
A church and a warehouse up in flames. So what's with all the fires?
So what's going on, and can we detect some kind of trend? You may have seen the pictures, rather creepy ones, of a man, apparently in some kind of helmet and mask, walking up the lane near the Kinning Park warehouse. The pictures show him climbing over a wall and a few minutes later, the flames have started and the man runs away. The police have confirmed the fire was started deliberately and in Glasgow it feels like a pattern. I saw it myself a couple of weeks ago when I spotted a fire in the woods in Bellahouston Park and reported it to the police. Fortunately, it was put out quickly and only a few of the trees were damaged.
It's also important to mention what's happening to the men and women who fight the fires. I was speaking to a newly recruited fireman the other day who was telling me he's volunteered to be shifted round different stations in Glasgow to plug the gaps in the staff. Some 1,200 firefighter posts in Scotland have been lost to cuts in the last 13 years and the fire service is also planning to close down 13 stations and scrap 10 appliances. The Fire Brigade Union makes the point that this affects response times and when response times get longer, fires do more damage and, potentially, not to put too fine a point on it, more people die.
Read more
LEZ and the problem with Glasgow's trees plan
The most notorious building in Glasgow: a way forward
Glasgow's rubbish-bin millions: where has the money gone?
But the wider context here is interesting if we're thinking about what's with all the fires and what's causing them, because house fires have actually fallen to an all-time low in the last 20 years or so; the number of deaths and casualties has also fallen and we know why: there's a wider use of smoke detectors and the detectors have got better. The stats on house fires are actually a conspicuous example of success in policy on public safety.
But it's with apparently deliberate fires that things get a bit murkier. On the whole, the trend has been downwards in the last five years or so, but the most recent statistics from the Scottish Government demonstrate it may not last. There were 226 deliberate building fires in the last quarter of 2024-25, up from 197 in the same period of 2023-24. There were also 185 deliberate road vehicle fires in the last quarter or 2024-25, up from 153 in 2023-24. In other words, the number of deliberate fires looks like it's increasing again.
The motivations for arson are complicated and can be linked to other criminality – who knows what was going on with that creepy masked man in Kinning Park. But we also know that visible signs of decay and disorder in a community – graffiti, broken windows, gaping roofs – attract even more decay and disorder; a community that's in a state or a building that's been left to rot eventually becomes an invitation to people who want to make it worse, often by fire. They may also think an abandoned or empty building means they can get whatever the buzz it is they get from arson with less risk to life. Whatever's going on, decaying, neglected communities and buildings increase the risk of fire.
Fiirefighters at the sight of the Kinning Park incident (Image: Newsquest)
Obviously, this does not apply to every incident – St Mungo's was a working church and we don't yet know the specific cause of the blaze. But the Cottage [[Theatre]] in [[Cumbernauld]] had not been properly maintained and was in a poor state, with the local MSP Jamie Hepburn calling the fire a demonstration of what happens when a building is left to go to rack and ruin. I suspect the building will eventually be lost for good sadly, and it wouldn't be the first to fall victim to the old formula: neglect = fire = demolition. For another example, look at the sorry state of Ayr Station Hotel. Same formula.
We know some of the background to this: council budgets are in a terrible state and buildings, particularly older buildings, can be expensive to maintain. Personal economic hardship also makes it harder for people to spend money on the places where they live which is why more often than not it's in areas of deprivation that the worst fires happen. Basically, it's about properly maintaining communities and the buildings in which people live and work (and sometimes pray) because if we don't properly maintain them, sooner or later some of them will end in flames.
