Slain gangster's texts with sex worker
Bilal Hamze was gunned down outside an Asian fusion restaurant four years ago.
The gangster lay groaning on the pavement outside the high end restaurant after 10 bullets were fired at him.
Blood spilling from his mouth, the sex worker he'd just been dining with screamed over him.
This week, his text messages with the woman have revealed the last-minute change of plans that landed him outside the Sydney restaurant where he was shot and killed.
Hamze was all set to meet with the woman – who'd known him for months as 'Bill' – at Potts Point restaurant Ms.G's on June 16, 2021. Bilal Hamze met with a sex worker for dinner on June 17, hours before he was shot dead. Supplied. Credit: Supplied
There were a 'number of threats' on the gangster's life at this stage, with a court told there was a clear conflict between crime families the Hamzes and Alameddines.
Hamze's texts with the sex worker, who cannot be identified, revealed she'd asked to reschedule their dinner on June 16 to the following evening before she requested another change of plans.
'I was gonna say if you haven't booked Ms G's we should try that Kid Kyoto we were talking about last time,' she texted him about 6pm on June 17 over the encrypted app Signal. Bilal Hamze died in hospital on June 17 after 10 shots were fired at him. Supplied. Credit: News Corp Australia
'Now I really know you love your Japanese,' Hamze replied, agreeing.
Footage shows Hamze making his way to the restaurant where he spent an hour and a half with the woman.
How alleged gangland shooting of Bilal Hamze and alleged plot to kill his brother Ibrahem unfoldedBut it was only one minute after they left the venue, at 10.23pm, when the first of 10 shots were fired at Hamze from a stolen Audi.
'I've never heard anything like it, I didn't know what it was,' the sex worker's police statement read.
Hamze ran after a second shot was fired, the sex worker seeking shelter in Kid Kyoto's doorway. The stolen Audi spotted travelling east through the Lane Cove Tunnel at 9.44pm on June 17. Supplied. Credit: Supplied The stolen Audi spotted on Tankstream Lane at 9.59pm on June 17. Picture Supplied. Credit: Supplied
Another eight shots were unleashed toward Hamze, with CCTV showing him appear to jump back before falling to the ground and rolling towards the kerb.
The woman ran out and found Hamze 'face down' on the pavement.
'There's blood': Gangster's final moments
The sex worker cried as her statement was read out in court, detailing how she called an ambulance but had to hang up because she was 'screaming and couldn't talk'.
'I could hear Bill making noises like grunting … I kept saying make noise, make noise. I didn't know what to do,' her statement said. Bilal Hamze in the lift of his residence, on his way to meet the sex worker for dinner on June 17. Supplied. Credit: Supplied
The gangster lay on the street with blood coming out of his mouth as a bystander who had rushed over to help told an ambulance operator how a car 'came past and shot a man'.
'He's groaning … Yes, there's blood … from his mouth,' the bystander said during a recording of the call played in court.
'We don't know where the wound is.'
Someone could be heard yelling 'he's not breathing' in the background.
Footage of murder nearly puts juror to sleep
Samuel John Rokomaqisa, who allegedly had links to the Alameddine family, is standing trial accused of Hamze's murder and allegedly plotting to kill the gangster's younger brother, Ibrahem. Samuel Rokomaqisa is standing trial accused of Bilal's murder and allegedly plotting to kill the gangster's younger brother, Ibrahem. 7News Credit: Supplied
As some of Bilal's final moments were played in court, including the loud sound of eight shots going off, suspicions a juror was 'nodding off' prompted Acting Justice Robert Allan Hulme to dismiss the man who he said was not paying attention 'at all' during the footage.
Person of interest's 'frantic' calls and texts
Defence lawyer Thomas Woods said there would be evidence of the sex worker in contact with an alleged person of interest around the time of the shooting.
'You will hear evidence about her in communication with someone else who was in the near vicinity at the time of these events, someone who on the police assessment was a person of interest,' Mr Woods said in his opening address.
