
An 11th-hour amendment creates a new education fund in Colorado with millions of dollars more for K-12 schools
An 11th-hour amendment creates a new education fund in Colorado with millions of dollars more for K-
An 11th-hour amendment creates a new education fund in Colorado with millions of dollars more for K-
An 11th-hour amendment creates a new education fund in Colorado with millions of dollars more for K-
With a week left in the legislative session, a hearing to finalize school funding took an unexpected turn.
The Senate Appropriations Committee approved a new education fund Thursday at the State Capitol that will include $233 million more for K-12 schools.
The money will come from income taxes -- the same as the State Education Fund, which is not impacted.
The change affects next year's budget and will mean less money for other expenditures.
State Senators Barb Kirkmeyer (R-Col) and Chris Kolker (D-Col)
CBS
State senators Barb Kirkmeyer (R-Col) and Chris Kolker (D-Col) say it's all about priorities.
"Sen. Kolker and I put down a marker that said we are going to fund education first," Kirkmeyer told CBS Colorado.
For years, she and Kolker have listened to colleagues claim school funding is a top priority. They say it's time to walk the talk.
"Education is the one thing in our constitution that provides a permanent source of funding," Kolker told CBS Colorado. "We just haven't fulfilled that promise."
Funding for K-12 schools should be growing by inflation every year, but for 15 years, lawmakers shortchanged it by billions of dollars.
Last year, they finally met their constitutional obligation, while also passing a new School Finance Act that promised even more money.
A year later, Kirkmeyer says, they're already backpedaling, "We can't keep going down this path," she said.
She and Kolker decided to blow things up. They brought an amendment to the School Finance Act during an Appropriations Committee hearing. It creates a brand-new education fund.
"We named it the Kids Matter Trust Fund for a reason -- because kids do matter and so does their education," said Kirkmeyer, who dared her colleagues to oppose it. "If you can't agree to this, it tells me you don't think we should be funding education first."
She says the $233 million can only be spent on per pupil funding and programs like special education.
"We are done with the time when we don't fund education, and we balance the budget on the backs of students," Kirkmeyer said.
Kolker says the new fund will be embedded in the State Education Fund, which he says will be insolvent within a few years without additional money.
"My message to kids, parents, teachers, schools, everyone involved in public education is, 'We see you, hear you,'" Kolker said. "All of us want to increase funding for education. Everyone down here wants to do that. We have to find the right methods to do that, and we believe we have."
Kolker and Kirkmeyer say they didn't intend to blindside anyone with the amendment to the School Finance Act. They had a bill drafted that would have set up the fund, but were told it was too late in the session to introduce it, so they found a different avenue.
Both say they are confident the amendment will stick when the bill goes to the Senate floor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
End of multi-billion Missouri fiscal surplus is near, budget director says
Missouri budget director Dan Haug speaks during the 2024 legislative session to the House Budget Committee. (Rudi Keller/Missouri Independent) The historically high surplus Missouri has enjoyed for the past six years will be nearly depleted at the end of the coming fiscal year, state budget director Dan Haug warned lawmakers during a committee hearing last week. For several years, the state has budgeted billions more from the general revenue fund than current taxes were generating. The extra money has come from a surplus accumulated from double-digit growth in tax collections during 2021 and 2022 and substituting federal COVID-19 relief funds for general revenue, generating savings. When Gov. Mike Kehoe unveiled his budget plan in January, the unobligated general revenue balance at the end of the coming fiscal year was projected to be $1.4 billion. Five months later, that estimate has been slashed in half. Now, Haug said, the unobligated reserve will be $600 million to $700 million. 'The times are going to be getting tougher as we go forward, and so I think we would like to try to limit general revenue spending so that we are able to craft responsible budgets,' Haug said last week to the Senate Appropriations Committee. Lawmakers are meeting in special session to consider Kehoe's plan to set aside nearly $1.5 billion in future tax revenue to finance new or renovated stadiums for the Kansas City Royals and Chiefs. To win passage in the Missouri Senate, Kehoe agreed to add $125 million in general revenue to a spending bill. Missouri governor allows more spending, property tax cap as he pursues stadium deal That addition would reduce Haug's projection for the June 30, 2026 balance to $500 million to $600 million, the lowest since June 2020. Haug declined to respond to questions from The Independent explaining what changed to lower the projected balance. The top leaders of the House Budget Committee, which will hold a hearing Tuesday on the special session spending bill, said they had not heard the latest forecast and will ask Haug to explain it. 'I'll need to ask him about that and have him walk me through what that projection is,' said Budget Committee Chairman Dirk Deaton, a Republican from Noel. 