logo
Ukrainians Are in Shock

Ukrainians Are in Shock

Yahoo06-03-2025
WHEN I CONSIDER THE PLIGHT of Afghans who worked with U.S. forces in the past, I know in my heart that my country is perfectly capable of abandoning allies. Our bureaucrats and politicians are known to make deadly mistakes and inhuman decisions.
When it comes to the Trump administration's abandonment of Ukraine, however, the process cannot be attributed to a mistake—it is gleeful and openly malicious, and carries tremendous ramifications for the role of the United States in the world.
JD Vance has already accused Ukrainian-Americans like me of dual loyalty. The vice president seems incapable of understanding why anyone would support Ukraine for reasons other than self-interest, but if Putin had invaded, say, Moldova, instead of my native Ukraine, I would feel exactly the same way about him.
Being loyal to my adopted country apparently means being loyal to Vance himself, and his well-documented isolationism and support for nationalist leaders like Viktor Orbán, who is useful—if not outright friendly—to Vladimir Putin and his goal of weakening and humiliating the United States.
Join the best pro-democracy community on the internet. Become a Bulwark+ member.
I don't think Vance—or Trump, for that matter—really understands Putin's burning hostility toward all Americans, especially American leaders. As I like to point out to fellow Americans, we hardly think about Russia at all, and thus can't imagine the seething hatred many Russians have for us.
Since Trump and Vance's disastrous meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office, since aid was stopped, and since intelligence sharing has also been paused, I've found myself as the designated recipient of the grief of friends and relatives in the country of my birth.
'We have been so grateful for the years of aid,' my late father's old friend, whom everyone calls Uncle Yurchik, told me, making me flinch as I remembered Vance's brazen lies about Ukraine's lack of gratitude. 'It feels impossible that a world leader like the U.S. would leave its allies to be torn apart.'
Yurchik and I spent the first weeks of the full-scale invasion on the phone constantly, chatting while he sheltered in a basement with his grandchildren. He had faith then, and he has it today. But few Americans, even sympathetic ones, can understand the truth of what Russia stands for, the truth that Yurchik knows and carries in his body, marked with illness and stress.
'Wherever Russia shows up, destruction and death follow,' Yurchik told me, referencing not only Ukraine, but also Syria, Georgia, West Africa, and other places. For people who haven't heard Russian planes screaming overhead, perhaps his words ring hollow. It's one thing to see videos of bombs and sterile explosions on social media or the news. It's another to hear, on the other end of the line, Yurchik in his basement, and to know that far above, another man in the cockpit of a bomber is trying to kill him.
Share
Russia has designs beyond Ukraine, and America is not exempt from them. If they can't attack us directly for now, they are sowing discord between us, so that we may do their job for them. Thanks in part to Russian provocation, Americans are more bitterly divided than we've been in generations, while the Kremlin's most provocative yet honest mouthpiece, Dmitry Medvedev, signals Russian designs on Alaska.
My fellow Second Amendment enthusiasts frequently point out that locals alone could defend Alaska quite nicely, but they forget about the long-term damage that disinformation and plain disorientation can have on people. They laugh about how we have superior weapons, not understanding that a weapon that destroys the American mind over time is not so easily overcome—the Orbánism on display in the highest office in the land is proof of that already. This is what Zelensky meant when, during the Oval Office catastrophe, he talked about how the ocean won't protect us, only to be jeered and dismissed.
