
In Trump's tough-guy era, New York mayoral candidates peddle their mettle
NEW YORK — Mayoral candidate Brad Lander, admired in New York politics for his policy chops and mocked for his lefty self-importance, tried something off brand when he cut his first TV ad this cycle: Donning a blue suit, the cerebral city comptroller steered a front loader in a junkyard to crush a Tesla bearing Donald Trump's name.
The intended message was obvious: Lander's not just a policy wonk who can audit the books and talk affordable housing. He's a tough guy, too.
That idea of toughness has been an undercurrent in the crowded Democratic primary to oust Mayor Eric Adams — a race that will culminate when voters hit the polls next Tuesday.
Andrew Cuomo portrays himself as the only candidate tough enough to stand up to Trump, leaning on his three terms as New York governor when his domineering style earned him a reputation of strength among his allies and a bully to just about everyone else.
Lander dropped a digital video of himself throwing jabs in a boxing gym as he told viewers he's been 'fighting Eric Adams' corruption.'
Scott Stringer released an ad ahead of the first televised debate entitled 'Toughest' — an attempt to show the bespectacled former city comptroller as a different brand of tough, someone who advocates for New Yorkers without all the bravado. In the spot, Stringer seemed to be doing what Lander didn't: Recognizing the limits of out-tough-guying Cuomo in its traditional sense.
In the lesser-watched city comptroller's race, the burly Justin Brannan is pitching himself as that contest's tough man as well — a bald, tattooed former punk rocker whose face is just inches from the camera as declares he's 'ready to take on Trump and his crew of freaks' in his TV ad. The spot ends casting Brannan as a 'bulldog.'
With the Republican president's aggression looming and Democrats saying they're desperate for a fighter, New York City candidates — generally men — are doing whatever they can to portray themselves as strong this cycle.
'Everything feels hard for New Yorkers, from paying rent and buying groceries to getting around the city. Then you have Trump targeting New York City and ripping New Yorkers away from their families in broad daylight. People are worried and scared. They want someone who sees their fear and anger and will fight back,' Jon Paul Lupo, general consultant for Brannan's campaign, said. 'This isn't about being a man or a woman or progressive or moderate, it's about showing you're as pissed as everyone else and that you have the guts to do something about it.'
How all that tough talk translates — and whether there's an appetite for a less testosterone-driven brand of strength — will impact the outcome of the race. The winner will face Adams, a brash politician and former police captain who relishes in fights, but backed away from the one New Yorkers seemed to want most when he aligned himself with Trump amid his now-dropped federal corruption charges.
No candidate in the crowded Democratic primary field has aspired to the perception of toughness more than Cuomo. Underscoring that theme is the independent ballot line he's organized for the November general election: 'Fight and Deliver.' Its symbol: a pair of boxing gloves.
As governor he wielded power at every turn to accomplish his agenda and punish his rivals. He argues it was that brand of toughness that led to the completion of long-delayed infrastructure projects like the Second Avenue Subway and the resolution of thorny political matters. The legalization of same-sex marriage — a signature Cuomo accomplishment — was preceded by strong-arm tactics and threats from his office, both for allies and opponents.
In the New York state house known for hardball politics, lawmakers long chafed at the aggressive tactics.
'Cuomo is all about being a tough guy from a distance,' said Democratic state Sen. Gustavo Rivera, who has endorsed his leading opponent, Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani. 'It's an '80s mentality — you can't be a softy. You have to be tough to get things done.'
The former governor's style was called into question in 2018 by primary rival Cynthia Nixon — an actress and far-left political activist who dubbed him 'Andrew the Bully.' He resoundingly defeated her at the ballot box, showing that voters either didn't believe her spin or didn't care.
Cuomo's Covid-era slogan was 'NY Tough' — a phrase that a vandal took advantage of in 2021 when the words lighting up a building in Albany were changed to 'NY Touch,' a reference to sexual harassment allegations the former governor denies. He also used it to express his version of tenderness, explaining that 'New York tough means New York loving.'
Tough is a preferred adjective Cuomo employs to convey a manly tenacity. His X account thrice referred to the New York Knicks during their playoff run as 'tough,' including assessing an April 24 win against the Detroit Pistons with the message: 'The @nyknicks were New York Tough tonight.'
Throughout his short campaign this cycle, he has leaned into a promise to combat the White House — seeking to pair voters' desires for a Trump resistance fighter with decades of managerial experience and fearlessness.
During the first televised debate, Cuomo said he 'fought on a daily basis' with Trump during Covid and was successful.
'He can be beaten, but he has to know he's up against an adversary who can actually beat him,' the ex-governor said.
But at times, Cuomo and his team have evinced nervousness and a strong aversion to risk.
