
Bloomberg Invest: Blue Owl Co-CEO Marc Lipschultz on the Growing Dominance of Private Credit
CC-Transcript
00:00Alix Steel Paul Sweeney. We are live here at the Bloomberg Invest 2025 Conference down here at Brookfield Place, formerly known as World Financial Center. I used to hang a shingle down here Merrill Lynch back in the day. So good memories here. I tell you, if I were to come back on the street, Alex again. Yeah, I'm telling you, private credit might be the place I go. I mean, I went. I went to the Chase Manhattan Bank Credit trading program. The best on the street. I could go run circles around these guys. I should have done that. Marc Lipschultz joins us, hitting CEO Blue Owl Capital, speaking here at our conference here today. We appreciate getting a few minutes of your time, Mark. Talk to us about Blue out, how you guys fit into the private credit business because Alex are just amazed at the the funds that are flowing into that market. Well, first I have to find out how to recruit you to join can for the best of the best of blue collar, open ended training all about the people it is. And I also want to say it's great to be back down here. I my first apartment in New York when I moved here in 1991 to work at Goldman Sachs, when it was at 85 Broad Street, right down that street. Me too. That's where Salomon Brothers put us up back in the day. So I could say I lived down here on a water view and all that kind of stuff. Lovely to some private credit. You guys are just a part of it. Just an amazing asset class. Well, we've been very fortunate to be part of an asset class. And, you know, I play our role in helping of all. But look, private credit to set the stage right, is about taking long term capital from investors. And we've tried to broaden the range of people that have access to it and to be able to provide that capital to corporate users to support their growth with a view to the long term and to be here on a day when, you know, the public market is so volatile, you know, in some ways is very much a reminder of why private credit works for investors, but also why it's important because, look, we're all doing business today. We're making loans today just like we were yesterday, just like we will tomorrow. You know, screen router, screen, blue screen green, prefer green. Yeah, I should disclose that to my money manager. I do own shares in Blue Owl Private credit. I do have some of that. I feel like I need to say that. Thank you, but not through me to my money guy. So help me understand the competitive landscape though, because it feels like banks now want to get a slice of the private credit market that they had to give up. And now we're seeing some partnerships with private credit shops. How do you look at it? Yeah, the evolving landscape with the banks is pretty interesting. Let's make a couple observations that the word like reference in the bank market I think is worth unpacking a little bit because as as obviously we'll know when we go back to 30 years ago, I started in the private markets. The alternative market wasn't called that at the time and we actually borrowed money from the banks when we were doing an LPL, as it was called. Then literally from their balance sheets that over the last 30 years has been on a long trajectory changing from being a lender to now. Banks don't lend to these companies at all, and that's been true for a while. They intermediate right? They'll go in and they'll underwrite a loan and then sell it into the market, cut it into pieces and sell it. And so in that regard, of course, that's an alternative way to finance a business. And we could talk about the pluses and minuses of both. It's great to have both markets. You want to have a good, vibrant bank intermediated market. But remember, what the bank here is about is can I underwrite the loan and sell it in the next 60 days? So the red screen today is traumatic for a decision for a bank to underwrite alone. On the other hand, word of the exact opposite. It doesn't really matter. Tell us what's happening in the market today. What matters to us is do we get paid back five, six, seven years ago? That's our decision. That's what we're focused on. So in that sense, we really live in kind of with different incentives and serve a different function. However, to the good point, the banks are saying, okay, but it turns out private credit really does work, right? They spent a lot of time criticizing the market and trying different ways to maybe scare up the boogeyman. But now they, in fact, are actually launching funds to do private credit. So I'd start with look of capital join them. And we that's great. Well, we'll take the endorsement of the market. It's a big world credit. It's a multitrillion dollar asset class, multi-trillion dollar marketplace. We need vibrant available capital. And having your bank launch a fund, you know, great. There's a lot of funds in the world and some of those will be done in partnerships, as you noted, and some of those be standalone efforts and some will just continue to stay the course, do their traditional underwriting. What's a typical deal for Blue Owl these days? So a typical deal for us, and this has been true for us from the