significant decline in new builds driven by infrastructure problems.
It also comes amid deepening tensions between Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael over the botched appointment of Minister James Browne's top candidate for housing 'tsar'.
Latest figures show An Bord Pleanála (ABP) has 'refused' permission for 23 developments with a combined 6,885 units from the SHD planning list. These include a development of 881 apartments in Dundrum, south Dublin. Some 1,018 of these rejections were made in the first four months of this year. The planning authority confirmed it has 'withdrawn' a further nine applications with a total of 5,518 new homes, including a proposal for a 2,567-home development in Belcamp, Dublin.
ABP confirmed that as of the end of last month, the fate of a further 19 SHD applications with 6,658 units is still 'not decided'. Dublin (3,059) accounts for the largest amount of SHD schemes that remain lingering in the system, followed by Cork (1,579); Bray, Co. Wicklow (694); Kildare (744); Offaly (349); and Wexford (233).
Over the past year, just eight SHD developments with 2,399 homes have been given the green light. The majority (1,050) are in Dublin, with the rest in Cork (563) and Bray, Co. Wicklow (586). An Bord Pleanála has rejected plans for almost 7,000 new homes stuck in the planning system for years, Extra.ie has learned. Pic: Shutterstock
The planning applications for more than 20,000 new homes were in stalled developments earmarked to be fast-tracked under the SHD.
Under the scheme, introduced in 2017, decisions on large-scale developments would be made within 16 weeks by ABP and bypass local authorities. It prioritised those with 100 or more houses and student accommodation units.
In 2021, applications made under the scheme ceased after the Government terminated the SHD planning arrangements and replaced them with different arrangements. In October that year, ABP secured 117 new staff to help it implement reforms and clear the backlog. Since then, the agency has been slowly working through the planning applications submitted to the SHD.
The updated figures were published on April 17 after the list detailing the scale of rejections and delays mysteriously disappeared from the ABP website for almost a month without notification or explanation.
On April 2, Independent Senator Victor Boyhan wrote to the planning authority requesting they 'please forward me the current SHD list', adding: 'I always downloaded the same on the ABP website, but understand it's been removed.' Catherine Connolly. Pic: Arthur Carron/Collins Photos
Six days later, in a Dáil question to Minister James Browne, Independent TD Catherine Connolly requested the number of properties on 'the current outstanding SHD planning application list'. In his response, Mr Browne simply stated, 'my Department does not hold the information requested' and referred her to an ABP email address for further information.
On April 22, Senator Boyhan received an ABP response informing him: 'The SHD list, which had been on the Board's website, was removed at the end of March 2025 following queries which brought to the attention of the Board that the list had not been updated.
'A newly revised list will be on the Board's website by the end of this week. In the meantime, please see the updated list (as of the 17th of April) attached.'
Senator Boyhan told Extra.ie the figures – and ABP's responses to his queries – are 'a prime example of the urgency for the Minister to get on with An Bord Pleanála reform'.
He added: 'The Minister will have to explain why all the SHD plans for housing units are not being built out and why the Board appears to be so slow, in an emergency, in passing plans. The Minister must now move swiftly to making real changes in devolving powers to councillors and give councils the money to build houses.' Rory Hearne. Pic: Colin Keegan/Collins Dublin
Social Democrats' housing spokesman Rory Hearne called the planning figures a 'mess' and pointed the finger of blame at the Coalition parties.
He told the MoS: 'They haven't resourced local authorities with sufficient planners. This Government is continuously acting like it hasn't been in Government for years. This is typified by Fianna Fáil who, after holding the housing ministry for five years, have suddenly discovered 'bottlenecks'… despite claiming misleadingly in the election they had turned the corner on housing.'
Sinn Féin housing spokesman Eoin ? Broin said a lack of staff at the planning authority is to blame for the backlog in applications.
'The Board has received sanction for extra staffing, but these positions have still not all been filled,' he added.'They need another 50 staff to clear the backlog, and this must be done swiftly.'
In response to queries, An Bord Pleanála said a key factor in the delays occurred in 2022 when, 'a number of SHD applications were lodged, where subsequently, a new City or County Development Plan came into force.
'The Board has been making significant progress in addressing a backlog of cases that arose over 2022 and 2023, which included a number of SHD applications.
'It is not possible at this juncture to provide a specific timeframe for each outstanding case.'
Mr Browne – facing criticism from the Opposition and within the Coalition amid a significant drop in building commencements this year – will likely not be happy with the number of developments progressed from the SHD list.
Speaking at the release of the Revised National Planning Framework (NPF) this week, he said, 'Ireland needs a step change in the delivery of housing' adding: 'I am ensuring that the vital conditions for the accelerated delivery of new homes are put in place.'
