Ford's planning a ‘Model T moment' for EVs on August 11th
Even as Ford's EV business took a $1.3 billion hit, the automaker's 'skunkworks' team, helmed by former Tesla engineer Alan Clarke, has been working in the background to develop a more affordable electric car. 'This is a Model T moment for us at Ford, a chance to bring a new family of vehicles to the world that offer incredible technology, efficiency, space, and features,' Farley said.
Ford said last year that the new low-cost EV platform will underpin a pickup truck slated for release in 2027 and will also extend to other vehicles in the future. The automaker's upcoming event comes at a pivotal moment for an industry that once felt like the future of cars. This month, Tesla revealed its largest revenue drop in years. The EV-maker also announced a slew of deals in an attempt to reverse slumping sales, and even revealed plans to launch a stripped-down Model Y.
President Donald Trump's recent actions haven't helped the EV industry, either, as the administration plans to roll back EV tax credits this September. Trump's tariffs have also hit automakers hard, with Ford saying it expects the duties to shave $2 billion off its annual earnings.
Farley says Ford is working to compete with the low-cost EVs made by Chinese automakers, like Geely and BYD. 'We believe the only way to really compete effectively with the Chinese over the globe on EVs is to go and really push ourselves to radically reengineer and transform our engineering supply chain and manufacturing process,' Farley said. 'That will come to life soon.'
Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All by Emma Roth
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Cars
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Electric Cars
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Ford
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All News
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Transportation
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sidero Labs Achieves SOC 2 Type II Certification, Reinforcing Enterprise-Grade Security and Operational Integrity
The independent SOC 2 Type II audit validates Omni's readiness for secure, compliant Kubernetes deployments in production and regulated environments SOC 2 Type II Certification GOLETA, Calif., Aug. 20, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Sidero Labs, delivering solutions that reduce friction in managing Kubernetes and containerized applications, today announced it has successfully completed its SOC 2 Type II audit. The independent assessment, conducted by A-LIGN, validated Sidero's ability to maintain effective controls across security, availability, and confidentiality throughout the audit period. SOC 2 Type II certification is a widely recognized benchmark for vendors serving enterprise and regulated environments. The audit confirms that Sidero Labs operates with disciplined security processes and controls that meet the rigorous criteria established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). For customers, the certification reduces risk in procurement, accelerates onboarding, and simplifies compliance assessments when deploying Sidero Labs' solutions in production. 'Security and reliability are at the core of how we build and support infrastructure,' said Spencer Smith, Director of Site Reliability and Customer Success at Sidero Labs. 'Achieving SOC 2 Type II further substantiates that the trust customers place in our platform is backed by rigorous operational discipline. It's another step forward in helping organizations manage Kubernetes securely, across bare metal, cloud, and edge environments.' Sidero Labs' technologies are designed for environments where infrastructure control and system integrity are non-negotiable. Talos Linux, the open source Kubernetes operating system, eliminates common attack vectors through a minimal, immutable architecture and a fully API-driven model that removes SSH. Omni, Sidero's SaaS platform for multi-cluster Kubernetes management, enables enterprise-grade orchestration at scale without compromising security or sovereignty. SOC 2 Type II certification adds a formal validation to Sidero Labs' security-first approach, already reflected in how its tools are used across sensitive, sovereign, and air-gapped deployments. The certification is part of the company's broader commitment to delivering secure-by-default infrastructure, operational transparency, and continuous improvement. About Sidero LabsFounded in 2019, Sidero Labs, Inc., the creator of Talos Linux and Omni, focuses on bringing simplicity and security to bare-metal and edge Kubernetes. By delivering scalable API-driven management for Kubernetes clusters in any environment, Talos Linux and Omni are making on-prem infrastructures secure by default, easier to use, and more reliable to operate. Talos Linux is a minimal, immutable, and API-managed operating system designed specifically for running Kubernetes. Omni is a SaaS platform that enables enterprise Kubernetes management across bare metal, data centers, cloud, and edge environments. Together, these tools are trusted by hundreds of companies and help manage tens of thousands of clusters worldwide. Learn more at ContactKyle Petersonkyle@ / Clement | Peterson An image accompanying this announcement is available at
