Opinion: Looking into a lead-filled society
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), if the amount of lead in the soil exceeds 400 parts per million (ppm) , it is deemed hazardous to health. The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment lowered the soil lead risk standard to just 80 ppm . However, in Santa Ana, out of the 1,500 soil samples collected, half of them were found to have exceeded the standard of 80 ppm. Furthermore, some samples were found to have reached an astounding 2,600 ppm, highlighting the severity of the issue.
Interestingly, UCI-led research found that in the soil where the median household income was below $50,000, there was a 440% higher amount of lead than in places with a median household income of $100,000. Furthermore, over 50% of unsafe lead found in samples were primarily in places with more minority residents who cannot afford benefits such as health insurance.
According to the samples collected, two main causes of the lead contamination issue in Santa Ana were found. The first was the excessive use of lead paint up to the year 1978. Buildings were primarily painted using lead paint, and their paint chips and dust continue to be a risk for lead poisoning. However, the main cause of the lead contamination was found to be from historical gasoline emissions. Santa Ana's many old highways and streets cause higher lead concentrations, especially due to its close proximity to neighborhoods.
In fact, high levels of lead in children can cause many neurological issues such as developmental delay, learning difficulties, loss of appetite/weight loss, hearing loss, seizures, and more. Adults can also suffer from high blood pressure, joint/muscle pain, loss of memory and concentration, mood disorders, miscarriage, and other symptoms.
Although there are still many challenges that the city of Santa Ana faces in regard to its lead contamination, there are many organizations working to make the city a safer place to live. Recently, an initiative headed by Jovenes Cultivando Cambios, called 'PloNo Santa Ana!' partnered with the Orange County Environmental Justice (OCEJ) organization to launch a General Plan (GP) to test lead, repair the soil, and to provide health care to residents who are impacted by the lead contamination. Furthermore, professors from UCI and community members of the Inequities in Childhood Life-Course Lead Exposure and Academic Neurobehavioral Outcomes (I-CLEAN) work to further study the impact that lead has on children.
There are several things that all of us can do to alleviate this problem. For example, you can plant vegetation such as sunflowers, spinach, or corn, which have the ability to remove lead from the soil . Furthermore, such plants add much-needed greenspace to cities like Santa Ana. If you want to help advocate for larger changes, then you can join organizations such as the OCEJ PloNo! movement and help change environmental policies on both local and national levels.
All of us can agree that everyone, especially children, deserve to live in clean environments. It is our collective responsibility to ensure that we build a country in which everyone has the right to live free of dangerous pollution and contaminants. Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
No proof Hamas routinely stole UN aid, Israeli military officials say
Now, with hunger at crisis levels in the territory, Israel is coming under increased international pressure over its conduct of the war in Gaza and the humanitarian suffering it has brought. Doctors in the territory say that an increasing number of their patients are suffering from -- and dying of -- starvation. More than 100 aid agencies and rights groups warned this past week of 'mass starvation' and implored Israel to lift restrictions on humanitarian assistance. The European Union and at least 28 governments, including Israeli allies like Britain, France, and Canada, issued a joint statement condemning Israel's 'drip-feeding of aid' to Gaza's 2 million Palestinian residents. Advertisement Israel has largely brushed off the criticism. David Mencer, a government spokesperson, said this past week that there was 'no famine caused by Israel.' Instead, he blamed Hamas and poor coordination by the United Nations for any food shortages. Advertisement Israel moved in May toward replacing the UN-led aid system that had been in place for most of the 21-month war in Gaza, opting instead to back a private, American-run operation guarded by armed US contractors in areas controlled by Israeli military forces. Some aid still comes into Gaza through the United Nations and other organizations. The new system has proved to be much deadlier for Palestinians trying to obtain food handouts. According to the Gaza Health Ministry, almost 1,100 people have been killed by gunfire on their way to get food handouts under the new system, in many cases by Israeli soldiers who opened fire on hungry crowds. Israeli officials have said they fired shots in the air in some instances because the crowds came too close or endangered their forces. The military officials who spoke to The New York Times said that the original UN aid operation was relatively reliable and less vulnerable to Hamas interference than the operations of many of the other groups bringing aid into