'There is a real, legitimate concern around long-term fiscal sustainability, and we've got to be mindful of that.' State Rep. Betsy Fogle of Springfield, the ranking Democrat on the committee, said she's getting pressure from members who want to add spending that failed when a construction spending bill was spiked before a final House vote. 'In order to make decisions about the economic future of Missouri, we need to have all the facts in front of us,' Fogle said. Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Lincoln Hough, a Republican from Springfield, said he disagrees with Haug's estimate, which he said is too low. 'They're taking a more pessimistic approach to their calculation than is warranted,' Hough said. The peak for reserve cash was nearly $8 billion at the end of fiscal 2023, including funds that could be spent like general revenue. For comparison, the lowest recent end-of-year balance was $5.1 million on hand at the end of fiscal 2017. With the avalanche of cash, the state embarked on several major projects unthinkable just a few years earlier. General revenue made up half of the $2.8 billion allocated for widening Interstate 70. Another $600 million was set aside to fund a major expansion of the Capitol Building. There were new general-revenue funded buildings on every public college campus, a new state health lab and a new $300 million mental hospital in Kansas City. The state employee pension system received $500 million to help its long-term outlook and state workers are enjoying pay raises totaling 21% over the past three years, with another raise of up to 10% coming for long-term workers. Lawmakers have also taken advantage of the surplus to fund local priorities. The trend began in 2022 with a few dozen items, and accelerated in each of the last three years with about 275 new earmarks added in 2023 and another 280 in 2024. Former Gov. Mike Parson used a line-item veto to cut many of the items added by lawmakers, but most remained in place. The budget on Kehoe's desk includes 250 new earmarked items, using $417.7 million in general revenue. During the regular session, before the new, lowered surplus projection, Deaton warned that this may be the last year for dipping into the surplus for local needs. 'We're still in a good position, but certainly those opportunities are diminishing,' he said. 'And if it's not next year, it'll be the year after that.' When Kehoe took over in January, the outlook was that the general revenue surplus would be $2.5 billion when the fiscal year ends on June 30, with another $1.4 billion in other funds that can be spent like general revenue. The budget before Kehoe uses $1.1 billion of those other funds. The special session spending bill began with $50 million in general revenue. Kehoe agreed to add $125 million, for two items: $100 million for St. Louis tornado recovery and $25 million for a new research reactor at the University of Missouri. The funds for tornado recovery and the reactor were items demanded by Senate Democratic lawmakers as the price for supporting — or at least not filibustering — the stadium bill. Democrats in the House, who provided the decisive votes in favor of the stadium financing plan during the regular session, will meet to decide if they will also ask for favors, Fogle said. The earmarked items in the spiked construction bill is a place to start, she said. 'There were vitally important investments in that bill,' Fogle said. There may be little room for negotiation, she noted. 'There's some truth to the fact that there's an assumption that the House is going to pass the bill, the stadium bill specifically, considering we already have,' Fogle said. The Republican majority will not seek additions to the spending bill, Deaton said. 'I've certainly had members talk to me and basically inquire as if there would be an opportunity, or if there was the possibility of things to be added, as you would expect,' Deaton said. 'I certainly won't be dropping any kind of a House committee substitute or adding anything.' Haug's warning of a disappearing surplus came despite positive trends in state tax collections, a growing total balance in the general revenue fund and a budget before Kehoe that spent $119 million less in general revenue than the governor requested in January. After running below the previous year for 11 months, revenues have turned sharply positive. If the year-to-date growth rate reported Friday continued to the end of the month, the state would collect about $300 million more than was forecast in December for the full fiscal year. And with modest growth projected for the coming year, the higher-than-expected revenue would carry over into a reset of the basic assumption for tax collections. The negative factors that will lower tax collections include a tax cut approved by lawmakers, expected to reduce revenue by about $250 million in the coming year, and federal tax changes, currently expected to cost the treasury at least $170 million. The federal budget bill being considered by the U.S. Senate also has the potential to impose large new costs on the state, up to $400 million annually to continue the SNAP food benefits program and unknown amounts due to changes in federal support for Medicaid. The state will be limited in its ability to launch new programs in the future, Haug said last week. 'We feel like we need to sort of get back to basics on general revenue spending,' he said. Future budgets will be tight because the state will need to pay those new costs and continue the programs it has already begun with surplus funds, Deaton said. 'It's one thing to be able to do it this year, but can you do it next year?' Deaton said. 'Can you do it the year after that, obviously, is the big open question. We will see what tax revenues do or don't do, but we're definitely on somewhat of a perilous path.' Hough, however, said he sees no reason to hold money just to maintain a large balance. 'I try to take what would be a more realistic approach,' Hough said. 'Everybody always talks about taxation as theft. Well, if we're going to steal your money, we ought to invest it in your communities on the things that matter to you and support you.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
