Questions and expectations swirl as Monarez steps into director's role at CDC
The CDC has lost nearly a quarter of its staff since January, thanks to massive workforce cuts at federal health agencies. The Trump administration's proposed budget for the fiscal year 2026 would slash the agency's funding by more than half. And under a proposed reorganization, the CDC stands to lose more of its programs: Some are set to be moved to a new Administration for a Healthy America while others, such as the National Center for Chronic Disease and Health Promotion, would be eliminated altogether.
All this is playing out as US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has long promoted misinformation about vaccines, has moved to undermine longstanding federal policies and processes that support vaccination in the United States.
Kennedy has also throttled communications coming out of federal health agencies, including the CDC, all but silencing its scientists amid the worst measles outbreak in the US in three decades.
Many at the agency and in the wider public health world are wondering whether Monarez will prove to be a savior or a sycophant.
Morale among agency staff is bleak, according to one CDC official who spoke on the condition that they not be named for fear of reprisals.
Staffers are feeling unsure about what Monarez's confirmation means, the official said. Many see her as a good scientist and someone with experience in leadership positions at federal agencies.
But they also wonder whether she'll be constrained by Kennedy, the official said.
Monarez was principal deputy director and acting director at the CDC from January to March. She recused herself from agency decisionmaking while awaiting Senate confirmation.
A second CDC source said Monarez had been silent during her early weeks at the agency.
'We never heard from her when she was interim director and could have interacted with the staff,' said the source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal.
'Everyone is also pretty discouraged that she's not a medical or public health person, and neither is HHS leadership,' the staffer said.
Monarez has a Ph.D. in microbiology and immunology but is not a medical doctor. She will be the first CDC director since the 1950s not to have a clinical background.
In her confirmation hearing, Monarez described herself as the daughter of a dairy farmer from rural Wisconsin who attended state schools and paid her own way through college and graduate school. She said that her research was focused on two diseases, African sleeping sickness and toxoplasmosis, and that she was drawn to public health because treatments for those diseases remain limited but public health interventions have reduced the impact of the diseases.
Monarez's tenure in government spans Republican and Democratic administrations. Before coming to the CDC in January, she was deputy director for the Advance Research Projects Agency for Health, or ARPA-H, and was founding director of the Center for Innovation at the Health Resources and Services Administration. She held other leadership positions at the Department of Homeland Security and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.
In a news release Thursday, Kennedy said that Monarez had 'unimpeachable scientific credentials' and that he had full confidence in her ability to restore Americans' trust in the agency.
'It is a great honor to join Secretary Kennedy and his HHS leadership team,' Monarez said in the news release. 'I consider it a privilege to work alongside the public servants at CDC. Together we will strengthen and modernize the nation's public health preparedness and response through science and innovation. We will work every day at CDC to Make America Healthy Again.'
But under questioning by senators at her confirmation hearing, Monarez seemed to distance herself from Kennedy on two issues: vaccines and fluoride.
In response to questions from Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, about the US ending its support for the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, Monarez said, 'I think vaccines save lives. I think that we need to continue to support the promotion and utilization of vaccines.'
When Sanders asked whether she agrees that there is no scientific proven link between vaccines and autism, Monarez said, 'I have not seen a causal link between vaccines and autism.'
Regarding fluoride, Monarez told Sen. Angela Alsobrooks that she considered it 'an important component to oral health. … The direct application can be very valuable.'
Alsobrooks asked about fluoridation of public drinking water, including in Monarez's own town. 'They have fluoridation there. Is it safe for families, the water in Potomac, Maryland?'
'I believe the water in Potomac, Maryland, is safe,' Monarez answered.
One staffer who worked under Monarez at ARPA-H described her as a quiet presence. She wasn't the type of manager who is an active presence on Slack or email, they said.
'We all respected her. She's been in government a long time,' said the staffer, who spoke on the condition that they not be named for fear of retaliation.
Dr. Jennifer Nuzzo, who directs the Pandemic Center at Brown University's School of Public Health, has known Monarez for at least a decade.