Gaza. That's largely because the United Nations managed its own supply chain and handled distribution directly inside Gaza. Hamas did steal from some of the smaller organizations that donated aid, as those groups were not always on the ground to oversee distribution, according to the senior Israeli officials and others involved in the matter. But, they say, there was no evidence that Hamas regularly stole from the United Nations, which provided the largest chunk of the aid. A Hamas representative did not immediately respond to requests for comment. An internal US government analysis came to a similar conclusion, Reuters reported Friday. It found no evidence of systematic Hamas theft of US-funded humanitarian supplies, the report said. Advertisement 'For months, we and other organizations were dragged through the mud by accusations that Hamas steals from us,' said Georgios Petropoulos, a former UN official in Gaza who oversaw aid coordination with Israel for nearly 13 months of war. The senior military officials and others interviewed by the Times spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly on behalf of the military or government. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office did not immediately respond to requests for comment. In a statement, the military said that it has been 'well documented' that Hamas has routinely 'exploited humanitarian aid to fund terrorist activities.' But the military did not dispute the assessment that there was no evidence that Hamas regularly stole aid from the United Nations. The Israeli government and military have often clashed over how to conduct the war in Gaza. Early last year, top commanders urged a cease-fire with Hamas to secure the release of hostages. Netanyahu's government instead expanded the ground operation in southern Gaza. Israel used the rationale that Hamas steals aid when it cut off all food and other supplies to Gaza between March and May. In March, after a cease-fire between Hamas and Israel collapsed, Netanyahu said: 'Hamas is currently taking control of all supplies and goods entering Gaza,' and he declared that Israel would prevent anything from entering the territory. That blockade, and problems with a new aid system that launched in May, brought hunger and starvation in Gaza to the current crisis levels. For most of the war, the UN was the largest single source of aid entering Gaza, according to data from the Israeli military unit that oversees policy in the territory. Advertisement Now, the new aid system is managed instead by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a private American company led by a former CIA agent. It was intended to eventually replace international aid organizations and the UN role. But it has only a few distribution hubs, compared with hundreds under the former UN-run operation. The new system's rollout at the end of May was quickly followed by near-daily episodes of deadly violence near distribution sites. Desperate and hungry Palestinians must go to the few aid distribution sites located in areas controlled by Israeli forces. The hours of operation are limited and supplies run out, so crowds arrive early, with some walking for miles to get there. Since May 19, when Israel allowed emergency supplies to resume entering Gaza after its two-month blockade, half of the aid has been distributed by the United Nations and international organizations, with the other half coming through the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the Israeli military says. Petropoulos welcomed the notion that some Israeli officials had recognized the UN-led aid system as effective during the war. But he said he wished that endorsement had come much sooner. 'If the UN had been taken at face value months ago, we wouldn't have wasted all this time and Gazans wouldn't be starving and being shot at trying to feed their families,' he said. This article originally appeared in
CNN
2 days ago
- CNN
US and Mexico agree to long-term wastewater treatment plan in the San Diego-Tijuana region
The governments of Mexico and the United States signed a memorandum of understanding on Thursday to fund and expedite several wastewater treatment projects in the Tijuana River basin. Untreated wastewater continually affects residents living along the river, which flows across the border from Tijuana and through several of San Diego's southern neighborhoods. Residents living along the river have long battled severe health issues which researchers say stem from the river's contamination. One research team based at the University of California San Diego found that trace amounts of waterborne chemicals from tires, personal care products, and even illicit drugs present in the Tijuana River are being introduced into the air — exacerbating health concerns for tens of thousands of residents living on its banks. In Thursday's event celebrated in Mexico City, US Environmental Protection Agency Secretary Lee Zeldin and Mexico's Secretary of the Environment and National Resources of Mexico Alicia Bárcena agreed to a series of actions to be taken by both governments by 2027 to address the deteriorating wastewater treatment crisis. The agreement stipulates that both Mexico and the US will re-commit to funding the construction and renovation of water treatment infrastructure on both sides of the border. The document also accelerates several projects to be completed over the next two years. 