Earthquake death tolls passes 2,000 in Myanmar
It comes as rescuers and an activist group said several hundred Muslims died while praying at mosques during Ramadan and 200 Buddhist monks were crushed by a collapsing monastery.
The quake could exacerbate hunger and disease outbreaks in a country that was already one of the world's most challenging places for humanitarian organisations to operate because of civil war, aid groups and the United Nations warned.
The 7.7 magnitude quake hit on Friday, with the epicentre near Myanmar's second-largest city, Mandalay.
It damaged the city's airport, buckled roads and collapsed hundreds of buildings along a wide swathe down the country's centre.
Relief efforts are further hampered by power outages, fuel shortages and spotty communications.
A lack of heavy machinery has slowed search and rescue operations, forcing many to search for survivors by hand in daily temperatures above 40C.
Rescue workers at Mandalay's collapsed U Hla Thein monastery said they were still searching for about 150 of the dead monks.
Some 700 Muslim worshippers attending Friday prayers were killed when mosques collapsed, said Tun Kyi, a member of the steering committee of the Spring Revolution Myanmar Muslim Network.
He said some 60 mosques were damaged or destroyed.
Videos posted on The Irrawaddy online news site showed several mosques toppling.
It was not clear whether those numbers were already included in the official toll.
Myanmar state MRTV reported that the leader of the military government, Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, told Pakistan's prime minister during a call that 2,065 people were killed, with more than 3,900 injured and about 270 missing.
Relief agencies expect those numbers to rise sharply, since access is slow to remote areas where communications are down.
The United Nations' Myanmar country team called for unimpeded access for aid teams.
'Even before this earthquake, nearly 20 million people in Myanmar were in need of humanitarian assistance,' said Marcoluigi Corsi, the UN resident and humanitarian co-ordinator.
'We're really not clear on the scale of the destruction at this stage,' Lauren Ellery, deputy director of programmes in Myanmar for the International Rescue Committee (IRC), told The Associated Press.
'They were talking about a town near Mandalay where 80% of the buildings were reportedly collapsed, but it wasn't in the news because telecommunications have been slow.'
Groups the IRC works with have reported that some places are cut off by landslides, she said.
The World Health Organisation said it has reports of three hospitals destroyed and 22 partially damaged in the region.
'There is an urgent need for trauma and surgical care, blood transfusion supplies, anaesthetics, essential medicines and mental health support,' it said.
An artificial intelligence analysis of satellite images of Mandalay by Microsoft's AI for Good Lab showed 515 buildings with 80% to 100% damage and another 1,524 with 20% to 80% damage.
It was not clear what percentage of the city's buildings that represented.
Rescue efforts are also complicated by the civil war.
In 2021, the military seized power from the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi, sparking what has turned into significant armed resistance.
While one group has declared a partial unilateral ceasefire, the government and other armed groups have not stopped fighting.
Government forces have lost control of much of Myanmar, and many places were dangerous or impossible for aid groups to reach even before the quake.
More than three million people have been displaced by the fighting, according to the UN.
Ms Ellery noted that the area worst hit by the earthquake was seriously damaged by flooding last year, and many displaced people sought refuge there.
Since the earthquake, many people have been sleeping outside, either because homes were destroyed or out of fear of aftershocks.
Monsoon rains start in May and finding people shelter will be a major challenge, she said.
International rescue teams from several countries are on the scene, including from Russia, China, India and several South East Asian countries.
On Monday, an Indian team jackhammered through slabs of fallen concrete at one site in Mandalay.
They could be seen bringing out one body.
The European Union, Britain, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea and others have announced millions of dollars in aid.
Despite massive cuts and sackings at the US Agency for International Development – the body charged with delivering humanitarian assistance overseas – the US embassy said a team of experts was on its way to Myanmar.
The embassy said it would provide up to two million dollars through local organisations.
A small number of US military personnel were sent to assist in Bangkok, where the earthquake killed at least 18 people, many at a construction site where a partially built high-rise collapsed.
Another 33 have been reported injured and 78 missing, primarily at the construction site near the popular Chatuchak market.
On Monday, heavy equipment was temporarily shut down at the site and authorities urged onlookers to be silent as they used machines to try to detect signs of life.
Bangkok governor Chadchart Sittipunt told reporters that signs had been detected on Sunday night, though experts could not determine whether it had been machine error.
Watching the crews at work, Naruemon Thonglek said she had 'made some peace' with the fact that her partner and five friends there were unlikely to be found alive.
