Consultation on scrapped national park in Galloway cost £160,000
A government body spent more than £160,000 on a consultation process which ultimately ended in plans for a new national park in Galloway being scrapped.The sum spent by NatureScot was revealed through a freedom of information (FOI) request by the BBC - and is only a fraction of the overall spend on the park plans.NatureScot said the total spent on the consultation had not been finalised, and final invoices would see the total rise "very slightly".The consultation was held between November and February and its findings were used to help deliver a final decision on whether or not a new national park should be created.
The Scottish government said it was "absolutely correct" to support the nomination process.
Plans for a new national park - to join the Cairngorms and Loch Lomond and the Trossachs - were part of a power-sharing deal between the SNP and the Scottish Greens.Although that agreement collapsed last year, the process continued.The Scottish government revealed in May last year that it had spent more than £300,000 in the earlier stages of the search for a national park.It spent a further £28,000 after Galloway was announced as the preferred potential location for a new national park in July 2024.However, it stressed that civil servants worked "flexibly" across a range of matters making it impossible to specify exact costs in terms of their time.
The final stage of the process was the extended consultation - both in person and online - across 14 weeks which was carried out by NatureScot.Here is a full breakdown of how much this cost:Licence for online engagement platform - £23,220Leaflets (printing and posting) - £20,438Gaelic translation - £215.55Event and other materials - £908.39Consultation events (hall bookings etc) - £5,695.96Facilitation consultants - £62,244.92Analysis consultants - £21,808.80Independent review of consultation - £9,900Board costs and subsistence - £7,982.35Staff costs and subsistence - £11,082.58Total spend (at 20 June 2025) - £163,496.55NatureScot said there were still some outstanding costs which would see the figure rise slightly.It said it intended to put the final cost on its website by early July.
The consultation ultimately led to a recommendation not to take forward the plan for a new national park, which proved a contentious in the area.NatureScot concluded - in its role as reporter - that from the views expressed the proposal had "not garnered sufficient support locally to proceed".Instead, it recommended the strengthening of the likes of the Galloway and Southern Ayrshire Biosphere, Galloway Forest Park and national scenic areas.It described the consultation as the "largest and most challenging" it had ever undertaken.Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon said the Scottish government had weighed up the arguments for and against and agreed not to proceed.Opponents welcomed the decision, saying the area did not need another "layer of bureaucracy".Campaigners in favour, however, said it was a "huge missed opportunity" and a "big loss" for the region.
'Absolutely correct'
The Scottish government said the Galloway nomination had met all the selection criteria to be confirmed as the proposed location for the country's third national park.It said the designation process required a "thorough consultation process" which had been independently reviewed by the Scottish Community Development Centre which found it achieved "very impressive levels of public involvement".A spokesperson said: "The consultation collected more than 5,000 surveys and more than 1,000 people attended events to share their opinion."Based on this engagement and the reporter's recommendations we took the decision not to designate Galloway and Ayrshire as a national park."But it was absolutely correct to support the nomination process, thoroughly consider the application and meet the statutory consultation requirements that such a process demands."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
8 minutes ago
- The National
Holyrood passes legislation to abolish SQA exams body
The Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) is set to be scrapped and replaced by a new body called Qualifications Scotland. The Education (Scotland) Bill was passed by 69 votes to 47 late on Wednesday evening, following two days of debate. As well as abolishing the SQA, the bill also sets out plans for a new chief inspector of education, who will be tasked with inspecting nurseries, schools and colleges across Scotland. READ MORE: 100 charities challenge Ian Murray and Scottish Labour to oppose UK welfare cuts The bill states that Qualification Scotland will have to give equal weighting to both British Sign Language (BSL) and the Gaelic language. It also outlines that the new body must consider the needs of pupils who use BSL or learn in BSL. The new body is expected to be up and running in the autumn, after this year's exam results are released. It comes almost five years after the 2020 exams scandal, where marks for more than 124,000 pupils were downgraded after exams had to be scrapped as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. Speaking as the legislation was passed, Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth said the bill would "fundamentally create a new and a different type of organisation which works with the teaching profession differently". Jenny Gilruth And speaking after the vote, Gilruth said: 'The successful passage of this legislation shows this Government is serious about implementing the changes needed to drive improvement across Scotland's education and skills system. "The creation of a new national qualifications body is about building the right conditions for reform to flourish; the new body will ensure that knowledge and experience of pupils and teachers are at the heart of our national qualifications offering." Gilruth added that the new chief inspector would have "greater independence and the power to set the frequency and focus of inspections". READ MORE: SNP MPs join Labour rebellion in bid to kill off benefit cuts 'Throughout this process, I have been determined to work with other parties on this vital legislation. I am also grateful to teaching unions and other organisations across civic Scotland who contributed to its development," she continued. 