
What we know about the secret Afghan relocation scheme
Thousands of Afghan people – some of whom had worked with British forces in the country – have been secretly relocated to the UK as a direct result of the leak, at an additional cost of more than £850m.
The breach has been subject to a superinjunction since August 2023, meaning journalists were banned from disclosing anything about it – or even the fact that an injunction existed.
The superinjunction, which is the first ever requested by a British government and the longest in history, was lifted by the high court on Tuesday, which is why details of the leak and response can now be revealed.
The leak in February 2022 was the result of an error by a defence official, who had been tasked with verifying applications to the Afghanistan Resettlement and Assistance Policy (Arap) resettlement scheme, designed for Afghans who had worked for British forces in the country.
Working outside authorised government systems, he contacted a number of Afghans in the UK, believing he was sending a list of 150 names. Instead, he had emailed a copy of the entire list of applicants, from where it was passed on to others in Afghanistan.
The Times reported the official was a British soldier based at Regent's Park barracks, the headquarters of the UK special forces.
The leaked dataset contained the personal details of 18,800 individuals who were applying for resettlement along with their family members, including their phone numbers and in some cases addresses, amounting to 33,000 lines of data. Some emails of British government officials were also disclosed.
It was discovered in August 2023 by an activist who was helping Afghans who had worked for UK forces. One of her contacts alerted her in alarm saying that an anonymous member of a Facebook group had said he had the database and was threatening to post it in full.
She immediately contacted the MoD, saying: 'The Taliban may now have a 33,000-long kill list – essentially provided to them by the British government. If any of these families are murdered, the government will be liable.' The discovery was 'simply bone-chilling', she wrote.
The realisation sparked panic in Whitehall, and an immediate hunt for the source of the leak. At the same time, UK officials contacted 1,800 Arap applicants in Pakistan warning them that they might be in danger.
The MoD asked Facebook to remove the post, citing the 'risk of physical harm'. It then launched a top secret initiative, named Operation Rubific, to secretly evacuate to the UK those deemed most at risk of Taliban assassination – although tens of thousands would be left behind.
After a number of journalists became aware of the leak within days of its disclosure to the MoD, Ben Wallace, then the defence secretary, asked the high court for an order banning any mention of the breach.
On 1 September 2023 the judge Mr Justice Knowles granted a three-month
superinjunction 'against the world', rather than named individuals, the first of its kind. Another judge extended it the following February, saying there was a 'real possibility that it is serving to protect' those named in the leaked database.
However he cautioned: 'What is clear is that the government has decided to offer help to only a very small proportion of those whose lives have been endangered by the data incident and that the decisions in this regard are being taken without any opportunity for scrutiny through the media or in parliament.'
The injuction was later extended further, despite challenges from four media organisations. The government cited concerns of retribution from the Taliban against those named.
In December 2023 a covert new scheme called the Afghanistan Response Route (ARR), was set up to evacuate to the UK some individuals on the list who were ineligible for Arap. Though it was initially set up to resettle around 200 'principals' and their families, to date 900 individuals and 3,600 family members have been brought to Britain or are in transit via ARR, at a cost of £400m.
Taking into account the wider schemes, other official figures show that so far the government has relocated 35,245 Afghans to Britain, of whom 16,156 were among those affected by the data leak.
The present defence minister, John Healey, had been briefed on the leak while in opposition, but said on Tuesday that other cabinet members had only become aware of the situation after Labour was elected to government in July 2024.
On taking office he 'began straightway to take a hard look at the policy complexities, costs, risks, court hearings and the range of Afghan relocation schemes being run across government', he told parliament on Tuesday.
In January, he commissioned a former senior civil servant, Paul Rimmer, to conduct an independent review. He concluded that, nearly four years into Taliban rule of Afghanistan, the leaked data 'may not have spread nearly as widely as initially feared', and 'there is little evidence of intent by the Taliban to conduct a campaign of retribution' against those on the leaked list.
The review concluded that the ARR scheme 'may now be disproportionate to the actual impact of the data loss'.
As a result, the government told the high court on Tuesday that the superinjunction should be discontinued. In his ruling, Mr Justice Chamberlain described the cost of the plans as amounting to 'the sort of money which makes a material difference to government spending plans and is normally the stuff of political debate'.
