Mom checks the baby monitor—and sees something she'll never forget
In a viral TikTok shared by @lu.brouns, one mom caught her child mid-nap (read: not sleeping at all), lying perfectly still, eyes locked on the lens… and then, slowly, silently, waves. It's hilarious. It's eerie. And if you've ever tried to parent a toddler, it's a little too real.
Because in that tiny gesture—barely a blip on the screen—is something so many of us feel but rarely say out loud: our kids are always watching. Always absorbing. Even when we think they're out cold and we're finally alone with a snack and a scroll.
The wave seen 'round the world
The TikTok has racked up over 5.3 million views in less than a week. There's no background music, no flashy editing. Just a toddler staring into the void (or the Nest cam) with the quiet intensity of someone delivering a sermon. And then comes the wave.
'Aterrador y adorable al mismo tiempo,' @Angel Palacios joked—'Terrifying and adorable at the same time.' Another, @Maii Meléndez chimed in,
'Fue parto normal o ritual? Pregunta seria '—'Was it a regular birth or a ritual one? Serious question .'
It's giving toddler monk. It's giving The Truman Show: Nap Time Edition. It's giving every parent that creeping feeling that the monitor works both ways.
Related: Mom checks baby monitor—and sees a crib moment she'll never forget
Why this moment feels bigger than it looks
Nap time is sacred for parents. The brief window when we can scroll in peace, eat something not cut into triangles, or remember what silence sounds like.
So when we peek at the monitor expecting a sleeping child—and instead see a toddler giving a direct-to-camera TED Talk—it messes with our heads a bit.
This kind of interaction reflects real developmental progress. By age 2, toddlers begin showing clear signs of self-awareness and social development. According to the CDC, they're learning how to:
Take turns
Imitate adult behavior
Express a wide range of emotions
Understand when someone is watching
These behaviors reflect growing awareness of themselves in relation to the people around them, and many will begin to actively respond when they know they're being observed.
So when a toddler makes eye contact with the baby cam and responds with a wave, they're demonstrating early awareness that someone might be watching—and they're ready to connect.
When baby monitors show us more than we expect
Parenting through a baby cam is a modern rite of passage. It gives us comfort, sure—but also a front-row seat to the weird, wonderful, totally unscripted world of toddlerhood.
You might catch them whispering to a stuffed giraffe, narrating a dream sequence, or recreating an entire grocery run with two Goldfish crackers and a board book. Or, as in this case, silently acknowledging your presence like a 2-year-old Obi-Wan.
These little glimpses matter. They remind us that even in quiet moments, our kids are actively learning, imagining, and reaching for connection.
Related: Baby says 'I love you' for the first time—mom's reaction on the baby monitor is everything
3 surprising things toddlers do on camera—and what they mean
Waving or staring directly into the lensA sign of growing self-awareness and a budding understanding of 'being watched.'
2. Talking to themselves or their toysNarrating stories or pretend play is an early literacy and emotional development skill.
3. Mimicking adults (like pretend phone calls or 'typing' on a keyboard)Monkey-see is monkey-do—this is how they practice and process what they observe.
The bottom line
There's something strangely profound about a toddler waving into a baby monitor. It's a reminder that even our tiniest humans are full of intention, mystery, and personality.
And honestly? We needed that.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Horror's middle class is vanishing – and that's bad news for all film fans
Does no one want to watch people get butchered any more? Horror, long recognised as one of Hollywood's most reliable cash cows, is in a panic: few scary movies are breaking through financially in 2025, many more are cratering completely, and questions are being asked about the future of a genre that once seemed as durable as Jason Voorhees. Forget the death of the archetypal movie star: if sassy psycho-cyborg M3GAN can't open a movie, who can? Back in 2022, the first M3GAN – about an artificially intelligent doll with a bloodthirst – grossed $182m (£135m), including $78m of pure profit for its backers at Universal Pictures and the micro-budget horror studio Blumhouse, off a production budget of just $12m. Thanks to smart marketing, which turned its leading lady's incongruous dancefloor skills into a spooky meme, M3GAN ended up exemplifying the dream outcome of the modern studio horror film: low-cost, big-brain thrills with such inescapable dazzle that audiences couldn't not seek it out. Why, then, did last month's M3GAN 2.0 go so badly? In four weeks, the more action-oriented sequel has grossed a measly $38m worldwide, a result so mortifying that the head of Blumhouse put his hands up within days of its release and admitted to having totally missed the mark. M3GAN 2.0 isn't alone, either. This year has seen a staggering number of horror films die at the box office, among them Blumhouse's reboot of Wolf Man ($34m gross on a production budget of $20m), the Ayo Edebiri horror comedy Opus ($2m gross/$10m budget), Jenna Ortega vehicle Death of a Unicorn ($16m gross/$15m budget), the well-received adoption chiller Bring Her Back ($23m gross/$15m budget), and last week's revival of the Nineties hit I Know What You Did Last Summer, which opened to a flat $13m in the US. Yes, these films' production budgets are lean (though the extent of marketing budgets is largely kept under lock and key), and many of the above titles will ultimately break even once video-on-demand grosses are factored in – but none of their respective backers will be happy with what amounts to loose change. On the other end of the spectrum, meanwhile, are this year's handful of out-and-out horror smashes, most significantly the Michael B Jordan vampire film Sinners, which cost a reported $100m to make but has grossed $365m. There's also been Final Destination: Bloodlines ($285m and counting on a budget of $50m) and Danny Boyle's 28 Years Later, which has so far grossed $145m on a budget of $60m – not wildly profitable, by any means, but decent enough. So people are still going to see horror on the big screen, but – echoing the Western world as a whole – horror's middle class is evaporating. The genre seems to either go big or collapse entirely. Any kind of