'She's a lifelong government scientist who has risen through the ranks to become a very senior leader,' Nuzzo said. 'She's loyal to serving the American people.'
They worked together when Monarez was detailed to the White House, where she worked on the US National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria.
'She got into the nitty-gritty of a complex policy issue, but she was also able to bring together a really diverse set of stakeholders to provide input into that strategy,' Nuzzo said. 'I think that's a great example of what Susan does.'
Monarez has said she has three priorities for the CDC.
First, she said, she wants to improve trust in the agency and its recommendations. Next, she will focus on strengthening public health infrastructure by investing in tools to prevent, detect and respond to threats in near real-time. She pledged to collaborate with state and local public health departments to build a nationwide public health network. Finally, she said, she will work to create rapid, evidence-based responses to public health emergencies, with timely communication that is consistent and grounded in facts.
While these are worthy goals, Nuzzo said, her biggest worry is whether Monarez will be able to act independently, without political interference.
'You can't run an organization as important and large as the CDC if you need to get permission for everything that needs to be done,' Nuzzo added.
Dr. Richard Besser, a former acting director of the CDC, said in a statement that he looked forward to meeting Monarez to better understand her plans to lead the agency. Besser is now president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
'Dr. Monarez must not only lead the CDC – she must fight for it. Our nation's entire public health system depends on CDC having the tools it needs to respond to pandemics, reduce chronic disease, and address health inequities that continue to leave too many communities behind. That starts with a director willing to speak the truth, defend science, and stand up for the health of every American,' Besser said.
CNN's Meg Tirrell contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
18 minutes ago
- CBS News
Mother, teenage daughter pulled from water at Illinois Beach State Park
A mother and her 14-year-old daughter were rescued from Lake Michigan at Illinois Beach State Park Thursday evening. The Lake County Sheriff's office said its deputies responded to Illinois Beach State Park for the woman and her teenage daughter, who were pulled from the water. They were revived by CPR, and were awake and breathing when they were taken to Vista Medical Center in Waukegan. This happened at the same spot where just a few weeks ago, 14-year-old Kyle Williams of Milwaukee drowned. In June, a 20-year-old man also died after being pulled from the water at Illinois Beach State Park. Fire officials in the area have been calling for more funding for water safety.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Dove Just Launched a Perimenopause and Menopause Skincare Line and Women Say They Love It for This Reason
Dove Just Launched a Perimenopause and Menopause Skincare Line and Women Say They Love It for This Reason originally appeared on Parade. No so long ago, women over 50 struggled to find products targeted towards their specific needs and concerns, like the hormonal and skin changes that come with perimenopause and menopause. But in recent years, perimenopause and menopause have been discussed openly by celebrities like Naomi Watts and Michelle Obama. Oprah has done several educational programs and created a resource guide for women to help them better understand this stage of life. Now, Dove has launched a Women's Wellness Collection that includes a cleansing oil, body wash, glycolic serum wash and ultra gentle balm for the vulva that are sold only on Amazon. Reviewers are saying they love how gentle the formulas are. But can these products actually make a difference for women going through perimenopause and in menopause? Related: Menopause Hot Flashes Ruining Summer? Doctors Share What Actually Helps What's Different About the Dove Wellness Collection? While these products don't treat menopause symptoms directly, women may benefit from the new Dove Women's Wellness Collection if they are having trouble with dry skin in particular. According to board-certified celebrity dermatologist , low estrogen levels can be the cause of the skin to be dry, itchy and flaky. The products are formulated to be extra gentle and hydrating for menopausal skin. And although they are at a lower price point than others marketed for menopause, Amazon reviewers found them too expensive, especially when compared with other Dove products. However, each of the four products has been given high marks by Amazon shoppers for being gentle on the skin. The cleansing oil is an oil-to-lather wash, and oil cleansers tend to be more hydrating than other lathering cleansers that contain sodium lauryl sulfate or other harsh ingredients. Dove Cleansing Oil, $20 "Our first priority, before we started formulating, was to listen to women,' Jessica Shepherd, OB/GYN told Oprah Daily. Shepherd co-developed the line along with other OB/GYNs and dermatologists. 