'They described his behaviour as frantic, sending messages, making phone calls, around the time of the killing.' The court was told there were a number of threats on Bilal Hamze's life by June 2021. Supplied. Credit: News Limited
Text messages later read in court revealed the sex worker had messaged a friend 'What's doing?' about 10.22pm on June 17.
The man replied saying 'not much wbu (what about you)?' around the time the first shots were fired at 10.23pm.
He then sent a barrage of texts and calls, messaging her 'You OK???' at 10.26pm, 'I'm gonna go room soon, I feel sick' at 10.31pm, and 'Are you okay?' at 10.36pm.
'From that overview (of messages), there was nothing in your contact with (your friend) that night where you indicated that you were in danger – do you agree or disagree?' Mr Rokomaqisa's lawyer Robert Deppeler asked the woman, who agreed.
'Ibby needs to go': Ibrahem's escape
Evidence suggested Ibrahem narrowly escaped a murder plot just months after his brother was gunned down.
The words 'Ibby needs to go' were allegedly heard during a conversation between senior members of the Alameddine organised crime network on June 8, 2021, captured by a covert police recording. Evidence suggested Ibrahem Hamze narrowly escaped a plot to kill him in August, 2021. NewsWire. Credit: News Corp Australia
Mr Woods said there was no indication his client was involved in this call and it fell outside the timeframe of the conspiracy his client was alleged to be involved in.
Prosecutors allege Mr Rokomaqisa was inside a stolen car spotted surveilling Ibrahem's unit a couple of months later on August 14, 2021.
They said the car circled the unit before attempting to enter its underground carpark, having 'just missed' Ibrahem, who had left.
The stolen car caught the eye of a nearby police officer when it tried to reverse park into a no-stopping zone across the street from Ibrahem's unit, and a police chase ensued when the car ran a red light.
It was ultimately called off when it became 'too dangerous', and prosecutors allege Mr Rokomaqisa then used a gun to threaten a man into giving he and another his car after they suffered a flat tyre in the chase. It is alleged Ibrahem Hamze's unit was being surveilled by August, 2021. NewsWire / Christian Gilles Credit: News Corp Australia
'That was me': Alleged crim's bragging
Mr Rokomaqisa allegedly told a trial witness 'that was me, that is what we do with the cars' while showing them news footage of Bilal's murder.
Mr Rokomaqisa was allegedly heard bragging about how well he'd driven the getaway car, that he was 'paid to be the driver of hits', and that he was linked 'to the shooting and s*it'.
Mr Rokomaqisa allegedly told another trial witness he was owed some $270,000 for the crimes, with prosecutors arguing 'unexplained wealth' pointed to his alleged involvement in criminal activities on behalf of the Alameddines.
Mr Rokomaqisa has entered not guilty pleas to murder, conspiring to murder and aggravated assault.
He has denied any involvement in the crimes and to having any links with the Alameddine family.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
8 hours ago
- Perth Now
Predator Catholic teacher's huge court loss
A predator Catholic brother and former school principal convicted of the vile historical sexual assault of a student will be returned to prison after his appeal attempt fell apart. The Court of Appeal ordered a warrant for Desmond Gregory Mackrell – previously known as 'Brother Bede' to his students – to lie on file for five days after the 90-year-old's unsuccessful application. Mr Mackrell, 90, was convicted in March on a single charge of repeated sexual conduct with a child and two charges of carnal knowledge against the order of conduct involved Mackrell raping a child in a toilet cubicle and sexually assaulting the student while he was in 'a state of partial or complete undress' in his office. Former Catholic brother and school principal Desmond Mackrell was convicted of repeated sexual contact with a child and carnal knowledge following a trial earlier in the year. NewsWire / John Gass Credit: News Corp Australia The third count of carnal knowledge related to Mackrell being party to another rape by a different teacher – aiding this teacher by 'holding or pulling the complainant down'. A jury was told all offences occurred between 1980-82 while Mackrell was a school principal. Mackrell was sentenced to seven years' jail with parole eligibility after serving half that time behind bars. But just a month later he was released on bail after challenging the convictions in Queensland's Court of Appeal, arguing they were 'unreasonable' and 'cannot be supported by the evidence'. On Tuesday, Justices Debra Mullins, Thomas Bradley and Philip Morrison dismissed the application. Mackrell had argued there was a 'reasonable possibility' the complainant had 'no actual memory' of the assaults – putting the 'memories' of sexual acts committed by the former principal down to 'dreams and nightmares' the complainant was experiencing. Mackrell appealed his convictions on the grounds they were 'unreasonable' and 'cannot be supported by the evidence'. NewsWire / John Gass Credit: News Corp Australia His legal team pointed to alleged discrepancies of the complainant not having a memory of the events of the sexual abuse until 'after he had a dream or nightmare' about the events in question. Mackrell said the complainant's first experiences of the nightmares of the abuse – or 'at best shards of memories he had developed and pieced together' – related only to the second teacher, referred to as 'Brother X'. The complainant had testified each time he experienced more nightmares 'the more he believed he had remembered', which Mackrell said created the risk that events would be 'recalled' that had not actually happened 'or that any true events would be recalled in a distorted fashion'. 