financial in-between is rapidly becoming a thing of the past. All this leaves a film such as next week's Weapons carrying undue levels of pressure. A missing-persons thriller starring Julia Garner and Josh Brolin, it revolves around the disappearance of a class of children in small-town USA, and serves as filmmaker Zach Cregger's follow-up to his 2022 sleeper hit Barbarian. Promotion for the film has been strong – lots of abstract and eerie imagery in trailers, and attempts at virality via the publishing of two hours of 'surveillance footage' from the night of the children's 'disappearance'. But the stakes feel particularly high. Weapons sparked a bidding war between rival studios when Cregger first unveiled his script, with Warner Bros so eager to get the up-and-comer on side that they coughed up a $38m budget for the film, and allowed him final cut. If Weapons underperforms, this kind of investment in a young, ambitious filmmaker's original ideas may become even rarer than it is already. Why this is bad for everyone is that, in the last decade or so, horror has been one of the few genres to wholeheartedly embrace fresh ideas and fresh voices. The likes of Jordan Peele's Get Out (2017), Coralie Fargeat's The Substance (2024), Ari Aster's Hereditary (2018) and Robert Eggers's The Witch (2015) proved that audiences will turn out in droves for intriguing new concepts, no matter how wild they might seem on paper – and in the process, an entire generation of buzzy new filmmakers developed fanbases, industry clout, and (relative) name recognition. Speaking to The Town podcast shortly after M3GAN 2.0 bombed, Blumhouse head Jason Blum suggested that there is simply too much horror being released for many films to break through, and that the cheap-to-produce movies that were Blumhouse's bread and butter (their biggest hits have included Get Out, Us, The Invisible Man and the Purge franchise) no longer cut it. 'We need to up the budgets,' he insisted. 'People need theatrical events.' Which is, I suppose, accurate. This year's most successful horror films had heavy promotional spends behind them, while even the most financially lucrative horrors of 2024 – meaning the low-cost, high-return likes of The Substance and Oz Perkins's Silence of the Lambs pastiche Longlegs – were transformed into must-see 'events' via relentless and effective marketing. But just as important is the actual quality of material on offer, with far too many modern horror movies settling for tedious mining of intellectual property and repetitive premises (Knives Out and Midsommar have created an unfortunate cottage industry of star-studded, eat-the-rich, religious-cult disappointments). Blumhouse have been particularly guilty of this over the last 18 months, tossing out a raft of movies that felt as if they were formed backwards from an already unimpressive elevator pitch: Night Swim (haunted pool!); AfrAId (haunted Alexa device!); House of Spoils (Ariana DeBose!). Things may, however, be looking up. As much as it pains me to slander a film that made smart use of Nineties stalwarts Freddie Prinze Jr and Jennifer Love Hewitt, it is something of a relief that I Know What You Did Last Summer couldn't get people in cinema seats last week. A largely serviceable but poorly directed slasher pastiche, the film may have lifted the story beats and faces from the 1997 original, but it failed at the things that truly matter: character development, suspense, memorable chase sequences. It seemed to prove that, when it comes to horror, box-office success in 2025 requires far more than just dusting off some old IP and hoping for the best. Hollywood does have a knack for taking all the wrong lessons from its success stories. (Just look at how Barbie's gargantuan box office has led to the development of loads of other movies about toys.) But wouldn't it be lovely if the triumph of Sinners sparked an influx of expensive, original horror movies moving forward – and not, well, Sinners 2. 'Weapons' is released 8 August
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Happy Gilmore 2 subtly honors Adam Sandler's late co-star Cameron Boyce
Adam Sandler managed to sneak in a subtle, yet heartwarming, tribute to his late Grown Ups co-star Cameron Boyce in the new Happy Gilmore sequel. Happy Gilmore 2, out now on Netflix, follows Sandler's titular retired golfer, Happy Gilmore, as he returns to the sport in order to pay for his daughter to attend a Parisian ballet school. It comes nearly 30 years after the original 1996 classic sports comedy. In one scene, Happy is seen walking up to a golf course check-in booth with a bag of clubs on his shoulder. As he nears the desk, the attendants inside are watching what appears to be an episode of Disney Channel's sitcom Jessie. The screen quickly flashes to show Boyce's character Luke Ross, whom he played throughout the show's entire 2011 to 2015 run. The brief nod to Boyce — who starred as Sandler's on-screen son in the 2010 family comedy Grown Ups and its 2013 sequel before his sudden death in 2019 — has left fans overcome with emotion. 'Adam Sandler honoring Cameron Boyce in Happy Gilmore 2 melts my heart,' one said on X, while a second added: 'Excuse me while I sob.' A third commented: 'Adam Sandler subtly including Cameron Boyce in this scene from #HappyGilmore2 hits different.' 'Happy Gilmore 2 was great,' another praised. 'The honoring of Cameron Boyce was such a cute and awesome Easter egg. Bottom right of the screen they're watching them on TV. Adam Sandler you killed it. Family is very happy.' Someone else on TikTok wrote that the tribute 'is hurting and healing my heart at the same time.' Boyce was only 20 when he died after experiencing a seizure in his sleep. At the time, his family released a statement, explaining the seizure 'was a result of an ongoing medical condition for which he was being treated.' 'The world is now undoubtedly without one of its brightest lights, but his spirit will live on through the kindness and compassion of all who knew and loved him. We are utterly heartbroken,' they added. Sandler was among many celebrities to honor Boyce after his death, posting on X: 'Loved that kid. Cared so much about his family. Cared so much about the world. Thank you, Cameron, for all you gave to us. So much more was on the way. All our hearts are broken.' Boyce isn't the only celebrity to make a surprise cameo in the new movie. Dozens of other cameo appearances from professional golfers, athletes and celebrities — some of which were announced when the film was in production — are also featured. Happy Gilmore 2 is streaming now on Netflix.
