logo
An 11th-hour amendment creates a new education fund in Colorado with millions of dollars more for K-12 schools

An 11th-hour amendment creates a new education fund in Colorado with millions of dollars more for K-12 schools

CBS News02-05-2025

An 11th-hour amendment creates a new education fund in Colorado with millions of dollars more for K-
An 11th-hour amendment creates a new education fund in Colorado with millions of dollars more for K-
An 11th-hour amendment creates a new education fund in Colorado with millions of dollars more for K-
With a week left in the legislative session, a hearing to finalize school funding took an unexpected turn.
The Senate Appropriations Committee approved a new education fund Thursday at the State Capitol that will include $233 million more for K-12 schools.
The money will come from income taxes -- the same as the State Education Fund, which is not impacted.
The change affects next year's budget and will mean less money for other expenditures.
State Senators Barb Kirkmeyer (R-Col) and Chris Kolker (D-Col)
CBS
State senators Barb Kirkmeyer (R-Col) and Chris Kolker (D-Col) say it's all about priorities.
"Sen. Kolker and I put down a marker that said we are going to fund education first," Kirkmeyer told CBS Colorado.
For years, she and Kolker have listened to colleagues claim school funding is a top priority. They say it's time to walk the talk.
"Education is the one thing in our constitution that provides a permanent source of funding," Kolker told CBS Colorado. "We just haven't fulfilled that promise."
Funding for K-12 schools should be growing by inflation every year, but for 15 years, lawmakers shortchanged it by billions of dollars.
Last year, they finally met their constitutional obligation, while also passing a new School Finance Act that promised even more money.
A year later, Kirkmeyer says, they're already backpedaling, "We can't keep going down this path," she said.
She and Kolker decided to blow things up. They brought an amendment to the School Finance Act during an Appropriations Committee hearing. It creates a brand-new education fund.
"We named it the Kids Matter Trust Fund for a reason -- because kids do matter and so does their education," said Kirkmeyer, who dared her colleagues to oppose it. "If you can't agree to this, it tells me you don't think we should be funding education first."
She says the $233 million can only be spent on per pupil funding and programs like special education.
"We are done with the time when we don't fund education, and we balance the budget on the backs of students," Kirkmeyer said.
Kolker says the new fund will be embedded in the State Education Fund, which he says will be insolvent within a few years without additional money.
"My message to kids, parents, teachers, schools, everyone involved in public education is, 'We see you, hear you,'" Kolker said. "All of us want to increase funding for education. Everyone down here wants to do that. We have to find the right methods to do that, and we believe we have."
Kolker and Kirkmeyer say they didn't intend to blindside anyone with the amendment to the School Finance Act. They had a bill drafted that would have set up the fund, but were told it was too late in the session to introduce it, so they found a different avenue.
Both say they are confident the amendment will stick when the bill goes to the Senate floor.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Watch live: Hegseth, Joint Chiefs of Staff chair testify before Senate on Defense budget
Watch live: Hegseth, Joint Chiefs of Staff chair testify before Senate on Defense budget

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Watch live: Hegseth, Joint Chiefs of Staff chair testify before Senate on Defense budget

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Dan Caine will testify Tuesday morning before the Senate Appropriations Committee on the Defense Department's fiscal 2026 budget request. The hearing comes as the administration has faced criticism over the deployment of troops to Los Angeles amid protests over local immigration raids. Hegseth testified before the House on Tuesday. The budget request includes a 13 percent spending increase focused on investments to 'strengthen the safety, security, and sovereignty of the homeland; deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific; and revitalize the U.S. defense industrial base.' The event is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. EDT. Watch the live video above. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Brunswick Democrat announces campaign for Susan Collins' senate seat
Brunswick Democrat announces campaign for Susan Collins' senate seat

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Brunswick Democrat announces campaign for Susan Collins' senate seat

