WA bill would require ‘egregious speeders' to install speed-limiting device in vehicles
House Bill 1596, which has passed both the House and Senate, is scheduled to be signed into law Monday. The legislation targets 'egregious speeders,' such as repeat offenders and reckless drivers.
State Rep. Mari Leavitt, the bill's primary sponsor, said the legislation was created after a deadly crash in Renton in 2024 involving a 17-year-old driver who sped through an intersection, colliding with another vehicle and killing a mother and three children. Two other children were injured.
'These are targeted to the most egregious speeders—think repeat offenders,' Leavitt said. 'It's a proven technology that's been used in a lot of different areas, including Europe, and the data shows it slows people down—literally and figuratively—because you simply can't go faster than it allows.'
The legislation would require individuals to install an Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA) device if they have been convicted of reckless driving or have at least three moving violations, including one for speeding. The device limits the vehicle's speed and reports data to authorities.
The Washington State Department of Licensing would oversee the program, which aims to reduce serious crashes by giving law enforcement and the courts a new tool to prevent dangerous driving behavior.
'It seems like a good idea,' said Sid Santiano, a local worker. 'The faster you go, the harder it is to avoid people. It's better to keep people capped if they're trying to speed somewhere.'
Not everyone agrees. Ethan Cramer, who said he also opposes speeding, believes the bill doesn't address the root cause.
'The government should have no control over our personal property,' Cramer said. 'It doesn't stop someone from stealing another car and speeding again. Punishing offenders appropriately the first time would be a smarter approach.'
Drivers required to use the ISA who are caught operating a vehicle without the device could face up to $5,000 in fines and potential jail time, Leavitt said.
'There will be consequences—pretty severe consequences—if they choose to drive without a speed limiter,' she said. 'And it applies to any vehicle they drive, not just their own.'
If the bill is signed into law, it's expected to take effect no later than January 1, 2029.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
10 hours ago
- USA Today
With MIchigan sanctions, NCAA sells what's left of soul to join college football money grab
Well, well, well. Look who joined the money grab. The long-awaited penalties for Michigan's illegal advanced scouting scheme were announced Friday, Aug. 15, and the NCAA made clear what's important. Get yours. Everyone else is cashing in on college football's new world, why shouldn't the NCAA? Look at the bright side: the NCAA can use Michigan's unprecedented fine for cheating – it could reach upwards of $35 million – to help pay the $2.8 billion in House case back pay owed to athletes for, you know, cheating them. PATH TO PLAYOFF: Sign up for our college football newsletter Hey, 1.25 percent of $2.8 billion is a start. If this is all confusing, it shouldn't be. There was zero chance the NCAA – which once famously sanctioned Boise State for allowing a recruit to sleep on a couch in the dorms – was laying down the law on one of its prized television properties. Even one that just last year was sanctioned for an entirely separate case of infractions within the football program, thus making Michigan a repeat offender. The worst kind of offender. A you've got to be kidding me, you can't be that stupid to try and break rules again offender. But instead of a postseason ban and/or scholarship/roster spot losses (see: real meat on the enforcement bone), the NCAA chose to reach into Michigan's deep and expansive cash war chest and grab a handful. And why not? If players are making billions from revenue sharing and private NIL deals, if coaches are making the same with fat, guaranteed contracts (some fired and paid to not coach), why can't the NCAA get in on the action? It's all fungible, anyway. Billions in money is changing hands at an alarming rate, and the four principle actors involved barely see it long enough to care. Universities, television partners, coaches, players, and now all the way back to universities with the NCAA's latest capitulation. What's worse, the sport's governing body just threw open the barn doors to (more) rampant cheating. The cost of a national title is now upwards of $35 million. Who wants some? It doesn't matter if you cheat, because the NCAA has no idea how to manage enforcement. It says so right there in the release from the committee on infractions: The NCAA is blaming the "new world of college athletics' for not taking the more significant road of scholarship reductions and postseason bans. The same 'world' the NCAA created in 2021 by approving NIL deals and free player movement nearly simultaneously — without any guardrails in place. By blaming the current 'world,' the NCAA conveniently allows itself a pass from making the difficult yet prudent decision of significant, meaningful penalties to one of its prized pupils. Or as the great Jerry Tarkanian once said, "The NCAA was so made at Kentucky, they gave Cleveland State two more years probation." The NCAA says players were not part of the advanced scouting scheme concocted by Michigan's former low level staffer Connor Stalions, and shouldn't be retroactively punished for it with scholarship reductions and postseason bans. Stalions isn't the villain here, everyone. Jim Harbaugh is. The same Harbaugh who allowed Stalions to infiltrate his program, and approved his illegal scheme. I'm going to say this one more time: there's no chance in hell Harbaugh – the most meticulously