Chery's iCar Off-Road Brand Confirmed for Australia, Electric V23 Model On the Cards
Published: 23 May 2025
Share Copy Link
Readtime: 4 min
Every product is carefully selected by our editors and experts. If you buy from a link, we may earn a commission. Learn more. For more information on how we test products, click here.
Chery's off-road EV brand 'iCar' set to launch in Australia after the UK by next year
Name changed to 'iCaur' due to trademark issue
The first vehicle is likely to be V23 compact off-roader to rival the Suzuki Jimny
Expected to be priced less than AUD$40,000 plus on-roads
One of the stars of the Shanghai Auto Show, Chery's off-road brand 'iCar,' is confirmed for Australia. The first car to arrive for local markets will be the iCar V23, according to a company representative who spoke to Drive.com.au. 'Because Jaecoo has the 03 exported already, we're going to do the V23 under iCaur (for overseas markets).' The V23 is a compact electric off-roader and soon-to-be range-extender hybrid that will be available to 'global markets' from mid-2026.
With Jeep Wrangler vibes and a length (4,220 mm) that would place it closer to a five-door Suzuki Jimny (3,965mm), the car will appeal to prospective buyers who want an off-road aesthetic, but will likely never leave the inner city streets of Sydney or Melbourne.
The car, which reminds us of Apple's scrapped EV project, will arrive with a different name to avoid trademark issues. Set to be called 'iCaur,' the V23 will likely be followed by the larger Jeep Wrangler-sized V25 hybrid SUV in late 2026 before the smaller V21 electric SUV arrives in 2027. Here's everything you need to know!
iCar V23 | Image: Supplied / iCar
While it looks like a Temu car, it ticks all the usual SUV design cues with those chunky wheel-arches, slab-sided proportions and mean-looking front-end. Hence, despite being just 4,220mm in length, it sure does pack a punch in terms of sheer road presence.
Despite its small stature, performance is just fine, and certainly better than a Suzuki Jimny because of that EV powertrain. Expect both the single and dual motor versions to arrive in Australia, and here's what power and range look like:
Single-motor iCar V23 (China specifications) : 100kW/180Nm 47 kWh lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) battery Up to 300km range (CLTC)
: Dual-motor Single-motor iCar V23 (China specifications) : 155kW 81 kWh (NMC) battery Up to 500km range (CLTC)
:
What stands out the most is that 300km range (CLTC) figure—it might not be enough. The CLTC cycle is far more lenient than the WLTP figure standard in Australia, and we'd only expect 250km of WLTP range when certified for our market. We don't see how this is enough to make it a true off-roader for Australia. It won't have enough range to make it out of the city, but the range-extender hybrid that's rumoured to arrive later could fix this issue.
Despite the tough looks, off-road ability is limited. The iCar V23 has only 210mm ground clearance, which is similar to a Toyota RAV4 (213 mm). On a positive note, it does have 43- and 41-degree approach and departure angles, which should help it out on steep carpark entries and exits.
iCar V23 | Image: Supplied / iCar
On the inside, the interior looks reasonably plush, while the steering wheel looks like a Range Rover and is flanked by actual buttons and a massive 15.4-inch touchscreen, which is standard fare these days.
The large infotainment system runs a Snapdragon 8155 chip in China, and you get safety features like ADAS, all-around cameras and more. Whether or not all of these features arrive in overseas markets like Australia is still up for question, but they usually do. Storage-wise, boot capacity is an ample 744 litres.
