
Trump-Harvard row: Students march after US plans to cut remaining contracts, raise concern for foreign peers
Hundreds of students gathered to oppose Trump's widening offensive, including Tuesday's measures estimated to be worth $100 million, against the university that has drawn his ire for refusing to give up control of curriculum, admissions and research.
"Trump = traitor", read one student placard, while the crowd chanted "who belongs in class today, let them stay" in reference to Harvard's international students whose status Trump has upended by summarily revoking the university's accreditation to the country's Student and Exchange Visitor program.
A judge issued a restraining order pending a hearing on the matter scheduled for Thursday, the same day as the university's commencement graduation ceremony for which thousands of graduating students and their families had gathered in Cambridge, Massachusetts near Boston.
The White House, meanwhile doubled down in its offensive, saying that instead of Harvard public money should go to vocational schools that train electricians and plumbers.
'The president is more interested in giving that taxpayer money to trade schools and programs and state schools where they are promoting American values, but most importantly, educating the next generation based on skills that we need in our economy and our society. We need more of those in our country, and less LGBTQ graduate majors from Harvard University,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Fox News Tuesday evening.
Tuesday's protest unfolded as news helicopters hovered overhead and graduating students in academic attire and their guests ate finger food at a reception on the lawns of Harvard Square nearby.
"All my international friends and peers and professors and researchers are at risk and (are) threatened with being deported -- or their option is to transfer" to another university. As a US student, it's my responsibility to speak out for them, said Alice Goyer, who attended the protest wearing a black academic gown.
One history of medicine student from Britain graduating this week who gave his name only as Jack said that the policies pursued by Trump would make US universities less attractive to international students, even if the courts overturn the most damaging measures.
"The cloud may pass, but the damage will be done," said Jack, whose parents had travelled from Britain for the graduation ceremony.
Foreign students "who are here don't know where they stand, those overseas don't know if they'll be able to get back in... I don't know if I'd pursue a PhD here, six years is a long time," he added.
Harvard itself has filed extensive legal challenges against the Trump measures, which legal experts say are likely to be overturned by the courts.
Separately, alumni plan to file a lawsuit against Trump on June 9, filmmaker Anurima Bhargava told a virtual meeting staged by Crimson Courage, a grassroots alumni group that held a mass webinar to raise awareness and a fighting fund from former students.
The cutting of contracts announced Tuesday, estimated by US media to be worth $100 million, would mark the slashing of business ties between the government and a university that is the country's oldest and a research powerhouse.
Amid a broad campaign against seats of learning that Trump accuses of being hotbeds of liberal bias and anti-Semitism, the president has singled out Harvard for particular punishment.
In the last few weeks, the elite educational powerhouse has seen billions of dollars in federal grants frozen and millions of dollars of federal contracts torn up.
The university has sued both to block the revocation of its right to recruit and sponsor foreign students, 27 percent of its total roll, as well as to overturn the withdrawal of federal funding.
A legal expert suggested Harvard could file a lawsuit to overturn the latest contract cuts as part of existing legal action.
"The case is so strong that the court system is not going to step to the side and allow this... to go forward," said Albany Law School professor Ray Brescia.
He said the Trump administration's assault on Harvard was so flawed that a higher court would likely strike down the campaign against the university if it were to challenge it on appeal.
On Monday, Trump nonetheless vowed he would prevail in the increasingly public struggle, claiming that foreign students at Harvard included 'radicalized lunatics, troublemakers.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
26 minutes ago
- News18
Trump's Troops Nab 23 on First Night of Washington DC Crackdown to 'Rescue Capitol from Crime'
At least twenty three arrests were made in Washington DC on the first night of President Trump's crackdown on crime in the US capital. White House press secretary said arrests were made for crimes such as homicide, drug possession, lewd acts among others. Karoline Leavitt said six illegal guns were seized during the operation, adding that 'this is only the beginning.'This comes as US president placed Washington, DC's, police department 'under direct federal control' in an 'unprecedented' move. "This is Liberation Day in DC, and we're going to take our capital back," the president told reporters at the White part of his move to take control of the US capital's law enforcement, Trump also deployed the National Guard troops to the city. The US president cited a public safety emergency after an assault on a former government worker as a trigger behind his decision. n18oc_world n18oc_crux0:00 INTRODUCTION6:02 NEW YORK, CHICAGO NEXT?7:50 WASHINGTON MAYOR PUSHES BACK ON TRUMP'S CLAIMS


The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Trump's Washington D.C. takeover begins as National Guard troops arrive
Some of the 800 National Guard members deployed by President Donald Trump began arriving in the nation's capital on Tuesday (August 12, 2025) ramping up after the White House ordered federal forces to take over the city's police department and reduce crime in what the president called — without substantiation — a lawless city. The influx came the morning after Mr. Trump announced he would be activating the guard members and taking over the department. He cited a crime emergency — but referred to the same crime that city officials stress is already falling noticeably. The President holds the legal right to make such moves for at least a month. Mayor Muriel Bowser pledged to work alongside the federal officials Mr. Trump has tasked with overseeing the city's law enforcement, while insisting the police chief remained in charge of the department and its officers. 