From surveillance to automation: How AI tech is being used at European borders
ADVERTISEMENT
As EU leaders said in Brussels this
week
that they need to keep exploring new ways to curb irregular migration, experts are calling for more attention to be drawn to how programmes backed by artificial intelligence (AI) and automated surveillance could be used at Europe's borders.
Experts told Euronews Next that 12 EU states are either testing automated border control systems or AI-powered systems at borders.
Derya Ozkul, an associate professor at the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom, said little is known about how these technologies will impact the rights of migrants.
'Migrants are being kind of used as guinea pigs really in this area,' Ozkul said in an interview.
'All of the glitches with the systems, all of the possible problems and so on are all become faults for migrants to deal with, and there's not really much accountability'.
Related
Europe at the crossroads: Euronews launches special EU summit show
What AI tech is already in place at the EU's borders?
Where AI is already integrated or being tested along some of the EU's borders is mostly as processing support for asylum seekers, Ozkul said.
One AI tool that Germany's Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF)
uses
is an automated language and dialect recognition software to help officials corroborate a migrant's country of origin without official documents based on a two minute voice recording.
Related
EU asylum requests down by 11% in 2024, but still exceed one million
A statement from BAMF to Euronews Next said the software recognises five major Arabic dialects: Egyptian, Gulf, Iraqi, Levantine, and Maghrebi and could be expanded to more in the future.
The tool is a way of verifying the information that a claimant would provide during their hearing but is only used 'in special cases… when appropriate,' the department said.
The department said dialect recognition was used in 43,593 cases in 2023 of the 334,000 applications it received that year.
AI is also used by border officials to help them recognise 'security-relevant facts' in asylum hearings, the government said. Decision-makers can then edit, supplement, or discard the information flagged by the AI, so the 'human decides, not the AI'.
The AI simplifies the reporting process for decision-makers who say it can be difficult to identify security information during these hearings, BAMF continued.
'[Migrants] usually have no idea how the system is processing their application, and they have no say in the process."
Derya Ozkul
Associate Professor, University of Warwick
Ozkul said migrants are often not aware that their asylum cases will be processed using automation or AI.
'[Migrants] usually have no idea how the system is processing their application, and they have no say in the process,' Ozkul said.
'They may not be able to reject the outcome because, again, they don't have as many rights as citizens would,' she added.
ADVERTISEMENT
What AI opportunities has the EU identified?
The EU has already invested in some AI-based projects throughout the bloc.
One of them is Centaurus, a project in Greek detention facilities like those along the Evros River that enables CCTV cameras with behavioural analysis algorithms that detect illegal behaviour by groups and uses drones to assess migrant behaviour in the facilities 'without human intervention'.
The bloc has also invested in Hyperion, a second
system
that uses biometric fingerprint data to make it easier to enter and exit detention facilities.
Maria Gavouneli, president of the Greek National Commission for Human Rights, an independent advisory body to the government, called it a 'major surveillance exercise that is coordinated [and] financed by the European Union'.
ADVERTISEMENT
'The major issue that we are going to be confronted with is questions of transparency, questions of accountability."
Maria Gavouneli
President, Greek National Commission for Human Rights
Gavouneli said that most of the surveillance technologies being used at Evros can also be used for national defence, something that will 'be intensified' in the coming years.
'The major issue that we are going to be confronted with is questions of transparency, questions of accountability,' Gavouneli said.
The EU has also invested in some AI-supported projects to detect migrant smuggling, like the
COMPASS2020
project, which saw patrol vessels autonomously launch underwater drones to boost their surveillance range.
Related
Has Europe politicised the right to asylum? | Radio Schuman
Another, the PROMENADE
project
, uses AI to improve maritime surveillance and data analysis around 370 kilometres from the coastline.
ADVERTISEMENT
There's also a possibility that the bloc expands AI use at borders in the near future, with a few key areas identified in a 2020
white paper
.