I suppose all we can do now is wait to see if the man who started the Kinning Park fire can be found and wait to see what the investigation into St Mungo's discovers. But whenever another building burns, those of us who care about our built heritage become more impatient with the lack of care shown towards it. Not only are we losing architecture that could have a future – and in some cases is rather beautiful – we're also paying the environmental cost of destroying buildings (by fire or bulldozer or dynamite) and putting up new ones in their place (most recent example: the Wynford high-rises). Better, I would have thought, to try and renovate the old ones. Better to protect them. Better to prevent them from turning intoto ashes.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1000%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75%26crop%3D3%3A2%2Csmart%26trim%3D&w=3840&q=100)

Scotsman
13 hours ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh's 11 top secondaries where pupils earned at least 5 Highers
Earning a diverse array of Highers is a great way for secondary school pupils to set themselves up for future success. Today (August 5) is SQA results day, with pupils and students across the whole of Scotland receiving the long-awaited outcomes of their Nationals and Highers exams in the mail throughout the morning. To mark the occasion, we've taken a look at the state-funded secondary schools within the City of Edinburgh council area that had particularly high rates of pupils earning at least five of these important qualifications, according to the most up-to-date data (currently for the 2023/24 school year). We based this on the Scottish Government's recently updated breadth and depth of qualifications data, specifically the proportion of each school's candidates that attained five or more. This is a fantastic achievement not only for pupils and their families, but for the school community as a whole. And while these rates are far from the only way to measure school success - they're still worth celebrating as an outward sign of what kind of learning environment it provides. Here were the 11 schools in and around Edinburgh that topped the list: 1 . Boroughmuir High School At the top of the list is Boroughmuir, a secondary school in the Fountainbridge area. In the 2023/24 school year, an astounding 74% of its pupils attained five or more Highers. | Google Photo Sales 2 . James Gillespie's High School Next up is James Gillespie's, a secondary school in the Marchmont area. In the 2023/24 school year, 68% of its pupils attained five or more Highers. | Google Photo Sales 3 . St Thomas Of Aquin's High School St Thomas Of Aquin's is a Catholic secondary school in the Lauriston area. In the 2023/24 school year, 63% of its pupils attained five or more Highers. | Google Photo Sales 4 . Craigmount High School Craigmount is a secondary school in the East Craigs area. In the 2023/24 school year, 61% of its pupils attained five or more Highers. | Google Photo Sales Related topics: EdinburghSchoolsStudentsParentsBoost

The National
14 hours ago
- The National
Scots should be telling the stories of our culture and traditions
I'm a tradition bearer and I recently watched an event at the Scottish Storytelling Centre focused on traditional Scottish folktales. The performance was polished, comedic and theatrical (and I'm sure many enjoyed it) but something didn't sit right. The lead storytellers were from England, yet the stories being told were deeply Scottish. If I went to a folklore centre in England, I'd expect to hear English voices telling English stories. That's cultural authenticity. READ MORE: 'The perfect stage': Kelpies to host first outdoor evening ceilidh When Scottish storytellers who have dedicated their lives to keeping traditions alive – often learning directly from communities, elders and oral sources – are passed over in favour of those who have only recently discovered the tradition, through books or academia, it starts to feel less like cultural celebration and more like cultural opportunity. We rely on the likes of Tracs (Traditional Arts and Culture Scotland), funded by the Scottish Government, to help protect and promote our living heritage, especially after generations of damage caused by centralised London rule. So much of our culture, language and oral tradition has been eroded. Spaces for renewal and revival are vital. But what does it say when our stories are so often performed by those not rooted in that heritage? I've noticed the same pattern elsewhere, too. A storyteller in residence appointed by the National Museum of Scotland and the host of the National Library's Teatime Tales podcast both appear to be from England. That in itself is not the issue. But when the same handful of individuals are repeatedly given platforms to tell Scottish stories while many incredible Scottish storytellers with deep roots in Highland and Lowland tradition are overlooked, it raises serious questions. Many now market themselves as traditional storytellers, yet often change the way the stories are told. They add flourishes, theatrical gestures, even alter the structure and meaning, often to make them more entertaining for a modern audience. That may be engaging for some but when it comes to inherited cultural material, that approach can cross a line. It stops being preservation and starts to look a lot like performance. In some cases, it edges into appropriation. READ MORE: Record number of young Scots headed to university after exam results I love to see people learn about and embrace Scottish culture, whether from England, Wales, Bahrain, or Peru. But cultural heritage is about lived experience, lineage and community connection. Around the world, we respect that. You wouldn't expect a first-generation Canadian to become the official storyteller of Native American traditions, not because they can't appreciate or love those stories, but because inherited traditions carry