Jun. 11—AUGUSTA — David Costello announced on Wednesday that he will seek the Democratic nomination to take on Republican U.S. Sen. Susan Collins next year. Costello, who ran unsuccessfully last year as a Democrat against Independent Gov. Angus King, said he's running to "end the Trump Administration's and Republican Congress's reckless assault on our democracy, environment, and economy." "Senator Collins, aside from expressing concern, has done little to prevent the Trump Administration and her Republican colleagues from undermining our economy, our critical government programs, and our nation's long-standing defense of democracy against authoritarianism and aggression," Costello said in a written statement. Collins chairs the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee and has used her influence to pushback and in some cases reverse unilateral funding and program cuts by the Trump administration, which she has described as "illegal," since it's being done without congressional approval. Collins also has a split record on Trump's most controversial cabinet members. She voted against Pete Hegseth as Defense Secretary and Kash Patel as FBI director, but supported Tulsi Gabbard as director of National Intelligence and vaccine-opponent Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. Democrats believe Collins is vulnerable this year. She's the only Republican running in a state won by Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024 presidential race. But recent polling has shown her approval rating on the rise, Collins has defied the odds before. The 65-year-old Brunswick resident is the third Democrat to formally declare a run against Collins, who is seeking a sixth, six-year term in the Senate. Jordan Wood, a 35-year-old Bristol resident, declared his candidacy in April and has been holding town hall events across the state. Wood is a former chief of staff for U.S. Rep. Katie Porter, D-Calif, and founder of democracyFIRST, a Democratic Super PAC. Natasha Alcala has also declared a run. She also filed paperwork to challenge King last year, but never qualified for the ballot. Gov. Janet Mills, meanwhile, has been facing pressure from national party leaders to take on Collins, especially after her high-profile clash with President Trump at the White House over transgender student athletes, which has been used to raise money. Mills says she's neither planning to run, nor has she ruled it out. And House Speaker Ryan Fecteau, D-Biddeford, is also considering a run, though he is currently trying to wrap up the legislative session, which is scheduled to end next Wednesday. Other candidates who have filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission include independent Phillip Rench and Republicans Carmen Calabrese and Daniel Smeriglio. Costello has decades of experience in government, but his candidacy against King, who routinely tops the polls as Maine's most popular politician, never caught traction with Democrats. Costello placed third with about 11% of the vote, behind King, who received 52%, and Republican Demi Kouzounas, who received 36%. "In 2024, I campaigned to strengthen our democracy and bolster the federal government's ability to address such pressing challenges as climate change; lack of affordable housing and health care; economic inequality; and insufficient retirement security," he said. "These are challenges the Trump Administration and Senator Collins and her Republican colleagues are either ignoring, or worse yet, exacerbating." In a news release, Costello said his work experience includes having held a high-level position at US AID, where managed foreign aid in Cambodia, Haiti, Bosnia, Serbia and Kosovo. He has also worked as a senior aide to the Maine Secretary of State, the mayor of Baltimore and the governor of Maryland, as well as Deputy and Acting Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment. Copy the Story Link

GOP backs Trump on LA, but there's skepticism over deploying Marines
GOP backs Trump on LA, but there's skepticism over deploying Marines