'The evolution of the complainant's accounts of sexual abuse reinforced the reasonable possibility … that his 'memory' of the appellant's participation in the abuse by others was the product of distortion and unreliable reconstruction,' Mackrell's team had argued, according to a published court judgment. Mackrell said this was reinforced by alleged inconsistencies between the accounts of offending and the evidence could therefore not be accepted as reliable. In the Court of Appeal's decision, Justice Morrison said the complainant had maintained he had actual memories of the events – even if they were referred to as 'shards'. The Queensland Court of Appeal unanimously rejected Mackrell's appeal, which attempted to raise questions about the complainant's memory of the events. NewsWire / John Gass Credit: News Corp Australia A jury heard the complainant reject the proposition from Mackrell's defence team that he had no real memories or they were the product of dreams or nightmares. 'The complainant's attempts to explain the significance of the dreams and nightmares were in the context of his maintaining that they added to memories that already existed,' the judgment states. 'The dreams and nightmares added clarity or volume or depth. Properly understood, the complainant's evidence did not accept that the dreams and nightmares established reality that was not there otherwise.' Justice Morrison said the evidence did not reach the point of compelling the conclusion that events recalled had not actually happened – or that any true events were recalled in a distorted fashion. He noted the complainant said he always knew that two Brothers were involved – and that Mackrell was one of them. 'In my view, the jury's advantage in seeing and hearing the evidence is capable of resolving … doubt, and therefore no miscarriage of justice has occurred,' the judgment continues. 'The assessment of the evidence does not cause me to have such a doubt as to the reliability of the complainant's evidence that the convictions should be set aside. 'In my view, upon the whole of the evidence it was open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was guilty.'
Perth Now
9 hours ago
- Perth Now
Boy, 14, attacked with machetes at Hoppers Crossing shopping centre
Police were called to reports of an attack involving a machete at shopping centre in Melbourne's southwest on Saturday. 9News Police were called to reports of an attack involving a machete at shopping centre in Melbourne's southwest on Saturday. 9News Credit: Supplied A teenager has been attacked by six people armed with machetes at a Melbourne shopping centre, in the latest incident involving the now-outlawed weapon. The latest attack happened in the suburb of Hoppers Crossing on Saturday afternoon. Saturday's incident led to a 14-year-old boy being taken to hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. 'Police are investigating a stabbing at a Hoppers Crossing shopping centre,' a police spokesperson said. Camera Icon Police were called to the Hoppers Crossing centre on Saturday afternoon. 9News Credit: Supplied 'Investigators have been told six males armed with machetes assaulted another male at the Heaths Road complex about 4.40pm. 'A 14-year-old boy sustained non-life-threatening injuries and was transported to hospital. 'The offenders fled in a black Hyundai i30 sedan. The investigation remains ongoing.' About midday Sunday, police confirmed no arrests had been made. Investigators want anyone with information to come forward; confidential reports can be made online. A brawl broke out at the same shopping centre on Thursday night. 'There have been no arrests yet,' the police spokesperson said. Camera Icon Jacinta Allan's government rushed through a ban on machetes this year in the aftermath of a wild brawl at a major shopping centre. NewsWire / Nadir Kinani Credit: News Corp Australia The same shopping centre played host to a brawl just two days earlier, on Thursday; this one reportedly involved a fight inside JD Sports, the Herald Sun reports. The sale of machetes was banned in Victoria in May. An interim ban was enacted while new laws were written up. Those laws have passed and from September 1, it will be permanently illegal to own, use, carry, transport, sell and buy machetes in Victoria, unless you are covered by an exemption or valid approval. The interim ban and laws were rushed through following a spate of public incidents involving machetes across Melbourne.