beginning. Obviously the attributes of the size have changed, but over the last roughly ten years that we've built Blue Owl, our reason to be was to come in and say, Look, we want private credit to become the lender of first choice as opposed to the lender of last resort and private credit. If you go back before that time was really a lender of last resort. It's where you went. If you could get money from a mainstream source. As I said, I was at KKR. For 21 years. And during that time, I don't recall ever working with a private laundry. That just wasn't what you did if you were a mainstream borrower. But the idea for Blue Collar and today, so to answer this question has been to create actually a real value proposition in having a partner to really work with a long dated capital pool for someone who has long dated needs and long dated ambitions with their business. So our typical company today, often backed by a private equity firm, a sponsor. Sometimes it's just private family owned businesses or other corporate enterprises, but typically a private equity backed business. And they're buying a very large company and they're looking for a long term partner to buy it. So typically when we do a transaction, we're lending maybe 40% of the purchase price and the buyer is putting up 60% of the capital. So that's a very, very low leverage structure compared to what people are used to. If you go back again ten years, 20 years, and the company today, our average company in our portfolio has over $200 million of EBIT. These are big companies today and that's been a dramatic shift from ten years ago when it was really a market for smaller businesses. So let's get to that 5 to 7 year time horizon, because ten years ago, about the exact same conversation I'd be having with private equity. Right. And then we see where things get tough and things get stickier when vintages don't work out or come under at different times of market stress, how does that apply to the credit space? So I think it applies for sure in the sense that every market evolves and every market will have its maybe slightly higher and lower moments. But there's an important distinction. At the end of the day, private equity, if I can use this metaphor, private equity, which is a business I personally participated in for decades, is about mining for gold, right? It's about going out. And maybe in our simplified parlance you might call them the get rich strategy. Just how do you go out there and shoot the moon on great returns? So they're mining for gold. Our business in private credit is to be the picks and shovels provider to those miners. So we're not trying to find a big gold vein. We're not betting on the price of gold. What we're saying is if the miners are active and miners in this case would be any corporate user of capital. So they are always active. We want to supply them and we take a less risky position and we expect a corollary attractive return. So on the one hand, of course, every market evolves and I want to suggest any busy lives in a vacuum. But the purpose of our strategies and the purpose of private credit from private credit from an investors point of view, is to have something that's much more about downside protection, stability and income generation through times of uncertainty, which is a bit why I say this sort of red environment today is actually a good time to have the conversation because we're trying to build our portfolios and successfully have done over $100 Billion of loans and are running lost rates have been 11 basis points. And I think it speaks to the idea that this is about durability and predictability when times are uncertain. And I think it's probably safe to say today everyone is looking around saying, gosh, it feels uncertain out there. Mark, we got about a minute left. What do you say to those folks who say as the business evolves, the dollars get bigger, regulation is needed? What do you say to those folks? Well, we're a highly regulated business as is. So your today. Look, we're we're regulated by the FCC. We're a public company asset manager. We have public vehicles. We have a we have a lot of regulators we work with constructively. Happy to do it. I don't think if what we mean by more regulation is more direction from sort of a central source as to what you should or shouldn't lend money to. Remember, when we look back where the sources of problems have been, they actually tend to be in the regulated institutions, not outside even recently. Of course, everyone remembers the financial crisis. But don't forget, over the last few years, as private credit has thrived, one of the moments we worked through was the run on the bank at Silicon Valley Bank. Yeah. So you know what's old is new. If you have one day capital and you do long term things with it, that's challenging. We have long term capital to do long term things. So I think at the end of the day, look, we don't touch depositors. We're not systemic. So what's a nice complement to a traditional banking market and a public marketplace? Great stuff, Mark, Thank you so much for your time. Mark Lipschultz, Blue Owl Capital Co CEO, talking about the private credit business and what a growth business it has been for sure.