Among my friends fighting off Russians on the front lines today, the only response to the Trump administration has been the word 'shock.' I've heard it over and over again, and while I'm jaded enough to not be shocked myself, I cannot ask them for more at this time. They've seen it all by now—rotting bodies in trenches, women and children following brutal rapes, blood on nursery room floors, little old ladies starving in ruined apartment blocks. To see all that and realize that the United States does not have your back any longer—what is there but shock?
Join now
Behind the front lines, my old friend, the radical feminist Mariya Dmytreva, a frequent critic of Zelensky, wrote to tell me that she 'expected better from Americans, who have been preaching for decades the virtue of democracy and honor.' I couldn't argue. I couldn't even object, 'Not all Americans!', not even as a joke—the caveat is too feeble. Abandoning our allies is a blight that mars us all.
American power likes to flex its muscle, and rightly so. As I often tell my friends and neighbors, a world ruled by the likes of China and Russia is not a world that anyone would want to live in.
Yet true strength does not mean stabbing a weaker ally in the back. Strong leaders and strong societies do not revel in the rapes and executions of the vulnerable.
'America First' is our own self-doubt, dressed up as robust, no-nonsense foreign policy. Because only an American who doubts our place in the world would copy and endorse Russian propaganda—as now de-facto president Elon Musk did, for example, when he labeled the transfer of Crimea to Ukraine as Khrushchev's mistake.
I agree with fellow Americans who say that Europe should start pulling its weight—increased defense spending is crucial. Europe can't afford to be a museum—and besides, even museums have guards. But with our Orbánist vice president trashing Europe as it aims to step up in Ukraine (because, and I hate that it even needs to be spelled out, Putin is a threat to the continent as a whole), I get the feeling that this won't be good enough for the current administration, either.
Russia doesn't have allies. It has nations it dominates and bullies and coerces, and nations it wishes to dominate and bully and coerce. How dissimilar is that foreign policy from America's now?
Share The Bulwark
Of course, Russia also has a tremendous gap between the rich and poor, and a docile, cowed populace that takes whatever scraps the elite throws its way. And I can't help but think that this gap looks attractive to our billionaires. We are in a new Gilded Age, albeit a tremendously stupid one.
The Trump administration's fact-free nihilism is also familiar to anyone who's observed Putin for more than five minutes. Trump administration's insistence that Ukraine is somehow responsible for Russia's invasion—these are the claims of a torturer who wants to break you until you knowingly repeat a lie, and the actions of Russia itself as it insists it attacked Ukraine in self-defense.
'How can a country that was attacked be responsible for starting a war?' Another old friend in Ukraine, Anatoly, asked me after he read Trump's statements. Like many Ukrainians, Anatoly has spent a large portion of his recent years hiding from missiles and drones instead of enjoying his retirement. He is a Russian speaker who used to have friends in Russia, the kind of person Russians claim they are 'protecting' in Ukraine, even as they seek to murder him and his family.
I had no easy answer for Anatoly, besides the fact that this state of unreality is expedient to those who wish to wash their hands of him.
The illusion that it will all be okay should be shelved for now. I love the United States with the entirety of my broken heart—this country welcomed me and saved me long ago, and made me into the person I am today—which is why I refuse to dabble in illusions on its behalf.
I also, however, dabble in hope. A humble hope, and not the pompous kind, because pompousness leads us nowhere. A hope born of many years watching the world fall apart and realign itself around me.
The gears of history are turning and some of us will be ground down, but maybe future generations will build things from our dust.
Share
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel-Hamas war roils Somerville mayoral race
Israel-Hamas war roils Somerville mayoral race