Perth Now
15 hours ago
- Perth Now
When mushroom cook's husband suspected plot
When Simon Patterson learnt each of his parents and aunt and uncle were ill following a lunch at his wife's home, he sprung into action. Don Patterson, his father, called him about 8.45am on July 30, 2023, to say they had been experiencing vomiting and diarrhoea since about midnight and were waiting for an ambulance. Don also told him Heather and Ian Wilkinson were sick too. 'I wasn't really sure what to do,' he told Patterson's trial in May. 'I tried both their mobile phones, but I didn't get an answer.' Simon Patterson remains married to Erin Patterson. NewsWire / David Geraghty Credit: News Corp Australia Simon jumped in the car and drove around to his aunt and uncle's house to check in, finding them 'sick, grey and stooped'. Despite the pair's reluctance, he convinced them they too needed to go to a hospital and took them himself after being warned an ambulance could be an hour away. He had good reason to be worried. Within a week Don, Simon's mother, Gail Patterson and Heather would be dead, and Ian would be fighting for his life. The quartet had eaten lunch the day prior at Simon's estranged wife Erin Patterson's home in the country Victorian town of Leongatha. Convicted killer cook Erin Patterson told police she hosted the lunch because she wanted to maintain her relationships with her in-laws. Simon himself had been invited but pulled out the night before, texting Patterson he was too uncomfortable to attend. She responded by trying to guilt him into coming. 'That's really disappointing. I've spent many hours this week preparing lunch … because I wanted it to be a special meal,' she wrote. 'I hope you'll change your mind. Your parents and Heather and Ian are coming at 12.30. I hope to see you there.' Simon's reasons for why he didn't want to attend can now be revealed after Justice Christopher Beale lifted a suppression order barring media from reporting on pre-trial rulings in the case. During these pre-trial hearings, Simon revealed he had begun to fear his wife was poisoning him in the year before the lunch after a spate of serious but unexplained illnesses. 'I thought there was a risk she would poison me if I attended,' he said of his reason for turning down the lunch invite. Erin Patterson's trial spanned 11 weeks. NewsWire / Paul Tyquin Credit: News Corp Australia He was hospitalised in November 2021, May 2022, July 2022 and September 2022 — and over time began to believe he could trace these illnesses to meals made by Patterson. On each occasion, Simon said he had begun experiencing gastro-like symptoms that quickly worsened. But each time doctors were unable to identify the cause of the mystery illnesses. On the advice of his GP Chris Ford, Simon began to trace what he had eaten before each of the illnesses in about July 2022. 'I asked him to do that because I couldn't understand why these things kept happening to him in such a way that he'd had essentially three near-death experiences,' Dr Ford told the court. 'It didn't fit into my medical models to account for anything.' Footage has been released of the moment Erin Patterson was asked to hand over her mobile phone to investigators as they searched her Leongatha home. Simon told the court he initially didn't seriously entertain the possibility Patterson was poisoning him until after a conversation with his cousin Tim Patterson in about September 2022. 'When I made the spreadsheet and looked at what I'd come up with my thought was this could appear to someone else looking at this that Erin was a cause because of her cooking the food,' Simon said. Dr Ford told the court Simon first raised the suspicion at a consult on February 21, 2023. 'I do recall, as a result, Simon elected to change his advanced care directives,' he said. Asked if he took it seriously, Dr Ford said: 'It was a possible explanation, yes.' 'He told me his perspective of what happened,' he said. 'To me, there was no other medical reason that could fit all of the different admissions. It seemed feasible that it could be a possible explanation.' Simon's sister Anna Terrington and brother Matthew Patterson (right). NewsWire/Ian Currie Credit: News Corp Australia Dr Ford and Tim Patterson were among a small group Simon shared his concerns with, including his sister Anna Terrington, brother Matthew and father Don. Simon described his father's reaction to the news, delivered months ahead of the lunch in late February, as 'very thoughtful'. 