Automated fingerprint and face recognition, AI-generated emotion detection, migrant risk assessments with algorithms, and AI monitoring of trends are a few key areas of interest, the report found.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
17 minutes ago
- Euronews
Referendum in Italy to fail as turnout far below threshold, poll shows
A referendum in Italy on citizenship requirements and job protection is likely to have failed, as turnout was far below the required threshold, polling agency YouTrend said on Monday. Turnout needed to be at least 50% plus one vote to make the referendum results binding, but based on data collected from 60,000 polling stations, turnout was around 30%. The referendum, proposed by trade unions and civic organisations, addresses issues that have generated political debate in Italy in recent years, particularly labour market reform, primarily the 2016 Labour Act, as well as migrant reception and integration policies. The first four questions relate to labour issues and concern the increasing protection of workers, small enterprises and their obligations towards employees, short-term contracts, and the responsibility of clients towards subcontracting parties and employees' safety. The fifth question concerns the period of time necessary for non-EU nationals residing in the country to be eligible for Italian citizenship, proposing to reduce it from 10 to five years. The parties of the ruling coalition, led by Premier Giorgia Meloni's Brothers of Italy, opposed the referendum, with some politicians urging citizens not to participate in the vote. According to the advocacy group International Democracy Community, although opposition parties have supported the referendum, it is primarily a citizens' initiative and not a political matter. "The referendum questions were proposed through a bottom-up approach, and did not come from parliament," the International Democracy Community said in a statement. "Members of the Europa+ party launched the initiative on the citizenship question, whilst the Italian General Confederation of Labour (CGIL) has been the initiator of the Labour Act ones, with support from the Democratic Party, the Five Star Movement, and the Green and Left Alliance." According to exit data after polls closed at 3 pm, the "yes" vote for the four labour law questions stood at around 85%, while 60% of voters said yes to the citizenship question. The referendum coincided with local elections in several Italian regions and municipalities.
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
'The EU needs to invest more at home'
The European Union is the world's third-largest economy with one of the highest household saving rates, yet when our companies are scaling up, they often turn to financial markets abroad. Why? Because we export much of our vast savings, supporting innovation elsewhere, while many of our own start-ups struggle to access the necessary funding to grow. The time has come for change and the EU needs to invest more at home. That is why seven European countries representing more than half of the EU economic output teamed up on Thursday, June 5, to channel these savings into investment in our continent's economy. Let's first consider the numbers. In 2024, the EU economy generated €17.9 trillion in output. Wealth and value are therefore evidently created in Europe at a very large scale. Meanwhile, European households are some of the greatest savers in the world, setting aside about 13% of their income every year, five points more than American households. That represents €1 trillion of new private savings every year, much of which sits idle in cash or deposit accounts earning low returns. In total, this has created a pool of capital of €35 trillion over the years. Meanwhile, Europe needs to invest at least 5% of its economy, or up to €800 billion a year, to close its technology and productivity gap with major competitors. Add new defense and security needs and that figure could easily surpass €1 trillion. In this time of rising geopolitical tension and increasing barriers to trade and financial flows around the globe, these savings are a strategic asset for Europe that we must mobilize to help fill that investment shortfall. Accelerating integration Vital work is being done to improve the integration of our capital markets. The European Commission also put forward its strategy for a Savings and Investment Union in March. We want to thank Commissioner for Financial Services Maria Luis Albuquerque for her commitment and we will continue to work closely with her to enhance financial opportunities for EU households and businesses.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
UN urges countries to ratify landmark High Seas Treaty
A landmark international treaty to protect the high seas is on the brink of receiving the 60 ratifications needed to become binding international law, according to French President Emmanuel Macron. In his opening remarks at the third UN Ocean Conference (UNOC), Macron claimed that the agreement has gained enough support to come into force. He told attendees that 50 countries had now ratified the treaty, and another 15 have "formally committed" to joining them. This "allows us to say that the High Seas Treaty will soon be implemented," Macron added, though he didn't give a specific time frame. Despite the French President's comments, the United Nations website still lists the total at 32 official ratifications - too few for the treaty to come into force. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres urged world leaders to ratify the treaty, warning that fishing, plastic pollution and rising sea temperatures were destroying ocean ecosystems. 'The ocean is the ultimate shared resource. But we are failing it,' he said. Ahead of UNOC, the EU and six of its member states announced their ratificationof the treaty. Spain and France already did so earlier this year. At the opening of the summit on Monday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the EU had pledged €40 million in funding for the Global Ocean programme to 'bring the High Seas Treaty to life'. This money will go towards supporting African, Caribbean and Pacific nations in their efforts to ratify and implement the agreement. 'We all know the Treaty is a crucial instrument to protect our Ocean beyond borders,' she said. 