logo
NASA's Webb finds cold giant planet caught in cosmic tug of war: Here's why it intrigues scientists

NASA's Webb finds cold giant planet caught in cosmic tug of war: Here's why it intrigues scientists

Time of India15-06-2025
NASA's
James Webb Space Telescope
has snapped a direct image of a frozen world with an orbit so off-track it's left astronomers puzzled. Named
14 Herculis c
, this distant planet lies about 58.4 light-years away in the constellation Hercules and appears to be drifting through a celestial crime scene.
"This is a totally new regime of study that Webb has unlocked with its extreme sensitivity in the infrared," said William Balmer, a graduate student at Johns Hopkins University and co-lead author of the new paper.
A cold giant in Deep Space
At minus 3°C, 14 Herculis c is among the coldest
exoplanets
ever directly imaged. Unlike the majority of observed exoplanets—usually hot and young—this one is roughly four billion years old and frigid. It is seven times as massive as Jupiter and orbits its star at a vast distance of about 1.4 billion miles.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
45세 이상이신가요? 느긋하게 쉬려면 이 게임을 플레이해 보세요 (지금 플레이해 보기)
Taonga: 아일랜드 팜
플레이하기
Undo
In the JWST image, it appears as a faint orange dot. That faintness is a surprise, given its size and age.
'The planet's actually significantly fainter than what we'd expect,' said Balmer. 'We don't think that this is a problem with the evolutionary models, however.'
Live Events
The brightness—or rather, the lack of it—may be explained by what's happening deep within the planet's atmosphere.
A misaligned and violent orbit
What's truly unusual is how this planet moves. The 14 Herculis system has two known planets that orbit their host star at sharply different angles. Instead of sweeping around their star in neat loops like our solar system, the planets cross paths in an 'X' pattern.
'This is the aftermath of a more violent planetary crime scene,' Balmer said. 'It reminds us that something similar could have happened to our own solar system, and that the outcomes for small planets like Earth are often dictated by much larger forces.'
Scientists believe the skewed orbit might be the result of a third planet that once existed in the system but was violently ejected during its early evolution. The remaining two appear to be locked in a long-term
gravitational tug-of-war
.
'These wobbles appear to be stable over long time scales,' Balmer added. 'We're trying to understand what kinds of planet-planet scatterings could produce such an exotic configuration of orbits.'
What the atmosphere reveals
Using JWST's Near-Infrared Camera and coronagraph—tools designed to block out starlight and catch faint planetary signals—astronomers were able to detect traces of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide in the planet's atmosphere.
"Added information, like the perceived brightness in direct imaging, would in theory support this estimate of the planet's temperature," said Daniella C. Bardalez Gagliuffi, co-author of the paper.
Gagliuffi explained that 14 Her c behaves more like a brown dwarf than a planet in terms of
atmospheric chemistry
. Normally, at such low temperatures, methane would dominate. But instead, carbon molecules created in warmer atmospheric layers appear to have been churned upward before they could convert.
'This is explained by churning in the atmosphere,' she said. 'Molecules made at warmer temperatures in the lower atmosphere are brought to the cold, upper atmosphere very quickly.'
The result is a planet that appears cooler and dimmer than it actually is—wrapped in a kind of cosmic disguise.
Rethinking planetary evolution
Most directly imaged exoplanets are young, bright, and close to their stars. But the strange tilt and great distance of 14 Her c made it a perfect target for Webb's advanced imaging techniques.
"This is great news for direct imaging," Balmer said. "We could confidently predict that JWST could resolve the outermost planet in the system."
With this image, JWST has expanded the known frontier of observable planets to include cold, mature giants. The discovery is more than a milestone—it's a gateway into understanding how solar systems form, clash, and settle.
"We want to understand how these planets change," said Balmer, "because we want to understand how we got here."
The team's findings have been accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Letters and were recently presented at the 246th American Astronomical Society meeting in Anchorage, Alaska.
This isn't just about a frozen gas giant orbiting far away. It's about understanding how planetary systems form, how they fight, and how they survive. Earth's place in the cosmos may have been secured not by order, but by surviving early chaos—and Webb's sharp new eye just gave us a glimpse of what that chaos looks like elsewhere.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Perseid meteor shower: When, where and how to watch hundreds of shooting stars as Venus, Jupiter converge? Check details
Perseid meteor shower: When, where and how to watch hundreds of shooting stars as Venus, Jupiter converge? Check details

Mint

time23 minutes ago

  • Mint

Perseid meteor shower: When, where and how to watch hundreds of shooting stars as Venus, Jupiter converge? Check details

