Parliamentarian rejects GOP attempt to prohibit federal subsidies for health plans that cover abortion services
The Republican language in the bill would restrict the ACA's cost-sharing subsidies from lowering the costs of plans that cover abortion services in about a dozen states, according to the Commonwealth Fund, an independent health research and policy group.
The provision would have had an 'outsized impact' on states such as Connecticut, Michigan and New Mexico, where insurers now cover abortion services voluntarily but would have incentive to drop abortion coverage to become eligible for federal cost-sharing payment under the Republican proposal, according to a Commonwealth Fund analysis.
The Senate Parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, rejected another provision to end 'silver loading' under the Affordable Care Act, which would change the longstanding practice of allowing insurers to increase premiums to cover the cost of subsidies that resulted in larger premium tax credits and made marketplace premiums more affordable for millions of consumers.
The Brookings Institution estimated that eliminating silver loading could cause large price increases for people with ACA-subsidized health insurance.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated that several hundred thousand people could lose health coverage as a result of ending silver loading.
MacDonough also ruled against a section of the bill that removes federal student aid eligibility from certain immigrants who are not citizens.
The Department of Education classifies non-citizens who are refugees, granted asylum or paroled as eligible for federal student aid.
She also rejected a section of the bill that would have expanded federal Pell Grants to programs at unaccredited and for-profit institutions of higher education.
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, touted the rulings.
'The Byrd Rule must be enforced, and Republicans shouldn't get away with circumventing the rules of reconciliation,' he said in a statement.
'Democrats will continue to make the case against every provision in this Big, Beautiful Betrayal of a bill that violates Senate rules and hurts families, students and workers,' he said.
Senate Republicans are still drafting final changes to the massive budget reconciliation package, which Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) hopes to bring to the floor on Friday.
The parliamentarian still needs to render rulings on the tax and Medicaid provisions that make up the core of the bill.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's America Party is nowhere to be seen 1 month later
Elon Musk said he would be forming a new political party on July 5. One month later, he hasn't taken the formal steps to do so. He's also remained a major GOP donor, even amid his feud with Trump. Elon Musk hasn't gone "founder mode" on building the America Party just yet. On July 5, enraged by the passage of the "Big Beautiful Bill" and encouraged by the results of an online poll, Musk said he would form a new political party in the United States. Over a month later, he hasn't taken any of the formal steps necessary to do so, and he hasn't publicly mentioned the idea in weeks. That's despite praise from Mark Cuban and a warning from the head of the Democratic Party that Musk's effort should be "taken seriously." In the meantime, several polls have indicated that while many Americans are hungry for a third party, far fewer are interested in one founded by Musk. This week, one of his top aides at both DOGE and xAI announced that she was breaking off to start her own podcast. Musk has also remained a major GOP donor as he's toyed with the idea of starting a third party and feuded with President Donald Trump, according to campaign finance records made public at the end of July. The tech titan gave a total of $15 million to several GOP super PACs on June 27, including: $5 million to MAGA Inc, which supports Trump; $5 million to the Senate Leadership Fund, which supports GOP senators and Senate candidates; $5 million to the Congressional Leadership Fund, which supports Republican House members and candidates. Those donations came just days before Musk said he'd form the America Party — and weeks after he first floated the idea at the beginning of his feud with Trump. "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" Musk asked his followers on June 5. All of this isn't to say that Musk couldn't pivot back to the project at some point. And if he did, he'd be joining a club of businessmen who've tried to take on the two-party system over the years. It takes a lot to stand up a new political party, including filing paperwork with the Federal Election Commission, collecting signatures to get on the ballot in various states, and recruiting candidates to run in House and Senate races next year. In other words, it's a resource-intensive and time-consuming process, and there's little indication that Musk has undertaken it. Musk did not respond to BI's request for comment for this story. Musk, the world's richest man, is known to go "founder mode" on things that he cares deeply about, devoting extraordinary amounts of energy and time to projects and even sleeping at the office. He did it when he took over Twitter, now known as X. He's done it at Tesla. He did it when he went all-in on supporting Trump in 2024. And he brought that same approach to DOGE, until he began winding down his involvement in late April. If Musk is serious about standing up a new party, we might expect him to bring that same "founder mode" approach to this venture. But so far, it hasn't happened. Read the original article on Business Insider
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Gasparino: Inside the enormous Biden effort to 'debank' Trump after Jan. 6
