logo
What's Real and What's Fake—Global Action Is Needed To Protect Us All

What's Real and What's Fake—Global Action Is Needed To Protect Us All

Newsweek6 days ago
Did the late Pope Francis really stride around in a puffy down jacket? Did an elephant really wrap a crocodile in its jaws? More seriously, is the person with a telephone voice that seems 99.8 percent the voice of your daughter really in such grave danger that only a quick bank transfer could rescue her?
As long as there has been human society, there have been scammers and scams. The too-good-to-be-true deal. The sob story that pulls at the heartstrings at the same time as it opens your wallet. The grifter who wheedles his way into your life, family or work, exploiting every psychological weakness he can find.
And the internet has made it much worse, with the age of AI threatening to make every single one of us, no matter how smart and savvy, into a potential victim.
Probably everyone reading this got at least a dozen emails in the 1990s from a Nigerian "prince" asking for $1,000 to get him to the U.S. and then he'd pay you $100,000. Or saying that there was $1,000,000 in a bank account with your name on it if only you paid a service charge to get the money transferred.
Some people fell for that, crude as it was, and lost money—sometimes many thousands.
Posters are displayed at a news conference to unveil the Take It Down Act to protect victims against non-consensual intimate image abuse, on Capitol Hill on June 18, 2024, in Washington.
Posters are displayed at a news conference to unveil the Take It Down Act to protect victims against non-consensual intimate image abuse, on Capitol Hill on June 18, 2024, in Washington.
Photo byToday, with AI, that fraud would no longer be crude. The "prince" could have a video conference with you from a room looking exactly like a lavishly appointed palace. Official-looking documents could be produced at the touch of a button.
Remember what the great American author Mark Twain once wrote: "It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled." Most people only wake up when their bank accounts have been raided and the "prince" has long faded into safety.
Even more sinister is the recent spate of "sextortion" scams where fraudsters convince teenagers to send explicit photos of themselves and then extort large sums of money from them under threat of public release. This sad scam has caused several teenage Americans to commit suicide and countless others to have severe mental distress.
This is now tragically even easier to do. A 65-year-old man could easily manipulate the AI on live chat to make him appear to be a young, attractive woman, preying on the lonely, the desperate and the inexperienced.
To remove AI deepfakes from the internet is a game of whack-a-mole that can be very expensive and time consuming.
As a lawyer, I dealt with a situation where as soon as I removed images, they popped up elsewhere and we had to go to great lengths to stop it, including sending someone to an internet server farm in Romania to surveil the activities there. In another case, a man was harassing my pro bono female client for turning him down for a date, and every time we got one of his websites taken down, another one popped up.
The Take It Down Act, a rare bipartisan bill signed by President Donald Trump that enacted stricter penalties for the distribution of non-consensual intimate imagery, sometimes called "revenge porn," as well as deepfakes created by AI, is a step in the right direction.
This will hopefully be followed by the bipartisan bill No Fakes Act, which seeks to create federal protections for artists' voice, likeness and image from unauthorized AI-generated deepfakes that could be extended to all individuals victimized by AI deepfakes.
Groups supporting this bill have argued that Americans across the board—whether teenagers or high-profile music artists—were at risk of their likenesses being misused, and this legislation, reintroduced in the Senate last month, would combat deepfakes by holding individuals or companies liable if they produced an unauthorized digital replica of an individual in a performance.
But having laws in one country is not enough—the internet is global, and images hop countries in a nanosecond.
Denmark is leading the charge against deepfakes by granting individuals ownership of their facial features, voices and physical likenesses. Culture Minister Jakob Engel-Schmidt said: "No one can copy your voice or face without consent. This is not just about deepfakes—it's about reclaiming control over our digital identities."
This is the minimum that we need in this AI age.
The deepfake crisis demands urgent coordinated action, not just in places sensitive to the issues already, like Denmark or the United States, but also in places where the vast server farms are hosted and bots by the tens of thousands can be released at the touch of a button.
We need clear legal frameworks to protect our digital identities. We need standardized takedown protocols, so lawyers protecting the innocent can quickly and efficiently go on the attack. We need global cooperation at the governmental level, ensuring that innocent citizens like you and me are served by technology, and not exploited or harmed by it.
Bryan Sullivan is an attorney who has represented high-profile clients in entertainment, intellectual property and corporate investments.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Americans spend nearly half their day online — whether it's work or play — ‘eye-opening' poll shows
Americans spend nearly half their day online — whether it's work or play — ‘eye-opening' poll shows

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Americans spend nearly half their day online — whether it's work or play — ‘eye-opening' poll shows