For YouLive TV
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNET
9 hours ago
- CNET
Trump Tariffs Likely to Raise Prices on Refrigerators, Washers and More. How to Save on Appliance Purchases This Year
Trump's new steel and aluminum tariffs could increase the price of appliances. Jeffrey Hazelwood/CNET Key takeaways Tariffs imposed by the Trump administration, including the recently doubled 50% tariff on imported steel and aluminum products are expected to drive up prices for home appliances. Appliances with imported components and those assembled outside of the US, like refrigerators, dishwashers and washing machines, are especially vulnerable to price hikes due to tariffs. Smart appliances may face even higher price increases if additional tariffs are placed on semiconductor chips. Experts recommend purchasing necessary appliances sooner rather than later to avoid price hikes and suggest looking to sales to save money. Over the last few months, you've probably heard more than you ever have about tariffs. Tariffs have been a big focus of President Donald Trump's second term and many companies have announced price hikes to offset tariff costs. Trump recently announced new 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports last week, a move that could hit home appliances particularly hard. "We expect home appliance prices to rise this year, especially for mid-range and premium models that rely heavily on imported parts and materials," said David Warrick, executive vice president at Overhaul, a supply chain management platform, and former head of global supply chain technology at Microsoft. Larger home appliances could be the most susceptible to price hikes. "Refrigerators, dishwashers and washing machines are particularly vulnerable because they often include a high percentage of foreign components -- even when final assembly happens in the US," said Warrick. CNET has been covering the Trump administration's tariff policy and changes, and we've already seen manufacturers and retailers raise prices on laptops, toys and groceries. Before you panic-buy a home appliance, here's what you need to know about tariffs and how they could increase appliance prices this year. How do tariffs impact home appliance prices? We could see home appliance prices rise on products that are made in countries hit with tariffs. Because tariffs are paid by the importing company, the costs are typically passed along to the consumer in the form of higher prices, although the price hike may not be a 1-to-1 ratio with the tariff rate. The tariffs that most threaten home appliances include the 50% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports, the 25% tariff on imported goods from Mexico and Canada and the 30% tariff on imports from China. Higher tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China have been temporarily halted but this could change in the coming months. Tariffs don't only apply to assembled products that are made elsewhere and then shipped here to be sold. Many products that are assembled in the US involve imported components. Materials like steel and aluminum are often imported, as are pumps, motors and hoses, so appliances that include those parts could see notable price increases, according to Travis Tokar, a professor of supply chain management at Texas Christian University. How tariffs impact home appliance prices could also vary depending on the type of appliance, the size and where it's manufactured. "A lot of this will depend on the agreement with Mexico since many large appliances are assembled in Mexico," said Patti Jordan, associate professor of professional practice at the Neely School of Business. "Product[s] manufactured primarily in China, such as vacuum cleaners, air purifiers and small appliances, will most definitely be impacted." The Trump administration has also wavered on its tariff policy, making it difficult for the industry to predict what's next. "It's the off-and-on tariff strategy that is leading to the supply chain instability more so than the tariffs -- at least so far," Buffington added. Could smart home appliances see even higher price hikes? There's been talk of separate semiconductor tariffs from the Trump administration that could impact the prices of anything with a smart chip in it, including laptops and smart home tech. If initiated, an additional tariff on semiconductors could raise the cost of smart appliances even more. "Smart appliances will absolutely feel the squeeze if semiconductor tariffs are implemented," Warrick said. "These products -- think smart fridges, ovens, robotic vacuums -- depend on imported chips and modules. The more 'smart' tech built into an appliance, the more exposed it becomes." Shawn DuBravac, CEO and president at Avrio