Airlines instructed to prevent unauthorised carriage of live animals into India
Amid multiple instances reported by airlines regarding the carriage of live animals into India by passengers without proper declaration or clearance, classified as unbeknownst imports, the DGCA asked the operators to devise strategies to detect and deter the violation of deportation conditions.
Going by rules laid down by the Animal Quarantine and Certification Services and Indian Customs, such animals were subject to immediate deportation to their country of origin, with appropriate intimation to concerned stakeholders and authorities in that country.
Though the carriage of animals/birds by air was governed by the Aeronautical Information Circular (AIC) of 1985, the DGCA's advisory intended to further guide and ensure compliance with the latest instructions/orders of the Indian Customs and other law-enforcing agencies and facilitate the safe and legally compliant deportation animals by all aircraft operators/airlines operating in India.
Responsibility of airlines
The aviation regulator said in case of detection of any unbeknownst imports of live animals into India, the concerned airline would be responsible for their immediate deportation. 'The airline that transported the undeclared live animals shall be solely responsible for deportation in accordance with applicable laws. All costs associated with deportation, including animal handling, in-transit welfare, documentation, and repatriation logistics shall be borne by the airline,' the advisory said.
As part of the preventive measures, the operators were advised to make sure that the employees deployed at check-in counters, boarding gates and in-flight operations were adequately trained and sensitised on customs and quarantine rules and regulations pertaining to transport of live animals. Passenger advisories and signage regarding restrictions on import of live animals should be displayed prominently, the sources said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
11 hours ago
- News18
Delhi T1 Canopy Collapse: DGCA Expert Panel Blames ‘Poor Workmanship', DIAL Refutes Findings
Delhi T1 Canopy Collapse: The report, that was not made public, has been accessed by CNN-News18, and has made startling revelations related to the construction of the canopy A report submitted by a committee set up by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) to carry out technical assessment of the collapse of canopy roof at Terminal One of the Delhi International Airport last year has highlighted discrepancies in the fabrication work, calling it 'poor workmanship". The operator, Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL), however, claimed that 'neither the design, the fabrication, nor the workmanship is inferior". The incident took place at Terminal 1D of Indira Gandhi International (IGI) Airport on June 28, 2024, killing one taxi driver and leaving others injured. What does the report say on the canopy collapse? The report, that was not made public, has been accessed by CNN-News18, and has made startling revelations related to the construction of the canopy. The report clearly mentions that the purlin drawings did not match with site conditions. In addition, the fabrication shows poor workmanship in a few places, the document reads. It further says, 'during inspection, it was observed that the welding, connection detailing, etc., appear to be of inferior workmanship at some locations…the structural members concealed between the roof and the false ceiling didn't have fireproof paint or anti-corrosion measures in the collapsed portion of the structure," it reads. Further, the findings reveal that the location of purlin joints lies very close to the supports where hogging bending stresses are maximum. 'It is an undesirable location for the splices and should have been avoided," the experts mentioned. DIAL's strong response to the findings It said in a response that fire protection coatings are not required for internal roofs above 6.7m in height. 'NFPA clause 7.2.3.2.8 also states that any roof more than 6.1 m in height does not require fire protection. The Old Terminal 1D Canopy was over this 6.7 m height and was external. Accordingly, fire protection was not required. All the members were adequately coated either with vermiculite coating, anti-corrosive metal primer, or a paint that acts as a protective coating for rust prevention," DIAL said. It added that to overcome the space constraints and to establish a viable connection, the horizontal tie member was lowered within the proximity of the joint location and connected to the flaring columns. 'The design effects due to lowering of the horizontal tie were duly accounted for in the connection design and detailing of the horizontal tie member, and thereby the structural adequacy and integrity of the joints were ensured. The changes made were safe and vetted by the structural consultants and TATA Consulting Engineers," the airport operator claimed. It further added that the assumption that the detailing and design of connections, particularly welding connections, have not been carried out adequately and were left to fabricators is incorrect. 'The detailing and design of connections, particularly welding connections, have been carried out by a specialist steel agency (Geodesic Techniques) with ISO 9001 certification, with decades of experience in the design and detailing of complex steel structures. The design of connections, including the weld in the fin, was based on the prevalent IS 1893-2002 and IS 800-1984, and in line with proper design practices," DIAL said, adding they have done the testing of the collapsed structure through an NABL-accredited laboratory and the test results do not suggest any inferior workmanship and show weld quality was satisfactory. Test reports were made available to the concerned, it said. Expert panel's recommendations & DIAL's reaction In addition to its findings on the collapsed structure, the report by the experts' committee had further made recommendations for the non-collapsed roof structure. It said that a thorough inspection and investigation by a specialized agency is recommended. In particular, all connections, welding, etc. shall be checked thoroughly. The structural design and