organized megalomaniac of a coach this side of Nick Saban – allows anything to happen within his program without full knowledge and approval. He's not allowing some flunky hanging around the program to stand right next to his coordinators on game day, and yell out play calls – so his coordinators could then switch play calls to the corresponding play against Ohio flipping State – without knowing everything about the scheme. Harbaugh is the Michigan football team, and Michigan gaining a competitive advantage because of the scheme is exactly why the Wolverines should've been fined and had scholarships/roster spots eliminated and been given a postseason ban. To say nothing of vacating wins — including those in the 2023 national championship season. HATE RUNS DEEP: Mateer gambling allegations latest SEC rivalry chapter history DESTINED TO FAIL: The Hugh Freeze experiment won't work at Auburn But the committee on infractions pointed to Harbaugh's three-game suspension in 2023, stating it was penalty enough for his part in the scheme. There's not a person on that committee who believes that, but it's good cover. Instead, Michigan will pay a $35 million bounty while nearly everyone in power either lied, obfuscated, or destroyed evidence about an illegal scheme that most certainly played a role in Michigan winning the 2023 national title. Money talks, everyone. It's the new world of NCAA enforcement. Who wants some? Matt Hayes is the senior national college football writer for USA TODAY Sports Network. Follow him on X at @MattHayesCFB.
San Francisco Chronicle
13 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's motivation for accusing Adam Schiff of fraud is clear. But the legal case is not
Sen. Adam Schiff has been on President Donald Trump's hit list for many years — an outspoken critic with a role in both of Trump's impeachments — so it came as no surprise when the president announced a criminal investigation into Schiff's financial transactions. What is far less clear is whether the California Democrat stepped over any legal lines when he bought two homes, on opposite coasts, and listed both of them for a number of years as his 'principal residence,' with potential benefits in mortgage rates and taxes. In 2003, three years after his election to the House of Representatives, Schiff and his wife, Eve, purchased a home in a Maryland suburb for themselves and their two young children. Six years later, the couple bought a condominium in Schiff's House district in Burbank. It was not until 2020 that he reclassified the Maryland home as a 'secondary' residence. Home owners can claim a tax deduction on mortgage payments for their primary residence, and Schiff says he took a deduction only on the condominium, saving $70 per year. They may also qualify for lower mortgage payments, and Schiff's office — while insisting that he has never misled his lenders — has not responded to questions on whether he sought reduced payments on either residence. The transactions came to Trump's attention last month. 'I have always suspected Shifty Adam Schiff was a scam artist,' Trump said in a July 15 post on his Truth Social network. Now, he said, federal financial investigators have found that 'Schiff has engaged in a sustained pattern of possible mortgage fraud,' and Ed Martin — designated 'special attorney' by Trump's Justice Department after he failed to win Senate confirmation as a U.S. attorney — will look into possible criminal charges. Schiff, unsurprisingly, called it a baseless smear, 'Donald Trump's latest attempt at political retaliation against his perceived enemies.' And Schiff, who served 24 years in the House before his Senate election last November, has been on Trump's enemies list at least since 2019, when he played a lead role in the congressional investigation that led to Trump's first impeachment. That followed disclosures that Trump had withheld congressionally approved military aid from Ukraine to pressure the nation's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, to announce an investigation of Democratic candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter. In 2021, Schiff also took part in the investigation that resulted in Trump's impeachment by the House for helping to incite the attack on the U.S. Capitol by a mob trying to overturn the 2020 election results. The Senate acquitted Trump in both cases, as Democrats lacked the two-thirds majority needed to remove him from office. Meanwhile, Schiff's supporters note that Trump has been silent about revelations last month that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican and strong supporter of the president, and his now-estranged wife had declared three separate homes in Texas as their primary residences at the same time, which reportedly made it possible for them to reduce their loan payments by hundreds of thousands of dollars. Schiff insists he has done nothing wrong. He says he notified his lenders and mortgage companies that he and his wife listed both their homes as 'principal residences' because they lived in both places and did not use them as vacation homes or rental property. And he says he acted 'in consultation' with House legal staff. 'Big surprise — members of Congress, almost all of them, own more than one home or rent more than one home because we're required to be on both coasts,' Schiff said in a video posted online. Federal mortgage fraud is the crime of deliberately making false statements to mislead a lender or mortgage company into approving a loan or granting other financial benefits that otherwise would have been denied. It requires proof that the person knowingly provided misinformation about an important issue in order to deceive the lender into approving a loan or providing financial benefits. The crime is a felony punishable by up to 30 years in prison. So did Schiff knowingly deceive his lenders? That might depend on whom you ask. The evidence Trump has relayed to prosecutor Ken Martin contains 'very serious allegations if true, and they could potentially constitute some level of fraud,' William Jacobson, a Cornell law professor and conservative commentator, told Fox News. 