logo
Reform would win most seats in general election, in-depth poll suggests

Reform would win most seats in general election, in-depth poll suggests

Sky News10 hours ago

The Reform Party is on track to get the most seats if an election took place this year - with combined support for the Conservatives and Labour collapsing to less than half of the national vote, new in-depth polling suggests.
Analysts at YouGov have carried out their first Multilevel Regression and Post-stratification (MRP) poll since the last general election. The research is based on thousands of people, and links voters and characteristics to help with its projection.
It is not a forecast, but an estimate of what could happen. The next election is not set to happen until 2029.
This is the first such piece of research published by YouGov since the last general election, and is more in-depth than standard polling where people are just asked who they want to vote for.
With a sample size of 11,500 people, it found that if a general election were to happen tomorrow, Nigel Farage's Reform UK would win 271 seats - the most of any party.
The Tories would fall to fourth place behind the Liberal Democrats, with just 46 Conservative MPs projected.
The Liberal Democrats, meanwhile, would gain nine extra seats to build a Commons caucus of 81 MPs, while the SNP would once again be the largest party in Scotland.
Both the Greens and Plaid Cymru would gain three seats each to both hold seven slots in parliament.
If this scenario were to materialise, it would mean a coalition government would be needed, as no one party would have a majority.
It is unclear what any such coalition would look like. If Reform and the Conservatives teamed up, they would only have 317 seats - short of the 325 needed.
Theresa May won 317 seats in 2017, and attempted to govern with the support of the Northern Irish DUP support.
YouGov said: "Reform's meteoric rise to becoming comfortably the largest party in a hung parliament is driven by impressive performances right across the country - including in Scotland."
The two major political parties of the last century would between them have just 224 seats, fewer than Reform is set to take by itself.
Possibility of rainbow coalition
Labour and the Conservatives would together have the support of just 41% of voters - down from 59% last year.
The report released by YouGov said: "That a clear majority would now vote for someone other than the two established main parties of British politics is a striking marker of just how far the fragmentation of the voting public has gone over the past decade."
It added: "According to our data and methods, 26% of voters would opt for Reform UK, 23% for Labour, 18% for the Conservatives, 15% the Liberal Democrats, 11% the Greens, 3% the SNP, 1% Plaid, and 2% for other parties and independent candidates."
According to YouGov, Reform came out top of the polls in 99% of their simulations, with the rest having Labour at the top.
Some 97% of simulations had a hung parliament - where no one party has a majority - as the outcome.
In around 9% of simulations, Reform and the Conservatives have enough seats together to form a government, while in only "a tiny fraction" do Labour and the Lib Dems have enough together to govern.
YouGov says "rainbow style coalition possibilities do appear".
"For instance, combining the Labour, Liberal Democrat, and SNP totals produces a majority in just 3% of simulations.
"Adding the Greens brings this figure to 11%, while adding Plaid pushes it up to 26%."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Glastonbury founder: Go elsewhere if you don't like our politics
Glastonbury founder: Go elsewhere if you don't like our politics

Telegraph

time37 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Glastonbury founder: Go elsewhere if you don't like our politics

The founder of the Glastonbury Festival has told people to 'go somewhere else' if they do not like the politics of the event. Sir Michael Eavis's comments came following calls for the festival to cancel a scheduled performance by Kneecap, the Irish republican rap trio, on Saturday afternoon. The band's involvement provoked a row after one of the group's members allegedly shouted 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah' at a past concert. Earlier this month, Liam O'Hanna, one of Kneecap's members, appeared in court accused of displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah, the proscribed terrorist organisation, at a gig in November 2024. The 27-year-old was released on unconditional bail until his next appearance court appearance on August 20. Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, urged the festival to kick Kneecap off its schedule, while Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, said the BBC should not broadcast footage of the group's show. But on Thursday, Sir Michael appeared to dismiss the calls. Asked by the Glastonbury Free Press, the event's newspaper, if the festival still 'stands for something,' the 89-year-old responded: 'Oh, heavens above – yes, of course it does. 'And I think the people that come here are into all those things. People that don't agree with the politics of the event can go somewhere else.' On Wednesday, his daughter Emily Eavis was asked about the row. She replied: 'We are just focusing on bringing the best festival to these people. We remain a platform of many artists all over the world and everyone is welcome here.' The band, made up of O'Hanna, Naoise Ó Cairealláin and J J Ó Dochartaigh from West Belfast, are known for their provocative lyrics and merchandise in support of Irish republicanism. Earlier this year, counter-terror police launched an investigation after footage from two of Kneecap's concerts allegedly showed members shouting: 'Kill your local MP.' In a statement, Kneecap rejected 'any suggestion that we would seek to incite violence against any MP or individual' and said the alleged comments were taken out of context. The band has also claimed it is a victim of a 'witch hunt' and said it 'never supported' Hamas or Hezbollah, which are banned groups in the UK. Through the years, Glastonbury has welcomed politicians, pundits and celebrities to speak on topics ranging from feminism to fascism at its Left Field and Green Fields Speakers Forum stages. Gary Lineker, the former Match of the Day presenter who left the BBC One show last month, will be speaking at the festival's Silver Hayes area on Saturday for a panel discussion titled: 'Standing Up For 'Getting Along' In A World That's Being Pushed Apart'. He told the Glastonbury Free Press: 'It's basically along the lines of: everything is done to try and divide us, and I think if people can pull together – because I think most of us are decent human beings – then just a bit more kindness in the world would go a long way at the moment.'

