Why some royals wore white to the inaugural mass of Pope Leo XIV, from Queens Letizia to Sofía – but what unconventional shade did Queen Elizabeth wear to meet Pope Francis?
It is customary to wear black in front of the pope, and as politicians and Europe's royals gathered in St Peter's Square in The Vatican on May 18, most adhered to the tradition. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and first lady Olena Zelenska both opted for dark attire, while
US Vice-President J.D. Vance and his wife Usha Vance also chose sombre shades, with the second lady also wearing a black mantilla, the traditional veil worn by women during mass.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (centre) receives applause from attendees as Pope Leo XIV mentions the situation in Ukraine during his inaugural mass in Vatican City on May 18. Photo: EPA-EFE
Advertisement
So why were a handful of the women from Europe's royal families clad in virgin white? The answer is a long-held custom held by the Catholic Church called the 'privilège du blanc' – the privilege of white – that permits select Catholic queens and princesses to wear white in the presence of the pontiff.
Currently, there are only seven women in the world who can exercise this right: Princess Charlene of Monaco, Queen Sofía and Queen Letizia of Spain, Queen Paola and Queen Mathilde of Belgium,
Grand Duchess Maria Teresa of Luxembourg , and Princess Marina of Naples.
Here are some all-white looks the royals have worn in the pope's presence.
King Felipe VI (right) and Queen Letizia of Spain attend the inauguration of Pope Leo XIV. Photo: IPA via Zuma Press
At the pontiff's inaugural mass, Queen Letizia wore a white Redondo dress along with a white lace veil.
Monaco's Prince Albert and Princess Charlene arrive for the inaugural mass of Pope Leo XIV. Photo: Reuters
Princess Charlene of Monaco, the first Monégasque princess to wear white in front of the pope, also wore a white veil and an icy hued midi-length Elie Saab dress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia Times
4 hours ago
- Asia Times
Did Trump know about Ukraine's drone blitz in advance?
Ukraine's strategic drone strikes on Sunday against elements of Russia's nuclear triad all across the country were an unprecedented provocation that risks a dramatic worsening of the conflict. Speculation has since swirled about whether Trump knew about these attacks in advance, which his Press Secretary denied. What follows are five relevant points, each accompanied by brief arguments about why they either do or do not prove that he really was aware, which will help readers make up their own mind: 1. Trump is Pushing For A Record Trillion-Dollar Defense Budget * Escalating and then maintaining tensions with Russia, but importantly keeping them manageable, would create a sense of urgency in Congress for passing this record budget by year's end and reduce opposition to it from key MAGA allies. The military-industrial complex is influential in Trump 2.0 and he himself has always boasted about how powerful he wants the US Armed Forces to become. He might thus have known about Ukraine's drone strike plans in advance, but didn't call them off for this reason. – Trump has invested a lot of political capital in trying to de-escalate tensions with Russia and caught tons of flak as a result, yet he still officially remains committed to it (at least for now), thus suggesting sincerity. Regarding his proposed defense budget, it may be more about preparing the US for war with China, rather than waging another endless war against Russia by proxy. There's also wide congressional approval for containing China, so his defense budget likely doesn't need escalated tensions with Russia to pass. 2. Trump Surprisingly Patched Up His Problems With Zelensky * The minerals deal, Trump's latest in-person meeting with Zelensky at the Vatican, and the influence of the US' permanent military, intelligence, and diplomatic bureaucracies ('deep state') might have combined to reshape Trump's perception of both Zelensky and Putin. It might therefore be that while Trump talks about peace with Putin in public, he's plotting against him during talks with Zelensky. Their latest in-person meeting could have even seen Trump approve of Zelensky's strategic drone strike plans. – Trump is profit-minded and mercurial so it makes sense that his attitude towards Zelensky changed for the better after the minerals deal was finally signed. Likewise, his inability to reach any similar or more significant deals with Putin – which are dependent on first freezing or resolving the Ukrainian conflict – accounts for his newly harsh rhetoric about him. Had Trump known about Zelensky's plans in advance, then he'd have called them off so as to not risk losing these potential deals with Putin in the aftermath. 