Publications, including Autocar and Drive, say that the iCar V23 is going to arrive in the UK by next year, meaning we should expect an Australian market launch a bit later in the year. In China, the V23 is priced between 99,800 to 139,800 yuan (AUD$21,500 to AUD$30,000), which does suggest that it could arrive in Australia with a targeted price of less than AUD$40,000 before on-road costs. It all depends on how much it costs to swap that 'iCar' badge to one that says 'iCaur.' Strange name, isn't it?!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Courier-Mail
4 hours ago
- Courier-Mail
‘Words are f***': China's Aus turf war explodes
Don't miss out on the headlines from Motoring. Followed categories will be added to My News. BYD's Australian boss has taken to social media to blast claims from rival Chinese car brand Chery that accuse BYD, MG and Geely of copying its hybrid technology – calling the suggestion F*** in a fiery LinkedIn post. The outburst comes after Carsales published an article quoting Chery Australia COO Lucas Harris, who said competing Chinese brands like BYD were '100 per cent' copying the company's so-called 'Super Hybrid' powertrain technology. Harris told Carsales this during the launch of Chery's Tiggo 7 and Tiggo 8 hybrid SUVs. The Carsales story referenced BYD's new Shark 6 ute, MG's HS Super Hybrid, and Geely's incoming Starray EM-i Super Hybrid, all of which use similar naming conventions and drivetrain logic, with varying claims about efficiency, battery backup, and petrol-electric switching. RELATED: China ramps up Aussie takeover BYD has produced more than 10 million hybrid and electric cars. Picture: Supplied But Harris said, 'No, they're copying us … 100 per cent they are.' 'Maybe we should be flattered that some of our competitors decided to copy our technology, or the name of our technology, because their technology is not the same.' The article and Harris's comments provoked an immediate and rare response from BYD Australia General Manager Wing You, who posted a screenshot of the article with a blunt remark. 'Emmmmm, very interesting!' he wrote on LinkedIn. 'They are very lucky by internal rules, we cannot negatively comment on other brands; however, I need to say, this GENTLEMEN's words are F***!.' MORE: Aussies 'not ready' for advanced driver tech BYD Australia general manager Mr Wing You fired back at rival Chery in a now taken down LinkedIn post, calling the hybrid copycat claims 'F***!'. Picture: Supplied The LinkedIn post has since been taken down, however BYD CMO Kate Hornstein confirmed that the automaker was the first globally to introduce plug-in hybrid technology with the launch of the F3DM in 2008. 'Before the launch of the SEALION 6 plug-in hybrid SUV in mid-2024, the term 'Super Hybrid' was used in the Australian market. Anything that suggests otherwise is misleading and risks confusing consumers who deserve clear, fact-based information to support their vehicle choices,' she said. In the Carsales interview, Harris told journalist Ally Lawrence that Chery took possession of the 'Super Hybrid' name more than 12 months ago in Europe. However, trademark records confirm the name 'Super Hybrid' and 'Super Hybrid System' is active in the United Kingdom, registered to Chery Automobile Co., Ltd., but it was only lodged in April 2025, not a year prior. Chery has pending trademark applications for the term in several other jurisdictions, including Thailand, Brazil and Australia. BYD applied to trademark its DM-i hybrid system in multiple countries, including the United States, Australia and Brazil as early as December 2024 – months before Chery's UK filing and most recently in the UK in May 2025. MORE: The end of travel as we know it The 2025 Chery Tiggo 7 launched in Australia this month, with the brand claiming its powertrain is being copied by rival Chinese automakers. Picture: Thomas Wielecki Harris told Carsales that Chery claimed to have possession of the 'Super Hybrid' name over 12 months ago in Europe; however, Harris admitted that BYD beat it to the Aussie market with the Shark 6 dual-cab ute. It uses a system called Dual Mode Intelligent (DM-i) in the Shark 6, with the car capable of driving in EV or hybrid mode without performance loss. In comparison, Chery's version is branded CHS or SHS depending on the model, promises better driveability when unplugged, with Harris claiming rival plug-in-hybrids (PHEVs) become 'awful to drive' when battery levels dip. 'Noise goes up considerably, the power delivery and driving feeling is significantly worse; and the fuel economy is just awful,' Harris told Carsales. 'That's a big difference with our technology; you can drive it around and never, ever, ever plug it in, and you'll have no deteriorated performance at all. 'You won't suffer any negative consequences by not plugging it in.' No formal legal action has been flagged. Originally published as 'Words are f***': China's Aus turf war explodes