The scale of the effort to 'debank' Donald Trump because of pressure from Biden administration regulators went far beyond JPMorgan and Bank of America, The Post has learned. At least 10 other financial institutions closed their windows to the billionaire real estate tycoon over his role in the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill melee. The moves came in the months after Trump left the White House in 2021, sources inside the Trump Organization told me. The stunning scale of the blacklisting is being revealed here for the first time. 3 President Donald Trump speaks during a cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 8, 2025. REUTERS It should be reported as much as possible for the simple reason that if any big bank can cancel a former president over politics as opposed to illegality, then every American citizen is in danger of facing the same mistreatment. For expressing an opinion, or starting a business out of step with the progressive culture norms that have infected so much of society, you too can see your economic livelihood go up in smoke and 'debanked.' Debanking is such an odd word for one of the most insidious parts of cancel culture, and its sponsors like it that way. It sanitizes, via clumsy, obtuse lingo, what is essentially something of dangerous Orwellian magnitude: negating an American citizen's ability to save, and conduct business through a big bank. That's why Trump and Republicans like South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott are taking steps to end the politicization of banking. Keep in mind, there are already laws preventing the likes of JPMorgan, BofA and Capital One — the banks Trump has publicly stated canceled him — from being conduits for drug kingpins and Mafiosi. (Trump has sued Capital One, which denied Trump's allegations.) Debanking takes it further. It forces banks to remove customers who might pose nothing more than 'reputational risk,' a flighty rule enforced by bank regulators in recent years to keep financial institutions from doing business with people like Jeffrey Epstein. The now-deceased convicted child sex predator was a JPMorgan customer for years, and in theory making it impossible for Epstein to finance his illegality sounds like what should be happening. That is until you dig deeper. Under pressure from the Biden administration, just after Trump lost the 2020 election and started to act out (which the last time I checked was his constitutional right), the enforcement of reputational risk took a decidedly political turn, bank officials tell me. If you believe people at the two largest banks, Jamie Dimon's JPMorgan and Brian Moynihan's BofA, the Biden administration unleashed its bank regulatory cops at the Office of Comptroller of Currency, the FDIC and the semi-independent Federal Reserve to go beyond nixing perverted financiers from their platform. 3 A Chase bank sign in Richmond, Virginia, Wednesday, June 2, 2021. AP They used the amorphous nature of what is reputational risk to enforce a political regime, the bank officials said. The Bidenistas hated crypto, thought it was an affront to their power to control the economy, and pressured banks from doing business with this somewhat heterodox emerging industry, according to the bank sources. So was anything related to guns and certain conservative religious organizations, they added. And most of all, anything MAGA, including the multibillion-dollar real estate and resort empire of Mr. MAGA himself, Donald J. Trump. Such an effort isn't easy to prove because there's no direct smoking gun, no memo (at least not yet) telling banks to cancel Trump from their system. 3 A general view of a Bank of America sign as seen in Wyckoff, New Jersey, on April 13, 2020. Christopher Sadowski The banks say the pressure was more subtle but still real: Failure to remove Trump or crypto types and others would result in heightened enforcement, harassment and possibly fines. The banks decided to drop customers, even rich ones like Trump, because it wasn't worth the hassle. I have covered finance for three decades now and thought I saw it all: Bernie Madoff, Epstein, the 2008 financial crisis, Wall Street scandals, penny stock scams and hedge fund implosions. But what happened to Trump in 2021 was truly surprising given the breadth of big banks dropping him as a client and scary given their rationale. As bad as the events of Jan. 6 were, Trump did tell the crowd that crazy afternoon to protest peacefully. Trump didn't break the law holding a rally. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters You may disagree with his rhetoric that day. He had just lost a closely fought election against Joe Biden. Trump said he really won it. Millions of people seemed to agree. He wouldn't be the first politician to pull that lever. Democrat Stacey Abrams never really fully conceded when she lost in her first attempt to become governor of Georgia against Republican Brian Kemp. How many times did Hillary Clinton say Trump was an 'illegitimate president' after she lost the 2016 contest to him? During the violent social justice protests of 2020, Gwen Walz, the wife of Minnesota Gov. and 2024 Democrat VP candidate Tim Walz, said she 'kept the windows' open to smell the burning debris. 'I felt like that was such a touchstone of what was happening,' she said. Or how about what Kamala Harris proudly said around the same time. The then-Biden VP candidate, who went on to get trounced by Trump in 2024, supported the defunding of the police movement that led to much more mayhem than what occurred on Jan. 6. Her rationale for the 'largely peaceful protests' that burned cities to the ground, delivered to fellow-traveler lefty late-night host Stephen Colbert, is at least as cringey as anything Trump said on Jan. 6. 'They're not going to stop,' she said during an appearance on the show. 'They're not. This is a movement. I'm telling you. They're not going to stop, and everyone, beware . . . That they're not going to let up. And they should not, and we should not.' Did Jamie Dimon tell Harris that her money isn't good at JPM?
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Texas Democrats rally against redistricting effort
People in Austin rallied against Texas Republicans on Saturday, as the party pushes forward with a plan to add five GOP congressional seats, and potentially cement Republicans' control of Congress in Washington. It comes as Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton ramps up his legal battle against Democrats who fled the state to stop the effort. NBC News' Ryan Chandler has moreAug. 10, 2025