3. Trump Warned That 'REALLY BAD' Things Might Soon Happen To Russia * His scandalous post came less than a week before Ukraine's strategic drone strikes and might have thus meant to foreshadow this unprecedented provocation, albeit in a 'plausibly deniable' way for escalation-control purposes. Trump could have also wanted to signal to Putin that he'd better accept an unconditional 30-day ceasefire or else. If that's really what happened, then he might be preparing another such post for the same reason, which he'd hope might then pressure Putin into concessions. – Critics claim that Trump sometimes bluffs as a negotiating tactic so this might have been one example of that in practice on the world's stage. The wording and timing coincidentally served the relevant interests of the Biden-era 'deep state,' which could have cooked up this unprecedented provocation long ago without him ever finding out, given that it might implicate Trump in Putin's eyes. In that event, the peace process might collapse, and Trump might thus escalate in response just like they want. 4. Axios Initially Claimed That Ukraine Informed The US In Advance * Although Axios later corrected its report to note that Ukraine did not inform the US in advance, its initial claim might have been accurate, but understandable escalation-control concerns vis-à-vis Russia could have prompted the White House to urgently request that they change it. Axios might have voluntarily complied for national security reasons or because it was coerced with legal threats. In any case, this incident convinced some people that Trump really was aware of Ukraine's plans in advance. – Axios either made an innocent error in its initial report that was then swiftly corrected, or this was a preplanned provocation by Democrat-loyal elements of the 'deep state' to falsely implicate Trump. If the second scenario is what happened, then the purpose would have been to convince Putin that Trump really was aware of Ukraine's plans in advance, which could then trigger the peace process's collapse. Even so, Russia is well aware of the 'deep state's' tricks, so it might not fall for this latest possible one. 5. Trump Has Remained Suspiciously Silent About These Attacks * For someone who seems to always have an opinion about everything, even the most mundane and random things, Trump hasn't yet said a word about Ukraine's unprecedented provocation against Russia. His suspicious silence is thus being interpreted by some as tacit approval. After all, these strategic drone strikes risk triggering the collapse of the peace process into which he's already invested so much political capital, so it follows that he'd have condemned Ukraine by now if he was really against what it did. – Trump might have been caught off guard by this just as much as Putin was if the Biden-era 'deep state' really did cook this up long ago without him ever finding out. Therefore, both of them might have agreed – whether during an unreported phone call on Sunday or during their top diplomats' one that same day – to play it cool while jointly investigating, thus keeping the peace process alive for now. In that case, Trump's silence would be temporary, and Putin would already know not to misconstrue it as acceptance. ———- Whether Trump knew about Ukraine's strategic strikes in advance will determine the extent of Russia's retaliation and whether it remains involved in the peace process. The best-case scenario from Russia's perspective is that Putin becomes convinced that Trump didn't know and that he then acts against those in his government that did, while the worst-case scenario is Putin concluding that Trump knew and either approved it, didn't care or couldn't stop it but didn't inform him. This article was first published on Andrew Korybko's Substack and is republished with kind permission. Become an Andrew Korybko Newsletter subscriber here.
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China and EU schedule crunch talks to resolve economic deadlock
China and the European Union have agreed to hold a new round of trade talks to pave the way for a high-level leaders' summit next month, but analysts said it remained to be seen whether the two sides could resolve the impasse in their bilateral economic relations. The talks were announced by the European Commission following a meeting between China's commerce minister, Wang Wentao, and EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic on the sidelines of a World Trade Organization event in Paris on Tuesday. They are expected to lay the groundwork for a high-level summit slated for late July in Beijing, where European leaders will meet with President Xi Jinping. 'The two sides held focused, candid and in-depth discussions on pressing and important issues related to China-EU economic and trade cooperation,' China's Ministry of Commerce said in a statement on Wednesday. 'They also tasked their respective working teams to intensify efforts in preparing for this year's key bilateral agenda on the economic and trade front,' it added. Meanwhile, an EU spokesperson said on Tuesday that the bloc's 'overall objective remains to rebalance our trade and investment relationship with China and level the playing field'.
South China Morning Post
8 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
How SkinnyTok TikTok trend and others glorifying thinness can spark eating disorders
Social media can push vulnerable young people towards developing eating disorders by glorifying thinness and promoting fake, dangerous advice about diet and nutrition, experts warn. Advertisement Young women and girls are much more likely to suffer from illnesses such as anorexia, bulimia and binge-eating disorder, though rates among men have been increasing. Research has shown the percentage of people worldwide who have had some kind of eating disorder during their lives rose from 3.5 per cent in 2000 to 7.8 per cent in 2018, a timeframe that captures the rise of social media. For the professionals trying to help teenagers recover from these disorders, misinformation from influencers on platforms such as TikTok and Instagram is a huge problem. 'We no longer treat an eating disorder without also addressing social media use,' French dietitian and nutritionist Carole Copti says. Advertisement 'It has become a trigger, definitely an accelerator and an obstacle to recovery.'