News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Words are f***': China's Aus turf war explodes
BYD's Australian boss has taken to social media to blast claims from rival Chinese car brand Chery that accuse BYD, MG and Geely of copying its hybrid technology – calling the suggestion F*** in a fiery LinkedIn post. The outburst comes after Carsales published an article quoting Chery Australia COO Lucas Harris, who said competing Chinese brands like BYD were '100 per cent' copying the company's so-called 'Super Hybrid' powertrain technology. Harris told Carsales this during the launch of Chery's Tiggo 7 and Tiggo 8 hybrid SUVs. The Carsales story referenced BYD's new Shark 6 ute, MG's HS Super Hybrid, and Geely's incoming Starray EM-i Super Hybrid, all of which use similar naming conventions and drivetrain logic, with varying claims about efficiency, battery backup, and petrol-electric switching. But Harris said, 'No, they're copying us … 100 per cent they are.' 'Maybe we should be flattered that some of our competitors decided to copy our technology, or the name of our technology, because their technology is not the same.' The article and Harris's comments provoked an immediate and rare response from BYD Australia General Manager Wing You, who posted a screenshot of the article with a blunt remark. 'Emmmmm, very interesting!' he wrote on LinkedIn. 'They are very lucky by internal rules, we cannot negatively comment on other brands; however, I need to say, this GENTLEMEN's words are F***!.' The LinkedIn post has since been taken down, however BYD CMO Kate Hornstein confirmed that the automaker was the first globally to introduce plug-in hybrid technology with the launch of the F3DM in 2008. 'Before the launch of the SEALION 6 plug-in hybrid SUV in mid-2024, the term 'Super Hybrid' was used in the Australian market. Anything that suggests otherwise is misleading and risks confusing consumers who deserve clear, fact-based information to support their vehicle choices,' she said. In the Carsales interview, Harris told journalist Ally Lawrence that Chery took possession of the 'Super Hybrid' name more than 12 months ago in Europe. However, trademark records confirm the name 'Super Hybrid' and 'Super Hybrid System' is active in the United Kingdom, registered to Chery Automobile Co., Ltd., but it was only lodged in April 2025, not a year prior. Chery has pending trademark applications for the term in several other jurisdictions, including Thailand, Brazil and Australia. BYD applied to trademark its DM-i hybrid system in multiple countries, including the United States, Australia and Brazil as early as December 2024 – months before Chery's UK filing and most recently in the UK in May 2025. Harris told Carsales that Chery claimed to have possession of the 'Super Hybrid' name over 12 months ago in Europe; however, Harris admitted that BYD beat it to the Aussie market with the Shark 6 dual-cab ute. It uses a system called Dual Mode Intelligent (DM-i) in the Shark 6, with the car capable of driving in EV or hybrid mode without performance loss. In comparison, Chery's version is branded CHS or SHS depending on the model, promises better driveability when unplugged, with Harris claiming rival plug-in-hybrids (PHEVs) become 'awful to drive' when battery levels dip. 'Noise goes up considerably, the power delivery and driving feeling is significantly worse; and the fuel economy is just awful,' Harris told Carsales. 'That's a big difference with our technology; you can drive it around and never, ever, ever plug it in, and you'll have no deteriorated performance at all. 'You won't suffer any negative consequences by not plugging it in.' No formal legal action has been flagged.