The Perseid meteor shower is famous for its bright meteors that often leave long, glowing trails. While in past years the shower has delivered around 40 to 50 visible meteors per hour, this year's display is expected to be less impressive, according to Bill Cooke, head of NASA's Meteoroid Environments Office. The reduced visibility is due to the timing of the shower, which comes just after August's full moon, its brightness likely obscuring many of the meteors from view. 'The average person under dark skies could see somewhere between 40 and 50 Perseids per hour. Instead, you're probably going to see 10 to 20 per hour or fewer, and that's because we have a bright Moon in the sky washing out the fainter meteors,' Cooke said. He added, "You're not going to see Perseids around suppertime. You're going to have to go out later. Look anywhere but at the Moon.' According to Meteor expert Robert Lunsford from the American Meteor Society mentioned, 'The best rates will probably be near 15 per hour, as dim meteors make up a majority of the activity.' Meteors can also be visible as early as 10 pm local time as per NASA. "You can watch for long Perseid earth grazers as soon as it gets dark until the moon begins to interfere. This will be about an hour for most folks," Lunsford added. According to Finn Burridge, a science communicator at the Royal Observatory Greenwich, the Perseid meteor shower in 2025 peaks during the nights of August 11–12 and August 12–13. Viewing of the Perseids takes place until August 23. You can watch livestreaming of Perseid meteor shower on YouTube. For the best chance to see a meteor shower, head outside during the early predawn hours, when the sky is darkest and the moon is low or not visible. Avoid bright light sources, as they can hinder your view. A dark, cloudless night during a new moon or when the moon is at its smallest offers the clearest conditions. And remember to keep your eyes on the sky, not your phone. Your vision adjusts better to the dark when you're not distracted by bright screens, making it easier to spot shooting stars. Meteor showers occur when Earth moves through bands of dust and debris left in space by comets or asteroids. The Perseid meteor shower comes from Comet Swift–Tuttle, which takes about 133 years to complete a full orbit around the Sun. As Earth crosses the path of debris left by this comet, tiny particles enter our atmosphere at speeds of roughly 37 miles (59 kilometers) per second. When they hit the atmosphere, they burn up, creating the bright flashes we see as meteors.

‘Alien: Earth' creator Noah Hawley reveals why he introduced new creatures and how it is linked to AI, Tesla and Thomas Edison
‘Alien: Earth' creator Noah Hawley reveals why he introduced new creatures and how it is linked to AI, Tesla and Thomas Edison

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

‘Alien: Earth' creator Noah Hawley reveals why he introduced new creatures and how it is linked to AI, Tesla and Thomas Edison

FX's upcoming sci-fi series Alien: Earth aims to recreate the sense of shock and horror that made Ridley Scott 's 1979 Alien a classic. But with seven films and two crossover movies already revealing much about the franchise's alien creatures, creator Noah Hawley says new challenges demanded new ideas. 'I've managed somehow to have this niche of reinventing classic movies as television shows. If I have a skill at it, it's in understanding what the original movie made me feel and why,' Hawley told reporters in May. 'Seven movies later, there's no discovery or mystery in the life cycle of this creature, so that feeling the audience has is unavailable to me, which is why I felt I had to introduce new creatures.' Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Ridley Scott's input on new creatures David W. Zucker, Alien: Earth executive producer and chief creative officer for Scott Free, said Ridley Scott's main concern was whether these new additions could be as impactful as the original Xenomorph. 'Ridley, candidly, his biggest concern for Noah and this series was the ambition to build out these other creatures — the necessity of that but also just how steep that challenge is to pull off in a way that is impactful but also that really taps into your imagination,' Zucker said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo Like the 1979 film, the new series does not reveal how these creatures live or reproduce. Instead, it shows that they are the last thing anyone would want crash-landing on Earth. Plot set before the original 'Alien' Set two years before Alien, the series follows Wendy (Sydney Chandler), the first human to have her consciousness transferred to a synthetic body. When a space vessel carrying alien specimens crashes on Earth, Wendy and a group of hybrids step in to respond. Alongside the alien threat, they face powerful corporations that could be as dangerous as the creatures themselves. Live Events You Might Also Like: 'It's 100% crap': Ex-Google exec rejects tech CEOs' rosy claims that AI will bring a golden age, warns even they aren't safe 'One of the reasons that 'Alien' was so exciting to me to adapt was that it's not just a monster movie. It's that moment [in the first movie] where Ash is revealed to be an Android,' Hawley said. 'You realize that humanity is trapped between this parasitic primordial past and the AI future, and they're both trying to kill us.' Corporate rivalries and hybrid characters Hawley began work on the project in 2018 and drew inspiration from the late 19th-century rivalry between Nikola Tesla, Thomas Edison, and George Westinghouse. 'It certainly seems like we're in a race for a global monopoly. There's usually a last step, which is a few players left all competing,' Hawley said. 'I thought, 'What if we make it that moment, technologically, of what's next for humanity?'' Wendy, while physically an adult, has the mental and emotional maturity of a 12-year-old. Hawley said this perspective allowed the story to explore humanity's worth through the eyes of children. 'Let the children navigate the discovery both of what these creatures are and then, also, what it means to be a grownup on some level,' he said. Ridley Scott's reaction to recreated sets Hawley has yet to meet Ridley Scott in person, but the director, who serves as an executive producer, reviewed footage and episodes during production. Zucker said Scott was especially impressed with the faithful recreation of original sets. 'I sent him some shots when he was shooting production in Hungary, and he was just, 'Well, f–k me. I built that, and it's still there all these years later,'' Zucker said. 'One of the things among many I know he's grateful to Noah about is, in the credits, there's acknowledgment for some of those original designers who put that ship set together.'