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Snowflake's AI-Powered Growth Trajectory Remains Strong, Says Analyst
Snowflake (NYSE:SNOW) stock surged on Wednesday, backed by continued AI frenzy, as the company capitalizes on growing demand for its data warehousing and AI-driven products. With a notable 26% year-to-date gain, the firm remains a key player in the AI data cloud market, driven by strong momentum in its core offerings like Cortex AI and Snowpark. This comes as major tech giants, including Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), and Google parent Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) (NASDAQ:GOOG), ramp up investments in AI, setting the stage for further growth in Snowflake's revenue and market of America Securities analyst Brad Sills upgraded the stock from Neutral to Buy and raised the price forecast from $220 to $240. He expressed higher conviction in Snowflake's ability to sustain its growth, citing the durability of its AI-driven momentum. Sills cited strong momentum in its core data warehouse, Cortex AI, and Snowpark developer businesses. He based the upgrade on three proprietary data sources pointing to accelerating demand, noting that despite a 47% year-over-year stock gain, shares still trade at a reasonable 1.5 times calendar 2026E FCF multiple adjusted for growth, compared with large-cap peers at 1.6 times. Sills now projects second-quarter product revenue of $1.064 billion, about 2.5% above Snowflake's $1.038 billion guidance, driven by more substantial web traffic and channel feedback indicating rising demand for AI-related workloads. He also raised earnings estimates, forecasting 2026 EPS of $0.95 (up from $0.93), 2027 EPS of $1.17 (up from $1.14), and 2028 EPS of $1.52 (up from $1.48). A recent survey of Snowflake customers reinforced his bullish stance, with respondents planning to increase spend by 12% over the next 12 months, a sharp acceleration versus the prior year, as adoption of AI workloads and new products expands. Price Action: SNOW stock is trading lower by 0.30% to $192.05 at last check Wednesday. Photo by Tada Images via Shutterstock Latest Ratings for SNOW Date Firm Action From To Mar 2022 Cowen & Co. Maintains Outperform Mar 2022 Rosenblatt Maintains Neutral Mar 2022 Jefferies Maintains Hold View More Analyst Ratings for SNOW View the Latest Analyst Ratings Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? SNOWFLAKE (SNOW): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Snowflake's AI-Powered Growth Trajectory Remains Strong, Says Analyst originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How the Trump administration could attack state laws it says stifle US economy
The Trump administration is hunting for state laws that drag down the US economy. But axing statutes it sees as problematic will depend on how it wields the Constitution's powerful Commerce Clause. Last Friday, the Justice Department and the National Economic Council announced a joint initiative to "address" state statutes that "significantly and adversely affect the national economy.' State regulations, policies, causes of action, and practices were also included as targets. The plan is meant to support the White House's deregulation agenda, which President Trump described in a series of separate executive orders issued in January, February, and April. Those orders emphasize the administration's goal of alleviating policies that it views as "unnecessary burdens" on Americans, small businesses, private enterprise, and entrepreneurship. In an unusual twist, the agencies also solicited help from US citizens, asking members of the public to point out economy-slowing state laws and to propose legal theories that could reverse the laws' adverse effects. "They're crowdsourcing their legal theories," said Emily Berman, a constitutional scholar with the University of Houston Law Center. However, the plan stopped short of explaining what theories the administration would rely on to undo suspected harmful state laws. Jeremy Rovinsky, a federal prosecutor who teaches constitutional law at Crestpoint University, said the language used in the DOJ's plan to attack state laws shows that the Trump administration has the Commerce Clause in mind. "It's clear that Trump's lawyers are thinking through it this way," Rovinsky said. "The Supreme Court has allowed the federal government to regulate state power in an almost unlimited way." But the Commerce Clause doesn't guarantee the administration power to alter state law. The provision vests power to regulate commerce in Congress, not in the executive branch. A more straightforward type of challenge, the lawyer said, is one where state law directly conflicts with federal statutes. In those cases, the Justice Department could raise preemption challenges under the Constitution's Supremacy Clause. Preemption challenges argue that a state rule essentially steps