'And indeed, we made it – the Treaty was agreed and adopted. And today, we are inches away from the 60 signatures for ratification.' The High Seas Treaty - also referred to as the Biodiversity Beyond National Borders agreement (BBNJ) - will allow nations to establish marine protected areas in international waters for the first time. These areas cover around two-thirds of the world's oceans but are largely ungoverned. They are managed through a patchwork of regional fisheries agreements, shipping conventions and scattered marine protected areas. The agreement is intended to support the protection of these bodies of water that are outside of international jurisdictions. Officially adopted in 2023 after nearly two decades of negotiations, 60 ratifications are needed for the treaty to become binding international law - something France was hoping would happen before UNOC. The agreement will enter into force 120 days after the 60th ratification. Conservationists are celebrating a proposal from the UK government to ban bottom trawling in dozens more marine protected areas (MPAs). MPAs are sections of the ocean that a country aims to protect because they are of particular ecological importance. Bottom trawling - a destructive type of fishing that drags weighted nets across the seafloor - is allowed in many of these sensitive areas. Currently, only four of the UK's 377 MPAs are fully protected from bottom-towed fishing gear - an area covering 18,000 square kilometres. A new proposal announced at the start of the third United Nations Oceans Conference (UNOC) in Nice would see an additional 30,000km2 protected, with the ban extended to 41 MPAs. Size wise, that's roughly half of English MPAs. 'Bottom trawling is damaging our precious marine wildlife and habitats. Without urgent action, our oceans will be irreversibly destroyed - depriving us, and generations to come, of the sea life on which we all enjoy,' Environment Secretary Steve Reed said in a statement this morning. 'The government is taking decisive action to ban destructive bottom trawling where appropriate.' Its first step is a consultation, launching today (9 June) until 1 September, which will invite marine and fisheries stakeholders to share their views and give evidence about the proposed ban. If adopted, the measures would protect marine habitats ranging from subtidal sandbanks to gravels to muds, and support important marine species such as lobster, clams, soft corals and langoustines, the government says. 'Destructive bottom trawling has no place in marine protected areas. These proposals provide a golden opportunity to safeguard these vital marine sanctuaries from the most damaging fishing practices,' says Hugo Tagholm, Executive Director of the ocean advocacy group Oceana UK. 'If these whole-site bans are fully implemented, this could provide an invaluable and urgently needed lifeline for England's seas, which are so crucial for wildlife and climate resilience.' Joan Edwards, Director of Policy and Public Affairs at The Wildlife Trusts, also emphasises that properly protecting MPAs is 'a win-win for both nature and the climate.' 'Removing this pressure is a great step forward towards protecting not only the wildlife and fish stocks within those sites, but also the carbon stored in the seabed muds beneath,' she says. Still, conservationists are anxious to ensure promising words are backed by action, even after the spotlight of UNOC3 has dimmed. 'The government should now strengthen the ban to cover all parts of our marine protected areas, and other types of destructive industrial fishing like supertrawlers and fly-shooters. Only this will ensure our marine ecosystems are protected in reality - not only on paper,' comments Ariana Densham, Head of Oceans at Greenpeace UK. Clare Brook, CEO of Blue Marine Foundation, calls the announcement 'highly encouraging and very welcome. If delivered (and remember this is a consultation) it will mean that England's offshore MPAs are at last given the protection they claim.' The ocean conservation charity is making waves with the release of its satirical short film featuring Stephen Fry and White Lotus star Theo James. The Bottom Line takes place in a fine dining restaurant, where James's character is presented with the gruesome bycatch behind his 'sustainable' hake order. 'As a keen diver, I've long been captivated by the ocean and been horrified by the impact humans are having on it. Having had a load of bycatch dumped on me, it really drove home just how grotesque and devastating the practice of bottom trawling is,' said James, who is an ambassador for the charity alongside Fry. "Conservation policy is awash with shiny new announcements and impressive sounding targets whereas what is needed is actual delivery,' Jonny Hughes, Senior Policy Manager at Blue Marine Foundation, said of today's news. 'This, at first glance, seems to be about delivering conservation. We need to see the full details but initial reading is positive." France's stance on bottom trawling is also under review. The co-host of UNOC has announced strict protection measures for 4 per cent of its mainland waters (15,000 square kilometres), banning harmful human activities including bottom trawling. But the announcement falls short of implementing a comprehensive ban on bottom trawling across all MPAs, environmental lawyers note. 'This is an important turning point,' ClientEarth CEO Laura Clarke said of the UK and French updates. 'We welcome these pledges at UNOC - and we would like to see more of them. We also need to see these bans effectively enforced.' Last year, Greece became the first European country to announce a ban on bottom trawling in its protected areas, starting with its three national marine parks by 2026. Sweden has gone a step further by promising to ban the damaging practice in all its territorial waters as of next month. The EU's 2023 Marie Action Plan calls on member states to phase out bottom trawling in all MPAs by 2030. But recent research from NGOs Oceana, Seas At Risk and ClientEarth revealed that no EU country currently has a comprehensive plan in place to phase out destructive fishing practices in these protected areas. As momentum builds, environmental organisations are pressuring all European countries to follow suit. ClientEarth, Oceana, Danish NGO Danmarks Naturfredningsforening and the Seas at Risk coalition last week threatened legal action against Denmark, the Netherlands and Spain for allowing widespread bottom trawling in its MPAs.