Fraudulent research is 'destroying trust in science'
Fraudulent research is 'destroying trust in science'

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Fraudulent research is 'destroying trust in science'

Representative image Fraudulent scientific research is on the rise and is jeopardizing medical research, experts have warned. A new study has found that networks of bad actors work together to publish bogus research. The findings, published in the journal PNAS this week came from analyzing more than 5 million scientific articles published across 70,000 journals. "There are groups of editors conspiring to publish low-quality articles, at scale, escaping traditional peer review processes," said the study's lead author Reese Richardson, a social scientist at Northwestern University in the US. The research uncovered evidence of networks of scientific journal editors who frequently publish research that is flagged for integrity issues, and "brokers" who connect fraudulent authors to these editor networks. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo "This kind of fraud destroys trust in science . It biases systematic and meta-analysis, it delays treatment and delays new research," said Anna Abalkina, a social scientist at the Free University of Berlin, who was not involved in the study. Scientific fraud is a growing issue New scientific research is published as research papers in research journals. There are tens of thousands of different research journals, each publishing different themes of research, and with different levels of scientific impact. These journals are platforms for researchers to share their findings, theories and ideas with peers and the broader public. "Historically, the scientific [publication] enterprise has been an engine for progress. It's given us vaccines, antibiotics, the internet, sterile surgery … everything that makes life comfortable for us now," said Richardson. But sham research is on the rise — as many as one in seven research publications contain fake data, by some estimates. Artificial intelligence is also fueling this research misconduct. Fraudulent studies contain fabricated data, unverified results, plagiarized research or manipulated images. "You can map out networks of image duplication that are thousands of articles wide," Richardson said. Bogus research damages scientific integrity Fake or poor-quality research is typically caught by journal editors or peer reviewers, but experts warn it is increasingly making its way to publication by groups of bad actors working together. Several high-profile instances of scientific fraud have been uncovered. During the COVID-19 pandemic, fraudulent research was used to make scientific and political judgments on the merits of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID infection. Experts linked the issue with "self-promotion journals" — where publication authors are often the editors of the very same journals in which they publish their studies. Even single fraudulent studies can cause lasting problems. For example, researchers found evidence of image manipulation in a landmark study about Alzheimer's disease. The paper was eventually retracted and the lead scientist resigned, but Abalkina said billions of dollars in research funding and years of research had already been invested from one bad study. "[It's] incredible what just one paper can do," Abalkina told DW. How to stamp out corruption in science? The study's senior author Luis Amaral of Northwestern University said it was "probably the most depressing project I've been involved with." "It's distressing to see others engage in fraud and in misleading others. But if you believe that science is useful and important for humanity, then you have to fight for it," Amaral said. Scientific publishing groups are aware of the issue and are working to create new methods to identify and retract fraudulent research. One major publisher, Springer Nature, retracted 2,923 articles from its publications in 2024. But retracting papers means that bad science has already made it to publication. Experts like Abalkina and Richardson said the issues ultimately come from how scientific research is valued. Scientific jobs and funding are dependent on scientific publication. "Where you're faced with a [lack] of resources and yet you're pressured to put out [publications], you're left with two options really: You either buy into scientific fraud, or your leave science. This is a situation that tens of thousands of scientists are in," said Richardson. That's why the best solution to fight fraudulent publications, he said, is to ditch all quantitative metrics of research assessment like counting publications and citations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store