Wired Americans spend nearly half their day online — splitting that time almost evenly between watching videos or TV shows and working, browsing and shopping, according to a new survey. 'This new survey was eye-opening,' said Eric Bruno, senior vice president of product management for Optimum, whose telecommunications firm interviewed 2,000 US residents who have a home Internet subscription with any company for the poll. 'We were amazed to see how many hours folks are watching, shopping and browsing online on a daily basis,' Bruno told The Post. Americans are spending nearly half of their day on the internet, according to a new survey. Dusan Petkovic – 'It underscores how important a strong, affordable, and reliable Internet has become in today's world.' On average, screen-zombie Americans spend more than 10 hours daily accessing the Web. They spend 5.4 of those hours browsing, working, gaming, looking at social media, reading email or paying bills, the survey found. They spend another five hours streaming video or TV content. A majority of the people — 55% — use their television to stream shows or movies, followed by 20% with mobile phones and 25% combined using laptop or desktop computers or tablets. For general Internet consumption, a majority of customers access service from their mobile phones or computers, while 44% do so from their TV. Besides streaming videos and TV shows, nearly 80% of customers said they use the Web to browse or pay bills, 73% scour social media, 72% shop online, 37% handle work assignments and 20% complete school work. The online survey of 2,000 adults ages 18 and over who subscribe or use home Internet service was conducted between May 6-14.

China, Nigeria in diplomatic talks over abandoned miners in Chinese-owned mines
China, Nigeria in diplomatic talks over abandoned miners in Chinese-owned mines

Business Insider

time2 hours ago

  • Business Insider

China, Nigeria in diplomatic talks over abandoned miners in Chinese-owned mines

The Chinese Embassy in Nigeria has responded to growing public concern after a viral video surfaced showing Nigerian miners allegedly trafficked and abandoned by a China-owned mining company in the Central African Republic (CAR). A viral video showcasing the plight of Nigerian miners allegedly trafficked by a Chinese mining company in the Central African Republic has sparked outrage. The Chinese Embassy in Nigeria has initiated an investigation and reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring lawful business practices overseas. Nigerian government agencies are working to repatriate the affected miners safely through diplomatic channels. The video, which circulated widely online, triggered outrage among Nigerians and prompted swift diplomatic attention from both Abuja and Beijing. The Embassy confirmed via an official statement that it had initiated an immediate investigation into the incident, reaffirming its commitment to upholding the rule of law and safeguarding the rights of all citizens involved. The Statement read: " The Chinese government consistently mandates that all Chinese enterprises and citizens operating abroad strictly comply with local laws and regulations, ensuring all business operations fully adhere to local legal frameworks." It added that " The Chinese side will urge the involved companies to address this matter appropriately, maintain close communication with Nigerian authorities throughout the investigation, and work together to safeguard the lawful rights and interests of citizens of both nations." Nigerian government reacts to miners' complaints The Embassy's response came after a disturbing video circulated online, showing distressed Nigerian miners stranded in Bambari, a remote town in the Central African Republic (CAR). In the video, the miners claimed they had been trafficked and abandoned by their employer, Denaco Erado Mining Company, a Chinese mining company. They alleged they had worked for nearly a year without pay, were denied food and shelter, and had their passports confiscated. Reacting to the incident, the Director of Media, Public Relations, and Protocols Unit of the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NiDCOM) said: " The attention of the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NIDCOM) has been drawn to the distress call in a viral video where some Nigerians were allegedly maltreated in the Central African Republic (CAR)." He added that " The Nigerians were deceived and abandoned in a foreign land, forced to work for 11 months without pay. Their passports were confiscated, leaving them stranded.' The agency, however, said it was working with the Nigerian Embassy in the CAR to secure the release and safe return of the affected citizens. Subsequently, in a separate statement signed by the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Kimiebi Ebienfa, the ministry expressed deep concern. The statement read: " The Ministry of Foreign Affairs wishes to inform that the affected Nigerians have been contacted by the hardworking officials of our Mission in the Central African Republic, and the Embassy of Nigeria in Bangui is actively engaging with relevant authorities to ensure the safety, protection, and swift repatriation of the affected Nigerian nationals." According to the ministry, a military vehicle has been dispatched to evacuate the stranded workers from Bambari to Bangui, with an expected arrival in the capital by Saturday, July 26. This is not the first time Chinese mining operations in Africa have come under scrutiny, with human rights groups repeatedly raising concerns over labour abuses, environmental damage, and lack of oversight in several countries.