'A part of me still hopes they will survive,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Myanmar military airstrike on gem-mining town kills at least 21
BANGKOK — An airstrike by Myanmar's military on the town of Mogok, the center of the Southeast Asian country's lucrative gem-mining industry, has killed at least 21 people including a pregnant woman, an armed opposition group, residents and Myanmar's online media said Saturday. The assault was the latest in a series of frequent and deadly military airstrikes, often causing civilian casualties, that have intensified in a bid to reclaim territory from resistance groups amid the civil war that erupted after the army seized power in February 2021. The attack occurred Thursday night in Shwegu ward in Mogok township, about 70 miles northeast of Mandalay, the country's second-largest city, said Lway Yay Oo, a spokesperson for the the Ta'ang National Liberation Army. The TNLA is one of the powerful ethnic militias fighting against the government army near the Chinese border. 'About 21 civilians were killed. Seven others were injured. Homes and Buddhist monastery buildings were also damaged,' Lway Yay Oo said. Mogok, the ruby-mining center in the upper Mandalay region, was seized in July 2024 by the TNLA, a member of an alliance of ethnic militias that seized a large swath of territory in northeastern Myanmar in an offensive that began in late 2023. The group's statement released Friday night on its Telegram social media channel said 16 women were among those killed in the airstrike, which appeared to target a Buddhist monastery in Mogok's Shwegu ward. It said 15 houses were also damaged when a jet fighter dropped a bomb. Two Mogok residents told the Associated Press on Saturday that the death toll had risen to nearly 30, though the exact number could not be independently confirmed. The residents, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were afraid of being arrested by the military, said the death toll was high because one of the bombed houses had been hosting visitors to the pregnant woman. Independent online media, including Myanmar Now and Democratic Voice of Burma, released pictures and videos described as debris in the aftermath of the airstrike. The military did not comment on the attack in Mogok. In the past, the army has said it attacks only legitimate targets of war, describing the resistance forces as terrorists. Myanmar, also known as Burma, has been in turmoil since the army seized power from the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi in February 2021. After peaceful demonstrations were put down with lethal force, many opponents of military rule took up arms, and large parts of the country are now embroiled in conflict. The military government has stepped up airstrikes against the armed pro-democracy People's Defense Force, and ethnic militias that have been fighting for greater autonomy for decades. The resistance forces have no defense against air attacks. The TNLA's statement said that 17 more people including two Buddhist monks had been killed and 20 others were injured in the first two weeks of August by airstrikes in areas controlled by the group. About 16 people, mostly truck drivers, were killed in airstrikes Monday on a convoy of trucks that were parked on the road due to heavy fighting near the town of Sagaing in central Myanmar, according to independent media reports in the country. Opponents and independent analysts estimate that the army now controls less than half the country while maintaining a tenacious grip on much of central Myanmar, including the capital, Naypyidaw. It has accelerated counteroffensives ahead of the election it has promised to hold at the end of this year in order to retake areas controlled by opposition forces. Critics say the elections won't be democratic because there is no free media and most leaders of Suu Kyi's party have been arrested. Suu Kyi was arrested in the 2021 coup. The planned vote is widely seen as an attempt to legitimize and maintain the military's rule. Several opposition groups have said they would seek to derail the election. Peck writes for the Associated Press.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What does recognizing Palestinian state mean, and does it change anything on the ground?