They were wary of taking on Adams, even after his September indictment, until it became so obvious he was political roadkill within the Democratic Party that it was a safe bet.
For much of the campaign, Cuomo long avoided public forums and interactions with the press — a common strategy for frontrunners like the former governor — but has upped his public appearances in recent weeks as the race tightens between him and Mamdani. In one incident, he drove away from an event rather than take questions from a group of reporters — and appeared to subsequently run a red light, though his campaign insists he stopped for a pedestrian.
The team tightly controls situations, including his launch event at a union headquarters that featured multiple checkpoints. The time and location was kept under wraps until just a few hours before it began.
His critics contend the strategy is a sign Cuomo has a glass jaw — fearless for cameras, but avoidant of direct combat with his opponents — and bolts from difficult questions. While governor, Cuomo would frequently retreat to safe-space interviews with preferred reporters in controlled settings.
'Cuomo's concept of toughness is muscle cars and self-mythologizing posters — because he's always been more interested in imagery than impact,' said Monica Klein, a communications consultant working for mayoral candidate Zellnor Myrie, a state senator who has not broken out of low single digits in the polls.
'It's tough to face New Yorkers, stand up for your record and present your vision to voters. Ducking press and accountability while refusing to defend your record except when legally mandated to do so is not.'
She called Cuomo's approach a 'veneer of bravado' generally associated with men.
Toughness for Cuomo often comes across as a form of machismo — one of his few hobbies is fixing up old hotrods — that can resonate with voters, said Democratic strategist Alexis Grenell.
'When people are feeling weak and vulnerable as many New Yorkers and Democrats are in theTrump II era, there's something seductive about it,' said Grenell, who has written in opposition to Cuomo's record, including a recent piece in The Nation titled 'Dominance Does Not Equal Competence.'
'That's when many candidates can play to those fears and take advantage of them,' she added.
For City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams — one of just two women in the race — the calculus is different.
Her campaign has tried to capitalize on her modest personality, framing the candidate as a quietly competent leader not interested in drama.
Adrienne Adams, who would become the first Black woman elected mayor, has an even-keeled, unassuming personality — a rarity in New York politics. Her critics say she lacks the political strength to be mayor and point to her late, low-key campaign that operatives believe has promise but has failed to take off.
She sings in her church choir and was urged to run by Attorney General Letitia James, a Cuomo foe. Her supporters see a clear contrast with the hard-charging former governor.
'Strength doesn't have to be loud, but you have to be concrete, you have to be thoughtful,' said Yvette Buckner, a Democratic strategist and the co-chair of The New Majority NYC, which pushed for a majority women City Council. 'You can be powerful without flexing.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Greg Abbott To Sign Texas Property Tax Bill: What To Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Texas Governor Greg Abbott is expected to sign new legislation offering property tax relief to homeowners in the state struggling with rising bills, on Monday. If endorsed by voters in November, the measures pushed forward by the GOP-led Texas legislature would significantly lower the cost of homeownership for millions of Lone Star State residents, including seniors and disabled owners, at a cost of over $3 billion. It would also dramatically slash revenues for local governments funding crucial public services, which the state would have to make up for. Why Do Texas Lawmakers And Abbott Want To Cut Property Taxes? While the Lone Star State is known for its relatively low tax environment, homeowners actually pay some of the highest property taxes in the country. These are levied by local governments and used for funding schools, streets, roads, police and fire protection. The governing body of each of these local governments sets its own tax rate based on a property's appraised value. But property taxes all across the U.S. have surged in step with home values since the pandemic, when historically low mortgage rates sparked a homebuying frenzy which had its epicenter in some of the country's most affordable states, including Texas. Between 2019 and 2023 alone, median property taxes in the Lone Star State rose by 26 percent, according to data by Cotality, formerly CoreLogic. Gov. Greg Abbott speaks during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025, in Austin, Texas. Gov. Greg Abbott speaks during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025, in Austin, of 2025, Texas homeowners are paying the seventh-highest property taxes in the nation, according to SmartAsset, at an effective rate of 1.63 percent. That is a lot higher than the national average, which stands at 0.90 percent, with the typical Texas homeowner paying $3,872 annually in property taxes. Abbott has long been trying to lower the property tax burden on Texas homeowners, signing in 2023 what was then the largest property tax cut in the state's history at $18 billion. But that intervention barely helped the many homeowners struggling with rising bills, and the Republican governor called for lowering property taxes as a priority during this year's legislative session. What Is In The New Package Of Property Tax Cuts? The package of property tax cuts that Abbott is expected to sign on Monday at the Robson Ranch clubhouse in Denton includes two bills recently passed by the Texas House and Senate that would back two constitutional amendments. One bill, SB 4, would raise the existing homestead exemption from $100,000 to $140,000 for all homeowners, while the other, SB 23, would raise it to $200,000 for those with disabilities or those aged 65 and above. "You've always heard that mantra, 'I don't want to rent my home—after it's paid for — from my school district,' " Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said after the two bills passed the Texas legislature. "Well, seniors, to the average senior out there, you're never going to have to do that again." SB includes a provision guaranteeing school districts would not lose funding due to the lower property taxes, trying to answer criticism that the cuts would harm public services. It would be up to the state to raise the difference—which is estimated at $3.5 billion. What Happens After Abbott Signs The Legislation? In order to implement the constitutional amendments approved by the legislation, voters would have to back the homestead exemption hikes in November. Texas Senator Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, who introduced the legislation, will be attending the signing ceremony on Monday. He said that he hopes there will be a "record turnout by the public" to get these tax cuts "enshrined" in the Texas constitution. Newsweek contacted Abbott's office and Bettencourt's office for comment by email on Monday morning.


