logo
California Rep. Zoe Lofgren Introduces Foreign Anti-Digital Piracy Act To Block Sites Infringing On U.S. Copyrights

California Rep. Zoe Lofgren Introduces Foreign Anti-Digital Piracy Act To Block Sites Infringing On U.S. Copyrights

Yahoo29-01-2025
U.S. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (Dem-CA) has introduced H.R. 791, the Foreign Anti-Digital Piracy Act (or FADPA), to prevent foreign-run piracy sites from exploiting loopholes in U.S. law. The Act sets site-blocking laws that require U.S. internet providers to make 'a good faith effort' to disable access to pirate websites.
Lofgren is Ranking Member of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee and a senior member of the House Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence and the Internet. After working for over a year with the tech, film, and television industries, she said, 'we've arrived at a proposal that has a remedy for copyright infringers located overseas that does not disrupt the free internet except for the infringers.'
More from Deadline
Global Industry Group ACE Announces Shutdown Of Fmovies, Deemed "World's Largest Piracy Ring"
Operators Of Jetflicks, An Illegal Streaming Service With A Catalog Larger Than Netflix, Prime Video And Hulu Put Together, Convicted By Federal Jury
Indonesia Clamps Down On Piracy Of Streamer Vidio's Content On Telegram
Foreign digital piracy, she adds, presents a 'massive and growing threat,' costing American jobs, harming the creative community, and exposing consumers to dangerous security risks. The Foreign Anti-Digital Piracy Act is a targeted approach that focuses on safety and intellectual property, while simultaneously upholding due process, respecting free speech, and ensuring enforcement is narrowly focused.
'Compromise is often found when you sit and hash out policy recommendations with the workers, companies, and users directly involved, and I appreciate the support from the tech and content communities in this effort. I look forward to continuing to work with Chairmen Darrell Issa and Jim Jordan on anti-piracy measures in the near future,' Lofgren said.
Rep. Issa (R-CA) is the Republican chair of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet.
Trade groups applauded the bill with the Motion Picture Association noting that intellectual property theft drains at least $30 billion and 230,000 jobs from the U.S. economy each year. It said more than 55 countries including Canada, the UK and Australia have tools in place similar to those proposed by Rep. Lofgren that have successfully reduced piracy's harms while protecting consumer access to legal content.
'The MPA thanks Rep. Lofgren for introducing FADPA and for her commitment to work with Chairman Issa to enact legislation this Congress to ensure America's creators have effective enforcement tools to combat offshore piracy targeting the U.S. market,' said MPA chairman and CEO Charles Rivkin.
Jean Prewitt, president and CEO of the Independent Film & Television Alliance, said foreign copyright piracy is also a grave problem for independent film producers. 'Site blocking legislation is badly needed to protect U.S. creators from industrial-strength theft of their films and programs by foreign bad actors, who are outside the reach of U.S. legal jurisdiction.'
'We also look forward to working with … Chair Darrell Issa as he leads a bi -partisan effort, working with Rep. Lofgren and other members to craft a legislative solution to deal with foreign copyright piracy and protect our industry and U.S. economic productivity,' she said.
The American Association of Independent Music (A2IM), the Authors Guild, the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE),the Copyright Alliance, and the Screen Actors Guild – American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), and leading technology policy think tanks, ITIF, also backed the bill.
Background on the issue Lofgren's office provided, citing research, said that in 2019, U.S.-produced television episodes and movies were illegally streamed or downloaded, respectively, 126.7 billion and 26.6 billion times. By 2022, global visits to movie and TV piracy sites reached 191.8 billion, costing the U.S. economy $29.2 billion annually and threatening more than 230,000 American jobs in entertainment, technology, and small businesses.
Today, it said, some illegal foreign online pirate sites are bigger than some of the biggest legit U.S. streaming services. One piracy site hit 364 million visits in October of 2024, which was larger than Disney+ viewership in that same month. Live sports are also a prime target, with piracy draining $28 billion annually from the global sports industry.
'Past U.S. efforts to curb piracy failed because they lacked due process, threatened free speech, and provided overly-broad enforcement powers that risked harming legitimate websites and the open internet,' the announcement said.
That's certainly what some felt about Obama-era legislation called the Stop Online Piracy Act (or SOPA), which lawmakers quickly walked back after facing a really furious onslaught by the U.S. tech industry.
Today is the first time legislators have really dared to touched the issue of digital piracy since then.
'A decade ago, I was at the center of the successful effort to prevent the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) from becoming law. That was not because I support copyright infringement, but because I support the open internet. Lofgren said. She said the Foreign Anti-Digital Piracy Act takes a better approach.
It protects service providers from legal liability. ISPs, DNS providers, and other intermediaries are shielded from lawsuits 'as long as they comply in good faith' with court-ordered blocking measures. The good faith element could make enforcement messy but it's a start.
As per the famous (or infamous) Section 230 of Telecommunications Act of the late 1990s, service providers are not responsible for content on their platforms, with very few exceptions. A 2018 law under the Trump Administration did legally prohibit sex trafficking sites. Providers tend to cry slippery slope and the end of free speech at any carve-out to their Section 230 freedom, which courts have mostly respected.
Other highlights of the Foreign Anti-Digital Piracy Act:
It only targets large-scale, foreign-run piracy sites.
It respects First Amendment rights. Every blocking order must go through a U.S. court, requiring clear evidence, due process, and judicial oversight to ensure fair enforcement and prevent censorship. Courts must first verify that any site-blocking order does not interfere with access to lawful material before issuing an order.
It allows for feasible tech solutions. Unlike past proposals, the bill does not mandate specific technical measures for blocking. Instead, it allows service providers to determine the best, least intrusive methods to comply with court orders.
It provides a narrowly-tailored blocking mechanism limited to piracy sites that exist solely to infringe copyrights.
Best of Deadline
How to Watch The 67th Annual Grammy Awards Online And With Cable
2025 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Oscars, Spirits, Grammys, Tonys, Guilds & More
The 2025 Oscars: Everything We Know So Far About The Nominations, Ceremony, Date & Host
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reps. Carson, Mrvan slam White House redistricting attempts as their own seats are under threat
Reps. Carson, Mrvan slam White House redistricting attempts as their own seats are under threat