But one Coalition source noted: 'When it comes to that [SHD] list, more house permissions are being disappeared than passed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
34 minutes ago
- Irish Times
A key plank of Ireland's social housing delivery now hangs in the balance
There are debates about where the State should and should not get involved in the housing market – but no argument that one area where it needs to step in is the provision of social housing for those who do not have the resources to rent or buy in the private market. Like many areas of the housing market, there are shortages here, as shown via long local authority housing lists and homelessness figures. So when a key Government scheme to provide more social housing is in danger of falling apart, it is noteworthy and the circumstances need to be examined. It is also clear that the decision of the Government to pull out of a public-private partnership (PPP) agreement to provide almost 500 social houses puts the whole process of using these kinds of deals to build social houses for local authorities in doubt. With future deals in the pipeline due to deliver another 1,000 social homes, this poses questions for the Government and Minister for Housing James Browne . [ Why is the housing crisis Ireland's most enduring failure? Opens in new window ] Late last week, as first reported in The Journal, Government officials deciding to pull the plug on a pubic private partnership programme where a private investment consortium was to deliver almost 500 social homes in Dublin, Kildare, Sligo and Wicklow. READ MORE The reason, according to the Department of Housing, was on cost grounds, with the decision made 'on a value for money basis.' Minister for Housing James Browne has said the department and the relevant local authorities remain fully committed to delivering the social housing in PPP Bundle three. Photograph Nick Bradshaw/ The Irish Times Nobody is saying much about the exact circumstances of this, but we can safely assume that the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform was heavily involved. A key unanswered question is why it took the Government so long to decide to pull the plug on a deal where a preferred bidder had been chosen six months ago, at which time the cost details were all known. These public/private partnerships had become an important route for delivery of social homes. Close to 1,000 homes were delivered under the first two partnership programmes, or ' bundles' as they are called. The one which has now been cancelled was to be the so-called Bundle three. Four more bundles are in the pipeline involving around 3,000 further homes and the Department says these are now being reviewed. Given the cost issues with Bundle three, there must now be serious doubt about whether these will go ahead. So a key plank of Government social housing delivery now hangs in the balance. PPPs involve a range of players. The houses are financed and constructed by a consortium – involving financiers, builders and housing managers – who then provide maintenance and tenancy management services for a 25-year period. The homes remain in the ownership of the local authorities and are handed back to them after the end of the 25-year period. The preferred bidders for Bundle three – who had also built out the second bundle – was a consortium called Torc , led by international financiers Equitix and the Kajima Partnerships. The consortium also involves construction companies JJ Rhatigan and the Spanish firm, Obrascon Huarte Lain SA (OHLA). Tenancy management services are provided by Tuath Housing and facilities management by Derwent for a 25-year service period. Minister Browne has said that the department and the relevant local authorities remain fully committed to delivering the social housing in PPP Bundle three through 'an alternative procurement and delivery strategy.' Planning permission has been granted in all cases and while the department will not comment on what happens next, one possible course of action would be for the local authorities to seek tenders to get the houses built, operating on a more traditional basis which does not involve a PPP contract to manage and maintain the properties afterward. Another option would be to re-enter talks with the consortium to see if the deal could be saved, or even if it might move forward on a different basis. Sources close to the consortium say it is keen to look at all the options. Sinn Féin housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin has called on the Government to provide funding to the local authorities to ensure that the houses are delivered as soon as possible. Ó'Broin has been critical of the PPP model in the past arguing that it does not deliver best value for the State. The build costs under previous two social housing PPPs have appeared broadly in line with the market, he said, but significant additional costs are built into the contract for financing, maintenance and management over the subsequent 25 years, raising questions about value for money. Dealing with problems which emerge can also be complicated for tenants, he says, given the complexity of the arrangements. The Dáil Public Accounts Committee also questioned the value-for-money achieved through expenditure of €639 million on the first two bundles of PPPs which delivered almost 1,000 social housing units in Dublin, Cork, Galway, Waterford, Clare, Kildare, and Roscommon. The total construction and life cycle costs were approximately €640,000 per unit, it pointed out. A breakdown of this figure was not provided to the committee beyond it being told that actual construction costs per unit were €222,000 and €277,000 respectively for the first two bundles. The PAC said it was 'concerned that it cannot evaluate whether the units delivered through this PPP programme represent good value-for-money, as commercial sensitivity means the total cost, minus construction costs, in the tenderers' models will remain confidential 'until a specified period of time has elapsed'.' Now, it appears, this value for money issue has come to a head. Sources say that the per unit cost – including construction but also all the other expenditure over the 25-year period – has risen sharply beyond the €640,000 per unit referenced in the PAC report, due – presumably – to rising build costs and general inflation. Some sources say that the increase could have been 20 -25 per cent or more per unit, though the figure could not be confirmed. The costs appear to have sounded alarm bells in the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform (Dper). What is odd is that this seemed to take so long to happen – the preferred consortium had been chosen last October, there had been extensive contacts since then, contracts were about to be signed and builders were close to going on site. Crucially, sources close to the consortium say that there had been no increase in the costs involved in the project since last October, when it had been chosen as the preferred bidder. So why did it take so long for the plug to be pulled? The agreement would have been assessed by Dper under what is called a public sector benchmark, to ensure value for money as compared to other possible forms of delivery. But this would presumably have been done before the preferred bidden decision. The Minister for Housing says that it is determined to get the projects moving in some form. But the questions now are what delivery mechanism will be used, what will it cost and, crucially, what the delay will now be in delivery. Public procurement rules will be an issue here in finding a way forward. Sources believe that with bundle three now in trouble, the subsequent four – which are at varying stages in the process and which were set on up exactly the same basis – are also now in doubt. The Department says that these will be reviewed 'to ensure the most appropriate procurement strategies for the delivery of these homes is selected and advanced.' This would appear to indicate uncertainty about the whole PPP approach. In turn this means problems for one area of social housing delivery on which the Government and the local authorities would have been relying to help to meet targets. It also sends out some decidedly mixed messages to international investors at a time when the Government is trying to attract more of them to build here under its rental reform programme. Had the plug been pulled late last year, when the costs were clear and before a preferred bidder was appointed, then there would have been more time to reassess the best way forward. Now, however, there is a messy situation with the bidding consortium and most other players – including the National Development Finance Agency (NDFA) who helps advise on these bundles – all apparently taken unawares. The consortium has also spent significant amounts of money, including hiring staff, with a reasonable expectation that the deal would go ahead. While sources close to the consortium say they wish to find a way forward, legal action – potentially- delaying matters further must surely be a possibility if some compromise is not found. This one still has a way to run and it is difficult to see how the delivery of the planned social housing will not now be subject to serious delay.
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Entire country could become RPZ under new plan
The entire country could be made a Rent Pressure Zone before the Dáil rises for its summer break in mid-July. It's understood the Minister for Housing, James Browne, is advancing legislative plans to that effect and hopes the measure can become law swiftly. It is anticipated that Opposition parties will their give their support to fast-track the process, even though they vociferously oppose other parts of the Government's rental reforms which were passed by the Cabinet on Tuesday. The change would mean that all tenancy increases would be limited to an annual cap of 2%, or the rate of inflation - whichever is lower. As it stands, roughly a fifth of tenancies are outside of RPZs and therefore are not subject to the 2% cap. A swift introduction of legislation would limit the ability of landlords outside of RPZ's to increase rents beyond the cap limit before the law is changed. After Tuesday's Cabinet decision, Minister Browne indicated that the designation of the entire country as an RPZ would be taken swiftly. Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald said in the Dáil that the measure should be introduced this week, adding that her party would back the Oireachtas sitting for as long as is necessary to get the job done. The party's housing spokesperson Eoin Ó Broin said the Government is "scrambling around" under pressure from the Opposition. "The department told journalists on Tuesday that the RPZ extension would take place in March 2026. After Opposition highlighted that this would put renters outside RPZs at risk of huge rent hikes, in anticipation of the application of the caps the Government changed the plan and are proposing to deal with this issue more quickly," he said. "We welcome this but continue to insist that the Government scrap the rest of their proposed changes to RPZs as these will lead to a hollowing out of the existing protections and significant rent increases for tens of thousands of renters."
