logo
America might finally make childbirth free—and moms could be the biggest winners

America might finally make childbirth free—and moms could be the biggest winners

Yahoo11-06-2025
'This is how much it costs to give birth in America: $44,318.41.' That was the now-viral TikTok from a mom just days postpartum, scrolling through the itemized bill at home. Her insurance only covered $20,353.62—despite paying $2,500 a month for coverage for her family of five.
This mom's story isn't an outlier. According to the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, privately insured families in the U.S. pay an average of $3,000 out-of-pocket for childbirth on average—just for having a baby.
By 'choosing' to have a baby with a midwife in a birth center, I personally had to pay a $10k fee upfront. (Wanting midwifery care in a calm setting for my super fast labors didn't feel like a choice, but in America, it is.)
Moms bear so many burdens for having babies. And one devastating cost that sets so many families back financially when they're just beginning life together is the price of childbirth, even with insurance. We're talking million-dollar NICU bills. $50k c-section charges. A financial punishment for doing the most critical work in a country: bringing the next generation of citizens into the world.
But that may soon change.
A bipartisan group of senators has introduced a bill that could be a game-changer for millions of American families. The Supporting Healthy Moms and Babies Act (S.1834) was announced on May 21, 2025, and aims to eliminate all out-of-pocket costs related to prenatal care, childbirth, and postpartum services for those with private health insurance.
The bill's sponsors—Sens. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Josh Hawley (R-MO), and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)—say the legislation is about protecting families from being buried in medical debt at one of the most vulnerable times in life.
'Bringing a child into the world is costly enough without piling on cost-share fees that saddle many mothers and families with debt,' Sen. Hyde-Smith said in a statement announcing the legislation. 'By relieving financial stresses associated with pregnancy and childbirth, hopefully more families will be encouraged to embrace the beautiful gift and responsibility of parenthood.'
A companion bill is expected in the House, led by Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME), who told Vox,
'This idea is simple and powerful: Pregnancy and childbirth are normal parts of family life. So, insurance companies should treat it like the routine care it is and cover the cost—not stick people with huge medical bills.'
While the average out-of-pocket cost is around $3,000, the financial burden can be far worse for many:
17% of privately insured moms face bills over $5,000
1% are hit with bills exceeding $10,000
17.5% of women with private insurance report problems paying medical bills
Nearly 9% say they couldn't pay them at all
These numbers are not just statistics—they represent real parents delaying care, going into debt, or struggling to recover financially in the fragile weeks after childbirth.
If passed, the bill would expand the list of 'essential health benefits' under the Affordable Care Act to include full-spectrum maternity care. Medicaid already covers these services in full, and that's how 41% of births in the U.S. are paid for. But for the 178 million people on private insurance plans? Birth is still a budget-buster.
The new legislation would require private insurers to pick up the tab. That means:
Prenatal care (including appointments and ultrasounds)
Labor and delivery
Hospital stays
Postpartum recovery and mental health care
Neonatal and perinatal services
Lactation support
The estimated premium hike to cover it all? About $30 per year, according to Lawson Mansell, policy analyst at the Niskanen Center, who conducted the cost modeling for the bill.
Mansell told Vox this proposal is the simplest way, on an administrative level, to make birth free.
Related: Too many U.S. moms are in debt from giving birth. They deserve better.
Beyond the financial relief, this bill has the potential to improve health outcomes for moms and babies.
Research backs this up: A report by the Washington State Office of the Insurance Commissioner found that eliminating cost-sharing for prenatal services is associated with improved maternal and infant outcomes, including fewer preterm births and higher birth weights. So in addition to relieving the stress families face, covering prenatal care fully makes it more likely that moms actually get it.