Institute, a business technology research firm, added that lower-priced home appliances that use semiconductor technology might face even bigger price increase percentages, because these items have lower margins and are less able to absorb price increases. Experts also noted that it would be difficult for the government to know when a product has a semiconductor chip and price it appropriately. "Managing this would seem to be impossible," said Jack Buffington, associate professor in supply chain management at the University of Denver. "How would customs be able to determine which products have chips, where they are from, and would there be a tariff by chip or just one tax for any product with one chip?" Since verifying semiconductor would be complicated, DuBravac thinks it's possible that home appliances, particularly those fully manufactured outside of the US, might avoid separate semiconductor tariffs altogether and instead be taxed at their product category rate for the exporting country. "However, home appliances that are manufactured in the US would likely face semiconductor tariffs if the component is imported," DuBravac added. Tariffs aren't the only reason we'll see appliance price hikes Experts expect home appliance prices to rise but tariffs aren't the only culprit. Companies are also looking at other costs when deciding whether to hike prices. "There are many factors that impact the price of a product besides a new tariff. Transportation costs, labor costs and material costs. Appliance manufacturers have to weigh in on the impact of each of these in order to determine the pricing of their product going forward," said Jordan. Which home appliances will see the biggest price hikes from tariffs? It's difficult to predict which way the Trump administration will take its tariff strategy. Based on what's currently implemented and future proposals, experts say the following appliances could see price hikes: Appliances with smart technology, like smart refrigerators or smart washers and dryers could see further increases if additional semiconductor tariffs are imposed. Here's how high prices could rise for each type of home appliance. OK, appliance prices will likely rise. Should I buy now or wait? Currently, the higher tariff pause for China is set to expire on Aug. 12. Most air purifiers would be exempt from the 25% tariffs on Mexico, but this agreement is also set to expire in July. Steel tariffs rose from 25% to 50% on June 4. That makes it tricky to decide if you should purchase a new appliance now or wait to see how President Trump's tariff war pans out. "It is somewhat a roll of the dice," said Jordan. "Right now, much of the inventory came into the US before the tariffs hit so now might be the right time to buy if it is in stock." DuBravac agrees. "My advice is: If you know you'll need it soon, buy now. Prices are more likely to rise than fall in the near term as tariff policy uncertainty looms and importers adjust inventory strategies. Waiting could mean paying more later." That doesn't mean you should panic-buy a new appliance, though. Experts suggest turning to sales like Prime Day and Black Friday to help offset any cost increases. If you know you're going to need a new appliance this year, work toward building a sinking fund -- a short-term savings plan -- and contribute money toward your fund with each paycheck. If you need to finance a purchase, factor in how much interest charges could add to your purchase. Interest rates are still high so if you put the purchase on a credit card and can't pay it off in full in one to two months, you might end up paying more than what a tariff would cost you. FAQs Can buying secondhand appliances save you money? The second-hand shopping market has reignited in the wake of Trump's tariffs and it could be a good way to compromise and fit an appliance purchase into your budget this year. Experts don't expect the secondhand market to see price hikes directly from tariffs but note that it's possible if the demand for secondhand products increases. "The secondhand market is a viable way to save -- at least in the short term," said Warrick, "As new appliance prices rise, more consumers will start considering used options, which could push up demand and eventually prices in that space too. But for now, it's a smart way to avoid tariff-driven sticker shock, especially for larger or smarter appliances." Shopping secondhand or repairing broken appliances won't always save you money, either. Purchasing an older model or fixing certain appliances could cost you more than the machine is worth, said Buffington. "For example, washing machines are around $400 to $1,000 so fixing an appliance or buying something that's 5 years old may not make sense if the lifespan is 10 years."