'He said 'I suggest you don't tell too many people about that',' Simon told the court. 'I thought I had a reasonable sense why he would say that … probably because that could create issues in the way they relate, especially with Erin and our family.' From the moment Simon learnt his parents and aunt and uncle were ill, he suspected his wife was the culprit. Don and Gail Patterson. 7 News Credit: Supplied He rang Dr Ford that morning to express his concerns and because the GP had promised to expend every effort to make sure toxicological testing was conducted should there be another illness. Dr Ford said he was packing for a week-long trip, but called a colleague he knew was working on-call at Leongatha Hospital, Dr Chris Webster, to warn him there may be patients coming in. 'It was along the lines of 'Hi Chris, I know this is a bit unusual, there are two people coming to you who I suspect might have deliberate food poisoning based on previous events that have gone on with one of my patients',' he recounted of the call. Dr Chris Webster said he thought the call was 'bizarre'. NewsWire / Nicki Connolly Credit: News Corp Australia Dr Ford said he tried to call the Korumburra Hospital but could not get through, so he drove to the hospital. He said he had a 'very similar conversation' to the one with Dr Webster, telling a doctor there was a suspicion of deliberate poisoning and to watch out for a decline in their condition. Dr Webster told the pre-trial hearing he thought Dr Ford's call was 'bizarre' but he acknowledged the concerns and thanked him for the warning. He said he told a nurse at the hospital they might be getting a patient from Dr Ford's church congregation, remarking: 'It looks like someone's trying to take out the church community.' Dr Webster told the court the following morning, on July 31, he received a call from Dandenong Hospital's Dr Beth Morgan about the case. He said Dr Morgan advised him Don and Gail had been moved to her hospital and it was now suspected the quartet had consumed death cap mushrooms. Patterson left hospital about five minutes after attending. Supplied/ Supreme Court of Victoria. Credit: Supplied At 8.05am that morning, Dr Webster said Erin Patterson attended the hospital and he explained there was a concern that all lunch guests, herself included, had consumed death caps. 'It was along the lines of the doctors at Dandenong believe you've been exposed to potentially lethal death cap mushroom toxins,' he said. The court was told five minutes later Ms Patterson discharged herself against medical advice saying she needed to make preparations before she could be admitted. She returned at 9.48am but not before Dr Webster called the local police due to his concern for her welfare. Dr Webster told the court he had stepped away from Ms Patterson but soon learnt she had left. 'Where the f*** did she go?' he said he questioned nurse Kylie Ashton. 'I've just told her she's been exposed to a potentially fatal dose. I would have thought a hospital would be a good place to stay. 'My initial impression of Dr Ford's phone call as bizarre had dramatically changed by that point.' In the startling call to the police, Dr Webster expressed concern Erin Patterson had also been exposed to the poisonous death caps mushrooms. After her arrest over the July 2023 fatal lunch, Patterson was initially charged with three counts of attempted murder over Simon's illnesses. These were later dropped by prosecutors after a ruling by Justice Beale would have split the case into two trials — one for the deadly lunch and a second for Simon's illnesses. Prosecutors had not alleged Simon's illnesses were caused by death cap mushroom poisoning, but that he was allegedly poisoned with unidentified toxic compounds. But during the pre-trial, intensive care specialist Professor Andrew Bersten gave evidence he had reviewed all of Simon's medical notes and found there were no identifiable causes. Patterson was found guilty of murdering Don Patterson, Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson and the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson following an 11-week trial earlier this year. She will face a pre-sentence hearing on August 25.