Another study published in BMC Public Health linked removing financial barriers under the Affordable Care Act to increased use of preventive care, such as mammography and Pap tests. While the study focused on these services, the findings suggest that eliminating financial barriers can encourage timely and consistent healthcare utilization.
The bill's sponsors come from across the political spectrum—and so do its supporters. Everyone from the American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to anti-abortion groups like Americans United for Life and Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America have voiced support.
Even Planned Parenthood Action Fund commented they 'generally supports legislation to make the cost of maternal health care and parenting more affordable.'
Related: The cost of giving birth is getting more expensive—and some families are getting hit with childbirth debt
If the bill becomes law, the financial landscape of pregnancy would change dramatically—especially for those in the 'missing middle': families who earn too much for Medicaid but not enough to easily afford thousands in delivery fees.
It would also offer immediate relief for parents managing multiple financial burdens at once: high rent, unpaid leave, child care costs, student loans. You know, new motherhood.
Call your representatives. Especially if you have private insurance and have ever been slammed with a delivery bill. You can find contact info at house.gov and senate.gov.
Share your story. Lawmakers have said constituent birth bill stories played a big role in shaping this legislation.
Talk about it on social. If your childbirth costs shocked you, say so. Use hashtags like #MakeBirthFree and tag your reps.
This moment is historic not just because it's bipartisan, but because it signals a new kind of family policy thinking: one where moms aren't expected to 'figure it out' in isolation, one giant bill at a time.
As Yuval Levin of the American Enterprise Institute put it in a policy brief,
'Substantively and symbolically, bringing the out-of-pocket health care costs of childbirth to zero is an ambitious but achievable starting point for the next generation of pro-family policies.'
Whether you're pregnant now or years past it, you probably remember your hospital bill—and you definitely remember how it made you feel. Exhausted. Angry. Maybe even ashamed.
This new bill says: No more.
And moms deserve that.
Sources:
Family-Friendly Policies for the 119th Congress. February 2025. AEI. Family-Friendly Policies for the 119th Congress.
America might finally make childbirth free. May 2025. Vox. America might finally make childbirth free.
Americans United for Life Applauds Bipartisan Innovative Policy Proposal. May 2025. America United for Life. Americans United for Life Applauds Bipartisan Innovative Policy Proposal to Make Maternal Healthcare More Affordable.
AMA advocacy to improve maternal health. May 2025. AMA. AMA advocacy to improve maternal health.
Impact of removing cost sharing. 2019. BMC Public Health. Impact of removing cost sharing under the affordable care act (ACA) on mammography and pap test use.
New bipartisan proposal would remove childbirth costs. May 2025. Niskanen Center. New bipartisan proposal would remove childbirth costs and confusion for parents.
Characteristics of Mothers by Source of Payment for the Delivery. May 2023. CDC. Characteristics of Mothers by Source of Payment for the Delivery: United States, 2021.
About the Affordable Care Act. Us Department of Health an Human Services. About the Affordable Care Act.
Out-of-pocket medical bills childbirth. National Library of Medicine. Out-of-pocket medical bills from first childbirth and subsequent childbearing.
The Association of Childbirth with Medical Debt. National Library of Medicine. The Association of Childbirth with Medical Debt in the USA, 2019–2020.
Sentators introduce bill to ease financial burden of pregnancy. Cindy Hyde-Smith. SENATORS INTRODUCE BIPARTISAN BILL TO EASE THE FINANCIAL BURDEN OF PREGNANCY, CHILDBIRTH.
Women who Give Birth Incur Nearly $19,000 in Additional Health Costs. KFF. Women who Give Birth Incur Nearly $19,000 in Additional Health Costs, Including $2,854 More that They Pay Out of Pocket.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Merck KGaA ventures into new territory in the US
Merck KGaA ventures into new territory in the US