Trump boasts of deporting the ‘worst of the worst.' LA raids tell a far different story
Trump boasts of deporting the ‘worst of the worst.' LA raids tell a far different story

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Trump boasts of deporting the ‘worst of the worst.' LA raids tell a far different story

LOS ANGELES - They called them the 'worst of the worst.' For more than a month and a half, the Trump administration has posted a barrage of mugshots of L.A. undocumented immigrants with long rap sheets. Officials have spotlighted Cuong Chanh Phan, a 49-year-old Vietnamese man convicted in 1997 of second-degree murder for his role in slaying two teens at a high school graduation party. They have shared blurry photos on Instagram of a slew of convicted criminals such as Rolando Veneracion-Enriquez, a 55-year-old Filipino man convicted in 1996 of sexual penetration with a foreign object with force and assault with intent to commit a felony. And Eswin Uriel Castro, a Mexican convicted in 2002 of child molestation and in 2021 of assault with a deadly weapon. But the immigrants that the Department of Homeland Security showcase in X posts and news releases do not represent the majority of immigrants swept up across Los Angeles. As the number of immigration arrests in the L.A. region quadrupled from 540 in April to 2,185 in June, seven out of 10 immigrants arrested in June had no criminal conviction - a trend that immigrant advocates say belies administration claims that they are targeting 'heinous illegal alien criminals' who represent a threat to public safety. According to a Los Angeles Times analysis of ICE data from the Deportation Data Project, the proportion of immigrants without criminal convictions arrested in seven counties in and around L.A. has skyrocketed from 35% in April, to 46% in May, and to 69% from June 1 to June 26. Austin Kocher, a geographer and research assistant professor at Syracuse University who specializes in immigration enforcement, said the Trump administration was not being entirely honest about the criminal status of those they were arresting. Officials, he said, followed a strategy of focusing on the minority of violent convicted criminals so they could justify enforcement policies that are proving to be less popular. 'I think they know that if they were honest with the American public that they're arresting people who cook our food, wash dishes in the kitchen, take care of people in nursing homes, people who are just living in part of the community … there's a large segment of the public, including a large segment of Trump's own supporters, who would be uncomfortable and might even oppose those kinds of immigration practices.' In Los Angeles, the raids swept up garment worker Jose Ortiz, who worked 18 years at the Ambiance Apparel clothing warehouse in downtown L.A., before being nabbed in a June 6 raid; car wash worker Jesus Cruz, a 52-year-old father who was snatched on June 8 - just before his daughter's graduation - from Westchester Hand Wash; and Emma De Paz, a recent widow and tamale vendor from Guatemala who was arrested June 19 outside a Hollywood Home Depot. Such arrests may be influencing the public's perception of the raids. Multiple polls show support for Trump's immigration agenda slipping as masked federal agents increasingly swoop up undocumented immigrants from workplaces and streets. ICE data shows that about 31% of the immigrants arrested across the L.A. region from June 1 to June 26 had criminal convictions, 11% had pending criminal charges and 58% were classified as 'other immigration violator,' which ICE defines as 'individuals without any known criminal convictions or pending charges in ICE's system of record at the time of the enforcement action.' The L.A. region's surge in arrests of noncriminals has been more dramatic than the U.S. as a whole: Arrests of immigrants with no criminal convictions climbed nationally from 57% in April to 69% in June. Federal raids here have also been more fiercely contested in Southern California - particularly in L.A. County, where more than 2 million residents are undocumented or living with undocumented family members. 'A core component of their messaging is that this is about public safety, that the people that they are arresting are threats to their communities,' said David Bier, director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, a Libertarian think tank. 'But it's hard to maintain that this is all about public safety when you're going out and arresting people who are just going about their lives and working.' Trump never said he would arrest only criminals. Almost as soon as he retook office on Jan. 20, Trump signed a stack of executive orders aimed at drastically curbing immigration. The administration then moved to expand arrests from immigrants who posed a security threat to anyone who entered the country illegally. Yet while officials kept insisting they were focused on violent criminals, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt issued a warning: 'That doesn't mean that the other illegal criminals who entered our nation's borders are off the table.' As White House chief adviser on border policy Tom Homan put it: 'If you're in the country illegally, you got a problem.' Still, things did not really pick up until May, when White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller ordered ICE's top field officials to shift to more aggressive tactics: arresting undocumented immigrants, whether or not they had a criminal record. Miller set a new goal: arresting 3,000 undocumented people a day, a quota that immigration experts say is impossible to reach by focusing only on criminals. 'There aren't enough criminal immigrants in the United States to fill their arrest quotas and to get millions and millions of deportations, which is what the president has explicitly promised,' Bier said. 