'What we are doing, in reality, is trying to resolve once and for all the problem of wastewater from the Tijuana River,' Bárcena said during her speech on Thursday. Zeldin concurred, saying the agreement represented 'a huge win for millions of Americans and Mexicans.' He attributed the success to President Trump's distinct interest in the issue and noted that addressing the water contamination crisis will ensure a safer environment for residents and Navy SEALS training on nearby beaches. Former Commissioner of the International Water and Boundary Commission (IBWC) Maria-Elena Giner called the agreement 'excellent news' toward reaffirming commitments made by the US and Mexican officials in Minute 328, which outlines how Mexico and the US will share the costs of operating and maintaining water treatment infrastructure on the border. Permanent and continued diplomacy, transparency of information, and defined concrete action with Mexico will be needed. Former IBWC Commissioner Maria-Elena Giner Funding wastewater treatment facilities and their continued operation has posed a constant challenge; this agreement sets expectations for construction and rehabilitation projects that haven't yet been financed. But given that Bárcena's and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum's Morena party currently controls the country's legislature, it is likely the funds could be allocated in the 2026 and 2027 budgets. At the Mexican President's daily press briefing on Friday, Bárcena noted that she is working to secure an agreement where the US and Mexico each cover half the costs of upgrading the critical San Antonio de los Buenos treatment plant, located southwest of Tijuana. She estimates the improvements for this project alone will cost $67 million or 1.2 billion pesos. CNN's Verónica Calderón and Isa Cardona contributed to this report.
CNN
2 days ago
- CNN
US and Mexico agree to long-term wastewater treatment plan in the San Diego-Tijuana region
The governments of Mexico and the United States signed a memorandum of understanding on Thursday to fund and expedite several wastewater treatment projects in the Tijuana River basin. Untreated wastewater continually affects residents living along the river, which flows across the border from Tijuana and through several of San Diego's southern neighborhoods. Residents living along the river have long battled severe health issues which researchers say stem from the river's contamination. One research team based at the University of California San Diego found that trace amounts of waterborne chemicals from tires, personal care products, and even illicit drugs present in the Tijuana River are being introduced into the air — exacerbating health concerns for tens of thousands of residents living on its banks. In Thursday's event celebrated in Mexico City, US Environmental Protection Agency Secretary Lee Zeldin and Mexico's Secretary of the Environment and National Resources of Mexico Alicia Bárcena agreed to a series of actions to be taken by both governments by 2027 to address the deteriorating wastewater treatment crisis. The agreement stipulates that both Mexico and the US will re-commit to funding the construction and renovation of water treatment infrastructure on both sides of the border. The document also accelerates several projects to be completed over the next two years. 'What we are doing, in reality, is trying to resolve once and for all the problem of wastewater from the Tijuana River,' Bárcena said during her speech on Thursday. Zeldin concurred, saying the agreement represented 'a huge win for millions of Americans and Mexicans.' He attributed the success to President Trump's distinct interest in the issue and noted that addressing the water contamination crisis will ensure a safer environment for residents and Navy SEALS training on nearby beaches. Former Commissioner of the International Water and Boundary Commission (IBWC) Maria-Elena Giner called the agreement 'excellent news' toward reaffirming commitments made by the US and Mexican officials in Minute 328, which outlines how Mexico and the US will share the costs of operating and maintaining water treatment infrastructure on the border. Permanent and continued diplomacy, transparency of information, and defined concrete action with Mexico will be needed. Former IBWC Commissioner Maria-Elena Giner Funding wastewater treatment facilities and their continued operation has posed a constant challenge; this agreement sets expectations for construction and rehabilitation projects that haven't yet been financed. But given that Bárcena's and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum's Morena party currently controls the country's legislature, it is likely the funds could be allocated in the 2026 and 2027 budgets. At the Mexican President's daily press briefing on Friday, Bárcena noted that she is working to secure an agreement where the US and Mexico each cover half the costs of upgrading the critical San Antonio de los Buenos treatment plant, located southwest of Tijuana. She estimates the improvements for this project alone will cost $67 million or 1.2 billion pesos. CNN's Verónica Calderón and Isa Cardona contributed to this report.