Douglas Ross hits out at NatureScot in debate on 'dominating' seagulls
Douglas Ross hits out at NatureScot in debate on 'dominating' seagulls

The Herald Scotland

time39 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Douglas Ross hits out at NatureScot in debate on 'dominating' seagulls

The debate was led by Mr Ross after he submitted a motion stating that the parliament should note concern around the reported changes to the approach taken for granting licences to control gulls in recent years by NatureScot. He argued that this has led to fewer licences being approved. A total of 2,041 licences were granted in 2023, however this figure fell to 505 in 2024. He told the chamber there is a 'clear conflict' in the Scottish Government body Nature Scot between conserving and preserving bird numbers and controlling the applications to regulate bird numbers. READ MORE: Can you be fined for feeding seagulls? Rules to follow Boffin denies being corrupt, but admits being incompetent Dundee University principal: 'I'm not corrupt, I'm incompetent' The Former Scottish Conservative leader said: 'Currently they are clearly conflicted between conserving and preserving bird numbers and also being the agency that looks at and deliberates on applications to control birds. 'It is not possible any more for Nature Scot to do those dual roles." Mr Ross pointed that Nature Scot keep a record of bird deaths or injury but not take any record of people injured. 'I think they have to look at that," he told MSPs today, "We do need to see a record of the number of attacks on people by gulls. 'They are causing a nuisance and people want action.' Mr Ross said communities and businesses in his own constituency of Moray, Nairn and Inverness have had significant problems with gulls in recent years, but that many communities across Scotland also experience similar problems. He also said the gulls are causing 'mental health issues' as their constant screeching torments the general public. 'They are a menace,' he emphasised to parliament. Mr Ross said he is not ignoring that people are encouraging gulls by feeding them and he accepted that was 'part of the problem'. Gulls 'dominating areas' are also seeing a reduction of other smaller birds, he argued. Mr Ross called on more "robust action" from the Scottish Government and NatureScot to protect humans and businesses from "the menace of dangerous gulls". He said this could include Scottish Ministers taking action through a section 11 order under the Natural Heritage (Scotland) Act 199. As a rebuttal, SNP MSP Christine Graham made her 'cautious defence of the common gull'. She named them 'clever and adaptable', saying she has seen the birds 'case out' shop fronts to find food. The MSP, sympathetic to the plight of the gull, said this is not 'mugging' and it would be wrong to anthropomorphise the gulls, adding that humans are 'mucky creatures' and, unlike gulls, know better. 'What we mustn't have is people versus gulls or gulls versus people', she stressed. SNP MSP Emma Roddick said there is potentially a need to reconsider what actions local councils can take to prevent damage and injury caused by gulls. Scottish Conservative MSP Findlay Carson said the 'wild flappers' appear to 'rule the roost' in his constituency of Dumfries and Galloway and 'appear to revel in the misery that they cause'. 'It's a growing public safety risk…These birds are no longer confined to our beaches,' he said. Labour MSP Rhoda Grant said it was important to note that the birds are not 'acting maliciously' but are protecting their young. However, she said the birds were causing considerable injury and it is a 'public health issue'. Green MSP Mark Ruskell raised in the chamber that the gull population numbers have halved since the 1980s. However, in a heated interaction, veteran SNP MSP Fergus Ewing intervened to say 'there was no such evidence for that' based on an FOI responses he had received disputing their decrease. The Agriculture Minister said he did not accept this comment from Mr Ewing and said he needs 'definitive proof' that is the case. Mr Ruskell continued to argue that the species numbers are declining and that the parliament should focus on 'finding a better way to co-exist' with an 'under-attack" species. Agriculture Minister Jim Fairlie said he accepts this is a 'deadly serious' matter in Scotland. He said licenses are dealt out for dealing with gulls is based on Nature Scot guidance which has changed. 'The use of language such as menace or nuisance is not a licensable purpose and that's a really critical part. "They can only be issued on the basis of health and safety which is why there has been this differentiation since previous applications. 'We have delegated [license] power to Nature Scot and that is where it should stay for this moment in time.' The minister said if the government went against their licensable purpose it could 'open' them up to judicial review. 'Therefore it would not be appropriate for ministers', he said. Mr Fairlie said society must limit food waste and public littering to 'take away feeding opportunities'. The Minister has said he will convene a summit on the issue in Inverness where the 'entire issue' of seagulls in Scotland will be raised. 'I'll make sure that we try to progress this so that we are not standing here in ten years time with another member's debate about gull species,' he concluded.