'How we got here or what we think about the circumstances — right now we have more police, and we want to make sure we use them,' she told reporters. The tone was a shift the day before, when Bowser said Mr. Trump's plan to take over the Metropolitan Police Department and call in the National Guard was not a productive step and argued his perceived state of emergency simply doesn't match the declining crime numbers. Still, the law gives the federal government more sway over the capital city than in U.S. states, and Bowser said her administration's ability to push back is limited. Attorney General Pam Bondi, meanwhile, called the Tuesday morning meeting productive in a social media post and said the Justice Department would 'work closely with the D.C. city government" to 'make Washington, D.C., safe again." While Mr. Trump invokes his plan by saying that 'we're going to take our capital back,' Bowser and the MPD maintain that violent crime overall in Washington has decreased to a 30-year low after a sharp rise in 2023. Carjackings, for example, dropped about 50% in 2024 and are down again this year. More than half of those arrested, however, are juveniles, and the extent of those punishments is a point of contention for the Trump administration. Bowser, a Democrat, spent much of Mr. Trump's first term in office openly sparring with the Republican president. She fended off his initial plans for a military parade through the streets and stood in public opposition when he called in a multi-agency flood of federal law enforcement to confront anti-police brutality protesters in summer 2020. She later had the words 'Black Lives Matter' painted in giant yellow letters on the street about a block from the White House. In Mr. Trump's second term, backed by Republican control of both houses of Congress, Bowser has walked a public tightrope for months, emphasizing common ground with the Trump administration on issues such as the successful effort to bring the NFL's Washington Commanders back to the District of Columbia. She watched with open concern for the city streets as Trump finally got his military parade this summer. Her decision to dismantle Black Lives Matter Plaza earlier this year served as a neat metaphor for just how much the power dynamics between the two executives had evolved. Now that fraught relationship enters uncharted territory as Trump has followed through on months of what many D.C. officials had quietly hoped were empty threats. The new standoff has cast Bowser in a sympathetic light, even among her longtime critics. 'It's a power play and we're an easy target,' said Clinique Chapman, CEO of the D.C. Justice Lab. A frequent critic of Bowser, whom she accuses of 'over policing our youth' with the recent expansions of Washington's youth curfew, Chapman said Trump's latest move 'is not about creating a safer D.C. It's just about power.' Bowser contends that all the power resides with Trump and that her administration can do little other than comply and make the best of it. As long as Washington remains a federal enclave with limited autonomy under the 1973 Home Rule Act, she said, it will remain vulnerable to such takeovers. 'We know that access to our democracy is tenuous," Bowser said. "That is why you have heard me, and many many Washingtonians before me, advocate for full statehood for the District of Columbia.' Section 740 of the Home Rule Act allows the president to take over Washington's police for up to 30 days during times of emergencies. No president has done so before, said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union's D.C. chapter. 'That should alarm everyone,' she said, 'not just in Washington.' For Mr. Trump, the effort to take over public safety in Washington reflects an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement. The District of Columbia's status as a congressionally established federal district gives him a unique opportunity to push his tough-on-crime agenda, though he has not proposed solutions to the root causes of homelessness or crime. 'Let me be crystal clear," Attorney General Pam Bondi said during Mr. Trump's announcement news conference. 'Crime in D.C. is ending and ending today.' Mr. Trump's declaration of a state of emergency fits the general pattern of his second term in office. He has declared states of emergency on issues ranging from border protection to economic tariffs, enabling him to essentially rule via executive order. In many cases, he has moved forward while the courts sorted them out. Bowser's claims about successfully driving down violent crime rates received backing earlier this year from an unlikely source. Ed Martin, Trump's original choice for U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, issued a press release in April hailing a 25% drop in violent crime rates from the previous year. 'Thanks to the leadership of President Trump and the efforts of our 'Make D.C. Safe Again' initiative, the District has seen a significant decline in violent crime,' Martin said. 'We are proving that strong enforcement, and smart policies can make our communities safer." In May, Mr. Trump abandoned his efforts to get Martin confirmed for the post in the face of opposition in Congress. His replacement candidate, former judge and former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, was recently confirmed. On Monday, Pirro — standing next to Trump — called his takeover 'the step that we need right now to make criminals understand that they are not going to get away with it anymore."


Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
White House says Trump-Putin meeting is a ‘listening exercise'
Friday's Alaska summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin 'is a listening exercise for the president,' the White House said on Tuesday, tempering expectations for a quick Russia-Ukraine ceasefire deal. 'Only one party that's involved in this war is going to be present, and so this is for the president to go and to get, again, a more firm and better understanding of how we can hopefully bring this war to an end,' said White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt. 'This is a listening exercise for the president.' Trump will meet one-on-one with Putin during the talks, which will take place in Anchorage, Alaska, the White House said. He may, in the future, also visit Russia. 'Perhaps there are plans in the future to travel to Russia,' said Leavitt. Key issues remain ahead of the talks. Trump has said the two sides will need to cede land to end the bloody 3-1/2-year-old conflict. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said his country's constitution prohibits such a deal and that no arrangements can be made without Ukraine's participation in talks. The White House declined to comment on conversations taking place prior to the Putin meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy. Trump said on Monday that Zelenskyy may be invited to a future meeting with Putin. 'The president has deep respect for all parties that are involved in this conflict and are trying to bring this conflict to an end,' said Leavitt.