Forbes
12 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Impact Of ZEE5 Recording 70% Non-Hindi Consumption In 2025
A poster of the Indian film 'Sankranthiki Vasthunam' which earned nearly $35 million worldwide when ... More it released in January this year. After its digital debut on ZEE5, it is among the top most-viewed films on the platform. The Indian streaming platform ZEE5, 70 percent of its content consumption was in non-Hindi languages, President of Digital Businesses and Platforms at Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd, Amit Goenka, says in an exclusive interview. Given the significant rise in non-Hindi content consumption, not just in India but worldwide, ZEE5 introduced an interesting subscription plan - based on language interests. The plans are currently running in India, but Goenka asserts they are soon bringing it to the US markets as well. Currently, the plans vary from $10 to $25 depending on the number of languages included in the plan. The changing language dynamics on ZEE5 Mr. Amit Goenka, President - Digital Businesses & Platforms, ZEE (1) - Copy In an era when the public has crossed the language barrier — thanks to subtitles on digital platforms - why would someone go for a specific language-based subscription alone? Goenka believes that while subtitling makes cross-language viewing easier, comfort viewing is eventually about watching content in your own language, every day. 'Our move to become a language-first platform comes from a very simple insight: language isn't just about communication, it's about identity, culture, and belonging. This shift cuts across everything – our content strategy, how the platform looks and feels, and even how we price our plans. It's aimed at India's next wave of digital users, especially in Tier 2 and Tier 3 markets, where this connection to language is even stronger. This approach was also guided by clear consumption patterns on our platform. Today, nearly half of our viewership in India comes from non-Hindi content.' 'At this point, the language-specific subscription plans are live exclusively in India, where the diversity and depth of linguistic preferences are most pronounced. That said, language content consumption is growing rapidly in international markets as well. These markets remain strategically important, and while current offers are India-focused, we may evaluate the opportunity to launch similar language-led propositions in international markets as well,' he says about introducing the plan in the US markets. Elaborating on the year-over-year performance of Hindi content versus non-Hindi (other Indian languages such as Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, etc.), Goenka says, 'While year-over-year figures vary, one consistent trend we've seen is the rapid rise of non-Hindi content consumption on the platform." He adds that almost 50 percent of the total viewership that ZEE5 registers comes from content in non-Hindi languages. "We see an even more pronounced pattern internationally among diaspora audiences, with non-Hindi consumption growing from 63% in 2023 to nearly 70% in the first half of 2025.' Revealing that Sankranthiki Vasthunam and Ayyana Mane rank on top among standout performers on the platform this year so far, Goenka says, 'Both logged record-breaking openings for Telugu language on our platform. Other strong performers include Identity (Malayalam), Kudumbasthan (Tamil), Max (Kannada), and Hanu-Man (Telugu). These trends reinforce our belief that hyperlocal and culturally relevant stories drive deeper audience engagement and platform loyalty.' Goenka adds that the development is also reshaping the commission, development and production of content—almost like operating seven different studios for the seven key languages 'tailored to the cultural and emotional contexts of their specific audiences.' He insists that the language-led commissioning approach allows them to greenlight projects with a 'sharper audience alignment and creative conviction'. Confirming that the technology in ZEE5 app ensures language is customized as per location, Goenka tells us that the app interface defaults to Tamil if someone logs in from Chennai, with an option to choose the language as well. 'The transformation also goes well beyond content curation. We're now building the platform so that the overall experience in each region is different. The way ZEE5 looks and feels in Maharashtra won't be the same as it does in West Bengal or Tamil Nadu. It's a shift that touches UI, discovery and navigation. We also plan to launch a major user interface/user experience revamp later this year which will bring in much stronger AI-led recommendation and personalization," Goenka concludes. (This conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.)