Starmer criticises Badenoch as she claims PM is ‘irrelevant' on world stage
Starmer criticises Badenoch as she claims PM is ‘irrelevant' on world stage

The Independent

time41 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Starmer criticises Badenoch as she claims PM is ‘irrelevant' on world stage

Sir Keir Starmer has criticised Kemi Badenoch as 'unserious' after she claimed his attendance at the G7 and Nato summits helped him avoid Prime Minister's Questions. The Prime Minister slapped down Mrs Badenoch's dismissal of him as 'irrelevant' on the global stage as she launched a barbed attack on Sir Keir while he gave a statement on the two international events to the Commons. Her tone was rebuked by one of her own backbenchers, who admitted he could have the whip withdrawn for his criticism. Mrs Badenoch had said: 'He has evaded Prime Minister's Questions for two weeks, only to come here to tell us what we already heard on the news. This is a weak statement from a weak Prime Minister which can be characterised in two words; 'noises off'.' She added: 'We used to be a strategic player on the global stage, advancing Britain's interests with confidence, and now we are on the sidelines.' She later said: 'Over the last few weeks, historic events unfolded in the Middle East, and at every stage Britain has been out of step with the US and out of the loop with Israel.' 'The Prime Minister may have finally returned to this House after a fortnight away, but in truth he is all at sea. Irrelevant on the world stage, impotent in the face of rising illegal immigration, and now with 126 of his own MPs all openly undermining his authority, his Government is incapable of making even the smallest changes to bring down the cost of our ever-expanding welfare bill,' she went on to say. In response, Sir Keir said: 'There has never been a more important time to work with our allies, and to be absolutely serious in our response. That response was unserious. 'To suggest that at a time like this that the Prime Minister attending a G7 summit and the Nato summit is avoiding PMQs is unserious. 'What happened at Nato yesterday was historic. It was very important at a time like this that Nato showed unity and strength with a commitment to the future, not just to the past. That took a huge amount of work with our allies over the last few days and weeks. 'We have been centrally involved in that, crafting the final outcome, and we were recognised as having done so. I am proud that we helped put that summit into the right place, and the world emerged safer as a result.' He added: 'For the leader of the Opposition to belittle it just shows how irrelevant she and the party opposite have become. They used to be serious about these issues, they used to be capable of cross-party consensus, and all of that is slipping away.' Conservative MP for the Wrekin Mark Pritchard said: 'Can I agree with the Prime Minister that as far as possible in this place, it would be better to keep partisan politics out of national security issues? 'And who knows, I may get withdrawn for saying that, but so be it, there are things that go beyond party politics.' Sir Keir had earlier said it was 'frankly embarrassing to suggest I shouldn't have been at Nato or the G7', adding: 'And I think her backbenchers recognise it.' Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey also criticised Mrs Badenoch, saying: 'It is astonishing, and I share his surprise, that it's now Conservative policy not to attend the G7 and Nato.' In his statement, the Prime Minister said the ceasefire between Iran and Israel had created an opportunity for peace, and said the pause in missile strikes between the two countries could also allow for a ceasefire in Gaza. He said: 'There is now a window for peace. We urge Iran and Israel to honour the ceasefire and seize this opportunity to stabilise the region. That is our priority, to get Iran back around the negotiating table with the US.' He added: 'Our national security strategy is clear, in this … era of radical uncertainty, faced with growing conflicts, state threats, illegal migration, organised crime and terrorism, the only way to respond to these issues is by being strong both at home and on the world stage, by pursuing a foreign policy that answers directly to the concerns of working people, and that is the approach I took to Nato and to the G7.' MPs heard the Government plans to spend 4.1% of GDP on defence by 2027, rising to 5% by 2035. Sir Keir said it would lead to a realignment of national security plans and economic policies in a way not seen since the Second World War. However Mrs Badenoch asked how the Government was going to meet its spending targets. She said: 'The Government's aspiration to get spending on national security to 5% is just hope. The reality is Labour does not have a plan to get to 3%, it is all smoke and mirrors.' Mrs Badenoch continued: 'It is one thing to talk about spending money on planes and infrastructure, making announcements about reviews, but it is another to be clear where the money comes from and how it will be spent efficiently to secure the defence of our nation.' Sir Keir replied: 'We are the party that has increased defence spend to the highest level since the Cold War, 2.5%, they talked about it. We did it.' He added that in a recent interview Mrs Badenoch had said the Conservative government had examined how to raise defence spending, but 'couldn't make the numbers work'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store