'Taken together our major programme of education and skills reform will bring about the changes needed to meet the needs of future generations of young people." The bill was backed by the Scottish Greens, who said that the new body "will put the voices of teachers and students at its heart". The party's education spokesperson, Ross Greer, who has previously campaigned for an overhaul of the exams body, said he was pleased MSPs had voted for "this fresh start in Scottish education". Ross Greer He said: "Senior leadership at the SQA was given the opportunity to change over many years, but refused to do so. "Replacing the organisation with one legally required to listen to teachers and students will end this constant cycle of scandals. "Now we can begin rebuilding the trust which was so completely destroyed over the last decade and put the focus back on supporting students." But he added that such reform needed to be followed up with "urgent work" to reduce teachers' workload and an overhaul of the "Victorian-era" end of term exams system towards a model of ongoing assessment. Greer also hit out at Scottish Labour, who voted down the bill on the basis it did not go far enough. "Labour's vote to protect the scandal-plagued and unaccountable SQA is bizarre," he said. 'How can anyone look at the mistakes of recent years and think it can continue? We need real change for students and teachers, which this bill will deliver." READ MORE: UK nations unite against Labour's 'inadequate' devolution approach Both Labour and the Tories voted down the bill on Wednesday. Pam Duncan-Glancy, Scottish Labour's education spokesperson, said: 'We needed a qualifications system fit for the future, one that respects the efforts of learners, supports the judgment of teachers, and earns the trust of employers and universities. 'We needed a curriculum that is broad and inclusive, we needed an inspectorate that can challenge where necessary but also celebrate excellence. But on reform this is a job unfinished.' Meanwhile, Scottish Tory education spokesperson Miles Briggs said the new body was "little more than a rebrand of the SQA". 'The SQA needed an overhaul, not a cosmetic makeover, and the changes proposed fall way short of what is required to ensure the organisation can operate effectively and is properly accountable," he added.
BBC News
36 minutes ago
- BBC News
No 10 in talks with Labour MPs over changing welfare policies as it faces growing rebellion
Update: Date: 07:52 BST Title: Labour rebel: New welfare criteria 'totally arbitrary way' of allocating support Content: Labour MP Toby Perkins tells the BBC he finds the proposed welfare changes "very difficult to support". 'I don't disagree that we need reform, but just because we need reform doesn't mean that any reform is the right one," he tells BBC Radio 4's Today programme. The bill would change how people are assessed for personal independence payment (Pip) and universal credit (UC). Perkins says the new criteria are a "totally arbitrary way" of delivering them. He describes the proposed reforms as cruel, and hopes the government will "get to the right place" before the vote on Tuesday. Perkins urges the government to "take a pause", saying: "Let's try and make sure we don't end up having damaging changes in amongst what ultimately, primarily, are some very positive changes." Update: Date: 07:46 BST Title: Why is the government trying to cut welfare spending? Content: By Ben Chu It is concerned about the rise in the number of people claiming working-age benefits in recent years and the implications of this trend for the public finances. Last Autumn, the government projected that the numbers of working-age claimants of Pip in England, Scotland and Wales would rise from 2.7 million in 2023-24 to 4.3 million in 2029-30, external, an increase of 1.6 million. At that time, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the government's official forecaster, projected, external that the overall cost of the working-age benefit system would rise from £48.5bn in 2024 to £75.7bn by 2030. That would have represented an increase from 1.7% of the size of the UK economy to 2.2%, roughly the size of current spending on defence. Ministers argue that this rising bill needs to be brought under control and that changes to the welfare system are part of that effort. It is worth noting though that - even after factoring in the planned cuts - the OBR still projected, , externalthis bill to continue to rise in cash terms to £72.3bn by 2030. And the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) still projected, , externalthe total number of working-age Pip recipients to rise by 1.2 million between 2023-24 and 2029-30 - after the cuts. In this sense, the main effect of the Pip cuts would be to reduce the increase in claimants that would otherwise have occurred. Update: Date: 07:43 BST Title: Trade minster speaking to BBC Content: Trade minister Douglas Alexander is speaking now to BBC Breakfast - we'll bring you the key lines as he's asked about the welfare bill. Update: Date: 07:39 BST Title: Labour 'pretty united' on welfare reform – what Starmer has said Content: Just yesterday, Keir Starmer stood firm when asked about his proposed welfare changes. Speaking to the media, Starmer said the Labour party was "pretty united" on reforming the welfare system and dismissed criticism as "noises off". Earlier, his deputy Angela Rayner told the House of Commons that a vote on the government's welfare bill will go ahead as planned on Tuesday. In his conference with