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Merck KGaA ventures into new territory in the US

This story was originally published on PharmaVoice. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily PharmaVoice newsletter. Merck KGaA has been making new moves to propel itself into becoming what CEO Belén Garijo described as a 'globally diversified science and technology powerhouse.' Most recently, the company closed its $3.4 billion acquisition of Pfizer spinout SpringWorks Therapeutics, which will help it stake a claim in the rare tumor space. And in general, it's all about 'doubling down' on R&D and building the company's U.S. footprint, said Miguel Fernández Alcalde, president of EMD Serono, Merck KGaA's healthcare business in the U.S. and Canada. Germany-based Merck KGaA has undergone a number of transformations throughout its deep history. In 2022, the company restructured into three distinct business units including one focused on the life sciences sector and manufacturing services. But with the contract manufacturing blitz of the COVID-19 pandemic era fading, the company is refocusing. EMD Serono relocated its U.S. headquarters to Boston's Seaport district to place itself squarely in the thick of the region's most innovative 'biotechs, startups, academia and scientists,' Fernández Alcalde said. 'I want to make sure we are bringing the U.S. [business] to the next level in terms of contributions to the whole organization." Miguel Fernández Alcalde President, EMD Serono Merck KGaA also elevated its global head of R&D and chief medical officer of its healthcare business, Dr. Danny Bar-Zohar, to healthcare CEO. 'That tells you that the company's moving along in the direction of doubling down on R&D,' Fernández Alcalde said. Fernández Alcalde's appointment to president of EMD Serono in December is also part of the company's overall quest to build its U.S. footprint and bolster R&D through external deals. 'I want to make sure we are bringing the U.S. [business] to the next level in terms of contributions to the whole organization,' he said. 'I do think we have lots of opportunities in the U.S. ecosystem and U.S. market. My job and my vision and ambition is to really untap all those things that we have ahead of us.' A pharmacist by trade, Fernández Alcalde has been with Merck KGaA since 2014, serving most recently as EMD Serono's chief operating officer. 'That gave me a lot of knowledge and understanding of the business of the company in the States and the teams, the dynamics, the culture, but also the U.S. [healthcare] ecosystem,' he said. Driving dealmaking Central to Fernández Alcalde's role is supplementing the company's current pipeline through external innovation investments, including more strategic in-licensing and co-development opportunities. The SpringWorks acquisition put the company on track to generate at least 50% of its future launch assets from external companies, compared to roughly 10%-15% just 18 months ago. 'It's easily a fivefold increase in our ambition from external innovation,' Fernández Alcalde said. In terms of what kinds of deals they're targeting, Fernández Alcalde said several factors are at play. 'We are not looking [for] the $40 billion type of acquisition,' he said. Nor will they chase first-in-class potential blockbusters with never-explored mechanisms of action. Instead, they'll target smaller deals with the 'right risk balance' for their pipeline. He pointed to the SpringWorks acquisition as an example, which not only adds two FDA-approved drugs to its portfolio, but also a 'runway of three to five years of nice growth' in the form of several clinical-phase pipeline candidates. 'These areas where we have deep, good science [and a] validated proof of concept or an about-to-be-validated proof of concept where the mechanism of action is already validated, is something we are interested in,' he said. The company will take a similar approach when it comes to therapeutic areas by branching out within reason. 'We are not sticking to the [therapeutic areas] we have today, but we are not going to go wild, either,' he said. Rather, they'll look for specialties that are 'adjacent' and 'logical' in terms of what they've been historically known for, such as oncology and neurology/immunology. Again, he pointed to the SpringWorks acquisition as an example and noted that some might ask what track record EMD Serono or Merck KGaA has in rare tumors. 'The answer is zero. But we do know how to commercialize,' he said. Plus, 'it's in an adjacent area of oncology.' Fernández Alcalde is also thinking globally, intending to follow good science wherever it leads and consider deals from around the world. 'We couldn't care less about where that science is coming from, whether it's China, my home country Spain, the U.S. or South Africa,' he said. 'If we think that science will help patients … we will definitely think about it.' Recommended Reading Let's make a deal? Big Pharma execs express varying views on their M&A future

Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the Legislative Frontlines
Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the Legislative Frontlines