International recognition of a Palestinian state does not automatically lead to the state's creation. On Monday, Australia joined a growing number of countries planning to recognize a Palestinian state at the 80th United Nations General Assembly in September. New Zealand said it is exploring the possibility, but has not yet committed to such a move. Although a Palestinian state is widely recognized in the UN already (by about 75% of member states), significant media attention has been focused on the new announcements from Canada, the UK, France, and now Australia. One reason for the furor is that the war between Israel and Hamas is ongoing, 20 living hostages are still believed to be held in Gaza – alongside 30 bodies – and Hamas still has control over the Gaza Strip. Israel, as a result, has argued that recognizing a Palestinian state is both premature (as the hostages have not been returned, and Hamas has yet to be thwarted) and a reward for terrorism, given that none of the recent countries have set conditions on the recognition. 'This is effectively unconditional recognition, which is astounding,' Senator for Western Australia Michaelia Cash commented on Monday. That being said, even if Canada, the UK, France, Australia, and potentially others choose to go ahead and recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly next month, what, if anything, will change on the ground? International recognition of a Palestinian state does not automatically lead to the state's creation. There are still no internationally-agreed upon borders, no capital city, no army, and no set government. Gaza is in the middle of a war, and there is yet to be discussion on significant minutiae such as land swaps, what happens to Jewish settlements in the West Bank, what happens to Israeli Arabs, and the like. Recognition is mostly symbolic. It is not an order or a plan. If anything, it is designed to put pressure on Israel to end the war and to ramp up humanitarian aid provision to the Strip. This was made evident in UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's July 29 speech in which he said that the recognition of a Palestinian state would go ahead 'unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agrees to a ceasefire, and commits to a long-term, sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution.' In other words, recognition – at least on the UK's part – is a bargaining chip for cajoling Israel into acting in line with international consensus on how the war should be carried out. International law regarding the creation of a state is generally based on the Montevideo Convention of 1933. This lists four specific criteria in order for something to qualify as a state. First, it must have a permanent population. Second, it must have a defined territory. Third, a government. And fourth, the capacity to enter into relations with other states. Palestine does not necessarily meet all of these four criteria. While it is generally considered to have a permanent population, it doesn't have a stable government (the Palestinian Authority has only limited control over the West Bank and no control over Gaza) and has disputed borders. As the Israel Democracy Institute recently explained, the traditional position in international law is that a state either exists, or it does not: 'If it does not meet the factual conditions for statehood, recognition of it has no meaning.' Additionally, Article 10 of the Montevideo Convention states that 'The primary interest of states is the conservation of peace. Differences of any nature that arise between them should be settled by recognized peaceful methods.' Critics have argued that this will not be upheld by a future Palestinian state. What say does Israel have? From a legal and diplomatic standpoint, Israel has very little say over the recognition of a Palestinian state. However, from a practical standpoint, it does. This is primarily because any final peace deal requires Israel's approval and because Israel has significant military and territorial control over the area, including borders, airspace, movement of people and goods, and most of Area C. Additionally, an agreement would have to be reached over Jerusalem. Israel considers all of Jerusalem to be its capital, while Palestinians believe east Jerusalem to be theirs. A lot of focus in the speeches of international leaders has also been on the 1967 borders, to be used as a demarcation of a future Palestinian state. However, '1967 borders' never existed. The '1967 borders' do not appear in any agreed-upon international documents. What leaders such as New Zealand Prime Minister Luxon are likely referring to are the demarcation lines set during the 1949 Armistice Agreements between Israel and its neighbors, which remained after the 1948 Arab-Israeli War until the Six-Day War. This is often known as the Green Line. Prior to the Six-Day War, the Jewish people were denied access to the Old City and its holy sites. Additionally, there is the security element of the 1967 borders. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu once said that if Israel were to revert to them, the Jewish state would be militarily 'indefensible.' Then there is the matter of whether a Palestinian state is capable of reforming its government and stamping out terror. In his Monday speech, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that his decision to recognize a Palestinian state was predicated on commitments received from the PA to reform its governance, along with its recognition of Israel's right to exist. Albanese seemed confident with the PA's alleged promises, 'including to reform governance, terminate prisoner payments, institute schooling reform, demilitarize, and hold general elections,' and sees the PA as the best option for a future government. And yet, the Palestinian Authority has been unable to eradicate terror, despite launching Operation Protect the Homeland in Jenin in December 2024, to crack down on local Palestinian militia. This is also the same PA that has been providing monthly stipends to the families of Palestinian terrorists since the 1960s. In 2018, the stipends were estimated to be over $300 million. While the PA said it was canceling its pay-for-slay policy earlier this year, senior security officials called the commitment to do so a 'deception.' The US's veto power Nevertheless, the diplomatic recognition of Palestine by the stated countries does have implications, partially because it makes Israel more dependent on the US for its use of veto power in the UN Security Council. If the UK and France recognize a Palestinian state next month, Palestine will have the support of four of the UN Security Council's five permanent members (alongside China and Russia). The only remaining permanent member not to recognize a Palestinian state – the United States – will be a minority. While US Vice-President JD Vance has said the US has no plans to recognize a Palestinian state, there is no guarantee that this will continue to be the case. If a future US government were to recognize a Palestinian state, Israel would have to stand alone against international pressure. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia and AMD's ‘special treatment' from Trump is shaking up an already tangled global chip supply chain