reporters, Starmer admitted that making changes to welfare was "tough going" but said, "the important thing is to focus on the change that we want to bring about". He argued that the current welfare system "doesn't work as it stands for people who desperately need help to get into work or for people who need protection". "We were elected in to change that which is broken, and that's what we will do, and that's why we will press ahead with reforms," he added. Update: Date: 07:30 BST Title: A Labour-led rebellion – what's the welfare changes row about? Content: The row over Keir Starmer's proposed welfare changes began when more than 130 MPs, including 120 from Labour, signed an amendment to reject plans to cut disability and sickness-related benefit payments. The government says the changes will save £5bn a year by 2030. Cabinet ministers have reportedly been calling Labour MPs to ask them to take their names off the amendment. So far, only one Labour MP, Samantha Niblett, has removed her name. MPs who signed the amendment include both new MPs from the 2024 intake and those who were in Parliament before Labour's election win. The rebels say they oppose the plans because of the number of people expected to be pushed into relative poverty, a lack of consultation, and what they say is an inadequate impact assessment on the jobs market. Update: Date: 07:25 BST Title: Welfare system broken but we want to get changes right, says No 10 source Content: Henry ZeffmanChief political correspondent More for you on this story now. A No 10 source tells the BBC: "Delivering fundamental change is not easy, and we all want to get it right, so of course we're talking to colleagues about the bill and the changes it will bring. "We want to start delivering this together on Tuesday." The source adds: "The broken welfare system is failing the most vulnerable and holding too many people back. "It's fair and responsible to fix it. There is broad consensus across the party on this." Update: Date: 07:20 BST Title: No 10 considering possible changes to welfare policies Content: Henry ZeffmanChief political correspondent Downing Street has confirmed it is in talks with Labour MPs about possible changes to the government's welfare policies. In a notable softening of tone, No 10 said that they "want" to hold a vote on Tuesday - as is currently planned - and admitted that getting the policy right was "not easy". This is a developing story, we'll have more for you on this shortly.
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Reform would win most seats in general election, in-depth poll suggests
The Reform Party is on track to get the most seats if an election took place this year - with combined support for the Conservatives and Labour collapsing to less than half of the national vote, new in-depth polling suggests. Analysts at YouGov have carried out their first Multilevel Regression and Post-stratification (MRP) poll since the last general election. The research is based on thousands of people, and links voters and characteristics to help with its projection. It is not a forecast, but an estimate of what could happen. The next election is not set to happen until 2029. This is the first such piece of research published by YouGov since the last general election, and is more in-depth than standard polling where people are just asked who they want to vote for. With a sample size of 11,500 people, it found that if a general election were to happen tomorrow, Nigel Farage's Reform UK would win 271 seats - the most of any party. The Tories would fall to fourth place behind the Liberal Democrats, with just 46 Conservative MPs projected. The Liberal Democrats, meanwhile, would gain nine extra seats to build a Commons caucus of 81 MPs, while the SNP would once again be the largest party in Scotland. Both the Greens and Plaid Cymru would gain three seats each to both hold seven slots in parliament. If this scenario were to materialise, it would mean a coalition government would be needed, as no one party would have a majority. It is unclear what any such coalition would look like. If Reform and the Conservatives teamed up, they would only have 317 seats - short of the 325 needed. Theresa May won 317 seats in 2017, and attempted to govern with the support of the Northern Irish DUP support. YouGov said: "Reform's meteoric rise to becoming comfortably the largest party in a hung parliament is driven by impressive performances right across the country - including in Scotland." The two major political parties of the last century would between them have just 224 seats, fewer than Reform is set to take by itself. Possibility of rainbow coalition Labour and the Conservatives would together have the support of just 41% of voters - down from 59% last year. The report released by YouGov said: "That a clear majority would now vote for someone other than the two established main parties of British politics is a striking marker of just how far the fragmentation of the voting public has gone over the past decade." It added: "According to our data and methods, 26% of voters would opt for Reform UK, 23% for Labour, 18% for the Conservatives, 15% the Liberal Democrats, 11% the Greens, 3% the SNP, 1% Plaid, and 2% for other parties and independent candidates." According to YouGov, Reform came out top of the polls in 99% of their simulations, with the rest having Labour at the top. Some 97% of simulations had a hung parliament - where no one party has a majority - as the outcome. In around 9% of simulations, Reform and the Conservatives have enough seats together to form a government, while in only "a tiny fraction" do Labour and the Lib Dems have enough together to govern. YouGov says "rainbow style coalition possibilities do appear". "For instance, combining the Labour, Liberal Democrat, and SNP totals produces a majority in just 3% of simulations. "Adding the Greens brings this figure to 11%, while adding Plaid pushes it up to 26%."
