
Big update on Rand water maintenance outages
Rand Water has successfully completed its critical B16 maintenance project and resumed pumping operations at Mapleton, marking a milestone in the utility's major infrastructure programme that has affected water supply across Gauteng since late May.
The water utility announced the completion of the B16 project on Monday morning, bringing relief to thousands of residents who have endured water shortages for several days.
'We're pleased to share that all work on the B16 project is complete, and pumping at Mapleton has officially started!' Rand Water stated on its social media platforms.
Rand water maintenance gradual recovery process expected
Despite the completion of maintenance work, the restoration of the water supply will not be immediate across all affected areas.
Rand Water emphasised that the distribution system requires time to rebuild pressure and capacity before normal supply can resume.
The utility explained that recovery patterns will vary significantly based on geographical elevation.
It stated that low-lying areas are expected to see water supply return first, while residents in high-lying areas will likely experience longer wait times before their taps flow normally again.
Demand management will play a crucial role in the recovery process, according to Rand Water officials.
'Recovery depends on overall demand, so if your supply is back, please use water sparingly to help the system stabilise,' the utility advised residents.
ALSO READ: Water outages continue in Gauteng due to maintenance
Extended recovery timeline
Both Rand Water and Johannesburg Water have prepared residents for a potentially lengthy restoration period.
Johannesburg Water previously cautioned that the recovery process would extend well beyond the completion of maintenance activities.
'After each maintenance has been completed, it will take a maximum of 14 days for the system to fully recover, and for normal water supply to return,' Johannesburg Water stated in earlier communications with residents.
ALSO READ: Gauteng water outage: Here's how long it could take water to be restored after maintenance
Ongoing maintenance programme
The B16 project forms part of Rand Water's broader maintenance programme that commenced on Thursday, 29 May.
The utility has been running multiple maintenance operations concurrently to address critical infrastructure needs across the water supply network.
Rand Water has not yet provided specific timelines for when different areas can expect full water supply restoration following the completion of the B16 project.
The utility continues to monitor system performance as pressure builds throughout the distribution network.
The water supplier concluded its latest update with appreciation for public cooperation during the challenging period.
NOW READ: Tshwane's water warning to residents

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
‘RAND-FIXING': BANKS HAVE THEIR DAY IN COURT
The Constitutional Court in Johannesburg will for four days, starting on Tuesday, hear arguments relating to allegations of Rand-fixing, following an appeal by the Competition Commission. Image: Timothy Bernard / Independent Newspapers THE Competition Commission has hauled some of the country's top banks to the apex court over allegations that they conspired with each other to manipulate the foreign exchange rate in respect of the US Dollar and the Rand. The commission turned to the Constitutional Court for leave to appeal the Competition Appeal Court (CAC) judgment handed down in January last year in which it upheld the appeal by the majority of the respondent banks accused of price-fixing. The Constitutional Court is due to hear legal arguments over four days. In June 2020, the Commission had referred the case regarding the alleged rand fixing against 28 local and foreign banks to the Competition Tribunal. The banks were ordered by the Tribunal in March 2023 to file their answering affidavits in response to the Commission's complaint referral, but objected to the Tribunal order and appealed it to the CAC. The CAC, in its judgment last year, released 17 banks from the complaint referral before they answered the allegations against them and restricted the Commission's case to only the four respondent banks. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ In its current application for leave to appeal, the Commission is appealing the CAC order to the Constitutional Court against 13 banks. These banks include Standard Bank of South Africa, Nedbank Limited and FirstRand Bank Limited, while the bulk are foreign banks. The Commission said this appeal will provide the Constitutional Court with an opportunity to pronounce on whether the South African competition authorities have jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute firms that are based outside of the Republic whose anti-competitive conduct affects the South African economy. In April 2015, the Commission initiated a complaint against various financial entities centred on allegations of price-fixing and market division in the trading of the USD/ZAR currency pair. The anti-competitive practices are alleged to have taken place between September 2007 to at least September 2013. According to the Commission, the general terms of the conspiracy included that the banks' traders would participate, actively and passively, in frequent and regular communication and contact with one or more traders employed by or representing competing banks when engaging in trading the USD/ZAR currency pair. The Commission subsequently referred the complaint to the Tribunal in February 2017. The banks took exception to the original referral. Those objections were adjudicated by the Tribunal in 2019 and considered again on appeal before the CAC in 2020, which ordered that the Commission file a new referral affidavit to substitute for and replace all the complaint referral affidavits. In accordance with the 2020 CAC order, the Commission filed its complaint referral anew in June 2020.

IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Competition Commission takes banks to Constitutional Court over forex manipulation allegations
The Constitutional Court in Johannesburg will for four days, starting on Tuesday, hear arguments relating to allegations of Rand-fixing, following an appeal by the Competition Commission. Image: File The Competition Commission has approached the Constitutional Court this week in yet another chapter of the ongoing saga following allegations that the banks conspired with each other to manipulate the foreign exchange rate in respect of the US Dollar and the Rand. The Competition Commission has approached the Constitutional Court for leave to appeal the Competition Appeal Court (CAC) judgment handed down in January last year in which it upheld the appeal by the majority of the respondent banks accused of price-fixing. The Constitutional Court is due to hear legal arguments over four days, starting on Tuesday. In June 2020, the Commission had referred the case regarding the alleged rand fixing against 28 local and foreign banks to the Competition Tribunal. The banks were ordered by the Tribunal in March 2023 to file their answering affidavits in response to the Commission's complaint referral, but objected to the Tribunal order and appealed it to the CAC. The CAC, in its judgment last year, released 17 banks from the complaint referral before they answered the allegations against them and restricted the Commission's case to only the four respondent banks. In its current application for leave to appeal, the Commission is appealing the CAC order to the Constitutional Court against 13 banks. These banks include Standard Bank of South Africa, Nedbank Limited and FirstRand Bank Limited, while the bulk are foreign banks. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The Commission said this appeal will provide the Constitutional Court with an opportunity to pronounce on whether the South African competition authorities have jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute firms that are based outside of the Republic whose anti-competitive conduct affects the South African economy. In April 2015, the Commission initiated a complaint against various financial entities centred on allegations of price-fixing and market division in the trading of the USD/ZAR currency pair. The anti-competitive practices are alleged to have taken place between September 2007 to at least September 2013. According to the Commission, the general terms of the conspiracy included that the banks' traders would participate, actively and passively, in frequent and regular communication and contact with one or more traders employed by or representing competing banks when engaging in trading the USD/ZAR currency pair. The Commission subsequently referred the complaint to the Tribunal in February 2017. The banks took exception to the original referral. Those objections were adjudicated by the Tribunal in 2019 and considered again on appeal before the CAC in 2020, which ordered that the Commission file a new referral affidavit to substitute for and replace all the complaint referral affidavits. In accordance with the 2020 CAC order, the Commission filed its complaint referral anew in June 2020. Again, the respondent banks filed exceptions together with applications for dismissal of this referral. It was against this referral that the respondent banks approached the CAC. In now turning to the apex court, the Commission argues that the CAC erred in several aspects of its judgment. Several banks, including Standard Bank, are meanwhile opposing the application, saying that this is not a constitutional issue, nor is it in the interest of justice to grant leave to appeal. While denying any hand in the Rand price-fixing allegations, they also say that these allegations against them have caused them tremendous reputational damage.


The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Radebe speaks on settlement reached between ELM and Randwater
SEDIBENG. – The Executive Mayor of Emfuleni Local Municipality (ELM), Sipho Radebe recently announced his delight in announcing a landmark settlement agreement between ELM and national water supplier Rand Water. The settlement, Radebe said, was facilitated through the Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) Forum. This agreement is said to have resulted in the upliftment of ELM's bank accounts, marking a significant step towards stabilising the municipality's financial position and ensuring the continued provision of water and sanitation services to our communities. 'We extend our sincere gratitude to the Gauteng MEC for Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA), Hon. Jacob Mamabolo, for his leadership and continued support in ensuring a constructive and solution-driven engagement between the parties. The key terms of the Agreement include an initial payment of R660 million has been made to Rand Water. There will be further engagement,' the ELM said. The parties are said to have have committed to reconvene in September to finalise a sustainable payment plan that is mutually acceptable. 'This agreement not only resolves the immediate financial impasse but also paves the way for the uninterrupted establishment of the Partnership between Emfuleni and Rand Water under the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), a critical intervention aimed at accelerating the restoration of water and sanitation infrastructure in Emfuleni.' Radebe said that he views this settlement as a pivotal milestone in the municipality's broader efforts to address infrastructure challenges and improve service delivery. 'This agreement is a symbol of what can be achieved through collaborative governance and constructive dialogue. It represents a major leap forward in our mission to restore the dignity of the people of the Vaal by ensuring reliable water and sanitation services,' said Mayor Radebe.' Radebe commend the following leaders and institutions for their commitment to finding an amicable resolution: Rand Water Board Chairperson, Ramateu Monyokolo, and Group Chief Executive Sipho Mosai. Emfuleni (ELM) Municipal Manager (MM), April Ntuli, and the leadership of both institutions.