Extra.ie
5 hours ago
- Extra.ie
'You are all over the place' - Ministers in panic over RPZ changes
The Government is scrambling to fast-track legislation to expand Rent Pressure Zones nationwide in a bid to save more than 11,000 renters from rent hikes. The new measures were initially set to take effect from March 1 next year – but it is now hoped they will be in force within weeks, with the Coalition accused of being 'all over the place' by the Opposition. There are around 46,000 tenancies outside of RPZs but an analysis by has found that around 11,502 could face a legal rent hike to market rates if the RPZ changes do not come into effect until March 1, 2026. This is based on an even distribution of when rent reviews would start and the time between now and the initial commencement date of 1 March 2026. The Government is scrambling to fast-track legislation to expand Rent Pressure Zones nationwide in a bid to save more than 11,000 renters from rent hikes. Pic: Getty Images The Coalition was accused of making a 'shambles' of its plans in heated exchanges with Opposition in the Dáil chamber yesterday. Officials in the Department of Housing had confirmed that all of the new measures announced on Tuesday would be coming into effect on March 1, 2026. However, Extra has learned that legislation will be rushed forward in the next fortnight to underpin the expansion of RPZs, which currently cover 82% of tenancies, to cover the entire country. A spokeswoman for Housing Minister James Browne claimed it was always the intention to introduce this aspect of the legislation earlier, despite Department of Housing officials stating the opposite the day before. In another blunder, the Department of Housing was forced to amend an initial press release announcing the measures on Tuesday which erroneously stated rents could be reset for 'all tenancies'. Extra has learned that legislation will be rushed forward in the next fortnight to underpin the expansion of RPZs. Pic: Leah Farrell/© This is despite the agreed policy at Cabinet that there would be no changes to existing tenancies and that the measures would only apply to new tenancies. Sinn Féin's housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin told Extra: 'We've called for Government to fast-track legislation to extend RPZs and we would work with them to do it. They need to publish the legislation as a matter of urgency.' In the Dáil yesterday, Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald told the Taoiseach that the proposals would 'jack up' rents ahead of the measures coming in to place. She said the proposals were 'a shambles'. 'You are literally all over the place, confused by your own back-of-the-envelope proposal,' she said during Leaders' Questions. Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald. Pic:She said there was 'a very real danger' that the plan will 'tighten' rental supply in the coming months, as landlords could delay putting properties back on the market to charge a higher rent from March next year. Ms McDonald said that the Government was unclear about whether the plan allowed all landlords to set their rents at 'full market' value at the end of the new six-year tenancies. The Sinn Féin leader and other Opposition TDs warned this would hike rents, either in the coming months for those outside RPZs, or in six years' time, facilitated by Government policy. On Tuesday in the Dáil, Ms McDonald, the Social Democrats and People Before Profit had raised concerns about a Department of Housing press release which said that 'all landlords will have the right to reset rent where the rent is below market at the end of each six-year tenancy, unless a 'no-fault eviction' occurs'. Yesterday, Ms McDonald said that this line had been changed on the department's website to include all landlords 'who have entered into a new tenancy arrangement on or after March 1, 2026' will have the right to reset rent at the end of each six-year tenancy. 'This clearly meant people staying in an existing property, signing a new tenancy agreement, along with people moving into a property for the first time. And then, you were caught out,' Ms McDonald said. 'So throughout the afternoon, you scrambled around denying that this was the case and then some time in the evening, somebody slipped off and bizarrely changed the press release on the department website with a new wording, a wording that changes nothing.' Taoiseach Micheál Martin accused Ms McDonald of 'bluff and bluster' which he said would contribute 'nothing' to Ireland's housing supply. 'You're attacking all of this, and you're making absolutely false assertions, because all you are interested in is the politics of this, ' he remarked. 'How can I exploit the housing situation to gain electoral or political gain?' Social Democrats' deputy leader Cian O'Callaghan accused the Government of 'contradictory messages' on its rent control plans. Pic: Gareth Chaney/Collins Photos He also asked whether they had 'ditched' the rent reset every six years based on comments given to the Dáil. 'You've told it all just a few minutes ago that new tenancies after March 2026 will be capped at CPI [Consumer Price Index], no mention of a reset every six years. No mention of that. Is the reset gone every six years?' he asked. 'Do you accept now they are going to lead to huge rent increases for most renters, and these measures will increase hardship, poverty, evictions and homelessness for renters?' 'No, I don't deputy,' the Taoiseach replied. 'The bottom line is, I repeat again, all existing tenants will not have their rents increase beyond 2% and no attempts by you to sow confusion will change that reality.' The latest report on the rental sector outlines the rate that rents are rising rapidly outside of RPZ. For example, in Co. Roscommon which is largely uncovered by RPZs, rents increased by 6.7% annually for one-bed apartments. There are around 46,000 tenancies currently outside of RPZs on which the rent can be increased at market rates if their landlord instigates a rent review. Rent reviews can only be initiated every two years and require a 90-day notice period. The Cabinet approved its suite of measures modifying RPZs, which cap rental increases at 2% annually, including incorporating every tenancy in the country under rent controls, allowing new tenancies to be set at market rents and reviewed every six years as well as linking rents with new-build apartments to inflation. New tenancy reforms include six-year minimum tenancies for the first time, to be rolled out from March 1, 2026, which will ban no-fault evictions for landlords with four or more tenancies.