Time Business News

time5 hours ago

  • Time Business News

Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the Legislative Frontlines

Debbie Wasserman Schultz has built a reputation in Congress as a determined advocate for civil rights, healthcare reform, and public safety. Representing Florida in the U.S. House of Representatives since 2005, she has consistently championed legislation that addresses the needs of vulnerable communities while working to strengthen the nation's democratic values. Throughout her career, Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been a strong defender of civil rights. She has taken bold positions on issues ranging from voting rights to LGBTQ equality. As a member of Congress, she has supported legislation aimed at expanding voter access, opposing discriminatory practices, and ensuring that every citizen has an equal voice in the democratic process. Her advocacy extends to protecting religious and ethnic minorities. Most recently, she has been at the forefront of efforts to create a national strategy to combat antisemitism, working across party lines to address the rise in hate crimes and extremist rhetoric. She views these initiatives not only as a matter of protecting one community, but as a fundamental defense of American democracy. For Debbie Wasserman Schultz, healthcare reform has always been more than a talking point. A breast cancer survivor herself, she has been a leading voice for policies that expand access to preventive care and early detection services. Her leadership on the EARLY Act has helped fund breast cancer education programs for young women, potentially saving thousands of lives through increased awareness and timely screenings. She has also recently introduced the Reducing Hereditary Cancer Act, a bipartisan bill designed to make genetic cancer testing more accessible to Americans who are at risk. By removing financial and coverage barriers, she hopes to create a healthcare system that focuses on prevention and equity, ensuring no patient is denied care because of cost or insurance limitations. In addition to her work on civil rights and healthcare, Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been an advocate for public safety measures that protect communities while respecting individual rights. She has supported common-sense gun safety reforms, investments in law enforcement training, and improved coordination among public safety agencies. Her legislative work also extends to protecting children and families. She has championed laws like the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act, which addresses child drownings by requiring safety standards for public pools and spas. These efforts reflect her broader commitment to legislation that has a tangible impact on everyday lives. While Congress is often marked by partisan gridlock, Debbie Wasserman Schultz has shown an ability to collaborate with colleagues from both sides of the aisle. Her bipartisan efforts on anti-hate initiatives, healthcare reform, and safety legislation demonstrate her belief that meaningful change requires cooperation and dialogue, even among political opponents. This approach has allowed her to move forward on initiatives that might otherwise stall in a divided political climate. By focusing on shared values such as safety, health, and equality, she has been able to advance legislation that benefits a broad range of Americans. As she continues her work in Congress, Debbie Wasserman Schultz remains committed to her core mission: defending civil rights, improving healthcare access, and safeguarding communities. She has made it clear that she sees these priorities as interconnected, with each influencing the strength and resilience of the nation as a whole. Her ongoing legislative efforts, from combating hate crimes to expanding medical testing access, are grounded in a belief that the government should be both responsive and proactive in addressing the needs of its people. This vision, combined with her experience and willingness to work across political divides, positions her as a significant force in shaping policy on some of the most pressing issues facing the country today. For constituents in Florida and for Americans across the nation, Debbie Wasserman Schultz continues to serve as a steadfast advocate, ensuring that civil rights, healthcare, and public safety remain at the top of the congressional agenda. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

Why UnitedHealth Stock Is Skyrocketing Today (Hint: Warren Buffett)
Why UnitedHealth Stock Is Skyrocketing Today (Hint: Warren Buffett)

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why UnitedHealth Stock Is Skyrocketing Today (Hint: Warren Buffett)

Key Points Berkshire Hathaway's latest SEC filing revealed that the company has taken a $1.6 billion stake in UnitedHealth Group. Berkshire added a few others while reducing stakes in both Apple and Bank of America. UnitedHealth has faced several challenges this year, including the revelation of multiple DOJ investigations and the resignation of its CEO. 10 stocks we like better than UnitedHealth Group › Shares of UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH) are jumping on Friday, up 13.8% as of 2:14 p.m. ET. The spike comes as the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) declined 0.1% and the Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX: ^IXIC) fell 0.3%. The troubled health insurance giant is finally seeing its stock rebound after months of trouble, thanks to the purchase of 5 million shares by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway. Berkshire buys UNH Berkshire Hathaway's latest regulatory filing revealed that the company took a considerable stake in UnitedHealth. The 5 million-share, $1.6 billion stake makes the massive health insurer the 18th-biggest position in Berkshire's portfolio. Buffett's company also trimmed its positions in Apple and Bank of America. The move took Wall Street by surprise, given the many issues UnitedHealth faces, and the revelation sent shares soaring immediately. UnitedHealth is struggling The company's most recent quarterly report revealed a darkening financial picture, including a significant miss on earnings per share, as costs from medical care continue to balloon. The company was also forced to suspend guidance as it tries to adapt to the shifting market. Its financial woes are far from the company's only issues, having recently suffered the sudden departure of its CEO for "personal reasons." The departure comes as the company faces two Department of Justice (DOJ) probes -- one criminal and one civil -- into its Medicare billing practices. Buyer beware It's hard to disagree with the Oracle of Omaha, but there are just too many issues facing UnitedHealth at the moment and with no clear picture of an imminent turnaround. I would stay away from the stock. Should you invest $1,000 in UnitedHealth Group right now? Before you buy stock in UnitedHealth Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and UnitedHealth Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Johnny Rice has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool recommends UnitedHealth Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why UnitedHealth Stock Is Skyrocketing Today (Hint: Warren Buffett) was originally published by The Motley Fool

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store