weight, responsibility and cultural authority. Why is it so controversial to say the same about Scotland? Why should someone who's just moved up from Little Codling-on-the-Wold and read a few books be given a national platform to tell Scottish folktales over tradition bearers such as the late, great Sheila Stewart or Duncan Williamson, whose families carried the tradition for generations through memory, song and speech? I'm not suggesting this is malicious but I think we need to ask whether decisions about who gets the platform are being made for the right reasons. Is there a kind of closed circle forming where connections, familiarity, and funding have more influence than authenticity or cultural grounding? Across our cultural institutions – museums, heritage bodies, arts organisation or libraries – many of the leadership roles are held by people who aren't from Scotland. When almost all of those in charge of shaping how Scotland's culture is preserved and presented come from outside the culture itself, it's worth asking what's being lost in the process. I've also noticed a tendency for people in the arts to describe themselves as 'Scotland-based'. READ MORE: Royal Edinburgh Military Tattoo issues statement to fans after show cancellation I don't believe anyone should be made to feel unwelcome. If you've lived here long enough to truly live the tradition, to absorb it through community, language, and experience, and you carry that with care and respect, then great. But when it comes to public leadership, funding, and representation of Scottish culture – especially in institutions specifically funded to protect it – that space should be led by people who aren't just 'based here' but carry the story in their bones. We've spent generations fighting to reclaim our voice in language, story, music and art. We mustn't hand it over to those with no deep, lived connection to them, just because they have the right contacts, know how to fill in a funding form, or perform well in front of an audience.


Scotsman
17 hours ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh trams: Consultation to help decide route of North-South tramline will launch on August 25
A 12-week public consultation on Edinburgh's proposed North-South tramline will be launched on August 25. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It will help to decide the controversial issue of which route the new line should follow from Granton to the city centre - using the former railway, now cycle route Roseburn Path; or plotting a new route via Orchard Brae. The line will run from Granton through the city centre - using the existing tramline - and the up the North Bridge / South Bridge corridor to the Royal Infirmary, the BioQuarter and beyond. Scottish Government funding would be needed to allow the project to go ahead. Campaigners don't want to lose the Roseburn Path. Picture: Lisa Ferguson. | LISA FERGUSON Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The main debate, however, has focused on the Roseburn Path versus Orchard Brae controversy. The council says the consultation will 'inform the development of a Strategic Business Case' for the expansion of the trams, which will then be presented to the council's transport and environment committee next year. When the original tram scheme was drawn up, the route planned for the Granton section of the line was along the Roseburn Path. But it has since become firmly established as a popular green corridor for pedestrians and cyclists. Campaigners say it is an invaluable space whose loss could threaten the future of the city's entire network of cycle paths. The alternative of an on-road route via Orchard Brae emerged in late 2022. It was said to have the benefits of providing good connections for the retail park at Craigleith and, more importantly, the Western General Hospital. But the trams would have to cross over Dean Bridge, which is seen as a major engineering challenge. A variation on the Roseburn Path route would see the tramline detour from the Roseburn Path and go along Telford Road for a bit, to get nearer to the Western General. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In early 2024, officials recommended Roseburn Path as the "preferred route". But councillors at the transport and environment committee said they had been inundated with protests over the loss of the cycle path and it was agreed both options should go out for consultation. At a public meeting in June 2024, former transport convener Lesley Hinds argued the Roseburn Path should be the route because it would give better journey times and reliability, mean quicker construction, with less impact on businesses and residents and avoid problems with underground utility pipes and cables. But Euan Baxter, of the Save Roseburn Path campaign, said the loss of Roseburn Path as a green corridor would be devastating for residents, wildlife and climate change. He claimed the the Orchard Brae option was the best route for the tram because it served a larger catchment area, was better for social inclusion and would 'take more people on more journeys'. If the Roseburn route is chosen, there would be a footpath alongside the tram track, while segregated cycling would be provided on Queensferry Road and Orchard Brae. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Transport and environment convener Stephen Jenkinson said: 'I'm pleased to have reached such an important stage in the project – and I look forward to hearing the public's views on our plans when the consultation opens later this month. 'Extending our hugely popular and multi award-winning tram service to the north and south of the city – and potentially beyond – would bring huge social, economic and environmental benefits, while helping us to face the challenges of the future.' The consultation will start on Monday 25 August 2025 and run for 12 weeks, finishing on Monday 17 November 2025. It will be hosted on the council's consultation hub.