Man of Many
5 hours ago
- Man of Many
I Bought the Internet's Favourite $250 Timex, Here are My Honest Thoughts
By Ben McKimm - News Published: 28 Jul 2025 Share Copy Link 0 Readtime: 4 min Every product is carefully selected by our editors and experts. If you buy from a link, we may earn a commission. Learn more. For more information on how we test products, click here. High point Low point Verdict Sub‑AUD $500 price, retro 34 mm 'TV‑Dial' case, and Perfect Fit expansion bracelet resizes at home. Miyota 8215 accuracy is middling (‑20 / +40 sec per day) and lacks hacking seconds. Charming, no‑fuss gateway into mechanical watches. If you've got an average‑size wrist, love vintage styling and don't obsess over chronometer‑grade accuracy, the Timex Automatic 1983 E Line Reissue is well worth its AUD $449.95 price. Scroll horizontally to view full table The worst hobbies in life are cars, watches, and whisky. Unfortunately, I'm addicted to all three of them. Luckily, I'm here to share all of my good and bad experiences with you readers, so you don't have to make the same mistakes I do. That said, look away if you don't want to buy another watch because I think you might be swayed by this sub-AUD$500 Timex that I have been wearing for the last six months. The Timex Automatic 1983 E Line Reissue (AUD$449.95) came into my life as it always does. There I am scrolling Instagram on a weeknight, my explore page full of watches, and I click on one of them. Suddenly, I'm keying in my credit card details, and next thing you know, I've bought another watch. It's cheap, though, so how bad could it be?! Well, having worn it for more than six months, I finally have an answer. Let's find out whether the Timex Automatic 1983 E Line was worth it or not. In case I need to be any clearer, I wasn't sent this watch. I bought it! Timex Automatic 1983 E Line Reissue | Image: Supplied / Timex Timex Automatic 1983 E Line Reissue Key Specifications Here are the key specs for the Timex Automatic 1983 E Line Reissue: Model / SKU : TW2W70800 : TW2W70800 Movement : Miyota 8215 Japanese 21‑jewel mechanical automatic (self‑winding) : Miyota 8215 Japanese 21‑jewel mechanical automatic (self‑winding) Case diameter : 34 mm : 34 mm Case thickness : 12 mm : 12 mm Crystal : Vintage‑style acrylic : Vintage‑style acrylic Water‑resistance : 50 m (suitable for light swimming) : 50 m (suitable for light swimming) Dial : Silver‑tone with full hour markers and date window at 3 o'clock : Silver‑tone with full hour markers and date window at 3 o'clock Strap : 20 mm brushed and polished Perfect Fit stainless‑steel expansion band (no clasp/buckle) : 20 mm brushed and polished Perfect Fit stainless‑steel expansion band (no clasp/buckle) Wrist fit: 150 – 205 mm / 5.9 – 8.1 in circumference Whether this is your first watch or your fiftieth, there are a few features that jumped off the spec sheet. I'm going to boil them down to make them as simple as possible so everyone can understand why they're exciting, not just the watch enthusiasts in the room. I love the 'TV Dial' case, which is elegant and wearable, but also perfectly sized for an average male wrist. It's a little smaller than average at 34 mm in diameter, and I wouldn't recommend it for larger wrists, but the 12 mm case thickness is also another plus, as it sits just underneath the cuff of your shirt without feeling flimsy. Timex Automatic 1983 E Line Reissue | Image: Supplied / Timex The 20 mm brushed and polished stainless‑steel Perfect Fit expansion band bracelet also needs a mention. You can size this watch at home, without tools, and because there's no clasp, it sits perfectly on your wrist. I was initially worried about the strength of the springs inside the bracelet, but they've conformed to my wrist over time, and I never found them to cut off circulation. The links tend to pinch your skin as they expand and contract, but this goes away after the first few wears. Then, there's the movement. The Timex Automatic 1983 E Line is powered by a Miyota 8215 Japanese 21‑jewel mechanical automatic self-winding movement. It's not a particularly accurate movement (-20～＋40 sec/day), but it pleases my inner watch nerd because the seconds hand slowly moves around the dial instead of clicking in one-second increments like a quartz watch would. I know I shouldn't care, but I do. Timex Automatic 1983 E Line Reissue | Image: Supplied / Timex The Seiko 4R36 movement in my Seiko 5 Sports SNXS (SRPK87) is much nicer, and the watch isn't that much more expensive, but I like the design of the Timex, and the Miyota does enough to get my stamp of approval. What would I change? Well, the acrylic crystal isn't my favourite, but it's something you expect to find in a watch at this price point. I've already managed to give it a little dust up, but that's okay because it's better to damage a sub-$500 watch than a $5,000 watch at the end of the day. If you're looking to pick up a Timex Automatic 1983 E Line, it's available via the Timex website below for USD$249.99 (AUD$449.95). Alternatively, do as I did and check out many of the brands' trusted retailers as you might be able to score a deal. Timex Automatic 1983 E Line Reissue | Image: Supplied / Timex Timex Automatic 1983 E Line Reissue | Image: Supplied / Timex Timex Automatic 1983 E Line Reissue | Image: Supplied / Timex Timex Automatic 1983 E Line Reissue | Image: Supplied / Timex