on the federal government's toes, Berman said. The Commerce Clause Absent such a clear-cut conflict, the administration would need more legal leverage to countermand state law. That leverage could come from the Commerce Clause, the constitutional scholar said, which empowers Congress to regulate interstate and foreign commerce. "Anything that regulates commerce falls within the scope of Congress's authority, which has been interpreted relatively broadly," Berman said. To tap into the federal government's authority over commerce, the administration would need to persuade lawmakers to pass new federal legislation invalidating state law. Ravinsky said he sees the DOJ's announcement as an opening salvo to persuade members of Congress. "I think the people that are in [Trump's] inner legal circle wrote that document the way they did, because they want to give Congress a heads up to have them codify what he's doing with executive actions into actual congressional legislation," Ravinsky said. Jonathan Entin, professor emeritus at Case Western Reserve School of Law, said it's possible, but not certain, that pressure on Congress from either President Trump or others in the executive branch would lead to new, preemptive federal laws. "If the president says this is a big priority, then maybe a fair number of people in both the House and the Senate would go along with it," Entin said. "Now, whether there will be enough votes, that's a separate question," he added. "Congress does not legislate very much." "If Congress wants to move legislation against state laws that they say hurt the economy, they need 60 votes in the Senate," Entin said. "And the chances of getting 60 votes in the Senate for much of anything these days are pretty slim." The Supreme Court has largely upheld Congress' power over interstate commerce in a series of cases evaluating the Commerce Clause stretching back more than 80 years. In 1942, the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Wickard v. Filburn that expanded the federal government's regulatory power under the Commerce Clause. The case involved an Ohio farmer who grew more wheat than permitted under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. The court rejected the farmer's argument that the federal government could not regulate his excess wheat supply under the act because it was grown for personal, rather than commercial, use. In a unanimous 8-0 decision, the court reasoned that while a single farmer's excess crop may not substantially impact interstate commerce, the same actions, if taken in the aggregate by multiple farmers, could indeed influence the national market. Despite the Supreme Court's longstanding support for expansive application of the Commerce Clause, Entin suspects that even new federal legislation could fail to preempt certain state laws. States still retain their police powers, he said, and can exercise those powers as long as doing so doesn't interfere with interstate commerce. "It's not clear to me that Congress can use its commerce power to preempt the state's exercise of their police powers, even if state laws may, in fact, be unwise or even foolish," Entin said. The 'dormant' Commerce Clause Still another, and equally uncertain, path to challenge state laws could involve a judge-created theory known as the "Dormant Commerce Clause," the lawyers said. The concept further expands Congress' power over interstate and foreign commerce by limiting states' authority to regulate commerce even when Congress has not directly legislated on an issue. The theory is intended to prevent states from adopting discriminatory, protectionist laws that benefit local economies to the detriment of the national market. The theory was put to the test and shown to have limits in a recent case decided by the Supreme Court. In 2023, the court loosely upheld a California state law known as Proposition 12, which criminalized California sales of pork meat that came from pigs housed in pens measuring less than 24 square feet — 10 square feet larger than the industry standard. The Iowa Pork Producers Association and 23 states argued that the law discriminated against out-of-state pork producers, imposing excessive burdens on interstate commerce. However, Berman said, Dormant Commerce Clause challenges to state rules have historically been brought by private litigants, not the federal government. "It's going to be a private business sector actor saying, 'Our business is being harmed ... we shouldn't have barriers to markets along state lines." Entin agreed that it would be unusual for the federal government to sue states over their regulations. Alternatively, he said, Congress could try to persuade states to change laws through conditional federal spending. The administration may not find support from the high court for pushing Congress' authority over commerce even further, Entin added. Conservatives on the court in recent years have expressed "real skepticism" about whether courts should be in the business of enforcing the Commerce Clause, he said. Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Sign in to access your portfolio