'Immigration and Customs Enforcement says there's half a million removable noncitizens who have criminal convictions in the United States. Most of those are nonviolent: traffic, immigration offenses. It's not millions and millions.' By the time Trump celebrated six months in office, DHS boasted that the Trump administration had already arrested more than 300,000 undocumented immigrants. '70% of ICE arrests,' the agency said in a news release, 'are individuals with criminal convictions or charges.' But that claim no longer appeared to be true. While 78% of undocumented immigrants arrested across the U.S. in April had a criminal conviction or faced a pending charge, that number had plummeted to 57% in June. In L.A., the difference between what Trump officials said and the reality on the ground was more stark: Only 43% of those arrested across the L.A. region had criminal convictions or faced a pending charge. Still, ICE kept insisting it was 'putting the worst first.' As stories circulate across communities about the arrests of law-abiding immigrants, there are signs that support for Trump's deportation agenda is falling. A CBS/YouGov poll published July 20 shows about 56% of those surveyed approved of Trump's handling of immigration in March, but that dropped to 50% in June and 46% in July. About 52% of poll respondents said the Trump administration is trying to deport more people than expected. When asked who the Trump administration is prioritizing for deporting, only 44% said 'dangerous criminals.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom and L.A. Mayor Karen Bass have repeatedly accused Trump of conducting a national experiment in Los Angeles. 'The federal government is using California as a playground to test their indiscriminate actions that fulfill unsafe arrest quotas and mass detention goals,' Diana Crofts-Pelayo, a spokesperson for Newsom told The Times. 'They are going after every single immigrant, regardless of whether they have a criminal background and without care that they are American citizens, legal status holders and foreign-born, and even targeting native-born U.S. citizens.' When pressed on why ICE is arresting immigrants who have not been convicted or are not facing pending criminal charges, Trump administration officials tend to argue that many of those people have violated immigration law. 'ICE agents are going to arrest people for being in the country illegally,' Homan told CBS News earlier this month. 'We still focus on public safety threats and national security threats, but if we find an illegal alien in the process of doing that, they're going to be arrested too.' Immigration experts say that undermines their message that they are ridding communities of people who threaten public safety. 'It's a big backtracking from 'These people are out killing people, raping people, harming them in demonstrable ways,' to 'This person broke immigration law in this way or that way,'' Bier said. The Trump administration is also trying to find new ways to target criminals in California. It has threatened to withhold federal funds to California due to its 'sanctuary state' law, which limits county jails from coordinating with ICE except in cases involving immigrants convicted of a serious crime or felonies such as murder, rape, robbery or arson. Last week, the U.S. Justice Department requested California counties, including L.A., provide data on all jail inmates who are not U.S. citizens in an effort to help federal immigration agents prioritize those who have committed crimes. 'Although every illegal alien by definition violates federal law,' the U.S. Justice Department said in a news release, 'those who go on to commit crimes after doing so show that they pose a heightened risk to our Nation's safety and security.' As Americans are bombarded with dueling narratives of good vs. bad immigrants, Kocher believes the question we have to grapple with is not 'What does the data say?' Instead, we should ask: 'How do we meaningfully distinguish between immigrants with serious criminal convictions and immigrants who are peacefully living their lives?' 'I don't think it's reasonable, or helpful, to represent everyone as criminals - or everyone as saints,' Kocher said. 'Probably the fundamental question, which is also a question that plagues our criminal justice system, is whether our legal system is capable of distinguishing between people who are genuine public safety threats and people who are simply caught up in the bureaucracy.' The data, Kocher said, show that ICE is currently unable or unwilling to make that distinction. 'If we don't like the way that the system is working, we might want to rethink whether we want a system where people who are simply living in the country following laws, working in their economy, should actually have a pathway to stay,' Kocher said. 'And the only way to do that is actually to change the laws.' In the rush to blast out mugshots of some of the most criminal L.A. immigrants, the Trump administration left out a key part of the story. According to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, its staff notified ICE on May 5 of Veneracion's pending release after he had served nearly 30 years in prison for the crimes of assault with intent to commit rape and sexual penetration with a foreign object with force. But ICE failed to pick up Veneracion and canceled its hold on him May 19, a day before he was released on parole. A few weeks later, as ICE amped up its raids, federal agents arrested Veneracion on June 7 at the ICE office in L.A. The very next day, DHS shared his mugshot in a news release titled 'President Trump is Stepping Up Where Democrats Won't.' The same document celebrated the capture of Phan, who served nearly 25 years in prison after he was convicted of second-degree murder. CDCR said the Board of Parole Hearings coordinated with ICE after Phan was granted parole in 2022. Phan was released that year to ICE custody. But those details did not stop Trump officials from taking credit for his arrest and blaming California leaders for letting Phan loose. 'It is sickening that Governor Newsom and Mayor Bass continue to protect violent criminal illegal aliens at the expense of the safety of American citizens and communities,' DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store