'If an average citizen misrepresented mortgage documents … to get a favorable rate, I think such person would be prosecuted.' Jacobson also criticized Schiff and other Democrats for 'cheerleading' Trump's prosecution and conviction on 34 felony charges. Trump was found guilty by a New York jury in May 2024 of concealing $130,000 in payments to former porn actress Stormy Daniels to keep her from disclosing their sexual relationship before the 2016 election. A sentencing judge imposed no criminal penalties this January, as Trump was about to return to office. Schiff's actions drew a similar assessment from William Pulte, a former businessman appointed by Trump in January to direct the Federal Housing Finance Agency. In a 'criminal referral' to Justice Department officials in May, Pulte, citing media reports, said Schiff 'has, in multiple instances, falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms.' A different assessment came from Lawrence Jacobson, a veteran real estate lawyer in Beverly Hills who has served as an expert witness in trials on property issues. 'He has done nothing wrong,' Jacobson — no relation to the Cornell professor — told the Chronicle. 'He made full disclosure to the lenders and did it only after advice of counsel. The only crime he committed was doing his job.' Candace Turitto, a professor of political science at the University of Maryland, said that 'technically, there's absolutely nothing wrong' with Schiff's transactions, based on the evidence so far. But she said the mortgage laws, allowing borrowers to claim benefits on only one home at a time, raise difficult legal and political issues for members of Congress from faraway states. 'It might make one ponder, where exactly is the line for a primary residence?' Turitto said. 'How much time of a year should I spend sleeping under a certain roof for it to count as primary? Must I travel across the country to go 'home' after work, while my MD or VA colleague has a 30-minute drive home?' And it also affects congressional dialogue, she said. Before the time of regular air travel, Turitto said, 'members of Congress would spend weekends and the like in DC. … They would socialize, break bread, talk shop in after-hours environments,' forming 'more cooperative relationships across party lines.' These days, she observed, 'there's much less of this.'
Axios
14 hours ago
- Axios
Not every Democrat is fighting Trump's D.C. police takeover
Some House Democrats are striking a much more careful tone on President Trump's D.C. crime crackdown than their party's leadership. Why it matters: Democrats' centrist wing has spent years rebutting claims by Republicans that the party is universally anti-law enforcement — and it's not about to let down its guard now. That could present complications for Democratic leadership if a measure to extend — or end — Trump's D.C. "crime emergency" comes up for a vote. It also complicates a message that has been largely centered on accusing Trump of overreacting to a non-existent crime problem. What they're saying: "I'm a believer in local control, which is why I've supported DC statehood. But under current law, the president does have authority to nationalize DC's local police under certain conditions," Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) said in a statement. He added: "If there is a disagreement between the president and leaders in DC about whether those conditions have been met, it will be up to the courts to decide." Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) told Axios in a statement: "I support efforts to reduce crime in Washington, D.C., and I stand with the members of law enforcement who are working to keep our communities safe." Cuellar said those efforts should be "closely coordinated with city officials, local police departments and federal law enforcement agencies" to avoid "unnecessary overlap." State of play: Trump announced Wednesday that he is federalizing the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department and deploying the D.C. National Guard to crack down on what he described as rampant crime in the city. Democrats have pushed back by noting that D.C. crime has fallen the last two years to a 30-year low, but Republicans have argued that the numbers are still far too high. A group of Democrats, led by House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), introduced a joint resolution on Friday to end the "crime emergency" upon which Trump's crackdown is based. Zoom in: Other Democratic centrists are trying to re-orient the issue through an anti-Trump lens, with some noting Republicans shortchanged the city by $1 billion in a government funding bill this year. "City leaders should be all in on fighting crime. Trump should give them their money back to hire more cops," said Greg Landsman (D-Ohio). "Why did he steal $1 billion from the city when they need it for public safety and roads? So fight crime and his chaos. If it doesn't make the city safer, fight back. Safety first." Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), another swing-district member, said she opposes the National Guard deployment and warned their roundup of homeless people in D.C. may overcrowd local hospitals. The other side: "Trusting a Democrat to handle crime is like asking the fox to guard the henhouse," said Mike Marinella, a spokesperson for the National Republican Congressional Committee, in a statement to Axios.