detailing are required to be checked thoroughly, it said. The committee has also suggested that all connections and components essential for the load transfer mechanism should be looked into and retrofitted by the specialized agency, if required. Drainage design shall be investigated for adequacy/inadequacy. Necessary modifications for example provision of suction devices in the drain, overflow mechanism, perforated false ceiling near drains, etc. may be required to remove the water stagnation in case of incessant rain events, it added. Reacting to these recommendations, DIAL said it appointed CORTEX Construction Solutions, a NABL-accredited agency that conducted several non-destructive tests on the non-collapsed structure of Old Terminal 1D, including on all weld joints. The test results and the recommendations were validated by IIT BHU, it claimed. top videos View all The airport operator further added, 'L&T was entrusted with the T1 reinstatement and retrofitting works, duly considering the IIT recommendations." All the design calculations and design drawings, prepared by L&T in accordance with the current code provisions, were thoroughly checked and approved by a team of three professors from IIT Delhi & IIT Jammu and are being implemented at the site, it said. About the Author Anvit Srivastava Anvit Srivastava, Principal Correspondent at CNN-News18, covers crime, security, policing and society in Delhi. His impactful ground reports have helped him make his mark among the select credited journalists More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : news18 specials view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 06, 2025, 13:46 IST News india Delhi T1 Canopy Collapse: DGCA Expert Panel Blames 'Poor Workmanship', DIAL Refutes Findings Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
New Indian Express
2 days ago
- New Indian Express
Kempegowda International Airport most prone to bird strikes among airports in South India
BENGALURU: Bengaluru's Kempegowda International Airport (KIA), which is accustomed to global admiration for its prized Terminal 2, has found itself associated with a concerning statistic. According to data revealed by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), KIA stands out as the airport most prone to bird strikes in the South Indian region, while ranking fourth behind Delhi, Mumbai and Ahmedabad at the national level. A total of 535 bird strikes were reported at KIA from 2022 till May 2025. Hyderabad and Chennai registered 420 and 379 respectively, for the same time period. Bird strikes are inadvertent collisions between aircraft and birds, often with the former hitting flocks of the latter. While statistically harmless in most cases, bird strikes happen during the two most critical phases of flying: take-off and landing. Most bird strikes cause critical harm, if any, to a single engine, which still gives pilots the leeway to execute emergency landings. However, in one of the most infamous cases of bird strikes, US Airways Flight 1549 – an Airbus A320 – had to make an emergency landing on the Hudson River, having suffered a dual-engine failure after a flock of geese hit the aircraft shortly after take-off. But why is Bengaluru unfortunately above the rest of the South Indian airports in this regard? As MB Krishna, a city-based ornithologist, shares, 'The whole area where the airport is built, used to be a lake. Additionally, the surrounding areas are agricultural, which explains the bird population.' Krishna added that since the bird species have been there long before the airport came up, their lives should be prioritised. According to a spokesperson from Bangalore International Airport Limited (BIAL), the airport's 'in-house Bird Aircraft Strike Hazard Management (BASHM) team employs a data-driven approach that goes beyond regulatory requirements to effectively minimise bird strike risks. Real-time automated bird monitoring systems alert our bird chasing team, enabling immediate response. Daily data analysis informs our adaptive wildlife hazard management plans and predictive forecasting of bird activity, optimising deterrent deployment and runway usage'.
New Indian Express
30-07-2025
- New Indian Express
Going beyond blame game to address fear of flying
Not a day has passed since the Air India crash in Ahmedabad when there has not been an incident involving planes—takeoffs aborted, aircraft skidding off runways, engines catching fire, flights returning to base after takeoff, cancellations, and diversions to other airports due to technical glitches have almost become routine. We also had six helicopter crashes involving pilgrims in Uttarakhand in this period, out of which two were fatal accidents. No wonder a sense of foreboding pervades the public's mind. The vivid live video of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner fireball and images of its aftermath are still haunting the imagination of the nation and the world. Though more people die in road and train accidents in India than anywhere else in the world, people are asking, 'Is it safe to fly?' This is why we have to look at the larger picture of Indian aviation today. First, of course, is Air India. The preliminary investigation report into its flight 171 crash has raised more questions than answers. It has stoked conspiracy theories and TV-presenters-on-steroids are working overtime sowing confusion. Aspersions are being cast by the pilots' association on the integrity and fairness of the probe agencies. Charges are being levelled that the truth has already been made a casualty. Given the trepidation in the air, the aviation ministry and Directorate General of Civil Aviation must do everything to earn the confidence of the public and the aviation community. They must speedily conclude the full investigation and publish the report for public knowledge. The cause of the accident must be established without fear—to learn from and avoid future disasters. For itself, Air India has to get its act together fast and earn back the reputation of its glory days during JRD Tata's charismatic leadership in the pioneering phase before independence. The airline lost its sheen and glamour after nationalisation and JRD's exit from the airline. It has had never-ending woes ever since.