The ARR has now closed, Healey told MPs, although he said 600 'invitations' that had already been granted to individuals and their families would be honoured. 'When this nation makes a promise, we should keep it,' he said.
He also offered 'a sincere apology on behalf of the British government', which was echoed by the Conservative shadow defence minister, James Cartlidge.
MoD figures published on Tuesday show that across several Afghan resettlement schemes, the numbers of those who have already come to the UK and those who have not yet travelled total 56,100 people, including family members.
The estimated total cost of all resettlement schemes is now £5.5-6bn. The covert ARR scheme set up specifically in response to the leak is expected to cost £850m.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
24 minutes ago
- Times
A neighbour is blocking our property sale — what can we do?
We are leaseholders of a downstairs maisonette in a building where we also have a share of the freehold. We are selling the property but the joint freeholder, who owns the flat upstairs, is refusing to co-operate. She is making unreasonable and ever-changing demands, such as demanding payment, access to our garden, cancellation of a previous debt and alterations to the lease. She has refused to sign the TR1 [ownership transfer form] to transfer the freehold share to our buyer, effectively blocking the sale. In the past, she has been abusive towards us and our tenants, resulting in police involvement and an Asbo. She is now refusing to communicate or engage in mediation, leaving us unable to proceed. We are seeking advice on how to resolve this deadlock. What legal options do we have to enable the sale of our property?DP • Read more expert advice on property, interiors and home improvement This is an extremely challenging situation and you have my sympathy. There are no easy or perfect answers but I have set out some possible options for you below: The real challenge for you is that you need simultaneously to resolve two problems: the refusal to sign the TR1 and the difficulty of physically selling the home. Dealing with the (easier) TR1 issue first, it is possible to make a relatively straightforward application to court under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. Section 14 enables the court to make an order for sale of the freehold without the co-freeholder's signature on the TR1. Turning to the issue of actually making the sale, you could issue a claim against your neighbour, seeking an injunction restraining her from causing a nuisance. However, not only would that be expensive and somewhat risky, there is no guarantee it would convince prospective buyers that nuisance issues would not reoccur. And a buyer might be concerned about potential issues when they themselves come to sell the property. One alternative is to sell the property in an auction. Via that method, you could find a buyer who is willing to overlook potential issues, for example an investor who doesn't intend to occupy the property. You may have to sell for less than you would like but at least you would have resolved the problem. One other option — subject to your budget, obviously — would be to offer to buy the neighbour's flat. You would then control the whole property. I realise that your neighbour has proven difficult to negotiate with, but at this point nothing should be off the table. I do hope you manage to find a Cracknell, partner, Russell-Cooke, I've had dark grey limestone paving laid on my new terrace. I left a tree in the middle of the terrace for the birds to enjoy. However, the birds are seriously disrespecting my new paving — even a low-pressure hose used daily doesn't remove their mess completely. I've tried hanging reflective deterrent rods in the tree, and also photos of birds of prey, but these haven't worked. Short of removing the tree, do readers have any tips for cleaning the bird mess effectively without damaging the paving?SB Get a decoy bird (such as a hawk) and mount it on a stake close to the tree in question. Ideally, move the decoy around regularly to stop the birds getting familiar with it, and keep it as high up as possible. Most garden centres sell Evans Sprinkle cheap supermarket biological washing powder on the wet paving. Leave for an hour or so. Brush. Sluice. Works a treat. And no harm to the stone. J Walters Use a diluted solution of Wet & Forget mould remover (£12.50, Simply spray on the paving when dry (and no rain is forecast for a few hours). The solution should keep the paving clean and new-looking for some Hollowday I fold strips of silver foil (into three to make them rigid) and attach them to the branches of my fruit trees. The birds get spooked by the strips flapping in the wind. Much less hassle and far kinder than directing a hose at How can I remove oily head-hair marks from the surface of an aniline leather sofa?Brian Hayward I've bought a new kitchen and have chosen Ikea carcasses and bespoke fronts from a specialist company. The carcasses have been installed but I'll have to wait about three months before the fronts arrive. Do any readers have tips for living with a kitchen without door fronts for this amount of time? Or any affordable temporary solutions?Veronica, Leyton Send tips and questions to homehelp@ Advice given without responsibility


