
Dubai's new art fair grant is taking Emirati art to the world
Last month, Dubai Culture – the emirate's agency that supports the arts and cultural heritage across Dubai – launched a programme to financially assist the emirate's galleries exhibiting in fairs around the world. The aim of the International Art Fairs Grant is to raise the global profile of Emirati artists and strengthen Dubai's position as a centre for the creative economy. The grant is open to emerging and established UAE-based artists, with an emphasis on promoting Emirati talent alongside artists who have established a residence in the UAE for no less than three years. This could, in turn, empower local galleries, create a name for Emirati art and also set in place a sustainable cultural ecosystem in the UAE. A key component of the grant is the financial assistance mechanism, which covers between a third and 50 per cent of the exhibition costs – which can otherwise be prohibitively expensive – for galleries at international art fairs. The eligibility criteria govern that galleries maintain a full-time presence in Dubai and engage in activities beyond their gallery space, such as presenting work at prestigious institutions, and thus includes participation in international art fairs. The grant, then, is intended to create opportunities for both artists and galleries in establishing a permanent, active presence in Dubai's evolving cultural landscape, as well as strengthening connections to the global art market. Dr Saeed Mubarak bin Kharbash, the chief executive of the Arts and Literature at Dubai Culture said the grant was essential to enhance Dubai's position in the international art community. Dubai's cultural hub status, according to Dr Kharbash, also arises from a lively art scene sustained by local galleries. There are some notable parallels to this initiative with other global efforts. Initiatives like the Australia Council for the Arts's funding for Australian galleries and artists to exhibit at international art fairs, and the British Council's international art programmes, provide financial support to local artists to showcase their work overseas. Both these programmes seek to elevate their countries' cultural profiles, support local artists and facilitate opportunities for these artists to participate in global dialogue. But what sets the Dubai Culture initiative apart is its emphasis on Emirati artists and the long-term goals of the UAE as a productive force in the creative economy. Whereas both the Australian and British models appear to offer support to a wide range of artists from different backgrounds, the Dubai Culture grant is very much about prioritising artists who have a direct connection with the country's cultural capital, therefore helping to forge a distinctive cultural identity on the world stage. Moreover, this grant seeks to tackle some structural issues that UAE-based galleries and artists face including the high costs of international art fairs as well as the difficulty of trying to establish a permanent presence in global art markets. The grant's provision of all booth costs through subsidy is a significant relief that consequently lessens the burden on smaller or unknown galleries that might otherwise have challenges finding their way into a global marketplace, especially considering the usually substantial price of entry. That is all the more true of galleries with emerging artists or artists of colour, who don't have the financial wherewithal to compete on equal terms with the top-tier international players. But there are points at which the grant could be enhanced further. While the programme's concentration on supporting galleries with a permanent presence in Dubai makes sense, expanding eligibility to accommodate other types of participation – like temporary exhibitions or pop-up galleries – could create opportunities for a broader cross-section of artists and venues. This would better represent the dynamic, flexible nature of contemporary art markets, in which pop-up events and non-traditional real estate often take prime position in showcasing innovative work. Moreover, given that the art world is inherently global in nature, it would also be helpful to give the opportunity of this grant not just to galleries but also to artists, especially those who are not gallery-affiliated but are still making great contributions to the UAE culture. In a similar vein, the impact of the International Art Fairs Grant could be magnified through offering some additional services for those receiving it, such as mentorship programmes or networking opportunities for the artists and galleries. This would accredit the monetary functions of the grant in so far as recipients are provided with the tools that facilitate their international reach and engagement with global collectors, curators and institutions. Such programmes could enable a more holistic approach to making Dubai's art scene even more international, beyond financial assistance, building long-term relationships and collaborations that will pay lasting dividends for the city's cultural economy. The impact of the grant can be measured not just through the ability to give but also through the ability to open a national conversation about the use of art in activism. International art fairs are prime real estate for artists to be seen by new audiences and connect with other creative people. Thus, Emirati artists have the opportunity to add their first-hand perspectives to the global art salons, one that could lead to shifts in the understanding of contemporary art on a global scale. There is no doubt the grant can be a powerful new way to position Dubai on the cultural map. Its support of galleries and artists is a welcome development, but a wider engagement could further its reach and effectiveness. With continued investment in local talent and global connections, Dubai can keep its art scene at the forefront of international exchange.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Eid Al Adha in UAE: Hundreds of workers celebrate; win car, flight tickets
Hundreds of workers celebrated Eid Al Adha with various activities, competitions, and raffle draws winning valuable prize, including a car and flight tickets. Held under the slogan ' Eid with Our Workers: Joy and Happiness', the activities were organised by the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation (MoHRE) at 10 locations across the UAE. 'Celebrating and honouring workers during holidays and national occasions is an integral part of MoHRE's sustainable strategy", said the ministry, adding: '(Our) objective is to bring joy to workers and enhance their wellbeing, quality of life, and psychological and social stability, while fostering a sense of belonging to the community and motivating them to give their best.' Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp Channels. Eid Al Adha events were held at workers' compounds in Jebel Ali, Al Quoz, and Muhaisnah in Dubai; Mussafah and Hameem Worker City in Abu Dhabi; Al Sajaa in Sharjah; the Industrial Areas in Ajman and Umm Al Quwain; RAKEZ in Ras Al Khaimah; and Al Hail Industrial Area in Fujairah. Partners from the government and private sectors took part in the celebrations, including the Ministry of Interior; Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs, and Ports Security; the General Commands of Abu Dhabi, Dubai, and Sharjah Police; and municipalities across the country. Partners also include Abu Dhabi Ports Group; the General Directorate of Residency and Foreigners Affairs in Dubai; Abu Dhabi Civil Defence Authority; Dubai Civil Defence; the Permanent Committee for Labour Affairs in the Emirate of Dubai; Dubai's Roads and Transport Authority (RTA); the Islamic Affairs and Charitable Activities Department in Dubai; Sharjah's Labour Standards Development Authority; the National Ambulance; Dubai Corporation for Ambulance Services; and Ras Al Khaimah Economic Zone (RAKEZ). MoHRE underscored the Eid celebrations 'highlight the significant role that workers in the UAE play in driving the country's development, supporting its ambitious and pioneering economic vision, and cementing its status as a premier global destination for living, investing, and working.'


Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
PumpFun's Revenue Redistribution Plan Sparks Debate Amid $4bn Valuation
PumpFun, a Solana-based memecoin launchpad, has announced plans to distribute protocol revenue to $PUMP token holders through a buyback mechanism. This move marks a significant shift from the typical speculative nature of memecoins, aiming to provide tangible value to its community. However, the platform's ambitious $4 billion valuation and a targeted $1 billion raise have raised questions about the feasibility and sustainability of its revenue model. Since its inception in January 2024, PumpFun has facilitated the creation of over 6 million memecoins, positioning itself as a central player in the Solana ecosystem's resurgence following the FTX collapse. The platform's user-friendly interface allows individuals to launch tokens with minimal effort, contributing to a surge in activity that saw Solana's Total Value Locked surpass $5 billion by mid-2025. The proposed buyback strategy involves using a portion of the platform's revenue to repurchase $PUMP tokens from the open market, thereby reducing supply and potentially increasing token value. This approach is intended to reward long-term holders and align the interests of the community with the platform's growth. However, the lack of clarity regarding the specific revenue streams and the proportion allocated for buybacks has led to skepticism among investors and analysts. ADVERTISEMENT PumpFun's revenue primarily stems from a 1% swap fee on all token trades and a 1.5 SOL fee when a token 'graduates' by reaching a market cap of $90,000. While these mechanisms have generated substantial income—estimated at over $380 million—the sustainability of such revenue in the volatile memecoin market remains uncertain. The platform's reliance on continuous user engagement and token creation raises concerns about the long-term viability of its financial model. The announcement of the $1 billion raise at a $4 billion valuation has further intensified scrutiny. Critics argue that the valuation may be inflated, given the speculative nature of the memecoin market and the platform's nascent stage. Comparisons have been drawn to other DeFi projects that have faced challenges in maintaining high valuations without robust and diversified revenue streams. Community members have expressed mixed reactions to the buyback plan. Some view it as a positive step towards creating a more sustainable and value-driven ecosystem, while others question the timing and transparency of the initiative. The absence of detailed information about the buyback schedule, funding sources, and governance mechanisms has fueled debates about the platform's commitment to accountability and investor protection. PumpFun's leadership, including founders Noah Tweedale, Alon Cohen, and Dylan Kerler, has yet to provide comprehensive details addressing these concerns. The platform's history of rapid growth and controversial features, such as the now-suspended livestreaming service that allowed for unmoderated content, adds to the apprehension surrounding its governance and operational practices. The broader context of the DeFi and memecoin markets also plays a role in shaping perceptions of PumpFun's strategy. The memecoin sector has experienced explosive growth, with market capitalizations reaching unprecedented levels. However, this growth has often been accompanied by high volatility, regulatory scrutiny, and instances of market manipulation, leading to caution among institutional investors and regulators.


Gulf Today
2 hours ago
- Gulf Today
How badly could Donald Trump hurt Elon Musk?