Boston Globe

time8 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Israel-Hamas war roils Somerville mayoral race

Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Alain Jehlen Advertisement Somerville Outrage against Israel makes Jews a target Shira Schoenberg is right but too lenient in her op-ed 'Could Somerville mayoral hopeful Willie Burnley fairly represent Zionist constituents?' Willie Burnley Jr. can't represent Somerville Zionists. He can't represent Jews; and in being bad for Jews, he's bad for Americans. Oct. 7, 2023, gave license to target Jews in ways that, if aimed at other minorities, would spark outrage. Once such actions are normalized against Jews, they become normalized against any group the mob targets. Jew hate was primed to erupt. Advertisement No other minority faces such mob punishment. Not the Chinese for Communist Party terror against Tibetans, Uyghurs, or Hong Kong; Arabs for horrors in Iraq or Syria; or Muslims for jihadist massacres in Africa. Only Jews. In doing so, radicals target all Americans who hold to the proposition that all are created equal and, out of many, one. In siding with them, Burnley and others don't just endanger Jews; they also threaten those principles and Americans who live by them. Steve Spear Brookline Still waiting to hear a certain condemnation from Burnley Shira Schoenberg's otherwise excellent op-ed about Willie Burnley Jr.'s campaign for mayor of Somerville noted that Burnley has been compared with New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. The comparison is faulty and unfair. Mamdani Burnley has failed to make any such statements, to my knowledge. In fact, on Aug. 7, I saw him at a 'Somerville for Palestine' rally and press conference in front of City Hall, where I politely asked him, 'How would you characterize what Hamas did on Oct. 7, 2023?' He looked at me and then, instead of answering, simply walked away. Ken Brociner Somerville Divestment would make Somerville more welcoming, not less As a Jewish resident of Massachusetts who has donated to Zohran Mamdani and canvassed for Willie Burnley Jr., I felt misrepresented when I read the phrase 'Both are raising fears among many Jewish, Zionist constituents' in Shira Schoenberg's Aug. 11 op-ed. This narrative implies that Jewish and Zionist are two identities that overlap, which couldn't be further from the truth and dangerously casts the Jewish community as universally supportive of Israel's actions. Advertisement Mamdani, rather than being a bogeyman in the Jewish community, is the leading candidate within it with a To hold that it is antisemitic to say that Somerville should not be investing in companies involved in war crimes is as ridiculous as saying that the divestment movement over South African apartheid in the 1980s promoted hatred against white people. Making Somerville a welcoming place doesn't mean avoiding these questions so as not to offend anyone; it means upholding our values of equality and human rights by divesting from entities involved with human rights violations and Israel's racist policies. Sam Levine Lexington At least the candidate is transparent Somerville mayoral candidate Willie Burnley Jr. has dealt with voters fairly by making his views about Israel clear. Voters can take these views into account. All politicians should be so transparent. Felicia Nimue Ackerman Providence

'Nuclear Power': NATO Ally Issues Trump Credibility Warning Over Russia
'Nuclear Power': NATO Ally Issues Trump Credibility Warning Over Russia

Newsweek

time9 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

'Nuclear Power': NATO Ally Issues Trump Credibility Warning Over Russia

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. French President Emmanuel Macron warned that the global credibility of the U.S. and its NATO allies is on the line in Ukraine, as President Donald Trump attempts to end the Russian invasion once and for all. There remain significant barriers to a settlement that ends the conflict, most notably on territorial control. Ukraine has consistently said it is constitutionally bound not to cede any of the fifth of its territory that Russia has seized. Kyiv and its European allies have urged Trump not to reward Russia for its aggression in Ukraine, saying it has broader consequences for security on the continent, fearing Moscow has similar ambitions elsewhere in the former Soviet sphere. "What's happening in Ukraine is extremely important for Ukrainian people, obviously, but for the whole security of Europe," Macron told NBC News's Kristen Welker in an interview after a multilateral White House meeting with Trump. "Because we speak about containing a nuclear power, which decided just not to respect international borders anymore. And I think it's very important for your country, because it's a matter of credibility. "The way we will behave in Ukraine will be a test for our collective credibility in the rest of the world." This is a developing article. Updates to follow.

Judge issues injunction preventing Trump's FTC from investigating watchdog Media Matters

time10 minutes ago

Judge issues injunction preventing Trump's FTC from investigating watchdog Media Matters

WASHINGTON -- A federal judge has issued an injunction preventing the Trump administration's Federal Trade Commission from investigating Media Matters for America, the liberal media watchdog group that had alleged the spread of hate speech on X since Elon Musk acquired the social media platform. U.S. District Court Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan ruled Friday that the FTC's probe of Media Matters, 'purportedly to investigate an advertiser boycott concerning social media platforms,' represents a clear violation of the group's freedom of speech. 'It should alarm all Americans when the government retaliates against individuals or organizations for engaging in constitutionally protected public debate,' Sooknanan wrote. Even before the FTC got involved, Media Matters has been defending itself against a lawsuit by Musk following the organization's November 2023 story that, following Musk's purchase of the social media site once known as Twitter, antisemitic posts and other offensive content were appearing next to advertisements there. Sooknanan said the injunction halting any FTC probe was merited because Media Matters is likely to succeed on its claim that the FTC is being used to retaliate against it for a critical article on a Trump supporter. 'The court's ruling demonstrates the importance of fighting over folding, which far too many are doing when confronted with intimidation from the Trump administration,' said Angelo Carusone, chairman and president of Media Matters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store