‘Prudent remedy' for veto error is special session, Legislative Council advises
Gov. Kelly Armstrong speaks during a meeting of the Senate Appropriations Committee on March 27, 2025. (Michael Achterling/North Dakota Monitor) Legal staff for North Dakota's legislative branch concluded the 'prudent remedy' to correct an error with Gov. Kelly Armstrong's line-item veto would be for the governor to call a special session, according to a memo issued Friday. But Attorney General Drew Wrigley, who is working on a separate opinion, maintains that Legislative Council has no role in determining the execution of the governor's veto. Armstrong announced May 22 a 'markup error' with a line-item veto that crossed out $35 million for a state housing development fund. The red X over the funding did not match what Armstrong indicated in his veto message that explained his reasoning. North Dakota governor unintentionally vetoes $35 million for housing programs A Legislative Council memo distributed to lawmakers Friday concluded that legal precedent supports the marked-up bill as the official veto document. 'Engaging in interpretive gymnastics' to disregard the markings on the bill could lead to unintended consequences in the future, Legislative Council concluded. Emily Thompson, legal division director for Legislative Council, said the Legislature needs to have an objective document to clearly illustrate what was vetoed, such as the specific veto markings on the bill, so lawmakers can exercise their veto override authority effectively. Lawmakers have six days remaining in their 80-day limit and could call themselves back into session to address the veto. However, the memo cautions that the Legislature may need those days to reconvene to respond to federal funding issues or other unforeseen reasons. Legislative Council recommends the governor call a special session, which would not count against the 80-day limit. A special session of the Legislature costs about $65,000 per day, according to Legislative Council. Armstrong is waiting for an attorney general's opinion to determine the next steps, according to a statement from his office. He previously said he would call a special session if necessary. Wrigley said Friday it's up to his office to assess the situation and issue an opinion on the governor's question. 'The power in question is strictly the governor's power and it has to be in compliance with the constitution and laws of North Dakota,' Wrigley said. 'That's the only assessment here. There's no role for this in Legislative Council. They have no authority in this regard.' Armstrong on May 19 issued two line-item vetoes in Senate Bill 2014, the budget for the state Industrial Commission. His veto message explained his reasons for objecting to a $150,000 one-time grant for a Native American-focused organization to fund a homelessness liaison position. But the marking also crossed out $25 million for housing projects and programs and $10 million to combat homelessness, which he later said he did not intend to veto. Chris Joseph, general counsel for Armstrong, wrote in a request for an attorney general's opinion that the markings served as a 'color-coded visual aid,' and the veto message should control the extent of the veto. Wrigley said his office is working on the opinion and aware that resolution of the issue is time sensitive. Bills passed by the Legislature with appropriations attached to them, such as the Industrial Commission budget, go into effect July 1. 'I look forward to publishing my opinion on that at the earliest possible time,' he said. The Legislative Council memo states, 'It would not be appropriate to allow the governor and attorney general to resolve the ambiguity by agreement.' In addition, Legislative Council concluded that if the governor's veto message is to be considered the controlling document for vetoes in the future, more ambiguities would likely be 'inevitable and frequent' and require resolution through the courts. The memo cites a 2018 North Dakota Supreme Court opinion involving a case between the Legislature and then-Gov. Doug Burgum that ruled 'a veto is complete and irrevocable upon return of the vetoed bill to the originating house,' and further stated the governor does not have the power to 'withdraw a veto.' 'Setting a precedent of the attorney general issuing a letter saying we can just go ahead and interpret the governor's veto message to mean what was, or was not, vetoed, that's a really concerning precedent to set,' Thompson said in an interview. Wrigley said any issues resulting from the opinion could be addressed by the courts. 'I sincerely hope that they (Legislative Council) are not trying to somehow publicly advocate, or attempt to influence a process for which they have no role,' Wrigley said. Legislative Council memo SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Epoch Times
5 days ago
- Epoch Times
Trump Admin Is Renegotiating CHIPS Act Deals to Secure More Investment, Lutnick Says
The Trump administration is reworking deals made with semiconductor makers under the Biden-era CHIPS Act to secure better terms that would bring more investment to the United States, according to Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick. At a Senate Appropriations Committee