Io Dodds, The Independent Even for Elon Musk, this is — to use the precise technical term — bonkers. Barely one week after leaving the Trump administration with every semblance of amity, the world's richest person is going scorched earth against the leader of the world's richest nation. Insults and threats. Calls for impeachment. Sinister references to Jeffrey Epstein. Somehow, Kanye West is also involved. It's like the messiest online influencer drama you've ever seen, except the parties are two of the most powerful people on Earth. But when it comes down to brass tacks, what exactly does Musk stand to lose in this titanic celebrity divorce? If Trump were to follow through on all his threats, and use every available weapon against Musk's business empire, how badly could it hurt him? The short answer is: pretty badly. In fact, with some admittedly quick and dirty math, we can put a price tag on some of it. SpaceX and the $68bn black hole. Elon Musk's estimated $388bn fortune — already $26.6bn smaller than it was before this frank exchange of thermonuclear warheads — depends on the success of two companies which are both intertwined with the US political system. One is Tesla, which makes electric vehicles; the other is SpaceX, which builds rockets, spacecraft, and satellites. X, formerly Twitter, can be left aside for now; having bought the social network 2022 for $44bn, Musk is still struggling to recoup his investment and has almost certainly lost money overall. Let's start with Space Exploration Technologies Corp., aka SpaceX. Not many people can afford to rent a rocket, so a lot of its business comes from government contracts, and U.S. government contracts most of all. As of writing, according to federal data, the Texas-based company has been paid or promised just under $21bn by Uncle Sam since 2008. The total potential value of all SpaceX's existing contracts, however, is much higher: $89.2bn. If Trump cancelled every contract tomorrow, that would mean a theoretical maximum of $68bn in lost potential income. For context, that's more than four times SpaceX's entire forecasted revenue for 2025, and nearly 15 times its revenue from 2022. Of course, there's no way to know if those maximum payments would ever actually have been made. So we could also get a rough sense of what SpaceX stands to lose by looking at the actual cash it received from federal coffers every year. In 2022 that was $2.8bn; in 2023, $3.1bn; and in 2024, $3.8bn. On the plus side for Musk, the US government is so dependent on SpaceX that some critics have called it a monopoly in the making. SpaceX ferries our astronauts to and from the International Space Station, is heavily involved in Nasa's moon landing program, and manages an increasing share of government satellite communications as well. Still, that does not guarantee safety. Would you really, in all soberness, bet against Donald Trump doing something that hurts the country merely to punish his personal enemies? In fact, as Talking Points Memo editor-in-chief Josh Marshall argues, SpaceX's critical role might actually put it in greater danger, because it leaves the feds with few options except "expropriation or nationalisation". Tesla in regulators' crosshairs?Like SpaceX, Tesla has benefited greatly from taxpayer money, mostly in the form of emission trading payments from non-electric carmakers and tax credits or consumers buying electric vehicles. An analysis by The Washington Post put Tesla's total income from emission credits since 2007 at $11.4bn as of this February. Its gain from tax credits, which allow more people to buy its cars at higher prices, has been estimated at $3.4bn. Those emission credit schemes are run by US states, not by the federal government. Nevertheless, Trump and the Republican Party have tried to undermine such schemes by contesting states' ability to set their own emissions rules. The wider impact is difficult to calculate. In contrast to SpaceX, Tesla sells to ordinary people, who tend to have their own opinions independent of government. In reputational terms, splitting noisily with Trump could reverse some of its recent sales losses; on the other hand, it might just make Tesla hated on both sides of politics. The biggest risk may be regulatory. At the time of Trump's second inauguration, Tesla was being investigated by numerous federal agencies including the Justice Department, the National Labor Relations Board, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration — which by itself had six pending probes. During his time at DOGE, Democrats feared Musk could use his power to influence or cancel these cases. But Trump's unabashed willingness to wield state power to punish those who displease him while rewarding loyalists cuts both ways. Live by the chainsaw, die by the chainsaw. How much that costs Tesla would depend on how far Trump is willing to go, and on the outcome of any ensuing court battle. But when U.S. stock exchanges closed on Thursday its share price had crashed by nearly 12 percent, wiping $122bn off its market value. Potential deportation — or worseSo far we've only addressed Elon Musk's finances. Yet there are other, more personal ways that Trump could hurt him if the former reality TV star truly isn't here to make friends. For example, Trump's old advisor Stephen Bannon — who has previously branded Musk a "parasitic illegal immigrant" — urged the administration to investigate Musk's immigration history, and potentially deport him. Unlike some of the feverish allegations that emanate from the extended Trump-o-sphere, this one actually has some substance. An investigation by The Washington Post last year alleged that Musk had worked illegally in the US while launching his Silicon Valley career in the mid-90s. Musk has denied this, and in any case he has been a US citizen since 2002. Still, legal experts have said his citizenship could technically be revoked if he were proven to have lied to immigration authorities. And while those laws have only rarely been enforced in the past 25 years, some Trump aides and allies have said they want that to change. Nor is that anywhere close to the only alleged skeleton in Musk's closet. What is his relationship with ecstasy, Adderall, ketamine, or magic mushrooms? Has he ever been in regular contact with Vladimir Putin? Did his colleagues at DOGE rigorously follow information security laws when extracting sensitive data from federal systems? What happened to all that data after it was obtained? At least we can probably can rule out plain old assassination by government special forces. Although, to be fair, that is literally something that Trump and his lawyers have argued should be protected by presidential immunity.