'Safety was at the heart of every decision," Shepherd said. That's why these formulas are sulfate and paraben-free, pH-optimized for vulva-safe use, and clinically tested for external vulvar skin.' Dove Whole Body Wash, $20 This body wash is also gynecologist-approved to cleanse the vulva, but it can be used all over the body. It's fragrance-free and helps to maintain the acidic pH of the vaginal area. It also has hyaluronic acid to hydrate the skin. Dove Glycolic Serum Wash, $20 The glycolic serum wash is intended to help with dull skin more than dry skin. It's formulated to remove dead skin cells in order to refresh skin and help with odor. Reviewers on Amazon said the smell is "amazing" and it's "gentle enough for everyday use but enough to be effective and exfoliating a bit" and that they would definitely buy it again. Related: A Comprehensive List of Every Single Menopause Symptom—and What to Do About Each Ultra Gentle Balm, $20 This balm is intended to help with vulvovaginal dryness and itching that can happen during perimenopause and menopause. The formula contains coconut oil, shea butter, mango seed butter, hyaluronic acid and jojoba oil and is free of fragrance, sulfates and parabens. Reviewers on Amazon called it "moisturizing and soothing" and liked that it was fragrance-free. According to Dove research, 83 percent of menopausal women report feeling a stigma around their symptoms. The brand says these new products deliver 'superior care for symptoms too often dismissed as 'TMI,' such as itch, odor, dryness, sensitivity and more.' Dove will feature stories from women across the country and is calling the campaign for this collection 'Made with TMI.' Dove Just Launched a Perimenopause and Menopause Skincare Line and Women Say They Love It for This Reason first appeared on Parade on Aug 7, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Aug 7, 2025, where it first appeared.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
A former FDA chief's ‘brilliant' move to test the agency's commitment to making America healthy
Federal agencies Food & healthFacebookTweetLink Follow The former head of the US Food and Drug Administration is testing the Trump administration's commitment to 'Make America Healthy Again' with a challenge to crack down on some of the key ingredients in ultraprocessed foods. In a petition filed Wednesday, the former FDA commissioner, Dr. David Kessler, argued that the agency has the authority to declare that certain sweeteners, refined flours and other additives are not 'generally recognized as safe.' Removing that designation, known as GRAS, would force makers of ultraprocessed foods to remove products from the market and reformulate recipes — or try to prove that those ingredients are not harmful. It would be a sweeping change to the food industry and a significant shift in the Trump administration's MAHA strategy. So far, US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has relied on popular food brands to volunteer to remove artificial dyes and other additives from their products. 'Kessler has given the FDA a way to define the vast majority of ultra-processed foods. In doing so, he has handed RFK Jr a huge gift on the path to regulating these products. It's just what MAHA has asked for. I hope they take it seriously,' Marion Nestle, the Paulette Goddard professor emerita of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York University, said in an email. Kessler proposed that companies have 12 months to submit a petition to keep those food additives in their products and then go on to prove they are safe. 'It's a very appropriate, worthy step to shift the burden of proof where it belongs and have the industry meet that burden, or stop using the substances.' said Michael Taylor, a former FDA food regulator and current co-chair of the nonprofit STOP Foodborne Illness. 'It's using the GRAS tool to really drive a serious safety conversation.' HHS did not respond to a request for comment. Federal health officials announced last month that they are looking for input on how to define ultraprocessed foods, a first step in eventually setting up new regulations, which could take months to years to establish. Kessler's petition could put pressure on that ultimately lengthy timeline; the agency is required to respond to the request within 180 days. Kessler, a physician who served as FDA commissioner under presidents Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush, and advised President Joe Biden during the Covid-19 pandemic, oversaw the agency when it began requiring nutrition labels on food products. He also spearheaded efforts for FDA to regulate tobacco in the 1990s and sees parallels to that fight. 