John Irving's 'Queen Esther' returns readers to setting of 'The Cider House Rules'
NEW YORK (AP) — In John Irving's next book, the author is returning to St. Cloud's, Maine, and to the orphanage made famous in his acclaimed 'The Cider House Rules.'
Simon & Schuster announced Thursday that Irving's 'Queen Esther' will be published Nov. 4. His novel will bring back Dr. Wilbur Larch from 'The Cider House Rules,' but otherwise features a new set of characters. According to Simon & Schuster, 'Queen Esther' will span much of the 20th century as it follows the life of Esther Nacht, a Viennese Jew born in 1905, abandoned at age 4 and taken in as a teen by a New England family.
Irving ends the story in Jerusalem, in 1981.
'The construction of this novel long predates the events of Oct. 7, and everything that's happened in Israel since those terrorist attacks and the hostage-taking," Irving said in a statement. 'With hindsight, it's easy to say that what I saw and heard in Israel in the early 1980s serves as a precursor to what has developed since that time, but this is what historical fiction is for.'
Irving, 82, is also known for such acclaimed works as 'The Hotel New Hampshire,' 'The World According to Garp' and 'A Prayer for Owen Meany.' He published 'The Cider House Rules' in 1985 and won an Oscar for writing the screenplay for the 1999 movie adaptation. Michael Caine, who played Dr. Larch, received an Oscar for best supporting actor.
'One of the deepest pleasures of reading John Irving comes from discovering the turns in his story along with his characters, so I will give away no plot details, other than to say this: In 'Queen Esther,' John Irving literally takes readers where he's never taken them before," Irving's editor, Simon and Schuster CEO Jonathan Karp, said in a statement.
"The fact that John is still breaking new artistic ground in his 80s and doing so with such audacious and impeccably crafted storytelling, is yet another reason why he is one of the world's greatest writers.'
Hillel Italie, The Associated Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Brandee Younger wants 'Gadabout Season' to inspire joy
Harpist Brandee Younger hopes her new album, "Gadabout Season," inspires listeners to intentionally seek joy, calling it even more creative than her previous project. (June 12) (AP interview and production by Gary Gerard Hamilton)
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Justin Baldoni to ‘March Forward' With Blake Lively Legal Battle After $400 Million Defamation Suit Thrown Out: Facts Are ‘on Our Side'
Justin Baldoni plans to keep at his legal battle with 'It Ends With Us' co-star Blake Lively after a judge dismissed his $400 million defamation lawsuit against her and her husband, Ryan Reynolds. 'Ms. Lively and her team's predictable declaration of victory is false, so let us be clear about the latest ruling,' Baldoni's lawyer Bryan Freedman said in a statement to Variety. 'While the court dismissed the defamation related claims, the court has invited us to amend four out of the seven claims against Ms. Lively, which will showcase additional evidence and refined allegations. This case is about false accusations of sexual harassment and retaliation and a nonexistent smear campaign, which Ms. Lively's own team conveniently describes as 'untraceable' because they cannot prove what never happened.' More from Variety Judge Throws Out Justin Baldoni's $400 Million Defamation Suit Against Blake Lively Judge Rules Blake Lively's Emotional Distress Claims Against Justin Baldoni Are Officially Dead Blake Lively Abandons Claims Against Justin Baldoni of Infliction of Emotional Distress Freedman's statement continued, 'Most importantly, Ms. Lively's own claims are no truer today than they were yesterday, and with the facts on our side, we march forward with the same confidence that we had when Ms. Lively and her cohorts initiated this battle and look forward to her forthcoming deposition, which I will be taking. We are grateful for the organic show of support from the public and for the dedication of the Internet sleuth community who continue to cover the case with discernment and integrity.' On Monday, a judge tossed out the entire lawsuit filed by Baldoni that accused Lively and Reynolds of extortion and other claims. Judge Lewis J. Liman, who found that Lively's accusations of sexual harassment were legally protected and therefore immune from suit, allowed Baldoni to amend and refile a couple of allegations regarding interference with contracts. Baldoni's lawsuit against The New York Times, which Baldoni claimed had conspired with Lively and Reynolds to destroy his career with false allegations, was also dismissed. 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the court saw right through it,' Lively's lawyers said on June 9 after the dismissal. 'We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni […] and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation.' Lively has sued Baldoni in federal court for sexual harassment and retaliation, alleging the director and producers of 'It Ends With Us' launched a smear campaign against her after she complained about the conditions on the film's set. A trial on Lively's complaint against Baldoni and his company, Wayfarer Studios, has been set for March 2026. Best of Variety 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge Throws Out Justin Baldoni's $400 Million Defamation Suit Against Blake Lively
A judge on Monday dismissed Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation claim against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, finding that her accusations of sexual harassment were legally protected and therefore immune from suit. Judge Lewis J. Liman dismissed Baldoni's entire lawsuit — which also alleged extortion and other claims — but allowed him to amend and refile a couple of allegations regarding interference with contracts. More from Variety Judge Rules Blake Lively's Emotional Distress Claims Against Justin Baldoni Are Officially Dead Blake Lively Abandons Claims Against Justin Baldoni of Infliction of Emotional Distress Taylor Swift Excluded From Baldoni-Lively Narrative, as Subpoena Is Withdrawn 'Today's opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively, along with those that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane and The New York Times,' Lively's lawyers said in a statement. 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it. We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan, and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation.' Lively has sued Baldoni in federal court for sexual harassment and retaliation, alleging that he and the producers of 'It Ends With Us' launched a smear campaign against her after she complained about conditions on the set of the film. Baldoni brought the defamation claim against the New York Times, Lively, Reynolds, and their publicist, alleging that they had conspired to destroy his career with false allegations. In his ruling on Monday, Liman found that initial claims — first made in a complaint to the California Civil Rights Department and shared with the Times — were covered by the litigation privilege, which immunizes legal claims from defamation actions. The Times' reporting on the claims was also protected under the 'fair report' privilege, which allows media outlets to cover legal proceedings without incurring defamation liability. Best of Variety 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week Emmy Predictions: Animated Program — Can Netflix Score Big With 'Arcane,' 'Devil May Cry' and the Final Season of 'Big Mouth?'