Wall Street Journal
2 days ago
- Wall Street Journal
Tesla, Cleveland-Cliffs, Dollar General and More Stocks That Defined the Week
U.S. steelmakers rallied on President Trump's recent move to double steel and aluminum tariffs to 50%. Cleveland-Cliffs shares surged 23% on Monday, while Steel Dynamics and Nucor shares each gained 10%. Meantime, bargain chains are bucking the trend of falling retail demand, thanks to an influx of higher-income customers looking for deals. Dollar General shares soared 16% Tuesday. And as a fierce feud between President Trump and Elon Musk ramped up on Thursday. Tesla shares fell 14% Thursday, losing about $152.4 billion in market value, the company's biggest one-day slide on record. Read more about this week's biggest stock moves and the news that drove them:

Wall Street Journal
3 days ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump's New Steel Tariffs Look Vulnerable to a Courtroom Challenge
U.S. steelmaker shares soared on news of President Trump's new tariffs. But are these tariffs as bulletproof as investors seem to believe? The steel tariffs, like those on autos and auto parts, are sector-based. They differ in that respect from the 'Liberation Day' tariffs Trump unveiled in April. The U.S. Court of International Trade in May blocked Trump's tariffs on U.S. trading partners, rejecting the argument that he could invoke emergency powers to set the country-by-country tariffs. An appeals court stayed that ruling, pending its own review. The conventional wisdom in the markets has been that Trump's recent sector-based tariffs are on firmer legal footing. That might not be the case, though. In fact, there is reason to believe his new 50% tariff on imported steel could be vulnerable to a legal challenge. To speed up the process, Trump piggybacked on the findings of a national-security investigation by the Commerce Department in 2018, during his first term. The question now is whether the findings were too stale to be the basis for a new tariff hike, and thus whether Trump should have sought a new national-security investigation first. Going that route would have delayed his CLF 7.04%increase; green up pointing triangle is up 30% since Trump announced his new tariff plans May 30. Nucor NUE 2.37%increase; green up pointing triangle and Steel Dynamics STLD 1.11%increase; green up pointing triangle are up 11% and 9%, respectively. The tariff increase took effect June 4. Trump also relied on Commerce Department findings from his first term in office when raising sector-based tariffs this year on aluminum, autos and auto parts. His directive raising aluminum tariffs to 50% from 25% took effect June 4, as well. While it is too soon to know whether the sectoral tariffs will draw serious court challenges, a look at the legal underpinnings shows potential soft spots. Trump in his June 3 proclamation said he exercised his authority under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to raise steel tariffs to 50% from 25%. In doing so, he cited the Commerce Department's 2018 investigative report that concluded the quantities of steel being imported into the U.S. threatened to harm national security. The trade statute says the president, within 90 days of such a report, shall determine whether he concurs with the findings and decide what action to take in response. After that, he has 15 days to implement the action. A 2021 ruling by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said the deadlines aren't strict and some flexibility is allowed. In that case, Trump waited five months after his initial 2018 action to boost tariffs on imported Turkish steel to 50% from 25%. An importer, Transpacific Steel, sued, and the Court of International Trade ruled against the higher tariffs on Turkish imports, saying Trump had gone past the statutory time limit. (By then, Trump had already returned the tariff on Turkish steel to 25%.) The appellate court reversed that ruling in a 2-1 decision. That decision might have opened the door for Trump to rely on the same 2018 investigative report yet again—seven years later—for his latest tariff boost. However, the appeals court said its ruling applied 'in the circumstances presented here.' A decision could turn out differently in other circumstances, such as where the investigative findings are 'simply too stale to be a basis' for new presidential actions, the court said. Tim Meyer, an international-trade specialist and professor at Duke Law School, said the appeals court's ruling appears to leave room for a plaintiff to challenge the new steel tariffs. 'The tricky part is how to apply the standards the court identifies,' he said. 'For example, what does it mean for a report to be 'stale'? The court seems to suggest that the passage of time might be enough. But how much time is too much time?' Much has happened in the past seven years, including a pandemic. U.S. steel imports were 26.2 million metric tons in 2024, according to the Commerce Department, down 24% since 2017. That point alone could underscore the need for new investigative findings as a predicate for presidential action. Trump in his June 3 proclamation said he also considered 'current information newly provided' by the Commerce Department, but didn't say what it was. Investors will be watching to see if any well-heeled plaintiffs surface to contest the tariffs. Gordon Johnson, chief executive at GLJ Research, in a June 2 note to clients said he believed the surge in steel stocks was premature and that the new 50% tariffs 'could be overturned due to a lack of a new investigation.' He also noted that no one had sought an injunction yet to block them. That said, he wrote, 'we believe there are procedural problems that make these new tariffs vulnerable to a lawsuit.' Steelmaker shares could take a hit if a court invalidated the sectoral tariffs. U.S. automaker stocks, on the other hand, could rally. Of course, the Trump administration could simply initiate new Commerce Department investigations and reinstitute the tariffs later. The net result for investors and the economy ultimately might be just more prolonged uncertainty about Trump's favorite negotiating tool. Write to Jonathan Weil at