Indianapolis Star

time29 minutes ago

  • Indianapolis Star

Reps. Carson, Mrvan slam White House redistricting attempts as their own seats are under threat

Indiana's two Democratic congressmen condemned the Trump administration's mid-decade redistricting efforts, as Vice President JD Vance prepares to talk to state leaders about the potential for redrawing the maps in Indiana. The congressmen, U.S. Rep. André Carson and U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, may be targets themselves. Mrvan, whose northwest Indiana district appears to be trending to the right, has already faced well-funded GOP opponents as the national party seeks to flip the district red. In 2024, House Speaker Mike Johnson told IndyStar the seat 'belongs in the Republican column.' Vance is meeting with Gov. Mike Braun and Indiana General Assembly leaders in Indianapolis on Aug. 7, where he's expected to discuss redistricting. But the jury's out on whether Braun, House Speaker Todd Huston and Senate Pro Tempore Rodric Bray will agree, particularly as any redistricting effort would require a special session. Braun has yet to make any commitments. "I'm going to listen and see where they're coming from," Braun told reporters at the Statehouse on Aug. 5. "And again, I'm going to be listening along with the other two leaders in the legislature and everybody's going to probably have a little different point of view." In a statement on Aug. 5, Mrvan called redistricting efforts an attempt to cling to power. 'It's reprehensible to call in the Indiana General Assembly for a special session on redistricting when the communities I represent believe their time would be better spent to discuss initiatives that restore state funds for our local police departments,' he said in the statement. Democrats have held the 1st district seat for nearly a century but faced trouble in 2022 after lines were redrawn. Since then, Mrvan has held onto the seat by a relatively slim margin — winning by almost six percentage points in 2022 and eight percentage points in 2024. Mrvan also called a potential mid-decade redistricting a violation of the Indiana Constitution. It's unclear if the move would in fact be unconstitutional. It is according to a 1995 opinion from the Attorney General's office, but that opinion is not binding. The section of the Indiana Constitution that opinion refers to requires redistricting to be done by state legislators elected during a federal decennial census year — the next of which is 2030. However, it's unclear how that provision applies to congressional districts. Carson told a crowd gathered at the Indianapolis Artsgarden during a 60-year celebration of the Voting Rights Act on Aug. 6 that Trump wants to redraw district lines because he's a 'dictator.' 'Our voting rights are under attack like never before,' Carson said. He also questioned the legality of the efforts, calling the Indiana Constitution 'clear' on when redistricting is done. Unlike Mrvan, Carson represents the bluest district in Indiana. In 2024, he beat his Republican opponent by nearly 30 percentage points. Carson didn't say if he expected his seat to be targeted when asked by IndyStar but said he was in contact with legislators and advocacy groups. 'We're taking a wait-and-see approach,' he said.