Daily Mirror
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Huge seaside resort built for 20k tourists bans foreigners weeks after opening
Despite years of delays and a grand opening ceremony, the world's most controversial Benidorm-inspired seaside resort has 'temporarily' prohibited foreign travellers from visiting A Benidorm-inspired seaside resort with 2.5 miles of golden sandy beach has sensationally banned foreigners from visiting, just 17 days after its grand opening. The Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Zone might look like any other coastal destination at first glance. Complete with 43 hotels and camping sites that hold capacity for a whopping 20,000 visitors, the resort boasts a huge water park with thrilling slides, a cinema, theatre, 'recreation centre', and pristine beach. However, this seaside haven isn't located on the sunny Costa Blanca (although it is rumoured to be based on the Spanish hotspot). Instead, it's situated in the cruel dictatorship of North Korea, which has been accused of a series of gross human rights violations. These include detaining residents in prison camps for trying to flee, severely restricting the rights to freedom of expression, and rejecting international aid while people starved due to food shortages. But in 2017, North Korea sent a delegation on a trip to Benidorm so officials could take note of how the hotspot had designed many of its hotels and attractions. Following years of delay, the tourist park - believed to be a crucial part of Kim Jong Un's ambitions to boost tourism in the country - opened on July 1 this year. According to reports, the first droves of Russian tourists arrived at the resort earlier this month, with Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov branding the project a 'good tourist attraction' that he hoped would become popular amongst Russians. However, on July 18, North Korea updated its tourism website, declaring that foreigners are 'temporarily' not allowed to visit. This follows North Korea's decision to abruptly halt tourism from the West - including travellers from France, Germany and the UK, back in February. At the time of writing, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) advises against all but essential travel to North Korea. "The level of tension on the Korean Peninsula remains high. While daily life in the capital city, Pyongyang, may appear calm, the security situation in North Korea can change quickly with no advance warning about possible actions by the authorities," the body warns. "This poses significant risks to British visitors and residents." Even before the site had actually opened, it garnered heavy criticism from human rights groups - including the UN which warned of 'shock brigades'. This is where workers are subject to harsh conditions and long working hours without adequate compensation. Cho Chung Hui, a North Korean who effectively defected from the country, witnessed some of these brutal conditions, although he wasn't directly involved in building the resort. "The principle behind these [brigades] was that no matter what, you had to complete the task, even if it cost you your life," he told the BBC. "I saw many women who were under so much physical strain and eating so poorly that their periods stopped altogether."


The Sun
24 minutes ago
- The Sun
‘Masked shooter' guns down three people in broad daylight ‘drive-by attack' as cops launch manhunt
A MANHUNT has been launched after a "masked shooter" gunned down three people in an alleged drive-by attack. Cops scrambled to Bulay Road in Huddersfield just after 3pm yesterday following reports a firearm had been discharged. West Yorkshire Police said three men sustained injuries and were taken to hospital for treatment. The suspects were seen fleeing the scene in a vehicle, said cops. Officers remain in the area to in carry out investigations and to reassure residents. Anyone who saw or who has footage of the incident has been asked to contact police. Eyewitnesses claimed the shots were fired from a car earlier this afternoon and left three men injured. "I was walking up Bulay Road and then I saw a black car and the driver wound down the window," one told Yorkshire Live. "Three shots were fired and he drove off. He had a full balaclava on." West Yorkshire Police said in a full statement: "Police were called to Bulay Road, Huddersfield at 3.02pm this afternoon to a report a firearm had been discharged there. "Three males were reported to have sustained injuries, with suspects fleeing the scene in a vehicle. "Emergency services attended and the victims have been taken to hospital for treatment " Initial enquiries are ongoing and a number of officers are currently in the area to investigate the incident, and also reassure residents. "Anyone who saw or has footage of what occurred is asked to contact Kirklees Police on 999 referencing police log 1114 of 22 July. "Information can also be given to the independent Crimestoppers charity anonymously on 0800 555 111." Yorkshire Ambulance Service said yesterday: "A number of ambulance resources attended an incident on Bulay Road this afternoon."