
Is Target Blaming Boycotts For Its Slump?
Is Target Blaming Boycotts For Its Slump?
getty
The country's seventh largest retailer has been the bullseye for grassroots consumer boycotts, but the real cause of its woes is in the c-suite.
For a moment there, at the onset of the COVID-19 quarantine, Target seemed to be riding high on a wave of innovation that broke out when retailers of every stripe and category had to scramble to save their businesses from a global catastrophe. As we reported here in 2021, Target managed a rapid roll-out of an experimental click-and-curbside-collect program while simultaneously building out a credible e-commerce platform to drive sales.
The gambit was a big success. Target's e-commerce business boomed, growing faster than Amazon and Walmart. The company won kudos for touches such as placing well-staffed pickup counters directly in front of the main entrance, ensuring crisp customer service. Shoppers were spared from standing in long lines and were more inclined to park and take a stroll through the store before leaving.
What a difference a pandemic makes. Over the past two years, Target has found itself on fumbling defense. At this time a year ago, the company first started reporting that a long stretch of revenue growth had run out of gas because (according to Target execs) its customer base had been spending less on nesting (think throw pillows and furnishings) and more on travel and entertainment.
For its fiscal year that ended on January 31, 2024, the company said revenue retreated by 1.6% and comparable store sales sagged by nearly 4%. In sharp contrast, both Walmart and Costco—with overlapping customer bases—posted annual revenue growth of more than 6%.
What went wrong? A series of clear leadership missteps?
Among the explanations was a boycott over an in-store Pride Month promotion in 2023 that backfired spectacularly.
Also in 2023, Target closed nine stores in urban areas citing theft and violence, but an in-depth CNBC investigation claimed it found that crime rates were actually lower at the closed stores than at other nearby stores that remained open. The difference: stores that stayed open were in higher-income neighborhoods.
According to CNBC, the findings, 'cast doubt on Target's explanation for the store closures and raise questions about whether the company's announcement was designed to advance its legislative agenda and obscure poor financial performance.'
Target ran into yet another publicity buzzsaw last year during Black History Month when several historical figures such as Booker T. Washington were misidentified on a collection of refrigerator magnets. And a customer filed a class action lawsuit claiming the company 'surreptitiously' operated an anti-theft surveillance system that violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act.
In the head-to-head competition with rivals, Target has seemed to be running a me-too campaign.
It was late in developing a robust line of private label merchandise, far behind Walmart and Costco. And the company ballyhooed a long-term plan to add 300 mostly full-sized locations just as its rivals were planning smaller stores in neighborhood shopping centers.
Finally, four days after the new administration took office in November, Target dismantled its DEI efforts—in which it had invested a lot of brand capital—which unleashed a fresh wave of scorn.
The latest news is more bleakness for the nation's seventh-largest retailer. Since January, foot traffic has been steadily declining. The company's management has been mostly silent, according to a recent report on Forbes, and analysts describe the company's woes as self-inflicted' and its leadership as 'drifting.'
Given the current economic cycle, with so much uncertainty and wariness among consumers, it's hard to imagine what Target could do to rescue itself from itself. Before the pandemic there were rumors that Amazon had its eye on acquiring the company as a quick way to create a bricks-and-mortar presence that could compete with Walmart, Costco, and others.
Nothing became of the Amazon rumor, and it is harder to imagine today than it might have been in 2019. But it will probably take a shake-up of equal magnitude—a leveraged buyout and a clean c-suite slate, perhaps—and a major rebranding to reverse the slide and possibly resurrect Target's once-coveted cachet as the classy discount store.
Investors might consider, what has been the 5-year return on invested shares? As of today, negative twenty-one percent (-21%) roughly vs S&P at plus ninety-four percent (+94%).

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
36 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Podcast: Trump's Plan B After Trade Court Setback
Last week, an obscure trade court dropped a bombshell ruling: President Trump didn't have the authority to issue sweeping tariffs under a 1977 law. The government has appealed the court's decision. WSJ's James Fanelli and Gavin Bade dig into the ruling and what it could mean for the future of Trump's trade agenda. Annie Minoff hosts. 🎧 Listen here to The Journal podcast.

Wall Street Journal
41 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Global Markets, U.S. Futures Lower on Trade Tensions
Global stocks and U.S. futures started the new month lower after President Trump threatened to double tariffs on steel and aluminum, and trade tensions escalated between China and the U.S. Late Friday, Trump said he would increase tariffs on steel and aluminum up to 50%, starting Wednesday. The president also accused China of breaking a trade truce agreed in mid-May, which China has denied.


Fast Company
43 minutes ago
- Fast Company
The household auto fleet is a money pit
There's a financial crisis hiding in plain sight: the American household vehicle fleet. Families are hemorrhaging money through car payments, insurance, fuel, maintenance, depreciation, parking, and registration. In many cases, this adds up to more than a family's annual savings—or the cost of sending a child to college every four years. Car ownership is nearly universal in the U.S., with 92% of households owning at least one vehicle. About 37% own two cars, and 22% own three or more. In 2023, the average annual cost to own and operate a new vehicle climbed to $12,182. For households with two cars, that's nearly $25,000 per year—a recurring expense that too often escapes scrutiny. Now consider how those vehicles are used. In 2021, more than half of all daily trips in the U.S. were under three miles. Nearly 30% were less than one mile. We're paying a fortune to go nowhere. The rise of remote and hybrid work has amplified the mismatch between cost and use. As of 2023, more than a third of U.S. employees worked remotely full time, with another 41% following hybrid work models. Pew Research Center reported that almost half of remote workers would look for a new job if their employer took this option off the table. Cars are parked roughly 95% of the time, depreciating as they collect pollen and bird droppings. And yet they demand monthly payments, insurance, fuel, and maintenance. The long-distance commute has been the primary reason for every working member of the family needing their own vehicle, but our travel habits have changed. What if owning fewer cars was a sign of more success? A growing number of families are experimenting with a car-lite lifestyle—ditching the second or third car and rediscovering local travel through bikes, transit, or walking. They're not doing it to make a statement. They're doing it to make ends meet—and to take back their time. At the center of this quiet shift: the e-bike. Part appliance and part liberation machine, e-bikes are redefining what a 'vehicle' can be. School drop-offs, grocery runs, commutes, and social visits—trips once assumed to require a car—are increasingly accomplished with battery-assisted pedaling. Terrain and distance fade as barriers. In 2022, more than 1.1 million e-bikes were sold in the U.S., nearly quadruple the number from 2019. E-bikes now account for over 20% of total bicycle sales in the U.S., and they represented 63% of revenue growth in the bike industry between 2019 and 2023. Bikes have become robust enough to handle everything from kid pickups to bulk grocery runs, and more cities are creating rebate programs to accelerate adoption. Replacing a car with an e-bike can save a household $120,000 over a decade—enough to wipe out debt, fund a college account, or boost retirement savings. And as infrastructure improves with more protected lanes, slower streets, and secure parking, the e-bike can graduate from practical to preferable. What if you spent less on movement and more on meaning? What if streets worked as well for bikes as they do for cars? What if getting around town felt like a lifestyle upgrade? For too long, success was measured by how many vehicles fit in your driveway. But those cars aren't status symbols—they're financial sinkholes. Remember, more than half of America's car trips are under a few miles. If you're going broke to go nowhere, the journey needs a new map.