Independent Michigan gubernatorial candidate Mike Duggan raises $3.2M in 6 months
Independent Michigan gubernatorial candidate Mike Duggan raises $3.2M in 6 months

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Independent Michigan gubernatorial candidate Mike Duggan raises $3.2M in 6 months

Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan said Friday his independent Michigan gubernatorial campaign brought in more than $3.2 million over the past six months and has more than $2.3 million cash on hand. According to the Duggan campaign, more than 93 percent of its donations came from Michigan. Duggan's campaign manager Ed Duggan also noted that the campaign has raised nearly $1.4 million over the past 30 days alone. 'As an Independent campaign, we can't rely on party infrastructure for our fundraising. We had to build everything from the ground up,' Ed Duggan said in a statement. 'Our numbers are a sign of the incredible grassroots energy we're feeling on the campaign trail. We couldn't be more grateful for all our supporters who made this possible.' Mike Duggan, who was elected mayor as a Democrat, launched his Independent bid for governor in December. The mayor's latest fundraising numbers come a day after Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson (D), the front-runner in the Democratic primary, announced her campaign raised more than $3.5 million since its launch in January and has more than $2.4 million in the bank. Benson's and Duggan's hauls are both more than the $1.5 million Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D), who is term-limited, raised at this point in 2017 after announcing her first gubernatorial bid in January of that year. In this year's Democratic primary, Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist II's campaign said he raised more than $750,000, while former Genesee County Sheriff Chris Swanson said his campaign has raised more than $1 million. Gilchrist jumped into the primary in March, and Swanson announced his bid in February. On the Republican side, former state Attorney General Mike Cox (R), who jumped into the race in April, said his campaign has raised $2.4 million and has $1.9 million in the bank. Rep. John James (R-Mich.), state Senate Minority Leader Aric Nesbitt (R), and former state House Speaker Tom Leonard (R) are also running in the GOP primary. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

Texas residents say ‘there should be consequences' for Dems fleeing state to avoid vote
Texas residents say ‘there should be consequences' for Dems fleeing state to avoid vote

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Texas residents say ‘there should be consequences' for Dems fleeing state to avoid vote

Texas residents slammed Democratic state lawmakers who fled the state to avoid a vote this week, speaking out during interviews with Fox News Digital. Houston locals voiced strong opposition to the decision by Democratic lawmakers to leave Texas earlier this week, a move intended to block a vote on the GOP's proposed congressional district map. Many residents condemned the tactic. "There should be consequences on both sides. It's happened both ways. And I feel like if you're, you know, elected, and you're holding a seat, and you're supposed to represent the people, I don't care which side of the aisle you're on. You show up every time you do it," James said. "It's your job," he added. Dozens of Democratic Texas state lawmakers fled the state this week to avoid a vote on Republicans' new proposed congressional district map, which would potentially secure five new GOP U.S. House seats in the 2026 midterm elections. They claim the redistricting – which is backed by President Donald Trump – will disenfranchise minority voters. The lawmakers intended their absence to block the quorum necessary to conduct a vote on the map. According to Texas House rules, at least 100 of the 150 members must be present to conduct business in the state legislature. Many of the Democrats traveled to Illinois, where they were invited by the state's Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker. "I'm going to do everything I can to make sure that they're welcome here, that they have the ability to stay as long as they need to and want to," Pritzker said on Sunday. Calvin, a Houston resident originally from Seattle, told Fox, "If these were regular jobs, people would probably be in a lot more trouble for this." He added, "I do think in general it's a problem that people are not showing up to general votes. I've heard stories where there's a lot of people not present during votes for bills, and it's only like 20% or less. So, I think that's kind of weird. Like, if I didn't show up for a meeting, I'd probably be in trouble." Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott threatened to arrest Democratic lawmakers who didn't return for Monday's vote and expel them from office. He wrote in a statement Sunday, "This truancy ends now. The derelict Democrat House members must return to Texas and be in attendance when the House reconvenes at 3:00 PM on Monday, August 4, 2025. For any member who fails to do so, I will invoke Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0382 to remove the missing Democrats from membership in the Texas House." GOP Texas Speaker of the House Dustin Burrows announced this week he would sign arrest warrants against any absent Democratic lawmakers if authorized by a vote of the chamber. Abbott then called on the Texas Department of Public Safety to arrest the "delinquent Texas House Democrats." Glenn said he doesn't agree with putting the lawmakers behind bars, but said there should be some penalty for their actions. "I don't think that they should be, you know, going to jail or anything like that, but maybe they need to do something to get the Democrats and the Republicans to work together on this. This is very important, but no… I don't think they should be reprimanded that bad, but you know, maybe taken off the seats." James agreed: "If it applies to everybody, I think there should be repercussions. Arrests seem a little bit harsh, but you know, depends on the situation, I guess." Calvin said he believes arrest warrants "would be justified," noting it's not likely that actual arrests would occur. "It'd be kinda more like a threat to get them back to voting on the redistricting," he said. When asked if the walkouts represented a threat to democracy, Hannah expressed skepticism that the public cares. "I feel like there's a lot of people that just honestly like – [the] average citizen that wouldn't even care about this, because a lot of people just don't go out and vote themselves." James felt differently, saying the move was "absolutely" a threat to democracy. A man named Ian told Fox, "I don't think it's a good way to deal with the problem. They need to improve their message and do better in elections so that they're not in the minority. As long as they're in the minority, one of the problems that they have is that they may not get their way." When asked if he thinks it's a threat to democracy, Glenn replied, "I do. I think that's not right."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store