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

GOP backs Trump on LA, but there's skepticism over deploying Marines

Republican senators support President Trump's crackdown on people protesting his administration's work to deport thousands of migrants, but they are uncertain about the Pentagon's deployment of 700 active-duty Marines to California. The Trump White House appears confident that a showdown with California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) over illegal immigration is good politics for the president. But some GOP lawmakers are worried about the prospect of street clashes spreading to other cities and of Trump invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807 to get the active-duty military more involved in responding to mass protests. There's no GOP opposition to a tough response to street protests. Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine), who is up for reelection next year in a state Trump lost to Biden, said 'the violence that we're witnessing against law enforcement, ICE officers in L.A.' and the property damage is 'completely unacceptable and does call for a strong response. But she warned that 'sending in active-duty troops to deal with domestic law enforcement issues raises very serious concerns.' 'I do not agree with the president's decision to do that,' she said, before pivoting to support for Trump's decision to call in the National Guard without the consent of local officials. 'I think calling up the National Guard, which has experience in dealing with domestic disasters, whether man-made or weather-related, does make sense,' Collins said. 'But I do not think that sending in active-duty Marines is a good idea. 'I think it puts them in a very difficult position,' she added. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), a member of the Armed Services Committee, said he hopes 'cooler heads prevail' on both sides of the political spectrum as the administration continues operations to deport migrants. Rounds said he doesn't want to see street clashes and property destruction play out in other cities. 'Hopefully it does not occur and hopefully cooler heads prevail all the way around,' he said. 'The challenge … is you've got individuals that are creating a scene when [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] is coming in and doing their job.' Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Sen. Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), a senior member of the Armed Services panel, declined to comment on the deployment of Marines. A poll of 4,309 U.S. adults by YouGov found that only 34 percent of Americans approved of Trump deploying Marines to Los Angeles, while 47 percent disapproved. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) on Tuesday defended Trump's decision to deploy 4,000 members of the California National Guard to help maintain the peace in Los Angeles, but he distanced himself from the decision to mobilize active-duty Marines, telling reporters he didn't know Trump's precise authority for doing so. 'I don't know the particulars on what authorities exist there, but my assumption is that the administration has been looking carefully at what he can and can't do under the law. Obviously, the 1798 Act is available to them if they choose to exercise it,' Thune told reporters. That's a reference to the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which authorizes the president during a declared war, invasion or predatory incursion to detain and deport citizens of an enemy nation. Thune argued Trump was justified in mobilizing the National Guard because local authorities failed to contain property destruction and the threat of violence. 'In this case, at least there were clear just failures on the part of state and local officials, which is why I think it required the president to take a federal response,' he said. 'There was a security situation out there that needed to be addressed, and I think ultimately, the president's objective is to keep people safe,' he said. Newsom accused Trump of 'intentionally causing chaos' by mobilizing troops, and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) said the move was 'completely unnecessary' because the Los Angeles Police Department was 'well equipped' to handle protests.' Trump's deployment of active-duty troops is raising questions on Capitol Hill about whether he will invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807. The president cited the law in January as potential authority to obtain complete operational control of the southern border, if necessary. White House aides drafted a proclamation during Trump's first term in 2020 to invoke the Insurrection Act in case Trump wanted to deploy active-duty troops to Washington, D.C., to respond to protests over the murder of George Floyd earlier that year. The president decided not to, despite calls by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), who wrote in a New York Times op-ed to 'send in the troops.' Gen. Eric Smith, the commandant of the Marine Corps, told Republican senators Tuesday morning that the 700 Marines Trump deployed would be limited to guarding federal properties and had training in crowd control. He said active-duty soldiers would not have arrest authority. Rounds told The Hill that Smith informed members of the Armed Services panel that Trump was operating under Title 10 of the United States Code, which includes the statutes often referred to as the Insurrection Act, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. 'They are there just as if they were on any other sovereign mission at an embassy anyplace else around the world. They have been trained in crowd control, but their mission is to protect other entities that are federal in nature, meaning buildings or other members of the military,' Rounds said. He said the National Guard troops — in contrast to the Marines — 'are federally activated' and 'members of the armed services under Title 10 rather than Title 32,' referring to the transfer of the California National Guard from Newsom to Trump. 'That was not part of the discussion,' he said of the Insurrection Act. 'I know it's available to him,' referring to Trump, 'but right now it's not necessary.' Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) claimed that the Democratic officials in California and Los Angeles 'seem not to be very concerned with controlling the violence' and 'in some ways are defiant of federal law' by refusing to work with federal officials to deport migrants who are living in the country illegally. He said 'my preference would be to have local, not national' law enforcement and troops handle local protests but warned that waiting too long to send in the National Guard could allow protests to spiral out of control, like they did in some cities during summer 2020 after Floyd's murder. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store