'What was key in tobacco was finding the regulatory hook,' Kessler told CNN. 'It was about asking the right legal question that would frame the issue.' That has been the tricky part of setting up any regulatory standards for sugary and starchy foods, he said. The term ultra processed foods has resonated with the public, he said, but 'it's going to be hard to define, legally, what's in it.' But there is a pressing need to do that, he argues. The FDA allowed these ingredients under GRAS regulations four decades ago, and rates of obesity, diabetes, and heart disease have climbed in the years since, he wrote in his petition. The argument echoes Kennedy's own case for MAHA reforms to food policy. The petition focuses on refined flours and starches — which the body breaks down into sugars — that are subjected to food extrusion technology, including wheat, corn, tapioca, oat and potato flour. It also references refined sugars, including corn syrup, corn solids, dextrose, xylose, maltose, and high-fructose corn syrups. Finally, the petition targets any manufactured sugars, flours and starches that contain additives commonly used in today's ultraprocessed foods. Tackling the issue of too much sugar is a key to better health, experts CNN spoke with agree, but they say the real genius of Kessler's petition is his focus on additives. 'The food industry uses the emulsifiers, the stabilizers, the gels and the rest to make inexpensive, high volume, industrially processed foods,' said Christopher Gardner, director of nutrition studies at the Stanford Prevention Research Center. 'If you take those tools away from industry it's not that foods will taste bad and icky,' Gardner said. 'They won't be as addictive, as flavorful, as tasty — and industry has made these foods as manipulatively flavorful and manipulatively tasty. That's the problem.' Several food and nutrition experts heralded Kessler's petition as a bold move that would, if enacted by FDA, reshape the food industry. 'This is an important proposal that is based on the true meaning of GRAS, which would exclude the majority of foods on our grocery shelves,' said leading nutrition researcher Dr. Walter Willett, professor of epidemiology and nutrition at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston. The GRAS standard, created in 1958, was originally intended to narrowly apply to commonly used ingredients in the nation's food supply, such as oil, vinegar and baking soda. Manufacturers that used those products could rely on existing research to show their safety but are supposed to file GRAS petitions for newer ingredients like refined sugars. FDA updated its system in the late 1990s — amid a backlog of petitions for new additives — allowing companies to voluntarily notify the agency that they had determined their ingredients were generally safe. A 2022 analysis conducted by the Environmental Working Group found that nearly 99% of new chemicals used in food or food packaging since 2000 were green-lit for use not by the FDA but by the food and chemical industry. During that period, food manufacturers asked the FDA's permission to introduce a new substance only 10 times, according to the analysis. Barry Popkin, the W. R. Kenan, Jr. Distinguished Professor at the Gillings School of Global Public Health in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, called Kessler's petition 'a brilliant move.' 'Knowing the FDA like he does - he's put industry in a real bind,' Popkin said. 'They have to show that without a reasonable doubt that carbohydrates, along with additives, are healthy, and do not hurt health. And that's next to impossible. 'It's the strongest play a citizen can do to affect our food supply that I've ever seen.' But Kessler's proposed changes are likely to meet significant pushback from major food brands. Michael Taylor was FDA's deputy commissioner for foods in 2015 when the agency revoked the GRAS status of partially hydrogenated oils, or trans fats, citing extensive research about their links to risks of heart disease and stroke. The agency gave companies three years to comply and remove those oils from their products. But at that time, 'the handwriting was on the wall' for industry and many companies had already stopped using those trans fats, Taylor said. 'Obviously the substances that [Kessler] is describing, it's a lot of … highly processed, fine carbohydrates, and a lot of products.' The petition lands as Trump administration officials, led by Kennedy, prepare to release their second MAHA report. While the MAHA Commission's first dispatch in June singled out potential drivers of chronic illnesses in children — including ingredients in ultraprocessed foods — its second installment is expected to lay out proposed policy changes. The report is due by Tuesday.