Hamilton Spectator
7 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Wisconsin dairy farmer sues Trump administration claiming discrimination against white farmers
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin dairy farmer alleged in a federal lawsuit filed Monday that the Trump administration is illegally denying financial assistance to white farmers by continuing programs that favor minorities. The conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed the lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture in federal court in Wisconsin on behalf of a white dairy farmer, Adam Faust. Faust was among several farmers who successfully sued the Biden administration in 2021 for race discrimination in the USDA's Farmer Loan Forgiveness Plan. The new lawsuit alleges the government has continued to implement diversity, equity and inclusion programs that were instituted under former President Joe Biden. The Wisconsin Institute wrote to the USDA in April warning of legal action, and six Republican Wisconsin congressmen called on the USDA to investigate and end the programs. 'The USDA should honor the President's promise to the American people to end racial discrimination in the federal government,' Faust said in a written statement. 'After being ignored by a federal agency that's meant to support agriculture, I hope my lawsuit brings answers, accountability, and results from USDA.' Trump administration spokesperson Anna Kelly did not immediately respond to an email Monday seeking comment. The lawsuit contends that Faust is one of 2 million white male American farmers who are subject to discriminatory race-based policies at the USDA. The lawsuit names three USDA programs and policies it says put white men at a disadvantage and violate the Constitution's guarantee of equal treatment by discriminating based on race and sex. Faust participates in one program designed to offset the gap between milk prices and the cost of feed, but the lawsuit alleges he is charged a $100 administrative fee that minority and female farmers do not have to pay. Faust also participates in a USDA program that guarantees 90% of the value of loans to white farmers, but 95% to women and racial minorities. That puts Faust at a disadvantage, the lawsuit alleges. Faust has also begun work on a new manure storage system that could qualify for reimbursement under a USDA environmental conservation program, but 75% of his costs are eligible while 90% of the costs of minority farmers qualify, the lawsuit contends. A federal court judge ruled in a similar 2021 case that granting loan forgiveness only to 'socially disadvantaged farmers' amounts to unconstitutional race discrimination. The Biden administration suspended the program and Congress repealed it in 2022. The Wisconsin Institute has filed dozens of such lawsuits in 25 states attacking DEI programs in government. In its April letter to the USDA, the law firm that has a long history of representing Republicans said it didn't want to sue 'but there is no excuse for this continued discrimination.' Trump has been aggressive in trying to end the government's DEI efforts to fulfill a campaign promise and bring about a profound cultural shift across the U.S. from promoting diversity to an exclusive focus on merit. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


CNN
7 minutes ago
- CNN
Supreme Court to hear arguments over whether states may subpoena faith-based pregnancy centers
The Supreme Court agreed Monday to take up a First Amendment appeal from a faith-based nonprofit that runs five 'crisis pregnancy centers' in New Jersey and that is fighting a subpoena from the state's Democratic attorney general. First Choice Women's Resources Centers had urged the conservative court to throw out a decision from the Philadelphia-based 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals siding with the state. That decision required the nonprofit to continue litigating its objections to the subpoena in state court. New Jersey officials subpoenaed the center in 2023 as part of investigation into whether the organization violated consumer fraud laws. Pregnancy centers are opposed to abortion, but New Jersey officials said their marketing may have left some patients with the impression that they could receive abortions at the facilities. The subpoena was aimed at evaluating whether the center 'or its staff engaged in misrepresentations and other prohibited conduct,' according to the state. It sought advertisements, donor solicitations, and the identification of licensed medical personnel. The center framed the subpoena as a demand for donor names. If that view of the subpoena prevails, then New Jersey's actions may be in conflict with a 2021 Supreme Court decision in which a majority found unconstitutional a California law requiring the conservative Americans for Prosperity Foundation to disclose its donors. A divided 3rd Circuit ruled in December that the center's claims were not yet ripe because state courts had not yet enforced the subpoena against them.