Donald Trump's decision to let Nvidia and AMD export AI processors to China in exchange for a cut of their sales will have repercussions far beyond the semiconductor supply chain is global, involving a wide array of non-U.S. companies, often based in countries that are U.S. allies. Nvidia's chips may be designed and sold by a U.S. company, but they're manufactured by Taiwan's TSMC, using chipmaking tools from companies like ASML, which is based in the Netherlands, and Japan's Tokyo Election, and using components from suppliers like South Korea's SK Hynix. The U.S. leaned on these global companies for years to try to limit their engagement with China; these efforts picked up after the passage of the CHIPS Act and the expansion of U.S. chip-export controls in 2022. Washington has also pressured major transshipment hubs, like Singapore and the United Arab Emirates, to more closely monitor chip shipments to ensure that controlled chips don't make their way to China in violation of U.S. law. Within the U.S., discussion of Trump's Nvidia deal has focused on what it means for China's government's and Chinese companies' ability to get their hands on cutting-edge U.S. technology. But several other countries and companies are likely studying the deal closely to see if they might get an opening to sell to China as well. Trump's Nvidia deal 'tells you that [U.S.] national security is not really the issue, or has never been the issue' with export controls, says Mario Morales, who leads market research firm IDC's work on semiconductors. Companies and countries will 'probably have to revisit what their strategy has been, and in some cases, they're going to break away from the U.S. administration's policies.' 'If Nvidia and AMD are given special treatment because they've 'paid to play', why shouldn't other companies be doing the same?' he adds. Getting allies on their side The Biden administration spent a lot of diplomatic energy to get its allies to agree to limit their semiconductor exports to China. First, Washington said that manufacturers like TSMC and Intel that wanted to tap billions in subsidies could not expand advanced chip production in China. Then, the U.S. pushed for its allies to impose their own sanctions on exports to China. 'Export controls and other sanctions efforts are necessarily multilateral, yet are fraught with collective action problems,' says Jennifer Lind, an associate professor at Dartmouth College and international relations expert. 'Other countries are often deeply unenthusiastic about telling their firms—which are positioned to bring in a lot of revenue, which they use for future innovation—that they cannot export to Country X or Country Y.' This translates to 'refusing to participate in export controls or to devoting little or no effort to ensuring that their firms are adhering to the controls,' she says. Paul Triolo, a partner at the DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, points out that 'Japanese and Dutch officials during the Biden administration resisted any serious alignment with U.S. controls,' and suggests that U.S allies 'will be glad to see a major stepping back from controls.' Ongoing trade negotiations between the U.S. and its trading partners could weaken export controls further. Chinese officials may demand a rollback of chip sanctions as part of a grand bargain between Washington and Beijing, similar to how the U.S. agreed to grant export licenses to Nvidia and AMD in exchange for China loosening its controls on rare earth magnets. Japan and South Korea may also bring up the chip controls as part of their own trade negotiations with Trump. 'Expect continuing diversions' A separate issue are controls over the transfer of Nvidia GPUs. The U.S. has leaned on governments like Singapore, Malaysia and the United Arab Emirates to prevent advanced Nvidia processors from making their way to China. Scrutiny picked up in the wake of DeepSeek's surprise AI release earlier this year, amid allegations that the Hangzhou-based startup had trained its powerful models on Nvidia processors that were subject to export controls. (The startup claims that it acquired its processors before export controls came into effect). As of now, the two chips allowed to be sold in China–Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308–are not the most powerful AI chips on the market. The leading-edge processors, like Nvidia's Blackwell chip, cannot be sold to China. That means chip smuggling will continue to be a concern for the U.S. government. Yet 'enforcement will be spotty,' Triolo says. 'The Commerce Department lacks resources to track GPUs globally, hence expect continuing diversions of limited amounts of GPUs to China via Thailand, Malaysia, and other jurisdictions.' Triolo is, instead, focused on another loophole in the export control regime: Chinese firms accessing AI chips based in overseas data centers. 'There is no sign that the Trump Commerce Department is gearing up to try and close this gaping loophole in U.S. efforts to limit Chinese access to advanced compute,' he says. How much will the global supply chain change? Not all analysts think we'll see a complete unraveling of the export control regime. 'The controls involve a complex multinational coalition that all parties will be hesitant to disrupt, given how uncertain the results will be,' says Chris Miller, author of Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology. He adds that many of these chipmakers and suppliers don't have the same political heft as Nvidia, the world's most valuable company. Yet while these companies may not be as politically savvy as Nvidia, they're just as important. TSMC, for example, is the only company that can manufacture the newest generation of advanced chips; ASML is the only supplier of the extreme ultraviolet lithography machines used to make the smallest semiconductors. 'I don't believe it's leverage that the Trump administration will easily give away,' says Ray Wang, a semiconductor researcher at the Futurum Group. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data